Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Expanding the World Wide Web Isn't So Good for the ... World

By Stan Cox, Prairie Writers Circle. Posted March 20, 2009.


The feds are spending $18 billion to stimulate the Internet -- and that means a huge increase in energy consumption.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
7 Reasons for Atheists to Celebrate the Holidays
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
10 Ways to Screw Over the Corporate Jackals Who've Been Screwing You
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Congress Gets Its Act Together: Repeals Ban on Syringe Exchange Funding, Allows D.C. to Enact Medical Marijuana Program
Bill Piper, Naomi Long

Environment:
Copenhagen Talks End With Agreement, But No Binding Deal: So, How Screwed Are We?

Food:
Quitting Meat Is at the Heart of 2009's Health Zeitgeist, And Author Kathy Freston Is Leading the Debate

Health and Wellness:
Health Care Reform Is Not Reform If It Denies Women Coverage
John Nichols

Immigration:
Immigration Police Are Keeping Secret Jails on U.S. Soil
Jacqueline Stevens

Media and Technology:
Is Handwriting Going the Way of the Dodo?
Anne Trubek

Movie Mix:
James Cameron's Wizardry in 'Avatar' Movie Demands Being Witnessed on the Big Screen
Wajahat Ali

Politics:
Howard Dean Is a Genuine Hero: Taking on Corporate 'Centrists' Like Lieberman
David Sirota

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Can Boob Jobs Serve the Public Good?
Alexandra Suich

Rights and Liberties:
Pockets of White America Are in the Throes of an Existential Crisis
Rich Benjamin

Sex and Relationships:
Guess What? Casual Sex Won't Make You Go Insane
Ellen Friedrichs

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
NASA Report Highlights Need to Retire Drainage Impaired Land in California
Dan Bacher

World:
$57,077.60 -- That's What We're Paying Each Minute for the Occupation of Afghanistan
Jo Comerford

More stories by Stan Cox

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The recently passed federal stimulus package contains $18 billion to stimulate the Internet. Technology fans are looking to that planet-wide digital organism to help revive our economy.

But it's an organism nourished by electricity, and lots of it. The Internet's escalating power consumption stands as a warning that the engines of economic growth can't run without depleting resources and cranking out wastes.

The servers and large data computing centers that run the Internet and other computer networks doubled their energy use between 2000 and 2006, the Environmental Protection Agency estimates. Add in the power used by computers and peripheral equipment in homes and commerce, along with a projected 75 percent further growth in data centers by 2011, and the system's electricity needs will exceed the total current consumption of 18 million average American households. The EPA says that by 2011 the peak load placed on the power grid by servers and data centers alone will require the output of 25 typical coal-fired power plants.

The national digital network doesn't rank among America's largest energy hogs, but it's no cute little piglet either. Demand projected for 2011 would sop up Mexico's entire current production of almost 200 million kilowatt hours, or by 2014, Australia's. That it's a small slice of the national electricity pie reflects more than anything just how big that pie is.

The harder and faster computers "think," the more power they require. Each generation of technology, from the vacuum tube to today's advanced processors, has handled more information per watt, but that efficiency has always been harnessed to push speed and output higher, not to save energy.

The industry produces tinier chips and bigger, hotter arrays of chips every year. A large share of the wattage going into a data center ends up as waste heat, so 40 percent or more of a center's energy use typically is for air conditioning. Running and cooling a single 6-foot-high rack of servers occupying 7 square feet of floor space can consume as much power as 30 typical California homes. Thousands of these racks in rooms or buildings ranging into the hundreds of thousands of square feet can have city-sized power demands.

Internet exponents claim that this vast expenditure of energy is more than canceled out by the many resource-efficiency gains that computers make possible. But such gains, where they have occurred, appear to be getting blotted out by our general resource use.

For example, electronic communications were expected to cut paper use, but savings have been slow in coming. Paper consumption for all uses in the United States hit a peak of more than 700 pounds per person annually in the 1990s, a 25 percent increase over the 1970s, before e-mail. A 3 percent drop in paper use in the 2000s may mean that computerization is finally having an effect.

Online marketing was supposed to help limit the size of the brick-and-mortar retail world and keep shoppers out of their cars. But retail floor space per American grew 12 percent from 1995 to 2003. Mall space grew by 34 percent per capita. Now a recession rather than digital shopping has finally slowed that growth.

It's widely anticipated that videoconferencing and telecommuting will substitute increasingly for business travel. But industry data show that, aside from a short post-9/11 slump, U.S. business travel marched upward at a steady rate of 5 percent per year from 1990 through early 2008.

Thanks to the economy's plunge, business travel fell off sharply in the last half of 2008 and is sure to fall further. In light of that and similar downtrends, the time may have come to enlist the Internet in the cause of saving energy.

Hard times might present electronic communication and virtual travel with their best opportunities yet to substitute for the costly hauling of live human beings and bulky goods or the paving of more big-box parking lots.

But conservation won't happen automatically. Today, a big share of the energy going into data centers -- and the waste heat coming out -- is aimed at persuading Internet users to consume more of everything, to convert more matter and energy into waste somewhere else. If the digital infrastructure is to help curb resource consumption rather than push it higher, all that power will have to be aimed in a different direction.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: environment, internet, google, yahoo, servers, data centers

Stan Cox is lead scientist for the Land Institute in Salina, Kan., and author of "Sick Planet: Corporate Food and Medicine." He wrote this comment for the institute's Prairie Writers Circle

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement