comments_imageCOMMENTS: 43

Not Just Homeowners, But Renters Are Really Getting Screwed

Homeowners aren't the only ones in trouble from foreclosures -- renters, urban neighborhoods, and entire cities are at risk.
March 19, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

The United States is in the midst of a national foreclosure crisis that threatens to wreak havoc not just on homeowners, but also tenants, urban neighborhoods, and entire cities. Community organizers and legal activists are working hard to stop it.

Over 2 million properties went into foreclosure proceedings last year, a number that experts fear could jump to 10 million in the next few years. Foreclosures aren't just pushing owners into the street. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, renters make up an estimated 40% of families facing eviction because of foreclosure. And because the shakiest loans are concentrated in inner cities, the impact of vacant buildings on already fragile neighborhoods can be devastating.

Lenders and lawmakers have been slow to respond to this growing crisis. The Obama administration's mortgage rescue plan announced in February offers limited help to some individual homeowners at risk of foreclosure, but almost completely overlooks the plight of renters in foreclosed buildings. Families facing eviction are left to fend for themselves, often with little understanding of their legal rights or other options. But an array of community organizers and legal advocates have been pushing back--organizing tenants, pressuring policymakers and lenders, and throwing wrenches into the legal system.

Steve Meacham, a tenant organizer with City Life/Vida Urbana, a Boston-based social-justice organization, has been on the front lines of the foreclosure battle. Traditionally, CL/VU had mainly organized tenants facing eviction into unions in order to negotiate with landlords. "About a year ago, we noticed something strange," explains Meacham. "Most of the evictions were being pushed by the banks and lenders."

Now the group scans the latest foreclosure listings and goes door to door to alert tenants. They host meetings with people at risk of eviction, provide assistance and advice about negotiating with lenders, and organize demonstrations outside banks. They also work with former owners who hope to renegotiate their loans with the banks and keep renting out their properties.

Renters are usually the last to learn about a foreclosure. "Tenants will get a letter from a bank offering them a few hundred dollars if they leave in two weeks, and threatening to evict them within a month if they refuse and give them nothing," says Meacham. Those who leave usually lose their security deposits and any prepaid rent. "Most banks depend on people getting scared and leaving. When people resist, especially tenants and former owners, the banks don't know what to do with that and back off."

Thanks to the group's tactics, scores of tenants and former owners have stalled foreclosures, negotiated higher payout deals, and even forced banks to cut mortgages.

Housing advocates are also taking the battle to state and federal policymakers. In December, New Haven Legal Assistance (NHLA) threatened to sue Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for illegally evicting tenants in buildings the federal lenders had foreclosed on. The agencies backed down and drew up new rules that stopped the practice. Now activists are pressing for the same rules to apply to private lenders.

"The current situation is lose-lose for everyone right now," says NHLA's Amy Eppler-Epstein. "Banks can make more money on a full building than an empty one that's trashed. Shareholders, neighborhoods, communities, and tenants are suffering. It's crazy and it's got to change."


Daniel Fireside is the Dollars & Sense book editor.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: economy, housing, foreclosure, financial crisis, rent


Comments are closed-

What a horrible mess former Pres. Dubya caused!
Posted by: Jay Randal on Mar 19, 2009 12:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow no end to the destruction Bush has caused. Homeowners and renters screwed over by banksters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Renters and Owners Left Homeless
Posted by: matt_gerchow on Mar 19, 2009 2:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether its property owners or tenants, when people cannot pay the mortgage and they are forced to leave the property...where do all these people go?

As everything rolls down hill, where are all the people at the bottom of the hill going to live?

We are still a long ways from getting out of this crisis, but at the end of the day, we will all survive.

Regards,

Matt Gerchow, CEO
Real-Estate-Investing.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: enters and Owners Left Homeless Posted by: northofthecity
» Same place as always Posted by: Karina

Comments are closed-

Excellent article. Renting isn't safe either.
Posted by: Zipidee DooDah & Dipidee DooDog on Mar 19, 2009 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tell you, I've come across countless others who panic and think that renting is the only way out. It ain't. In fact, renting can often times turn out to be more costly than buying itself. Plus there's no tax deduction for renting which made a huge difference for me. These past two years, after moving out of my filthy apartment to a home which I saved money for and was able to get a reasonable price on it and responsibly so, I noticed a huge difference in paying my taxes. No longer do I have to pay the motherfucking IRS 7000-10000 dollars a year but I'm now getting 3000-5000 is tax refunds ! What is needed is tax cuts for those who rent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

renters
Posted by: jmndodge on Mar 19, 2009 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of these people will not show up in the reports. I could guess that few will find rents cheaper than the places that they were forced to leave, nor will many find places closer to their work/school/neighborhood communities cutting down on transportation costs. With moving expenses on credit cards, (when available) higher rents, likely additional transportation expenses, and perhaps loss of jobs during the disruption in their lives, these people will suffer for years to come. Children changing schools, will more likely suffer from the transfer, although a few might discover a new school or teacher who really makes a difference for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: renters Posted by: snax
» RE: renters Posted by: and_abottleofrum

Comments are closed-

Landlesss Peasant Fucks
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Mar 19, 2009 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
google the banker manifesto of 1892

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Landlesss Peasant Fucks Posted by: northofthecity

Comments are closed-

Escrow accounts question
Posted by: anna_2 on Mar 19, 2009 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not understand why security an last months rent should disappear they are suppose to be in escrow account: who gets this money?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: scrow accounts question Posted by: gar1948
» RE: scrow accounts question Posted by: katjac2

Comments are closed-

Am I the only one who gets annoyed by all these bitter "homeowners" -
Posted by: and_abottleofrum on Mar 19, 2009 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as if people who still have twenty-years' worth of mortgage payments before their paid up really own the property - whining about how bad it is paying mortgage?

Most should have seen this crash in property values coming. Everyone has probably heard the saying that if it sounds too good to be true, for example property values skyrocketing for years in a row, then it probably is too good to be true. This is common wisdom that seems to have been lost on millions upon millions of whiners.

I think most were just blinded by greedy visions of using idle residential land as an investment from which to profit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

renters are probably getting screwed worse...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Mar 19, 2009 3:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
many renters have faithfully paid their rent only to have the sheriff show up to throw them out...because the OWNER didn't live up to his/her end of the bargain...seems to me there should be some way for the bank and the renter to work out some kind of arrangement so the renter can stay...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Yes, but some rents are cheaper
Posted by: dayahka on Mar 19, 2009 3:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Granting your points does not exclude there also being good news, that rents in some areas are down and rentals more plentiful. In my area, I have watched rental prices go down by 20-25% in the last few months.

As for the possible losses, well it all depends on how new you are. Some places require a 6 or 12 month lease, with two months deposit--in case you make a midnight run for the border or wreck the place. After that, it's usually month to month and your deposit could be reduced to just one month's worth, which means you'd lose only at most one month's rent if the bank threw you out. So, that's not too bad, as many places deduct for cleaning and so on from your deposit, and many people just leave and forget the deposit as a loss as they take off for what they make think is greener pastures.

You face these risks even in a good economy. And if you check out your apartment house before you move in, you lessen the chances of your being ripped off. Many small landlords make good money off their rentals, even if only partially filled, enough to pay any mortgage and also leave themselves a princely sum to live on.

So, basically, I don't think this is as dire a situation as you make it out to be. You're just joining the gloomy doomer crowd with yet one more "sky is falling" scenario.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes, but some rents are cheaper Posted by: northofthecity
» RE: Yes, but some rents are cheaper Posted by: northofthecity
» RE: Yes, but some rents are cheaper Posted by: northofthecity

Comments are closed-

Anthony D'Auria
Posted by: Tony D on Mar 20, 2009 12:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What really bothers me is the fact that we have given these banks billions without any strings attached and meanwhile the banks show no sympathy for the mortgage holders. Every time you turn around the banks are spending their bail out money without the slightest thought of the suffering that is occurring amongst those who have had their homes taken from them. There should be a moratorium on foreclosures because the stupid bankers are going to do the foreclosure thing until they ruin themselves and the country. They seem to act like robots without any critical thinking, just a list of things they must do without thinking of the ultimate consequences. In my younger days there was a saying: “To the hills men….. the shovels broke!”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Anthony D'Auria Posted by: northofthecity
Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

What a horrible mess former Pres. Dubya caused!
Posted by: Jay Randal on Mar 19, 2009 12:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow no end to the destruction Bush has caused. Homeowners and renters screwed over by banksters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Renters and Owners Left Homeless
Posted by: matt_gerchow on Mar 19, 2009 2:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether its property owners or tenants, when people cannot pay the mortgage and they are forced to leave the property...where do all these people go?

As everything rolls down hill, where are all the people at the bottom of the hill going to live?

We are still a long ways from getting out of this crisis, but at the end of the day, we will all survive.

Regards,

Matt Gerchow, CEO
Real-Estate-Investing.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: enters and Owners Left Homeless Posted by: northofthecity
» Same place as always Posted by: Karina

Comments are closed-

Excellent article. Renting isn't safe either.
Posted by: Zipidee DooDah & Dipidee DooDog on Mar 19, 2009 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tell you, I've come across countless others who panic and think that renting is the only way out. It ain't. In fact, renting can often times turn out to be more costly than buying itself. Plus there's no tax deduction for renting which made a huge difference for me. These past two years, after moving out of my filthy apartment to a home which I saved money for and was able to get a reasonable price on it and responsibly so, I noticed a huge difference in paying my taxes. No longer do I have to pay the motherfucking IRS 7000-10000 dollars a year but I'm now getting 3000-5000 is tax refunds ! What is needed is tax cuts for those who rent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

renters
Posted by: jmndodge on Mar 19, 2009 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of these people will not show up in the reports. I could guess that few will find rents cheaper than the places that they were forced to leave, nor will many find places closer to their work/school/neighborhood communities cutting down on transportation costs. With moving expenses on credit cards, (when available) higher rents, likely additional transportation expenses, and perhaps loss of jobs during the disruption in their lives, these people will suffer for years to come. Children changing schools, will more likely suffer from the transfer, although a few might discover a new school or teacher who really makes a difference for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: renters Posted by: snax
» RE: renters Posted by: and_abottleofrum

Comments are closed-

Landlesss Peasant Fucks
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Mar 19, 2009 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
google the banker manifesto of 1892

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Landlesss Peasant Fucks Posted by: northofthecity

Comments are closed-

Escrow accounts question
Posted by: anna_2 on Mar 19, 2009 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not understand why security an last months rent should disappear they are suppose to be in escrow account: who gets this money?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: scrow accounts question Posted by: gar1948
» RE: scrow accounts question Posted by: katjac2

Comments are closed-

Am I the only one who gets annoyed by all these bitter "homeowners" -
Posted by: and_abottleofrum on Mar 19, 2009 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as if people who still have twenty-years' worth of mortgage payments before their paid up really own the property - whining about how bad it is paying mortgage?

Most should have seen this crash in property values coming. Everyone has probably heard the saying that if it sounds too good to be true, for example property values skyrocketing for years in a row, then it probably is too good to be true. This is common wisdom that seems to have been lost on millions upon millions of whiners.

I think most were just blinded by greedy visions of using idle residential land as an investment from which to profit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

renters are probably getting screwed worse...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Mar 19, 2009 3:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
many renters have faithfully paid their rent only to have the sheriff show up to throw them out...because the OWNER didn't live up to his/her end of the bargain...seems to me there should be some way for the bank and the renter to work out some kind of arrangement so the renter can stay...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Yes, but some rents are cheaper
Posted by: dayahka on Mar 19, 2009 3:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Granting your points does not exclude there also being good news, that rents in some areas are down and rentals more plentiful. In my area, I have watched rental prices go down by 20-25% in the last few months.

As for the possible losses, well it all depends on how new you are. Some places require a 6 or 12 month lease, with two months deposit--in case you make a midnight run for the border or wreck the place. After that, it's usually month to month and your deposit could be reduced to just one month's worth, which means you'd lose only at most one month's rent if the bank threw you out. So, that's not too bad, as many places deduct for cleaning and so on from your deposit, and many people just leave and forget the deposit as a loss as they take off for what they make think is greener pastures.

You face these risks even in a good economy. And if you check out your apartment house before you move in, you lessen the chances of your being ripped off. Many small landlords make good money off their rentals, even if only partially filled, enough to pay any mortgage and also leave themselves a princely sum to live on.

So, basically, I don't think this is as dire a situation as you make it out to be. You're just joining the gloomy doomer crowd with yet one more "sky is falling" scenario.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes, but some rents are cheaper Posted by: northofthecity
» RE: Yes, but some rents are cheaper Posted by: northofthecity
» RE: Yes, but some rents are cheaper Posted by: northofthecity

Comments are closed-

Anthony D'Auria
Posted by: Tony D on Mar 20, 2009 12:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What really bothers me is the fact that we have given these banks billions without any strings attached and meanwhile the banks show no sympathy for the mortgage holders. Every time you turn around the banks are spending their bail out money without the slightest thought of the suffering that is occurring amongst those who have had their homes taken from them. There should be a moratorium on foreclosures because the stupid bankers are going to do the foreclosure thing until they ruin themselves and the country. They seem to act like robots without any critical thinking, just a list of things they must do without thinking of the ultimate consequences. In my younger days there was a saying: “To the hills men….. the shovels broke!”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Anthony D'Auria Posted by: northofthecity
 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS