Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The End of the Women's Movement

By Courtney E. Martin, The American Prospect. Posted April 6, 2009.


The era of the singular feminist agenda is over. But that doesn't mean gender-based activism is.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Courtney E. Martin

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art, housed at the continually surprising and alive Brooklyn Museum, celebrated its second anniversary last weekend with a speak-out called "Unfinished Business." As the title suggests, the aim was to bring a diverse range of feminists together in one auditorium to talk about the future of our so-called movement. The lineup of official speakers was, indeed, admirably diverse -- both ethnically and generationally; it included activist and researcher C. Nicole Mason, labor organizer Ai-jen Poo, GritTV host Laura Flanders, novelist and rabble-rouser Esther Broner, and hip-hop artist Toni Blackman.

Most of the voices from the audience, however, sounded eerily similar. They spoke longingly about the exuberant past, characterized by abundant energy and "sisterhood." They lamented that no locatable movement exists anymore, that no one is organized, that no one is out in the streets. At one point, Broner even admitted, "I interpret everything through that time."

With the utmost respect for Broner, whom I found refreshing and radical, I think that this approach is at the center of contemporary feminism's biggest challenge. We are intergenerationally fractured, right down to the most foundational of questions: Is there a formal feminist movement anymore? Does there need to be?

Members of the second-wave generation developed their feminist identity during the heyday of direct action. They had ecstatic, very physical experiences of feminism. They went to meetings -- so, so many meetings. They pounded the pavement. They participated in direct-action spectacles like taking over the offices of The Ladies Home Journal. They yelled until their vocal chords were raw.

Now these women are older, many of them happily shifting into what Jane Fonda calls "the third act" -- a stage of life when they don't give a shit what anyone else thinks, and they want to see the world live up to its God damn potential, once and for all. They start dying their hair funky shades of red. They urge their husband to get a hobby as they head out for another expletive- and laughter-filled lunch with their friends -- other women who are funding feminist causes, editing feminist publications, and leading local feminist efforts. In some ways, it's a return to their earnest youth -- a time less fraught with the compromises that come with juggling families and careers. They're prioritizing changing the world again. And as such, they seem to experience an old hankering for an unapologetic women's movement that they can see, hear, and touch.

I don't blame them. All of their stories -- about marching in the streets, about taking over offices, about riding around the country in vans, falling in love – not only sounds like they had a whole lot of fun, but also managed to make some profound political changes. But I also recognize that it is a time that has passed. Not only is the women's movement -- as it was known in the 1960s -- over, but women my age don't even agree on what a "woman" really is.

Sometimes I feel as if my generation -- women in our 20s and 30s -- are feminism's Frankensteins. After all, Broner herself was responsible for building some of the first women's studies programs in the nation. Now a generation is graduating from them using words like "genderqueer" -- meaning that one doesn't identify exclusively as male or female. We generally aren't down for the subtle messaging by many older women who believe that females in positions of power are inherently less violent or more community-minded than their male counterparts, a view that Bitch magazine founder Lisa Jervis hilariously called "femmenism."

Many second-wave leaders have founded nonprofit organizations (Steinem alone is partly or fully responsible for Choice USA, the Women's Media Center, and The Ms. Foundation) that allow young women to become professional feminists -- those who make a living off of feminist activism by writing, teaching, and organizing. Thanks to their support -- financial and otherwise -- I wake up each morning and sit down at my laptop to "fight the patriarchy" (although I avoid the term like the plague). I mentor other young women who are interested in forging feminist careers. I teach women how to write op-eds. I go on conservative television shows and argue for the feminist point of view.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gloria steinem, second-wave feminism, esther broner

Courtney E. Martin is the author of Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters: How the Quest for Perfection is Harming Young Women. You can read more about her work at www.courtneyemartin.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No Longer Quivering
Posted by: deni_haven on Apr 6, 2009 4:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh how I wish that I'd encountered some feminist teaching when I was younger ~ it would have saved me and my children from YEARS of control and abuse at the hands of a man whom we all believed was appointed by God as the patriarchal leader of our home.

I've ditched that sort of God ~ and I divorced my husband. As I like to say it ~ Once I got rid of the BIG BABY (God), the little baby (my patriarchal ex) had to go too.

Here's a link to the blog where I've been processing it all:

NO LONGER QUIVERING

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

beware
Posted by: wint on Apr 6, 2009 4:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As we taught our daughters to always beware of men (I'm a man and I'm the feminest in the family) is today still true. In the context of the country we try to tell our daughters that being female is to be awake to all around you and to be sure that you are getting a fair shake in employment and education. A movement maybe but move yes. Move upwards and especially outwards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a man of 62 years I hope this isn't the end.
Posted by: archives@uwyo.edu on Apr 6, 2009 5:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our male values dominated society is basically nothing but vomit. We have guns, big pickup trucks, beer busts, TV, lying, cheating, bullying, and stealing. These are not signs of power or strength. They are clear indications of weakness. Women need to learn the power of hatred.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is something even more imcdieous
Posted by: cori on Apr 8, 2009 1:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sothing ths that is depriving us or affordable healtcare and rhat s the Blus Dog Demcrats. Even though our nation is drowning from lack of proper healthcare and lives sr being lost,prople sre struggling to survive Blue dog Democats sre willing to depive the whole nation that has fsllen to 37th in the world in longrvrity to depprive us of essential life suppots and cave to specisl interests at out ecpense. We must fight these southern senators we didnt elect them to work for the medicsl indsursnce compsnies. it is time to insist those blue dogs we want nstionsl hesthcsre like 65 other nstions. If We can sfford to kill prople we can afford to tske csre of people

How warm and fuzzy have the Blue Dogs felt when they watched their Republican colleagues hound Bill Clinton for his entire presidency, steal the national election from Al Gore in 2000 and swift-boat their way to a second George W. Bush term in 2004?

And, as Democrats, how can they stand by and be so formally compromising when they see the GOP gutting social programs, refusing to heat the homes of the elderly and disabled this winter and fighting a minimum-wage hike every time the Democrats try to raise it from poverty level?


How much more must the Blue Dogs see to comprehend that the time for equivocation and compromise has gone and the time for a resolute stance on Democratic values has arrived?

We all saw the repulsive pictures of Republicans on the floor of their convention in 2004 wearing purple heart bandages as a way of further demeaning John Kerry's military service. We saw how they got Saxby Chambliss elected in Georgia by calling Democrat Max Cleland – who lost three limbs in Vietnam – unpatriotic and running television ads of Cleland's picture next to one of Osama bin Laden. As I've said, if Audie Murphy himself were a Democrat today, the GOP would find a way to smear his service as well.

Now we see the likes of Schmidt calling Murtha a coward and the White House issuing a press release on the Congressman's thoughtful call for action on Iraq saying that "...he is endorsing the policy positions of Michael Moore and the extreme liberal wing of the Democratic party" in an effort to depict a conservative Democrat as far out of the mainstream.

And it's not like most of these Blue Dogs need to belong to such a group to be politically viable. Of the 37 Blue Dog members, only half are from strongly-Republican states like Utah and Georgia, while the rest are from swing states or solidly-Blue states like California and New York.

Another raison d'etre for the Blue Dog Coalition is to fight for the cause of fiscal conservatism and to make sure our country keeps its financial house in order. Given that a Republican president hasn't balanced a budget in 40 years, wouldn't these guys be better off strategizing on the nation's financial health with their Democratic colleagues?

If nothing else, these Democrats should see the treatment of Murtha who has, for 30 years, been one of the most compromising and conservative Democrats in the House, as yet another sign that they are being played as political chumps.

So come home, Congressional Blue Dogs. Now more than ever, we can use you in the Democratic wing of the Democratic party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

White middle class women who made it in the academy
Posted by: RR#1 on Apr 15, 2009 1:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and are living fat now don't have any reason to march now nooooooo. Well, by making men the enemy instead of class and looking to be president of the company so you to could have balls and exploit others well, this is where it has gotten us. You helped destroy the left, made me feel like criminal and indeed wanted men arrested for getting hard when looking at a beautiful women ( an hey nature does call) or hey for even "leering" at a women, and now that your lesbian daughters are having sex with their gay boyfriends, and their gay daughters while watching porn on the cable after school you wonder what is there to do. In the meantime the ruling CLASS and their prostitutes are still laughing all the way to the off shore account, women are turning to stripping to make a living ( hey it's legal it's honourable work as far as I am concerned, I feel sorry for the lonely sucker who just got laid off and has to pay someone to "care" about him. Where was I? Oh yeah, how's the weather up there? Like being on top?

Cheers,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement