COMMENTS: 12
America Is a Dangerous Vigilante, Heroes Are Sociopaths: The Not-So-Mythical World of 'Watchmen'
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Watchmen -- the astonishing and reverent adaptation of Alan Moore's classic graphic novel -- brings to life a fascinating alternate world; a 1985 in which the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union is an omnipresent threat. The conflict is on the verge of going nuclear, and the Doomsday Clock inches inexorably towards midnight. Public fear is reaching a breaking point, and it appears that nothing and no one can prevent humanity's extinction
Not even our superheroes.
This is the brilliant conceit of Watchmen: The book and movie are set in a recognizable world, only one inhabited by actual superheroes.
It's a world vastly different from any previous depiction in comics. For one thing, anyone adopting the persona of a vigilante and dressing in costume to fight crime is a borderline personality. More significantly however, is that if a Superman did exist, and if he did in fact fight for "the American Way" -- the way Kal-El did in the Superman comics -- then this would profoundly distort the global balance of power.
In this alternate 1985, masked superheroes -- more accurately, vigilantes -- have been a fact of American life for more than a generation, having burst on the scene in 1939, only to be banned by the federal "Keene Act" in 1977 after large-scale strikes by the police led to anarchy.
However nominally it may be about these costumed vigilantes, Watchmen's most significant vigilante is actually the United States itself: having outlawed them domestically, America nonetheless reserves for itself the right to employ the godlike powers of one superhero and the psychopathic violence of another to "shock and awe" its foes in foreign wars and to topple Marxist governments.
Author Alan Moore and illustrator Dave Gibbons intended Watchmen as a meditation on power, and their relentless deconstruction of our notions of the heroic is closely tied to their views on the exercise of geopolitical power -- as one of the many books-within-a-book in the graphic novel put it, it's about the relationship between "Super-powers and the Superpowers."
The film's one all-powerful character is Jon Osterman (Billy Crudup), a physicist whose nuclear accident in 1959 transformed him into a super-being that the U.S. government (with the intention of intimidating other nations) dubs "Dr. Manhattan."
Living outside of linear time, able to teleport himself anywhere in the universe and to rearrange matter at will, Dr. Manhattan is objective to the point of indifference, and while he works for the government, he feels no moral foundation for his actions. Having him act for the U.S. military results in a Republican's wet dream: he annihilates the Viet Cong, leading to a victory in Vietnam (which in the novel eventually becomes the 51st state) and a series of re-elections for term-limitless President Richard Nixon.
The other Watchman working for the government is the Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan), a sociopath and rapist who enjoys dealing out death and pain. He fought in Vietnam, and is shown to have been the "grassy knoll" gunman who assassinated President John F. Kennedy. As he goes on a rampage against a mob of demonstrators, another Watchman despairingly asks him, "What happened to the American Dream?" he replies, "It came true! You're looking at it!"
Between the omnipotent amorality of Dr. Manhattan and the immorality of the Comedian, the United States has achieved unquestioned global dominance. However, when the Comedian is killed in the opening scenes, and Dr. Manhattan later leaves Earth for Mars, America is suddenly stripped of its invulnerability. Nixon (Robert Wisden) and his generals retreat to an uncanny reproduction of the war room in the film Dr. Strangelove.
It is now up to the film's remaining characters -- despite their lack of actual superpowers -- to solve the mystery of The Comedian's murder and prevent the end of the world.
Leading the investigation is the implacable Rorschach (Jackie Earle Hailey), a mentally disturbed vigilante once known as Walter Kovacs, who has spent years facing down the criminal underworld. He is joined by his onetime partner Dan Dreiberg, the Night Owl (Patrick Wilson), a Batman-esque scientist with an array of high-tech gadgets and vehicles, as well as Laurie Jupiter, the Silk Specter (Malin Akerman), a companion to Dr. Manhattan. The most powerful of them all is Adrian Veidt, aka Ozymandias (Matthew Goode), a tremendously fit and intelligent multimillionaire.
Moore (who has disassociated himself from the film and removed his name from the credits) and Gibbons used these characters to thoroughly deconstruct the traditional superhero. These "masks" are either deeply flawed, mentally disturbed or morally dubious. They have, with no real justification or authority, laid claim to powers not available to their fellow citizens. For all their presumption, however, they are collectively unable to succeed, either as crime fighters or saviors.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Woodpecker on Mar 12, 2009 3:58 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyway superheroes(irrespective of their declared politics) tend to be status quo and conservative!
(Iron Man is probably more to the Right than Captain America, but they are both pro-Establishment)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Mar 12, 2009 4:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Children grow up believing it's the strong who are right, and if you pay attention, notice it's also the loud guy wins.
There is no negotiation, no discourse.
Until we learn the lessons shown in this film, (by "we" I mean right wing conservative blow hards and their followers) then our people will always be ugly Americans.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Well put
Posted by: NWCrow
» RE: Might makes Right (Don't hold your Breath!)
Posted by: javajoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Adastra on Mar 12, 2009 9:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Immortality (one of man's favorite daydreams) would be a curse before too many centuries had gone by. We humans have limited memory storage, very great capacity, but ultimately limited. How long before the memories begin to be lost to make room for others? How satisfying is a life in which you literally can't remember what happened yesterday? or can't remember what important thing you had planned for tomorrow?
I can't think of any fantasy that doesn't become a horror story when pushed to the limit. Better to keep our fantasies as entertaining fiction than try to realize them. As a great French author once wrote, "Qui veux faire l'ange fait la bete," or in English, "Whoever tries to be an angel becomes a beast." We were designed (by God or by evolution)to be human, angelic nature is incompatible with humanity.
With love under will,
Bob, Adastra,
The Wizzard of Jacksonville
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: That would change with new tech even now growing
Posted by: fred_53_99
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PrinceRobert on Mar 12, 2009 11:54 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unitedstatesofstupidity on Mar 12, 2009 7:22 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry there's some blood in it. There's a bit of that in real life too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PeaceLove on Mar 12, 2009 8:02 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a dark, depressing, dystopian film. I can't imagine anyone watching (or reading) The Watchmen and thinking the violence it contains is in any way fun, glamorous or glorious.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittynboi on Mar 13, 2009 4:52 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While we may find anti-violence, anti imperialist messages in this film, the book ends on a MUCH more ambivalent tone in regards to the morality of what occurs, leaving the future, and whether anyone was simply right or wrong, very unclear.
This is not the first time viewers, readers, and directors have muddled Moore's ideas. V For Vendetta shared some of the same problems, and Moore himself derided the V for Vendetta adaptation for being written as a liberal vs neocon story, with little to no mention of Anarchism vs Fascism. Like Watchmen, the film of V for Vendetta messed up the ending, and the overall tone of the original book, which was much more ambivalent as to the "right and wrong" of what was going on in the story.
Moore has said that he does not like putting for a simple "This is right, this is wrong" message in his works, and when moviemakers do so to make it more palatable to audiences, they end up betraying the basic premise of what is being adapted.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Mar 14, 2009 3:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*the LIGHT! an American has finally SEEN THE LIGHT!"
maybe there is hope for Humanity, yet...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Mar 15, 2009 9:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
On Anniversary of Iraq Invasion, Time to Rethink Anti-War Activism
The Timing Is Ripe for Obama to Make Demands on Israel to Settle for Peace
How Many Mexican Drug War Deaths Can We Attribute to U.S. Pot Laws?




