comments_image -

Why I Was Deported from Turkey

Payal and I traveled to the World Water Forum in Istanbul to inform the world about the risks of building large dams.
March 21, 2009  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Back home in Berlin, I am overwhelmed by the show of support for our message that dams are a risky business. In India alone, one hundred activists and organizations signed a petition denouncing our deportation from the World Water Forum and thanking International Rivers for saying no to risky dams.

Payal and I traveled to the World Water Forum in Istanbul to inform the world about the risks of building large dams. We painted a large banner in red, yellow and blue with the words "No Risky Dams" and brought that into the official forum. With the banner, we wanted to show the world that while the World Water Forum seeks to advocate for the construction of more large dams, people around the world know that dams are a risky business.

Minutes before the start of the opening ceremony on Monday morning, when a speaker asked everybody to take their seats, and the stage was packed with reporters, we unfurled our banner. Filled with pride in our message and ready to get the attention of the entire 3,000-person audience, we held the banner over our heads and shouted "No Risky Dams!"

Not even a minute later, security took the banner and led us out of the venue. First, we thought that they would keep us for some hours, take away our conference accreditation and then let us go. However, after six hours, we were informed that we had to leave the country, or face time in a Turkish prison. We were accused of “influencing public opinion.”

While we of course wanted to influence public opinion, the World Water Forum and the World Water Council, with their harsh reaction to our peaceful protest (for their reaction to a demonstration outside of the venue, read Peter's blog), sought to stifle the debate about controversial dams. This is no surprise, as Turkey is planning to build the Ilisu Dam, one of the largest currently planned dams, on the last free-flowing river in the country, the Tigris. The dam would have a reservoir of more than 300 square kilometers; threaten the habitats of endangered fish species, migrating birds and the Tigris turtle. It would also drown almost one hundred villages and displace more than 50,000 people who have not had the right to make their voices heard in the decisions related to the dam.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]