Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

We Are Entering a New Political Era, and We Need an Educated Public to Deal with It

By Doug Kreeger, AlterNet. Posted March 18, 2009.


The era of hearing that government is evil, that a "hands-off" government gives us freedom is over. Now it's time to think about the public good.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
15 Signs American Society Is Coming Apart at the Seams
David DeGraw

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Dobbs' Resignation Was Long Overdue
Janet Murguía

Media and Technology:
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" the Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Army Sends Mom to Afghanistan, Infant to Protective Services
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Doug Kreeger

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Like China during the Cultural Revolution, the cultural shift in the United States over the last thirty years has created a significant void in the talent required to shift this country into the 21st economy. Clearly, we stand at a crucial point in our history as a nation. We are a house divided by race and economics but, most importantly, divided by those who mistrust the very institutions that were created to protect us.  There is a staggering division between those who believe that government was created to protect the common good and insure domestic tranquility, and those who have utter mistrust. For thirty years, the ideologues in power convinced the very people who need a strong and competent government to protect them that government was evil.  This ideal ultimately gave power to group who relentlessly worked against these people.

A generation of Americans has grown up hearing messages that government is evil, that a “hands-off” government gives them freedom.  Meanwhile, the government was really taking away those freedoms. We no longer had a government that protected us from the abuses of powerful corporations that were willing to foul our air and water while creating a financial system that placed greed over economic well-being.  Over the last thirty years, our national education policy has been more concerned with producing ideologues than creating scientists and critical thinkers. This “cultural” entity tried to turn schools into factories for reciting information for tests that were based on religious dogma and conservative ideology. The best and the brightest in the conservative movement were shuttled through colleges like Regent University (whose tagline is “Christian Leadership to Change the World”) to find their way into positions of influence in the Judicial Department, the EPA and the White House.

Recently, hope arrived when what many thought would take a generation to overcome appeared to turn the corner on November 4th, 2008. As Obama and his administration now struggle with our near dead economy, they are valiantly trying to jump-start everything that will bring us some sort of stability as we approach the second decade of the 21st century. Historians and pundits are comparing this period to the 1930’s and the birth of the New Deal. However, while there are many comparisons to this period in terms of economic pain, we really need to look further back to understand why today’s challenges are compounded.  To fully appreciate the massive challenge Obama faces, we need to look at the Reconstruction of America after the Civil War. It is not merely that Obama and Lincoln came from Illinois that connects the two leaders. When Obama makes references to Lincoln, it is with the understanding that they both came to the Presidency with a country divided.

After the Civil War, re-educating the country was the only option for moving us forward.  At that time, communication was not at lightening speed and we have an amazing opportunity to realize, today, that the missing piece here is a focus on education. We need to return to teaching scientific freedom and critical thinking.  With a pragmatist as our President, we need to be reassured that teaching this generation of young people how to think, not what to think, will bring our country back into the light. We need to stop listening to people who mislead and spew hate for their own profit, at the expense of productive dialogue that is required to find solutions to our shared responsibility to meet the challenges of today and tomorrow. We cannot talk our way out of this mess like Rush Limbaugh and the Republicans in Congress want to do. It needs bold action and real leadership and we are fortunate to have someone in the White House who is smart enough to know, not only how bad things are, but also how good we can be if we take the right steps. This crisis will only get better if we are willing to accept personal responsibility for helping to fix what is broken and make sacrifices for those in greater need then ourselves. It is not about an ideology based on believing in magic, but a real understanding of what hard work and dedication to serving each other means for a society to prosper. It is E Pluribus Unum. 

As we face the challenges of Reconstruction 2009 we need to make sure we think as broadly as we can.  While taking into account our short-term needs, we need to have a vision as to the legacy we are creating for our children and grandchildren. We need to re-educate a generation of people who truly believed that government was our enemy as opposed to an institution that exists for the common good. We need to overcome fear and distrust and replace it with caring and compassion. We are one nation and one world and are all connected to a common ancestor that needs to share a belief that what is good for one, should be good for all.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: freedom, ideology, anti-government

Douglas Kreeger is the former CEO of Air America Radio and board chair of the Independent Media Institute, AlterNet's parent organization.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
False Dichotomy ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 18, 2009 12:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" There is a staggering division between those who believe that government was created to protect the common good and insure domestic tranquility, and those who have utter mistrust. "

Actually there are those that "believe that government was created to protect the common good and insure domestic tranquility" and also have utter mistrust about our current government because the government has become the captive of special interests to the utter detriment of " We the People".

The way I see it is that there are those who believe in the promise of government and those that don't. Anybody trusting the current batch of bastards running our country is a fool or a paid hack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: False Dichotomy ... Posted by: richholland
» Chickens and Eggs (and Propaganda) Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: False Dichotomy ... Posted by: Spiritgirl
new political era??...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Mar 18, 2009 1:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
guess again...

i too had believed that the nitemare had ended on november 4.. but i was wrong if these polls are any indication...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You mean "typo." Posted by: Curio
The Answer
Posted by: Tom Degan on Mar 18, 2009 2:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call this Civics 101, but it is my humble opinion that if there is one thing that a nation with a population that exceeds a quarter of a billion people needs it is governance.

BREAKING NEWS: RONALD REAGAN IS DEAD

The era of the government being the problem not the answer is over. The so-called "revolution" which bore the name of Ronald Reagan is deader than the gipper himself.

There will be times (and this is certainly one of those tomes) when government will not only be a probable answer, it;ll be the only answer. Why doesn't the Right Wing get it?

Jackals and Jackasses

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Answer Posted by: weathered
» RE: The Answer Posted by: Lilly
» good lord don't give 'em any ideas!! Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Distinctly pathological
Posted by: Perry Logan on Mar 18, 2009 2:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It only takes a moment's thought to see that a negative attitude toward government is distinctly pathological.

Since government is an inherent component of any society, hating government is like hating one of your own vital organs. It cannot possibly be healthy.

If anti-government types ran the show, I guess they'd end up having government workers wear armbands, or computer implants, so we can watch for their inevitable skullduggery. Children who express a desire to go into government service would be routed immediately to counselors. It would be like nirvana, with all humankind united in mutual hatred of government.

All in all, it's a bad idea to get your political ideas from the 1980s. Let us pray to God that our "winger fever" has run its course. :)


A meditation on Forgiving the Neocons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stupidly simplistic. Posted by: -matti
» RE: Verbally abusive = right wing Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Stupidly simplistic. Posted by: Curio
» RE: Stupidly simplistic. Posted by: cats.anon
a four word summary of most human activity: "monkey see, monkey do"
Posted by: Suzon on Mar 18, 2009 3:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even widely-esteemed Cambridge University offers hundreds of fields of study which lead to careers, but only a few which try to understand the way things work.

But of course the elite probably already understand the basics (that they live in a plutocracy where the wealthiest run things for their own benefit) and are just looking for their own niche in it.

However, there is a new book by Richard Wilkinson (author of The Impact of Inequality: How to make sick societies healthier) and a colleague (can't remember her name, sorry) which presents epidemiological evidence that even the wealthiest benefit (in terms of longer life expectancy) when inequality is reduced.

Even the rich should be educated! I'll bet Rupert Murdoch is at an age where he'd like to lengthen his lifespan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Definition of "elite" Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Definition of "elite" Posted by: Crazy H
» "elite" according to merriam-webster Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Remove the incumbents
Posted by: weathered on Mar 18, 2009 3:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Deshackle MSM from corporations.
Dismantle Homeland Security
Crush the Patriot Act
and above all else Free us from the toxic reach of Israel. Connect the dots, the Planet is ill and so are we.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for a REVOLUTION!
Posted by: thinkverybig on Mar 18, 2009 4:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I voted for President Obama and support him 100% but I also believe in my heart that he can not do this alone. The corporations have the power and we need to take it back.

It's time for all of us to hits the streets and protests for change! DEMAND CHANGE! DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY! DEMAND INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE CRIMINALS ON WALL STREET!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Time for a REVOLUTION! Posted by: weathered
» RE: Time for a REVOLUTION! Posted by: Sister_Lauren
I hate to say this but even with Obama in office, some people have the nerve to "defend" bad pols.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 18, 2009 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've often noticed even on this site when others point out Obama's betrayals, the die-hard Obama supporters often times lash out and preach "personal responsibility" even while shamelessly defending him and his party's equal betrayals. They won't support the Republican Party and that is understandable given the way they sold this country out big time once in power for all these years. However, if the person telling the truth happened to be a 3rd party voter or at best reluctantly vote for Obama, he or she is pelted at without rhyme or reason. If we had an educated public to begin with, 3rd parties would have been given a chance and the political system would have been less likely rigged. Look at Europe, Asia, and even Latin America and Canada. Plenty of freedom for 3rd parties with fewer stipulations whereas in this country, the braindamaged electorate for the most part rail against 3rd parties as "spoilers" and "irrelevant" and these are the same people who rely on corporate whoop-dee-doo polls to tell them who to vote for and along with it spread the lie that we gotta pick the lesser of the two evils or else it's the end of the world shit. Yea, I don't mind trying to work within the two parties but this would be much easier if the watchdog parties would have their say. After all, why pay taxes when pols keep telling you to make them do it? People have work to do and it's not always easy getting in touch with our pols even though we may have email and snail mail. I wish this country lots of good luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THANK YOU max ! Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: THANK YOU max ! Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: THANK YOU max ! Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» Absolutely right Posted by: Curio
» RE: Absolutely right Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Absolutely right Posted by: Curio
Not evil ... just incompetent
Posted by: Derek Maddox on Mar 18, 2009 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Government isn't really evil, although there are certainly some corrupt and self-serving politicians and appointed officials. But government is incompetent. Every branch, at every level, the excellence of specific individual government employees is quickly overwhelmed by the gross incompetence of the larger organization.

Look around you, folks. Take the V-22 program. A plane nobody wanted, which is dangerous to fly. DoD tried to kill the program four times, but Congress forced them to continue the program. Cost overruns, schedule problems, crash after crash. A picture of efficiency.

Look at the auto industry. They're making hundreds of hybrid vehicles that no one wants to buy, at least not at what it costs to make them. Every auto manufacturer is losing money on every hybrid sold. So why are they doing this? Because the government told them they had to.

Why did the banks lend money to people they knew damned well couldn't pay it back? The government told them they had to, and then offered to buy the bad loans from them.

Hell, we can't even find a Russian linguist in the state department capable of translating the word "Reset" properly.

Government is incompetent. The less we have government involved in our daily lives, the better off we'll all be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not evil ... just incompetent Posted by: Derek Maddox
it will take a generation at least...
Posted by: ellie on Mar 18, 2009 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to get the people back up to speed in education... basics like spelling and reading comprehension, addition and subtraction... we lost so much brain power during the past 8 years to the point that all we now understand is fear...

we returned to the dark ages under the last administration and are trying furiously to get out...

it will be up to the kids in school now who must be able to make conscious and intelligent decisions... the question is, do we have the teachers who are ABLE to actually teach??? sadly, education has failed to provide nothing but rote memorization and do as you are told...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Government remembers who it serves.
Posted by: Dream on Mar 18, 2009 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe there could be such a thing as good government, however we don't have it.
Yes education is one of the answers but we can't have the propagaist manipulating that education. I love the quote from wookie foot "you can't escape if you think your free"
My question is; Do I own myself? If the government recognised this as true we would have a very differant tax structure. There wouldn't be so many people in prison for personal choices like utilizing the blessings of Herb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent Article, Hits Nail on Head
Posted by: Lilly on Mar 18, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I seem to have developed a hobby of going to conservative websites---don't ask me why as I have never been especially political. But these columns and comments threads more than fascinate me; they hold me in thrall. I love trying to unravel their logic. And today's AlterNet article is absolutely, totally, utterly correct. The hatred and distrust of government is a unifying theme on, say, townhall.com. These folks resent everything from mandatory public education to helmet laws. Any federal money going to a local district is "pork" and any federal money used for the public good is "Socialism" if not "Communism" or "Marxism". They say things like "Why should I pay for public transportation when I drive my own car"?. Since Obama was elected, they rant more on guns, bragging about the size of their arsenals, which they hope to use when their much-discussed revolution comes about. They think that taxation = theft and they especially hate federal taxes; several recently have stated that they have sent their federal tax money to their state, so we'll see how that works out. They see politicians as crooks, government employees as lazy leeches, and all government as not just incompetent but purposefully evil. While there is much about the Republican remaking of the world after 1980 that I despise, nothing worries me more than that an American population that may not be willing to accept governance except by their own extremist people, may have been created. I can't sufficiently emphasize the force of feeling on conservative websites and, if you haven't done so already, I urge you to take a trip there because, indeed, travel is broadening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PEOPLE GOT A LITTLE LAZY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 18, 2009 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But to compliment their laziness, only half the states require American History or Civics in any form. Most of us were required to learn about what made things work in our country. Not any more. We have to go back to 'boring everyone to death' in classrooms everywhere. In the end that's how we learn. Former Jusice O'Connor has begun a website called "Our Courts" in an effort to keep people informed. Bush would never have been elected by my grandpartents' generaton. They were too smart. Most were not educated, but they knew what was going on. We have som catching up to do. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PEOPLE GOT A LITTLE LAZY Posted by: Quannah
Educated public... good luck
Posted by: skoog5600 on Mar 18, 2009 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes that is what the country needs, but you are not going to get it. Let me look at the list, ah yes, number one - they have to get over their dysfunctions of consumption tv and food, lose a little weight, begin to see reality for what it is before they decide to become educated and participate. Unfortunately, I believe education is number 20 on the list of to dos.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One more thing Posted by: skoog5600
Why do you think they slash the budget on education FIRST???
Posted by: Kym525 on Mar 18, 2009 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huge cuts in education along with failed programs like 'No Child Left Behind' and ideologically-based nonsense like abstinence-only sex education have done more damage to our educational system. We may have laughed at Sarah "Caribou Barbie" Palin as she completely blew it on basic constitional principles, but the average American is just as unknowledgable about their basic rights (unless they are rabid NRA folks who have the 2nd Amendment tattooed someone on their bodies). Hmm, most college students still can't point out Afghanistan on a world map and we might text more, but on the average our written skills are horrid.

Thomas Jefferson once said that an educated populace was the first defense against a government taking too much power.

No truer words have been spoken as we watched the Bush Crime Syndicate basically run rough-shod over the Constitution. Bush and his cohorts managed to convince the general public that the supposed "war" on terror meant giving up our precious civil liberties. Ben Franklin said it best: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

And think about the presidential campaign in which far-right wackos painted Barack Obama as an "elitist" because he's a highly educated and successful man. These people were actually mocking his education instead of celebrating it and holding him as an example of the value of education. The point is, there are people out there with a vested interest in keeping Americans dumb. A dumb American won't ask or demand accountability of their leaders. A dumb American will listen to loudmouth shills like Limbaugh and Coulter and treat their garbage as gospel.

I say that we should sue the local, state and federal governments for denying our kids and adults the right to a fair and equal education. After all, education is a part of "the general welfare" guaranteed by the Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The irony of conservatives against government
Posted by: mrnedb on Mar 18, 2009 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do conservatives, who think government is the problem, end up running for office and supporting free market baloney that only enriches their corporate sponsors. Public service is NOT a profit making enterprise. You cannot say you are a public servant supporting the general welfare of the nation and claim government is the problem. If government IS the problem..then YOU conservatives in government, by nature, ARE the problem. If you want to stand astride history and yell, 'stop' as Bill Buckley so famously stated, then you have been the problem. All progress in working class, middle class, minority rights have been liberal progressive change. You might still be working 7 days a week alongside your children for crap wages if it had not been for progressive government enlightened action from Jefferson, to Lincoln, TR and FDR. Wake up America. Today's conservatives are corporate monsters - alongside some of our idiot democrats. Citizens of all colors deserve the right to vote, organize unions, and petition their government. That's a free American society, a free political market. Stop corporate rule of America. Take it back!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It wasn't "hands Off"
Posted by: willymack on Mar 18, 2009 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So much as it was "it's none of your goddam business" and "the constitution is just a goddam piece of paper" under ronnie raygun & dumbya. I'd surely love to see the end of:
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery, and
Ignorance is Power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marx and understanding government
Posted by: cplot on Mar 18, 2009 4:17 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doug Kreeger writes:

“We need to re-educate a generation of people who truly believed that government was our enemy as opposed to an institution that exists for the common good“

I think Marx offered a way for us to understand government that is very illuminating right now. For Marx, the state (government) should be understood as in a complex relation with the dominant political economy of a society. That is for feudalism the state tends to serve the needs of feudalists, for capitalism it tends to serve the needs of capitalists. for communism a state would tend to serve the needs of communists.

While the US is widely celebrated as a capitalist society, is there any wonder that the government serves capitalist interests. Therefore the resentment of capitalist government is misconstrued as a resentment of all government (including those resenting government) because they only know capitalist government. Similarly, there is a tension between those who want government to be other than a capitalist government – a government serving the needs of those other than the capitalists – and the demands the ruling class puts on government to serve only itself.

While in some places Marx expressed a belief that democracy was an ideal form of government to serve capitalism, he may have thought it was the ideals of democracy that served capitalism much more than democracy itself. This creates a tension then that ruling elites must deal with. If the public, the people, the proletariat, are empowered to influence the government, they will ultimately push it in directions that undermine its role in serving the capitalist ruling class (undermining conditions of capitalism's existence). However, if the ruling elite can present the failure of government (a failure in the sense of serving the public but not in serving the capitalist rulers) as an essential feature of government, then this explains and justifies government's failure to the public. Lower the public's expectations of government and they will be become complacent with government's failure. They will expect less. This explains anarchist and libertarian movements which blame the government in general and not specifically capitalist government.

Calls for reforming government, for serving the general interest (the proletarian interest) are all calls for transforming government to a different form: one not serving only capitalist interests. The capitalists want us wallowing in consumer debt. The capitalists want a powerful state apparatus that can spring to action to suppress dissent and unrest (domestically and abroad). Capitalists want workers to rely on their employers for their medical care, for their pension for all of their needs. These are all signs that government works splendidly: but that it works splendidly for only the ruling class. However, democracy provides us with a mechanism to revolutionize government: to make it serve the working class and not the capitalist class. If only we can see the problem as one of capitalist government and not government in general.

Now you might be thinking: but maybe I am a capitalist (as a former or current CEO). However, then maybe you are a traitor to your class and you don't share their values. Welcome to the other side. I applaud your treachery. If even the capitalists are joining the workers in solidarity, perhaps that is a good sign. Now all we need is to overcome the manipulative tactics of the increasingly fascist capitalist ruling class, install genuine democratic institutions and the revolution is won.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more owning class kool-aid
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 18, 2009 4:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to re-educate a generation of people who truly believed that government was our enemy as opposed to an institution that exists for the common good. We need to overcome fear and distrust and replace it with caring and compassion. We are one nation and one world and are all connected to a common ancestor that needs to share a belief that what is good for one, should be good for all.

And just how is any of that going to happen with a core group representing nearly 46% of the electorate (which itself is barely 50% of the populace at large) being belligerent and arrogant enough to shove their heads in the sand and insist that no one move until they say jump?! How?

I'm telling you, it'll come to blood and blows because that's what happened last time and if there's one thing you can count on, is 'Merkaaner reliability when it comes to thuggery and mob rules.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FASCIST FABLES from the Dark Side
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Mar 18, 2009 9:32 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We are one nation and one world and are all connected to a common ancestor that needs to share a belief that what is good for one, should be good for all."

Really?

I’d say any nation that should be "good for all" needs to face reality first and lose the criminal pipedreams.

Otherwise, what world and nation are we talking about?

Could it be the nation where corporate monopoly media rules through programs like "Operation Mockingbird" built to brainwash America under the supervision of CIA ruling class hacks inspired by Edward Bernays. Ditto for the "education" system k thru graduate school under the Rockefeller foundations.

What does that pipedream world say about a 9/11 coverup that still drives the genocide zombie killing fields of 9/11 "war on terror". A sham travesty that is 1000 lies old (and counting) according to the Center for Public Integrity? A 9/11 coverup that went virtually unnoticed at Air America and Alternet (the supposed answers to mainstream corporate media).

Where does the fantasy planet come down on more than $9 TRILLION dollars stolen by Wall Street private ponzi trap "Federal Reserve" Corp handlers that run Washington-MSM actors like a prize pimp runs a stable of high-priced whores.

The naïve and their propaganda pushers employed by a Washington-MSM circus complex would say these are just random unconnected failures. That they are the chance exceptions and not the rule. The ones who have looked under the rocks know that endless examples of Fascist rule mean Fascism for America. And that organized corporate crime has been in charge for a long, long time.


“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the government of the U.S. ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
President FDR (on de facto Fascist rule in a letter to corporate monopoly charlatan “Colonel” Edward M. House, co-founder of the Council on Foreign Relations and political fixer for the ruling class. House also handled President Wilson. 11/21/ l933 from the book "F.D.R.: His Personal Letters" - New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce 1950)

“The minority, the ruling class at present, has the schools and press, usually the Church as well, under its thumb. This enables it to organize and sway the emotions of the masses, and make its tool of them.”
Doctor Albert Einstein (in a letter to Sigmund Freud 7/30/1932. 1879-1955)


“Those who manipulate the unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested by men we have never heard of.”
EDWARD L. BERNAYS (Sigmund Freud’s nephew and the father of psy-ops and modern propaganda. Bernay’s techniques sold WWI to Americans thru the “Committee on Public Information” and were employed by Goebbels under Hitler. Bernays partnered with William Paley to run CBS via CIA mass media manipulation “Operation Mockingbird”. Quote: Bernay book “Propaganda” 1928)

“If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about answers.
Thomas Pynchon (Gravity’s Rainbow 1973)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Entering a new political era? I doubt it. It's just more of the same.
Posted by: Zipidee DooDah & Dipidee DooDog on Mar 18, 2009 11:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Get it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Otto
Posted by: otto on Mar 19, 2009 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush and Reagan administrations kept repeating the mantra "You can't trust Big Government" while they had government actually grow by leaps and bounds in power; for the people, their words seemed to speak louder than their actions. Our education, if possible, needs to get us beyond listening to slogans and generalizations, and actually down to the nitty-gritty of what is going on. How to do it is a great question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A WONDERFUL PROPOSAL!
Posted by: reelman on Mar 24, 2009 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LA: A WONDERFUL PROPOSAL!

BATON ROUGE — March 24.2009…All state, parish and local elected officials should be limited to serving no more than three consecutive terms in office, according to an Acadiana legislator who has filed legislation to impose those limits.

Rep. Simone Champagne, D-Jeanerette, Monday filed in advance of the April 27 lawmaking session House Bill 84, a proposed change in the state Constitution putting a maximum three-term limit on all elected officials at the “state, parish, municipal, ward, (or) district” level. The measure would not impose the limits on members of the state’s congressional delegation or persons elected to run political parties.

The proposal will need a two-thirds vote to clear both houses of the Legislature; if it survives it would have to be approved by voters in the Nov. 2, 2010, federal election.
CRAWFISH NOTE: God bless this great woman! If the democrat in congress had not gone to court to get congress exempted years ago…imagine how wonderful the sound of the term limit toilet flushing those 20-40 year spoiled over spending parasites!!!
So many of these arrogant self-serving folks would have been sent home years ago and the new ones would know that congress is not a lifetime job.
Count on democrats to again lead the opposition to sanity. We can dream.

http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement