Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Will Our Economic Collapse Cause the Death of Millions Abroad?

By Michael T. Klare, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted March 20, 2009.


As the wealthier nations cease investing in the developing world or acquiring its exports, the crisis is hitting them with a vengeance.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Michael T. Klare

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

While the economic contraction is apparently slowing in the advanced industrial countries and may reach bottom in the not-too-distant future, it's only beginning to gain momentum in the developing world, which was spared the earliest effects of the global meltdown. Because the crisis was largely precipitated by a collapse of the housing market in the United States and the resulting disintegration of financial products derived from the "securitization" of questionable mortgages, most developing nations were unaffected by the early stages of the meltdown, for the simple reason that they possessed few such assets.

But now, as the wealthier nations cease investing in the developing world or acquiring its exports, the crisis is hitting them with a vengeance. On top of this, conditions are deteriorating at a time when severe drought is affecting many key food-producing regions and poor farmers lack the wherewithal to buy seeds, fertilizers, and fuel.

The likely result: A looming food crisis in many areas hit hardest by the global economic meltdown.

Until now, concern over the human impact of the global crisis has largely been focused -- understandably so -- on unemployment and economic hardship in the United States, Europe, and former Soviet Union. Many stories have appeared on the devastating impact of plant closings, bankruptcies, and home foreclosures on families and communities in these parts of the world. Much less coverage has been devoted to the meltdown's impact on people in the developing world. As the crisis spreads to the poorer countries, however, it's likely that people in these areas will experience hardships every bit as severe as those in the wealthier countries -- and, in many cases, far worse.

The greatest worry is that most of the gains achieved in eradicating poverty over the last decade or so will be wiped out, forcing tens or hundreds of millions of people from the working class and the lower rungs of the middle class back into the penury from which they escaped. Equally worrisome is the risk of food scarcity in these areas, resulting in widespread malnutrition, hunger, and starvation. All this is sure to produce vast human misery, sickness, and death, but could also result in social and political unrest of various sorts, including riot, rebellion, and ethnic strife.

The president, Congress, or the mainstream media are not, for the most part, discussing these perils. As before, public interest remains focused on the ways in which the crisis is affecting the United States and the other major industrial powers. But the World Bank, the Food and Agriculture Organization, and U.S. intelligence officials, in three recent reports, are paying increased attention to the prospect of a second economic shockwave, this time affecting the developing world.

Sinking Back Into Penury

In late February, the World Bank staff prepared a background paper for the Group of 20 (G-20) finance ministers meeting held near London on March 13 and 14. Entitled "Swimming Against the Tide: How Developing Countries Are Coping with the Global Crisis," it provides a preliminary assessment of the meltdown's impact on low-income countries (LICs). The picture, though still hazy, is one of deepening gloom.

Most LICs were shielded from the initial impact of the sudden blockage in private capital flows because they have such limited access to such markets. "But while slower to emerge," the report notes, "the impact of the crisis on LICs has been no less significant as the effects have spread through other channels." For example, "many LIC governments rely on disproportionately on revenue from commodity exports, the prices of which have declined sharply along with global demand." Likewise, foreign direct investment is falling, particularly in the natural resource sectors. On top of this, remittances from immigrants in the wealthier countries to their families back home have dropped, erasing an important source of income to poor communities.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: hunger, economy, food crisis, developing world

Michael T. Klare is a professor of peace and world security studies at Hampshire College in Amherst, Mass., and the author of Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America's Growing Petroleum Dependency.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Moving to a more sustainable future.
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist. on Mar 20, 2009 12:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember all that “buy local” crap y’all wanted? Now you have it. Populations in the 3rd world are as sustainable as peek oil. Both had to end eventially.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And ... It Gets Worse ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 20, 2009 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like Peak Oil hit in 2008 ...

The Depression will lower demand for a while but will also severely cut money for exploration and development ... cutting supplies down the road.

World Oil Production Peaked in 2008

As soon as the world economy even hints at a recovery energy prices will once again zoom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» FUCK PUKE OIL LIES Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
It is usually considered that genocide or international aggression is the
Posted by: and_abottleofrum on Mar 20, 2009 12:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
greatest injustice in the world. This is untrue. These are merely the greatest sensational injustices for which it is relatively simple to identify specific villainous actors as a main proximate cause.

According to the U.N.,

there are around 815 million undernourished people in the world and that every year 36 million people die, directly or indirectly, as a result of hunger and nutritional deficiencies, most of them women and children, particularly in developing countries, in a world that already produces enough food to feed the whole global population

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: The Right to Food, Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2002/25

Death by malnutrition at a rate of 36 million per year as of 2002, when enough food was and still is produced in the world to feed all and maintain general health, yet it is distributed very unequally, is a far greater injustice than any war or genocide in history. In fact the injustices of poverty vastly outweigh any other type in terms of their death toll and the human misery wrought. Consider the hundreds of millions who must have perished unnecessarily, and in misery, over just the recent decades due to gross economic inequality.

But it seems easier to shrug aside these injustices than it is to ignore an unjust war or a genocide, simply because poverty and its effects tend to be regarded as part of the normal "background" of the workings of complex, stratified societies. It is generally impossible to attribute the existence of poverty to the actions of any single identifiable actor or set thereof. Rather there is a structural quality that becomes apparent when one attempts to trace the causation of poverty: it is the result of generations of exploitation by multitudes of often unwitting participants.

However the fact that the horrors that economic inequality produces cannot rightly be placed at the feet of any villainous individual, cabal, or group does nothing to reduce the magnitude of the injustice. The fact that it seems easier to accept mass death and suffering when their origins are too complex to trace simple causation does not erase their moral stain upon the world.

A name should be coined that readily expresses and condemns the injustice of economic inequality, one with at least as much emotional power as the words "war" and "genocide." I've considered the name structural genocide, as opposed to the usual agential genocide with which that noun is associated. It's one possibility.

It must be widely recognized that poverty around the world is more terrible than any war or political persecution and deserves to be treated with even greater revulsion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perfection Impossible
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Mar 20, 2009 1:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there has always been uneven development of human settlements and intelligence. Some will survive climate change, some won't, whether the change is the natural swings that will occur whether we pass carbon limits or not or whether greenhouse gas does affect climate significantly.

Wars and disease are inevitable. Humans are always on the move. And germs and hate move with them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perfection Impossible Posted by: VZEQICVA
More fruits
Posted by: Perry Logan on Mar 20, 2009 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More fruits of the Republican Revolution.

Forgiving the Neocons

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But Michael, we have killed millions because of 9/11 lies, and you haven't cared at all.
Posted by: pfgetty on Mar 20, 2009 3:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why, Michael, are you concerned about the deaths of millions because of our economic collapse? It has been over seven years since 9/11, and for that fairytale that we were told, our government is responsible for the deaths of millions. And yet, not one word from you. I've read your books and articles. Never a word about the glaring inconsistencies and lies about the official story of 9/11.
I cannot believe you have not been aware of the work done by great 9/11 Truth researchers, proving that 9/11 was an inside job. It would be almost impossible for someone like you not to realize that the official story is a lie. Just the collapse of building seven alone should spark an interest in this story, as no building can collapse from fire at FREE FALL speed without controlled demolition. And it is virtually impossible that four planes would avoid interception from our air defense systems, and no consistent or reasonable explanation has ever been given.

If you care so much about people dying, then why no concern about 9/11?
I'll tell you why. Because the entire media system of the US has been frightened off the story. I'm not sure what kind of pressure you have been put under, or if it is self censorship so that you will not be attacked, but you and Amy Goodman and all of Alternet and Common Dreams and MotherJones and Counterpunch and antiwar.com and the rest have all conspired to keep the truth from us.

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to see and look into obvious contradictions and lies about 9/11. Not to do so is, I think, treason. The world is suffering from 9/11, and it is because of the media's conspiracy to keep the real story of 9/11 from us.

Wake up to your crime, Michael. You could change the world if you could bring us the truth, bring it to the American people. Our kids and grandkids need you to do the right thing.

If you or anyone else thinks I am way out on this, email me, ......... pfgetty@embarqmail.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This will infuriate you but.... Posted by: Grandma Crabby
Enough of this idiotic scare mongering. Let's be realistic here. We're not gonna die off the cliff.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 20, 2009 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're just gonna have more conscientous societies that don't put greed before thinking. The developing countries have already been suffering and whoever out there suffers from the economic collapse would have suffered before that anyway. Sure, food scarcities could cause fighting but often times, most of these wars the author refers to would have happened anyway. You're only gonna suffer big if you've depending on gambling on the stock market and I'm assuming that this author is probably a full time daytrader too. Here's something better to read and learn from:

http://www.marco.org/165

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said maxpayne. Posted by: WYGunston
dieoff.org
Posted by: astralman on Mar 20, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://dieoff.org/

this sums up things pretty good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ALL DELIBERATE
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Mar 20, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AND YOU PEOPLE KNOW IT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So which is it?
Posted by: NthnBrazil on Mar 20, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm confused. Do we have a population problem that needs resolving or will millions be dying that we need to save?

Blah Blah Blah

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a natural result of overpopulation
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Mar 20, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The world is growing ever more overpopulated, with population now expected to hit 9 billion by mid-century. This is not a sustainable number for the long run. Regardless of the reasons why people have more children than they or their societies can support, the fact remains that with climate change, increasingly-scarce water supplies, perhaps a dwindling of the genetic strength of the crops we rely upon, and many other factors, it is extremely unlikely that we can sustain such a large human population for too much longer.

Some sneer at Malthus, but, IMO, he wasn't wrong, just premature in his doom-saying. Sooner or later, the human population will be trimmed; either we will do it ourselves, through birth control and attrition, or Mother Nature will do it for us, and her methods are often inhumane and even messy.

And then there are the random forces that may intervene, such as the volcanic activity rumbling away in such diverse locations as Alaska and the Pacific island of Tonga, or perhaps an asteroid that doesn't quite miss us....there are lots of ways the human population can be reduced, most of them quite unpleasant. Let's hope that it doesn't come to that, but this planet simply can't sustain indefinite growth of human populations. This is a fact that we should pray will not have to be proved to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I know this isn't the "global" thing to say...
Posted by: eviltwit on Mar 20, 2009 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but there are many people who are having enough trouble dealing with their own family crisis in this time, rather than having to worry about the whole world's economic crises - it's just too much to put on people who are already struggling with their own economic travails

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» exactly what i was thinking... Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Sorry, but this isn't a bad thing
Posted by: peterharrell on Mar 20, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's simply too many humans in the world, and if a few million here and there starve to death because they are overpopulated, that's the natural way of things.

In fact, we shouldn't be doing anything to slow that process, or slow the spread of aids, either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And the peanut allergy kids too! Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
the economic crisis will lead to a saner world
Posted by: alturn on Mar 20, 2009 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The economic crisis is putting strain on the first world's "I'm all right Jack" attitude. Without this increasing suffering in the first world, unfortunately we would forever turn a blind eye to the plight of third world nations.

There is enough food for everyone. The will to see everyone fed and the will to execute proper distribution has been the issue. Food instead has been used as a weapon in the quest for dominance. That will change as everyday people see the sanity of a world that shares its resources with everyone, not just a privileged few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Double whammy
Posted by: willymack on Mar 20, 2009 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, the third world will probably go down the chute, along with the richer nations, huh? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems those same third world nations were going down the chute while the most prosperous ones were still prosperous. What's that say about cannibalistic capitalism, huh? What's that say about the corporate scumbags so adored here and elsewhere? Are we goig to learn a lesson from all this and become more HUMANE and less GREEDY? Ha!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nearly ALL Western Investment In Third World Countries Is Done For The Benefit of Rich W/Bankers
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Mar 20, 2009 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It transfers our well paid jobs to formerly happy people who were quite content at growing their own food on their own land.

The former farmers are dragged off their land and herded into factories and turned into our subcontracted slaves.

If we go bust - it will be a Godsend to the slaves. Their local corrupt rich local fascist controllers will have to release them.

And lets face it - we deserve to go bust.

We are not very nice.

Meanwhile Check Out The Third World Poverty and Hunger in America.

I am not American and have never been there - but this shocked me.

I thought you guys were rich.

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All of these "wealthy" nations obtained their wealth through colossal banditry
Posted by: chlamor on Mar 20, 2009 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What gets to me is people thinking America was once a great country with a moral compass? When was that? I must have missed that part of history. From the massacres of Indians, to slavery, to Hiroshima, Vietnam, to its policies in Latin America, to its support for the creation of the terrorist state of Israel, to supporting the Shah of Iran, to supporting Saddam with intelligence and chemical weapons against the Iranian people, to these modern day Middle East massacres, America has by far the worst track record. They just have a very powerful propaganda machine to show they are the land of the free.

"We" stole half of Mexico by armed force -- the nice parts with rich deposits of gold and silver (and, as it turned out, oil -- though "we" didn't actually recognize that at the time.)

"We" made sure that "our" influence over Latin America was such that wealth would be steadily transferred from their countries to ours. "We" sent the Marines to Nicaragua, Haiti, & Guatemala often enough to insure that life in those countries would be a permanent living hell for most of the inhabitants. "We" imposed military dictatorships in almost every Central & South American country, stunting the aspirations of their people, & imposing conditions from which some of those countries will never recover. (So if some of the people want to escape from the living conditions in those countries, "we" had very much to do with creating those conditions.)

Interestingly, "we" started doing all this at the same time that "we" were exterminating the indigenous people here, AND using black slaves from Africa. What a lovable, righteous people "we" are, here in the "Land of the Free"!!

"We" came here somewhere in the early 1600s. "We" found this Promised Land, rich beyond imagination with fresh water and fertile earth and abundant game and timber for the felling. And to "our" further delight, it was largely uninhabited--if "we" didn't count the Red Ones.

"We" didn't see too many of them at first; they avoided our noise and the smoke from our fires, which were always too big. But soon enough, "we" were here in such numbers that they couldn't go around us anymore.

"We" were shocked--SHOCKED, I tell ya--that there were Savages in "our" Promised Land! So "we" set about exterminating them. "We" killed them whenever "we" saw them, "we" drove them from their land and their homes, "we" slaughtered their food supply and left the buffalo bodies to rot in the sun by the hundreds of acres. "We" gave them blankets full of smallpox, murdered their children and raped their women before "we" murdered them as well. "We" rounded them up into concentration camps and ate their food while they starved. "We" made them cut their hair, wear britches and beat them to death if they wouldn't speak "our" language.

"We" stole a whole continent from them and paid them in Genocide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Just Do It Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Just Do It Posted by: tony_opmoc
» DRUMMERS OF BURUNDI WOMAD 2001 Posted by: tony_opmoc
Support will fall
Posted by: dealmeinfo2 on Mar 20, 2009 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think ultimately a lot of people will die as they are unable to get any help and people's pockets are tightening up. A lot of charities are going to start feeling the crunch big time.



-------------------------------------------------
Minneapolis Home Mortgage

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will we save ourselves? The jury's still out.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 20, 2009 12:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did we humans really believe that we could continue to reproduce like rabbits, use more resources faster than they are being replenished, build lavish lifestyles in the "advanced" countries on the backs of eveyrone else's slave labor and support a capitalistic economic system that rewards greed, thievery and waste (charge "whatever the traffic will bear" "planned obsolescence") FOREVER?!

We are at the beginning of massive, worldwide convulsons of a very sick socio-economic system, with an enormous amount of built-up rage from those who have been trying to climb up the economic pyramid, and now find that the weight of the few privileged at the top have caused the pyramid to crumble.

We may come out of this, decades from now, bruised and battered but wiser for the experience. Or not. We have the intelligence and the creativity to at least ameliorate much of the inevitable pain that will come from a complete reordering of human priorities, should we choose to employ them. What do not have, however, and we'd better find, fast, is a spirit of empathy and cooperation, common sense and common humanity, the feeling that "I am my brother's keeper." Preditory economic systems like the laissez-faire capitalism that we've spread throughout the world are doomed to failure by their very nature; what the rapacious piracy of Wall Street has done is simply accelerated the process. Where we go from here, if we do not open our eyes and see the world as it is instead of nothing more than a profit center, is anybody's guess.

No matter what organized religion has told us (to further their own selfish goals), there is nothing in God's or Nature's plan that decrees that human beings will always survive on this planet. Species more successful and long-lived than us have been wiped from the Earth (seen any dinosaurs lately?), and we're no different, except in our ability to soil our own nest. It is up to us to save ourselves – and, so far, we're doing a damned poor job of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad
Posted by: RipVanWil on Mar 20, 2009 1:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, I think its inevitable. To late to avoid it now.

RT
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Million HAVE DIED it's Called sham 9/11 "WAR ON TERROR"
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Mar 20, 2009 5:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A criminal 9/11 coverup still drives the genocide of false “war on terror” that is 1000 lies old (Center for Public Integrity) and counting. An Orwellian farce no more real and no less absurd than war on a noun.

PATRIOTS QUESTION 9/11

War on a noun has cost well over a million innocent lives. All of those lives were snuffed out directly over trillions in Big Oil.

Global wars have always been fought over wealth for power. This one was always about means, motive and opportunity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, Empire's economic 'shock doctine' kills 'social democracies'
Posted by: amacd on Mar 20, 2009 5:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the end of WWII (the second war of the Empires), the rest of the democratic European and Japanese world has been progressing as a post-Empire world of; reasonable equality, reasonable energy efficiency, reasonable ‘universal’ health-care, reasonable foreign policies, reasonable gun laws, reasonable media balance, and reasonably representative government through ‘social democracy’

Such substantial progress away from Empire and toward pluralistic democracy has been achieved over the last half century in all European countries and Japan (and more recently by many other Asian, South American, and even newer East European countries).

During the first few decades (late 1940’s to 1970’s) of this post-WWII era, the US continued its progress (from the capitalist Great Crash and Great Depression) toward a broad middle-class living standard, albeit at little or no progress on the modern Post-war issues of ‘universal health care’, energy efficiency, public transportation, reasonable (non-imperialist) foreign policy or other issues.

However, in the last quarter century (starting in 1980) the gap between the ‘social democracies’ of Europe and Japan vs. the U.S., the change has been both telling and highly detrimental to us caught in the U.S.:

1. Inequality comparable to the Gilded Age in America?

It's worse now. GINI Coefficient of income inequality (0 to 1, where higher is unequal):

The 'social democracies' of Europe and Japan --- 0.23 to 0.31
‘Our’ United States of America --- 0.49
Mugabe's plutocratic dictatorship of Zimbabwe --- 0.53

2. Socialism, which is inaccurately called “a failed system” (like communism and fascism)?

Truth: "socialism was never tried".

NAZI EMPIRE (National ‘Socialist’) --- was not 'socialism' despite name --- it was fascist/corporatist Empire, run by an insane ‘bad actor’.

Soviet EMPIRE (Communism) --- was not 'socialism --- it was a ruling-elite totalitarian EMPIRE, run by a string of amateur ‘bad actors’ posing as socialists.

The only existence proof of success for any post WWII, and any ‘post-EMPIRE’ world is the European (including UK) and Japan 'social democracy' model (aka 'socialist democracy', aka ‘peoples democracy’).

Our sentimentally remembered United States of America --- contrasts with today’s reality of professional elite ‘bad actors’ guilefully using the façade of faux democracy to run a much more sophisticated two-party ‘Vichy’ ruling-elite global corporate/financial Empire --- (more disingenuous than Goebbles ever dreamed of)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oil Will Skyrocket Later
Posted by: Royt6 on Mar 20, 2009 6:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just watch what happens. The US dollar will get killed by inflation, oil production will decrease, and then boom there is suddenly demand. Oil goes back to $150, maybe higher this time

George
web site traffic

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be fruitful and multiply
Posted by: abusedbypenguins on Mar 20, 2009 7:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so you can die slowly of starvation and disease like a good little christian, hindu, muslim or whatever. The sky daddy dosen't care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad in Bangladesh
Posted by: DrBrian on Mar 20, 2009 7:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unquestionably we are seeing more and more severe malnutrition here in Bangladesh, and I see a number of deaths weekly as a result.

While there's a bailout for the greedy Wall Street tycoons who created the mess, and there's even some relief in sight for most of the American population, the crushing burden of worldwide recession falls most heavily on the world's poorest and little concern for them amongst those who could do something. The US would rather shell out billions of dollars a week on futile wars and imperialist military bases than do very much to alleviate the misery that Reagan, Clinton and the Bushes, along with Congress, have visited on the world with their idiotic financial policies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what's better...........?
Posted by: RickW on Mar 20, 2009 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1] Be kept in perpetual servitude and on the verge of starvation, because the so-called "1st world" dictates the prices it will buy for?

OR

2] Die and get it over with, as that is where many in the 3rd world are heading anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why we need to render Oil as useless as Sludge- Crimes against Humanity
Posted by: Purple Girl on Mar 21, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only do the Oil Royals commit Crimes against Humanity by limiting oil supply and causing pricing to go Up- but so are those Who Speculate which drives the price up on a Hunch.
first and foremost to such essential Resources as energy and Food must be taken off the stock market boards. Want to gamble then palce wagers on whethr max Factor will kick Revelons ass, or HP outsells Dell, or Jack Daniels beats the hell out of Jim Beam.
Pay Farmers -REAL Farmers a living Wage for their product, level price regardless of how much they produce. When an average farmer can be undercut in pricing because the Corps can afford to drive down the price and thus drive out the smaller competition- That is not a Free market. Esp when the Corps are getting subsideies and tax breaks far more than small farmers. Hell they are paid NOT to plant, thus effecting the amount of food available on the market. How many more Children have starved because of this immoral arrangement?
Then we must not only get off Oil, but return the ownership of Energy production to the citizens of the country which generates it- Home owners and small business should be able to generate their own natural renewable energy and they sell the excess to local, state & fed for general Use. As for the limited, regional energy (NG,Oil) those are the Countries property, not the states. So it should be every American who gets a check whenever Our natioanl reserves are sold to Corps- not just Alaskans.Alaskans Own the Oil as much as Michigan Owns the Great lakes. If needed to support our fellow countrymen life , we would be obliged to assist. We are the United States. (Of course I'm not sharing just to water your Desert oasis lawn.To Water crops -yes, Landscaping NO!)
Want to break the strangle hold of the Oil Royals over our economy, the lives of millions- effectively destroying their power & wealth and ending their crimes agaisnt humanity- Make their only 'valueable' resource Sand.I fyou want to defeat terrorism without firing another shot- take out the Funding that supports them by destroying the nations economies which spawn them. Most 9/11 Attackers Were (are) Saudi's!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"YES!"... next question?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Mar 21, 2009 4:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
though I'm thrilled an American seems to care about non-Americans during this 'Made in America' ethics-based global economic crisis.






perspective, people.


Perspective.

The Jeff Farias Show: streams FREE & LIVE Mon-Fri, 6-9pmEST

FREE podcast

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement