U.S. Tells Teen Girls Worldwide to Just Say No

By Barbara Crossette, Women's eNews. Posted May 28, 2002.

The Bush administration, which has blocked payments to the United Nations Population Fund because of unfounded reports that American money was going to abortion in China, opened a new front in its opposition to international family planning efforts this month.

This time, in meetings surrounding the United Nations Special Session on Children, the American delegation tried to parlay its "abstinence-only" sex education plan into international policy.

The bid to give prominence to a "just say no" policy on adolescent sex was defeated by a majority of nations this time. Yet women's health experts, inside and outside the United Nations, fear that the issue will sooner or later resurface, and say Washington's campaign can only hurt girls in the poorest nations.

In the developing world, pregnant girls are most often married, sometimes at 10 or younger, or are the victims of sexual coercion and trafficking, said Adrienne Germain, president of the International Women's Health Coalition, based in New York.

Promiscuous behavior is not the issue. Sex education is not a moral question but often a matter of life or death, especially now that AIDS has begun to affect girls and women in sharply rising numbers in Africa and Asia, outstripping the spread of the disease among men, experts said.

Moreover, pregnancy is the leading cause of death for young women ages 15 to 19 in poor countries, according to UNICEF, the United Nations Children's Fund. Many die because they are physically too young to be mothers. But their societies give them no choice.

"Abstinence-only sex education is a very negative position that the U.S. is taking, which need not be imposed on other countries," Germain said.

U.S. Leads Abstinence-Only Campaign

Tommy Thompson, the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services who led the United States delegation at the Special Session on Children from May 8 to May 10, is among Bush administration officials who have emphasized abstinence as a preventive measure not only for unwanted pregnancies but also for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. In April, a House of Representatives committee voted to continue an abstinence-only sex education program in the United States at a cost of $50 million a year. Broader sex education programs cannot draw on those funds.

Speaking at a news conference during the United Nations special assembly, Anne Peterson, Assistant Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development's Bureau for Global Health, said that the administration's aim was to prevent many diseases as well as teen-age pregnancies, both internationally and on the domestic front. She said that there was clear evidence that delaying the onset of sexual activity was an integral part of a successful health program. She added that the administration advocated raising the age of marriage around the world to avoid adverse health consequences from early births when abstinence was not possible.

Opponents of the Bush formula say that the United States encourages other nations and the Vatican to advocate this policy in international gatherings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »