Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Out of Respect for Human Decency, Obama Should End the Drug War

By Silja J.A. Talvi, In These Times. Posted March 6, 2009.


This is the right political moment for Obama to enact major progressive reforms in all avenues of the drug war and our justice system.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why the End May Be Coming for Coal
Christine MacDonald

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Study Claims Even the Most Sophisticated Readers Can Be Manipulated
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Silja J.A. Talvi

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

President Obama faces a heap of crises: a major economic recession, crumbling national infrastructure, and ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Buried in that heap is another war, one less present in public discourse but no less toxic: the drug war. The concentrated battleground of the drug war has been on domestic soil, with America’s so-called interdiction efforts spreading the fight across the world, from poppy-rich Afghanistan to the coca-nurturing Andes to the most brutal battlefield of them all, Mexico, which saw more than 5,600 drug-related murders last year, including several that involved publicly displayed decapitations

With the Obama administration, many see an unprecedented opportunity for meaningful criminal justice/drug war reform. Much of that hope stems from Obama’s seven-year track record as a state senator in Illinois—a state with one of the nation’s largest prison populations. In Springfield, Obama sponsored more than 100 bills on crime, corrections, treatment, re-entry, racial disparities and the death penalty that were mostly (though not exclusively) progressive in nature.

He also gained respect among younger voters for his willingness to talk candidly about his teenage drug use, and his present-day battle with nicotine addiction. During a campaign stop at Northwestern University while running for the U.S. Senate in 2004, Obama told a crowd of students that he supported decriminalizing marijuana (a position he no longer supports publicly). More significantly, Obama flatly stated that “the war on drugs has been an utter failure.”

“Most of what Obama has said previously on criminal justice issues has been good,” says David Borden, director of the Drug Reform Coordination Network in Washington, D.C. “If he carries some of that into office, we could see an enormous change in the direction of the drug war and sentencing policies. That said, criminal justice reform, especially when it comes to drugs, has always been the first issue the Democrats drop when it looks like they’re being called ‘soft on crime.’ “

Marc Mauer, director of the Sentencing Project in Washington, D.C., agrees with this cautious optimism.

“The political climate on crime issues has shifted significantly over the last 10 years or so,” says Mauer. “At the national level, there’s a modest but growing bipartisan movement for more rational policies. We see it most clearly around prison re-entry issues.”

After years of operating on the margins of political discourse, drug war and criminal justice reform movements have reached a new plateau of recognition and respect. Conservative lawmakers, law enforcement associations, health professionals and religious groups have joined the call for fiscal, legislative and social changes in our approach toward criminality. Even mainstream civil rights groups, which often shied away from directly addressing the injustices of the drug war and the class and ethnic disparities in arrest and sentencing rates, have grown more comfortable allying themselves with criminal justice reform.

Yet mainstream Democrats have continued dragging their feet—to the point of pushing the kind of punitive legislation championed by President Reagan.

“We’ve seen this for over 30 years now, that Democrats have often been reluctant or even hostile to the idea of embracing criminal justice reform,” Mauer says. “Our strategy is to continue to reach out to Republicans and conservative constituencies to develop broad support for some of these reforms. We need to give Democrats a comfort zone … a sense that they’re not being ‘too out there.’ “

The Second Chance Act, signed into law in April 2008, provided just such a comfort zone for Congressional Democrats and Republicans alike. Introduced by Rep. Danny Davis (D-Ill.) and Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah) in the House and by Sens. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) in the Senate, the act was signed into law in April 2008. It was a remarkable step forward for a country that had all but turned a blind eye to sky-high recidivism rates for decades on end. (Of nearly 752,000 people released from U.S. prisons annually, two-thirds will be re-arrested within three years.)

The Second Chance Act provided an initial $362 million in federal grants to government agencies, as well as community and faith-based organizations, for the purpose of providing employment assistance, substance abuse treatment, housing, family programming, mentoring, and other social services known to reduce re-offending and drug addiction relapse. Unfortunately, the Democratic-controlled Congress has yet to authorize that funding.

States Take the Lead


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, drug reform, war on drugs, prisons

Silja J.A. Talvi is an investigative journalist and the author of Women Behind Bars: The Crisis of Women in the U.S. Prison System (Seal Press: 2007). Her work has already appeared in many book anthologies, including It's So You (Seal Press, 2007), Prison Nation (Routledge: 2005), Prison Profiteers (The New Press: 2008), and Body Outlaws (Seal Press: 2004). She is a senior editor at In These Times.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
END THIS DAMNED DRUG WAR NOW!
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 6, 2009 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of the reforms mentioned here are designed to stave off reform. To make the status quo of the drug war more palatable and to undermine criticisms about the Jim Crow cognitive dissonance that is the prohibition of drugs.

Even Talvi's analysis evades anything that would truly give offense to the status quo of the drug war. He mentions that the U.S. Conference of Mayors, in 2006 passed a resolution for '“fair and effective” sentencing policies.' But he does not mention that in 2007 the U.S. conference of Mayors passed a much bolder resolution stating plainly that the war on drugs has failed.

"NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the United States Conference of Mayors believes the war on drugs has failed and calls for a New Bottom Line in U.S. drug policy, a public health approach that concentrates more fully on reducing the negative consequences associated with drug abuse, while ensuring that our policies do not exacerbate these problems or create new social problems of their own; establishes quantifiable, short- and long-term objectives for drug policy; saves taxpayer money; and holds state and federal agencies accountable.."

"NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the United States Conference of Mayors believes the war on drugs has failed...

Get it folks? This is not a call for sentencing reform. this is a denunciation of the policy that is sentencing people, in its entirety and without equivocation.

The mayors of America are the front line elected administrators of our cities who must mop up the blood left in the streets by the drug war. They represent an elective majority of America's urban population. This is not some minor group of activists but the leaders of our nation's cities.

Talvi goes on to write, in support of these baby steps that effectively leave the nation's population under the thumb of the prohibition: "Legislators and politicians have begun to realize that these kinds of reforms are much more likely to garner public support than ever before.."

Recent polls suggest that nearly a majority of Americans want marijuana, the drug responsible for most arrests, outright legalized. Writing pabulum like this does only reinforces for politicians their comfort zone in the status quo of ignoring the wishes of the people.

And if Americans comes to realize that that the economic paradigm that the drug war imposes is actually responsible for funding the crime and and stateless terrorism that threatens our borders and our forces in Afghanistan the population of this nation will rise up and boot these status quo drug war pandering politicians out of office. Maybe even with impeachments for ignoring their constitutional mandate to "establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare". The status quo of the war on drugs specifically violates these fundamental founding mandates that these drug war status quo pandering politicians swore to uphold and defend.

LEAP has it right. And most everyone else in the national reform leadership are DEAD WRONG! Maybe its because, unlike the former police and justice system experts of LEAP most drug policy reform leadership has too little practical experience with the harms of the drug war that they are supposed to be working to reduce.

The incremental approach is all well and good for people in nice offices who have budgets for conferences and the like. But their baby step of sentencing reform does nothing to stop people from being thrown into jail and brutalized by the policies that Joe Biden, Barack Obama and the majority of the cabinet of the current administration have helped to maintain.

END THIS DAMNED DRUG WAR NOW! this is the only viable strategy that deserves any consideration or support in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Please excuse my grammar Posted by: aahpat
» RE: Cash Cows... Posted by: Cybershaman
» No testicular fortitude Posted by: aahpat
» Good thing we have ovarian fortitude Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: END THIS DAMNED DRUG WAR NOW! Posted by: Jim Swanson
» He can't. Posted by: rickiey
Move to a cash free society
Posted by: lazloman on Mar 7, 2009 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything is already in place to do this. Drugs and other crimes are facilitated, by the anonymity of cash. Eliminate cash, and you effectively eliminate whole classes of crime. Privacy is a major issue with this, but since we've already given up most of that with debit and credit cards, just close the cash loophole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Less freedom is un-American Posted by: aahpat
» RE: Less freedom is un-American Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» theres only one problem... Posted by: Annapurna1
» RE: theres only one problem... Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» no..they cant use a helicopter... Posted by: Annapurna1
» RE: Move to a cash free society Posted by: robert.noll
voters see the drug war as a war.. not prohibition...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Mar 7, 2009 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and as long as this cultural narrative persists..voters will continue to demand escalating the drug war..no matter how damning the facts and figures may be...

to put yourself in their shoes..just pretend its 1942 and ask yourself if we should fork over california to the japanese in order to avoid the cost of fighting WW II...

sad but true..american voters have a similar view about legalizing marijuana.. let alone all the drugs...

compounding the WW II narrative is the fact that the drug war provides oppressed individuals with someone to feel strong over...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» changing the narrative Posted by: aahpat
» RE: it is our government Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Government prohibits responsible regulation
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 7, 2009 12:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is the government that prohibits society from regulating the criminal and terrorist anarchy out of the distribution of drugs. As a result the free world suffers under the burden of well funded gangsters, cartels and stateless terrorist armies.

Guns proliferate due to the demand for cheap and easy to get guns by the drug gangs. This demand subsidizes all demand for guns by would-be creeps looking to escalate their criminality with deadly force. We do not need more gun regulation. We need some drug market regulation.

the Taliban get 70% of their funding from drugs and protecting drug gangsters. We could severely weaken the Taliban, without firing a shot or increasing our troop strength in Afghanistan by medicalizing and prescribing addictive drugs the way Switzerland has been doing with great success for more than a decade.

As long as the demand for drugs in America goes unregulated the billions of dollars a year U.S. market will entice suppliers willing to commit any extreme atrocity and seek out any possible method undermine our border and protect their market share.

Regulate the criminal anarchy out of the markets. Put responsible adult supervision in control of sales, for a change, instead of the addicts and gangsters who today are happy to sell drugs to children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: AGANOMICS says No Regulations Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Most of us know at a gut level Posted by: kettleblack
» Better than your defeatism Posted by: aahpat
Obama & Democrats escalating and militarizing
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 7, 2009 5:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Will Obama Pull the Plug on the War on Drugs?"

Actually the drug warrior Obama administration is in the process of escalating and militarizing the drug war in Mexico and on our border.

There are hearings in congress this coming week on militarizing and escalating the drug war on the Mexican border. I have provided as much information as I can get together on it.

"Beating A Crescendo of Drug 'War Drums' in Congress"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wishful thinking
Posted by: EinMD on Mar 8, 2009 3:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Drug war is a waste of time, energy, money and time.

But Obama's not going to end it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep it simple.
Posted by: John Thomas on Mar 8, 2009 9:35 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talvi goes out of her way to avoid talking about individual "drugs." She even skips around the fact that Drug Czar Walters spent 90 percent of this time and resources fighting against marijuana reform. If we fall for this lumping strategy, we play right into prohibitionist hands. We don't have the same alcohol policy as we do tobacco policy as we do caffiene policy. Neither should we attempt to address "drug" policy or the "drug war." This is drinking the prohibitionist Kool-Aid and letting them frame the debate.

85 percent of the entire "illegal" drug market is marijuana sales. Polls show most Americans now want an end to marijuana prohibition.

Those two facts tell us all we need to know about where to focus our energies.

Going with what the people are ready for will end the vast majority of the "problem." Once they see the sky doesn't fall with re-legalized marijuana, they will be ready to take a rational look at the exponentially smaller issue of the hard drugs.

As Julian Heicklen said, "Marijuana is the messenger, not the message. The lit marijuana herb is the torch of freedom!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep it simple. Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Keep it very simple. Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Keep it very simple. Posted by: John Thomas
» RE: Keep it very simple. Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Keep it very simple. Posted by: John Thomas
» Off-base assumptions, continued Posted by: siljatalvi
» Archived list of articles, cont. Posted by: siljatalvi
Is There No Human Decency??
Posted by: picket on Mar 9, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, there is no human decency when it comes to Drug Policy in the USA!!

The COPS are brutal, just look at the humiliation of human beings on the TV Show. BUT..the cops DO NOT make the laws..the Lawmaker is the one that acted interested when getting votes, now he/she has hands over ears. "LA la la I can't hear you."

MJ is a Schedule 1 drug...so we are told it has high potential for abuse, no current accepted medical use, not enough study to test it's safety. HELLO... Are we ready for another 70 years of these lies?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is There No Human Decency?? Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Human Decency is an Oxymoron? Posted by: kettleblack
Re-Legalize Marijuana through MERP Now!
Posted by: bcainw on Mar 9, 2009 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My name is Bruce W. Cain. I am the editor of the website www.newagecitizen. One of the other bloggers rightfully stated that Obama is out to escalate the Drug War by attempting to integrate the US and Mexican Military in order to "fight" the Mexican Drug Cartels.

I have a much better solution. Re-Legalize Marijuana under the MERP Model. As you will read about it below MERP will completely destroy the Cartels without firing a single shot nor suffering a single additional loss of life on either side of this unnecesary War. MERP will defund the Cartels because 70% of their revenue is from Marijuana which, under MERP, will be as legal to grow as beer is to brew.

I have known most of the moneyed activists throughout the years: Nadleman, Kampia, St. Pierre and many others. Like the dullards in the movie "Idiocracy" they just don't want to grasp the obvious:

We Need To Re-Legalize Marijuana NOW!!!

But oh no, not them. "We must muddle forward with "incremental" change instead they insist. This is no longer acceptable. I would recommend that you don't give another dime to DPA, NORML or MPP until they endorse and get behind the MERP Model. This is the only model that would truly defund the gangs and cartels. It is also the only model that will stop the border violence without firing a shot. Please help me get the word out on the MERP Model. It could be implemented in weeks if we could just simply ban together as mothers, fathers, smokers and non-smokers.

In the movie Idiocracy the dullards could not figure out why their crops were dying but it turned out the reason was they were spraying their crops with a "gatorade" like liquid. The hero almost gets killed by solving the problem. He substitutes water and the plants once more started growing.

Apply MERP to the Drug War and both peace and prosperity will once again start growing. Please trust me on this one. For more:

The MERP Project
The Marijuana Re-Legalization Policy Project (MRPP)
http://www.newagecitizen.com/MERP.htm

Please help realize the Re-Legalization of Marijuana in 2009. It can be done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Decriminalizing Marijuana Sends the Wrong Message to Kids . . .
Posted by: PaulK on Mar 9, 2009 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our kids aren't stoopid. They already get the dope message just listening to oldies. "Ground control to Major Tom..."

If we decriminalize pot we send the message that we're dealing with reality, which is, or which might be, a significant part of life, just maybe not as significant as our fantasy life about us keeping our kids safe from information.

If you want to send a message use Twitter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The "Wrong" message . . . Posted by: johnbradleycopeland
Out of respect for human decency
Posted by: weathered on Mar 9, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama should shit can Emanuel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pressure the Police, they are against drug reform
Posted by: ibolyap on Mar 9, 2009 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Police in North America are against drug reform. Civilian authorities are not effective in getting changes which would reduce the penalties for drug crimes because the police are against it. Look at meetings of police chiefs. They consistently reject laws which would remove marijuana for personal use from the books. They protect their turf and budgets by ensuring that they can continue to arrest people for minor drug offences. Getting the police to change their ways is very difficult because they are an effective lobby and they resist civilian oversight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's mixed signals - such as Holder as Atty General
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on Mar 9, 2009 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama has been sending mixed signals about the drug issue, as in his appointing a mindless drug warrior like Dick Holder (ha ha), I mean Eric Holder, to be Attorney General.

The moment IS right for change, and most of the public will support a change in direction now -- but next year might be a different story. Let's not wait for Obama, let's get some action from Congress and the state legislatures while the getting is good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» your blog looks good Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
Morality aside - prisons cost money and drugs can be taxed
Posted by: Outspokengrandmother on Mar 9, 2009 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs was for wealthier times. Supporting huge prisons with - what - a third of Americas population in the penal system...is crazy. We could tax the sale of drugs and save our state budgets....there is nothing smart or sane about the war on drugs....just profits for the few at the expense of the many (the many pay the taxes that support the profits of the prison industrial complex)...Ending the war on drugs makes good economic sense...I wonder if our politicians are sensible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Painted into a corner Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Painted into a corner Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
Want to end the Cartel vs. CIA drug Wars?
Posted by: Maxemum on Mar 9, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalize them!

Wake up America! Turn off ABCNNBCBS and Fix News.

infowars.com
whatreallyhappened.com
http://snardfarker.ning.com/page/radio-3
http://www.americansworking.com/index.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New York's Chance for Drug Reform...3/6/09 timesunion.com
Posted by: picket on Mar 9, 2009 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NYS Assembly has passed measures to reform the inhumane Rockefeller Drug Laws but the Senate members are really really concerned about the proposed shift from punishment to treatment.

The Senators may be persuaded to change their minds we are advised "if" there is a provision that the drug offender pleads guilty and be certified as addicted as a condition to be sent to treatment.

So if a citizen uses MJ and gets arrested he must be certified as being addicted?? Or, God forbid he grows a couple plants and sells an oz to his neighbor, he has to be certified as addicted to avoid the "big house?" Millions know that MJ is not in the true sense addictive. So what's another lie?

Cannabis should legalized and taken out of the PLAN. How many more hard working citizens
need to be made criminals? It is like a BEAST that is never full.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama and the Dems are in bed with Big Oil just like the Repugs.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 9, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only the Democratic Party had more Ralph Yarboroughs and not pro-Big Oil Dems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not only out of regard for human decency, -----
Posted by: symcokid on Mar 9, 2009 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but because the Feds will never be able to win the war on drugs anyway. If they could figure out a way to tax same then they might be winning in a sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drug War Facts
Posted by: Defenestrator on Mar 9, 2009 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drug War Facts (PDF)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ALL THE DRUG WAR IS DOING IS MAKING CERTAIN OLD FAMILIES RICH
Posted by: joeocho88 on Mar 9, 2009 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AND WE ALL KNOW WHO THEY ARE.

WE NEED LEGALIZE AND TAX THE PROCEEDS OF THE DRUG WAR.

OPIUM IS THE REAL REASON WE ARE IN AFGHANISTAN.

OPIUM IS ONE OF THE REAL REASONS WE WERE IN VIETNAM.

DRUGS ARE A MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR BUSINESS.

AND AS LONG AS THE DRUG CARTELS CAN KEEP ON BRIBING POLITICIANS, THE DRUG WAR CONTINUES.

WHAT A FARCE.

IT IS AS VIABLE AS PROHIBITION WAS IN THE 1930S.

PEOPLE IN MEXICO ARE DYING BY THE THOUSANDS BECAUSE OF THIS DRUG WAR --THE WAR AMONG RIVAL CARTEL FACTIONS.

I DO NOT USE DRUGS. I DO NOT BUY DRUGS. THAT IS MY CHOICE.

I AM TIRED OF SEEING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS BEING MURDERED BECAUSE SOMEBODY WANTS TO SMOKE WEED OR SNORT SOME COCAINE.

LEGALIZE IT, TAX IT AND STOP THE SENSELESS VILENCE AND BLOODSHED.

IT IS STUPID.

IT MAKES NO SENSE UNLESS YOU ARE A VERY WEALTHY AND INFLUENTIAL FAMILY WHO IS LIVING OFF OF THE ILLEGAL DRUG --AND QUITE A FEW ARE --GUESS WHO?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JT Barrie
Posted by: rimchamp77 on Mar 9, 2009 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The drug war is pure Stalinism [in Russian he is the man of steel or strength]. Drugs are the enemy of the country and undermine its strength. Those who are critics are weak on drugs and lack the resolve to support the government.
The failures are personal in nature: it's necessary to protect the country and is undermined by corrupt law enforcement and lack of resolve from the people to give the government enough "tools" to win this war. The fact that drug war profits enabled by drug laws fund other enemies only strengthens the Stalinist argument. Anyone who questions the drug war is suspected of giving comfort to the enemies: those who sell and use "dangerous drugs".

Can anyone think of a more Stalinist policy than the drug war? I didn't think so - which is why apologists are terrified of giving critics a forum to confront this policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JT Barrie Posted by: Sister_Lauren
you are living in a dream world if you think obama has any intention of ending the "war on drugs"
Posted by: rafaeltoral on Mar 9, 2009 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You obamatrons make me laugh. "Obama should do this". "Obama should do that". Look at what he has already done and figure out for yourself where he will go from here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cancer
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Mar 9, 2009 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read all sorts of stuff on the Internet claiming virtually everything imaginable in human experience. I tend to be rather cynical about outrageous claims - particularly "miracle" cures.

I don't believe in miracles but am well aware of death, because 3 of my 4 brothers and sisters are already dead through cancer - and my only surviving sister has also been diagnosed with cancer.

Many of my friends have cancer or are already dead from it.

The epidemic of cancer is very real. It was rare when I was a child.

Anyway from a link from here to another article on Alternet - I found...

Cannabis Cures Cancer - "Run From The Cure" The Rick Simpson Story

And downloaded it. It's 700MB and took quite awhile.

Its also available on Youtube and Google Video.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7331006790306000271

link

I've just watched it.

It's almost unbelievable - yet I believe the contents of it are true - and all the people involved with this film completely honest.

I suggest you watch it. It might not only change your mind but save your life.

Incidentally, I am well aware of the negative effects of cannabis. Whilst cannabis appears to have no negative effects on some people, in my personal experience, it does appear to have serious negative effects on others. Paranoia and Psychosis are very real dangers that can suddenly occur without warning particularly with individuals who have heavy regular use over several years - yet apparently no adverse effects. I personally know several people where this has occurred - including myself. I smoked it heavily for 5 years with no ill effects - and then one day went completely paranoid on my way to work - convinced that I was being followed. I then got over the paranoia but then became psychotic - like manically high that lasted for months during which time I was unable to work because I was too happy. My employer wouldn't let me in cos I had a great big smile on my face and talked complete nonsense. So I gave it up in 1985.

However being happy and useless is better than being dead with cancer.

Why won't my doctor prescribe it in small pure doses as a preventative, when there is such a high terminal incidence of cancer in my family?

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Crazy Diamond Posted by: 2dogarage
The Drug War is Treason
Posted by: Old Uncle Dave on Mar 9, 2009 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
War are not waged against things, they are waged against people!

The Constitution of the United States of America
Article III
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Check out this site

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Drug War is Treason Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Decency isn't in their game plan.....
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Mar 9, 2009 10:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when has our government been decent? I've been watching the idiots for years and I've never seen one ounce of it in their actions.

This government is the biggest importer of hard drugs than any Mafia could ever hope to be. Did you ever notice every time Mexico tries to bailout of it's 'Drug War Deal' with the US,something happens to them. Last time we just drove their economy into the dirt. Now they have 'cartels' killing folks right and left. Cartels we set up,managed and have operatives in, and yes Matilda they're killing people,just like they did when the FBI was in the Klan, deep cover means you do like the others or you get sniffed out. Any trouble south of the border,you can bet your last dollar the US is in it up to their eyeballs.

We make lots of money with the drug war. Yes I said 'make money'. We bring in the crap, dump it on the streets through our corrupted police forces, let them feed their snitches with it,bust folks,take their money,put the crap back out on the streets again and start all over. There's no way the government is going to give up this cash cow. Sure they let us know how much of our money they are stealing to finance this farce but they make ten times that in the recycling of drugs,money and snitches.

If the government was anything like the neo-cons 'Capitalism and personal Liberty' shitwagon they are pushing, there would have never been a 'drug war' because 'Personal Liberty' means 'We have the Right to Live as we Please'. Look around,if you find someone,that's not a billionaire, that has 'personal Liberty' I'd like to meet them.

It took 'The People' willing to stand at gunpoint for us to have a Bill of Rights. We may have to do it again. We don't need guns to get it done just a little courage. The courage to let others live without judgement,as far as drugs go. Stop calling the cops everytime you see someone smoking a joint. Stop calling the MEG Unit everytime you smell something 'funny' near someone's house. Stop being willing to squeal on everyone you know just because you got busted with a pipe. Truth is cops hate snitches as much as the rest of us. Show a little guts and take the 30 days for a pipe instead of turning on your friends or accepting the 2 year probation hook in you.

Unless we,as a Nation, push for total and complete legalization of all drugs,it's not going to happen. That does'nt mean 12 year olds get access to coke,speed,pot or herion,most drugs they get from the family medicine cabinet. No I mean ADULTS. If you're the legal age to go off and kill people for this most corrupt of governances then you're old enough to try drugs.

Truth is all street drugs can't even come close to killing off as many folks as,say, cigarettes do. Nor as many as booze does. Their combined total is almost a million lives a year. Perscription drugs do in almost 12,000
a year and all illegal drugs are responsible for less than 5,000 a year. Clearly the folks that do illegal drugs are much more in control of their habits than cigarette smokers,martini drinkers and perscription pill poppers.

Could we pay for total healthcare for all Americans by taxing the use,growing, and sales of drugs? YES!! Could we make farmers of folks that might not otherwise have a job? YES!! Can we create an upwelling of small businesses related to drugs? YES!!!

So why have'nt we done it? Because we elect spineless idiots that see how much money changes hands in DC and they become insane with ideas of 'Condemn and Control' and they wind up listening to even bigger idiots like Rush Limbaugh, himself a perscription drug abuser who bounced Doctor's like Coby,got caught and spent ZERO time in jail even though what he was doing was against FEDERAL LAW. Then again,Rush had the money to 'buy' Liberty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for a peace treaty in the war on drug users
Posted by: DignityForAll on Mar 9, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mar 5, 2009, The Economist calls for an end to prohibition and a legal, regulated market of all drugs.
"How to stop the drug wars – Prohibition has failed; legalisation is the least bad”

Feb 5, 2009 – United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture calls on UN member states to adopt a rights based approach to drug policies.

Mar 11-20, 2009, Vienna a UN commission will meet to set the course for the next 10 years of drug policy. But the US administration does not yet have a coherent drug policy, leading to calls for a one year moratorium. The UN meeting is closed, but see CNDBlog.org for news.

100 years ago in the US all drugs were legally available from a pharmacy, and use of cocaine, opiates, and cannabis was far lower than today. There was no "drug epidemic", addiction was a personal medical issue. The Pure Foods and Drug Act of 1906 mandated sensible accurate labeling of all drugs.

But ambitious and radical bureaucrats saw a great scapegoat issue in the "drug question" and pressed for ever increasing prohibitions to "tackle" the "evil" drugs. This demonized users of now prohibited drugs and increased unsafe drug use practices.

The drug war is a moral tragedy based from the beginning on corruption and lies.

Drug war is an utter failure, US judges.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

W'are so innocent: terrorism war, drug war,... the next to come
Posted by: Artra on Mar 9, 2009 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why people on top does not even hear the resonings about changing concrete particular problems? They even laugh at them.

In an intoxicated's sincerety moment they would tell you:

IT IS NOT DRUGS, IT IS NOT TERRORISM, IT IS BUSSINESS POLITICS STUPID! WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO GET IT?!

VIOLENCE AND DRUGS ARE MANAGED HERE IN USA AND ABROAD!

DON'T SPOIL A BIG WEAPONS DEAL -AND A BIG ECONOMICAL PROJECT WITH IT- COMMING SOON IN OUR BACKYARD!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: reality check Posted by: Sister_Lauren
International Drug Policy: Animated Report 2009
Posted by: DignityForAll on Mar 9, 2009 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Produced by an Oscar-winning studio for the Global Drug Policy Program of the Open Society Institute, International Drug Policy: Animated Report 2009 highlights some of the disastrous effects of drug policy in recent years and proposes solutions for a way forward."

"In the run-up to the March 2009 UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs meeting—where the future path of international drug policy will be determined—this film seeks to show that pursuing a "drug-free world" can lead to more harm than good."

7 1/2 minutes, highly recommended. The global drug black-market is 320 billion dollars! It's out of control and completely untaxed.

The UN crime chief says laundered drug money rescued banks in the crisis. Reuters, Jan 25, 2009.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please decriminalize drugs
Posted by: zrants on Mar 9, 2009 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fastest way to kill an industry is to cut prices by lowering product value. Marijuana grows like a weed. There is no reason to pay for it if you can grow it legally yourself. You can immediately cut the profit motive by decriminalizing it.

Many countries have decriminalized drugs, so there are a lot of examples of programs to choose them. The US should take a look at the results in these other countries and pick a plan that works for us

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Please decriminalize drugs Posted by: TheLimit
Random thoughts
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Mar 9, 2009 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The powder vs crack disparity has been that way for a long time, and yes it sure smells racist. That should change. It is all cocaine.

Califonia has been looking at legalization and early jail release for non-violent offenders as the state goes broke. It is coming to that in a lot of states, and it would be a huge money saver if they went to decim or legalization/tax/regulate scheme instead of incarcerating a lot of comparatively harmless potheads with real criminals. We are at the point financially where we need to choose our government's pursuits and objectives carefully, and this is being looked at.

I can see them legalizing or decriminalizing and taxing pot and maybe mushrooms. That would be about it. Legalization of stuff like crystal meth and LSD, and cocaine would never fly.

Maybe the decrim folks were using the wrong approach with trying to bring medical and hemp back on line and then decriminalization or legalization of pot. Approach it for what it is, and call the medical usage and hemp products nice side bonuses to legalization.

The other thing that legalization would bring would be the elimination of an entire criminal enterprise. There would be less violence over pot, as importers, distributors and dealers would pretty much be eliminated by the gardener down the street. That and taking users out of the justice system are about the most compelling arguments for legalization imho. It would save billions and lower crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you say "should", he doesn't have to do it. If you say MUST, then it's mandatory and for real.
Posted by: WYGunston on Mar 9, 2009 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyway, good luck getting that sucker to even try.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't be a whore for the Drug War
Posted by: jaylindberg@hotmail.com on Mar 9, 2009 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Order to make the Drug War work you need to control three things. The Drugs, The Money and the War. If you lose control of the drugs, the money generated will give them access to power, one way or the other.

The most dangerous part of the war is the political capital that can be bought by drug money itself. The function of controlling the war is the regulation of political capital. It's all about power and control or who gets the graft and who gets the shaft.

The drug war is not a waste of money, its a pillaging of assets. I have serious doubts that opponents to the war on drugs will ever figure that one out or deal with that reality honestly. If you want an honest answer about how to end this war, taking the corruption of our institutions into account, the answer is simple.

"The more I learn about the government, the more I appreciate the French Revolution. They will leave in cuffs or they will leave in a box.

Jay Lindberg

Author Of "Drug War Economics" the Machine behind the Madness. If you email me at jaylindberg@hotmail.com I will send you a PDF copy of the book for free. And I really mean free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't legalize drugs; Socialize drugs
Posted by: Gaubladt on Mar 9, 2009 5:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalizing drugs will create an extremely powerful lobby group that will dominate politics, and the media. Eventually, they will naturally align with right wing politicians, just like tobacco and alcohol lobbies. If drugs are legalized, then the organizations who distributed drugs will join with the Wall Street P.R. and advertizing firms. The tactics of both will combine. Wall Street will become even more vicious than it is currently. And P.R. firms are incredibly good at creating demand for product. Money when mixed with drugs is an incredibly toxic combination.
There is an alternative: Socialize drugs; have the government provide the drugs free to those who are willing to register as addicts. This would destroy the market. It would discourage dealers from turning new people on. Mechanisms could be installed that would discourage people from sharing their drugs with others. Also, emergency medical technicians could be present at the distribution centers to reduce the chances of death due to overdose. Along side distribution clinics, there could be rehab clinics to encourage addicts to get clean.
Socialization is a much better alternative to legalization, regarding the trade in opiates and alkaloids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Prohibition Speak Posted by: John Thomas
» RE: Prohibition Speak Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Prohibition Speak Posted by: John Thomas
» RE: Prohibition Speak Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Prohibition Speak Posted by: John Thomas
DRUG WARRIOR OBAMA SENDING TROOPS TO MEXICAN BORDER
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 9, 2009 5:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1,000 Troop U.S. Military Drug War Deployment

According to a March 9, 2009 Associated Press dispatch titled "Soldiers Sent to Texas-Mexico Border to Curb Drug War"

"One thousand soldiers are being sent to the Texas-Mexico border to help control the latest outbreaks of violence by Mexican drug cartels.

The move is the latest by the U.S. Government to try to free citizens from daily assassinations, kidnappings and beheadings."


Also today, from the American Forces Press Service, Chairman, President discuss U.S. support to Mexico

"The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and President Barack Obama discussed the situation in Mexico and the military capabilities that could assist the country in a March 7 conversation."
(snip)
"Obama and Mullen discussed what military capabilities might apply to the situation, the official said. This is not any kind of commitment, but rather is just a discussion at this point, the official emphasized."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He should
Posted by: Juven on Mar 9, 2009 6:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and should be getting rid of that pesky Patriot Act-- but I am not going to hold mty breath. This guy seems most concerned about taking away more rights and with the way the economy is going I can imagine this being a gue priority-- funny how he worries about taking away gun rights as the ship is sinking...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MINDTRVLR
Posted by: mindtrvlr on Mar 9, 2009 8:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS: STOP THIS IGNORAMOUS WAR ON MARIJUANA. POT NEVER HURT ANYBODY. I 66 YOA AND HAVE USED IT SINCE I WAS 22 AND HAVE NEVER HAD ANYTHING NEGATIVE HAPPEN TO ME. I AM A RETIRED DEPUTY AND NEVER ARRESTED ANYONE FOR POT. JUST MADE THEM DUMP IT OUT TO THE WIND. BESIDE, HALF OR MORE OF THE COPS I KNEW WOULD GET TOGETHER ON OUR DAYS OFF AND TOKE UP. IT IS A LOT BETTER THAN GETTING BLIND DRUNK AND END UP KILLING SOME INOCENT PERSON WHILE DWI. BELIEVE ME, I ARRESTED ANYONE AND ANYBODY I CAUGHT DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ANY HARD DRUG OR LIQUER. WE HAVE TO STOP PUNISHING INNOCENT PEOPLE AND RUINING THEIR LIVE OVER A SIMPLE THING AS A JOINT. NUFF SAID

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» thanks for that Posted by: 2dogarage
Cartoons from Prohibition, Part I
Posted by: DignityForAll on Mar 10, 2009 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anti-prohibition cartoons, all so relevant for today.

More entertainment: Satire from the Manhattan Institute, 1997, Don’t Legalize Drugs by Theodore Dalrymple.

Quote: "The extreme intellectual elegance of the proposal to legalize the distribution and consumption of drugs, touted as the solution to so many problems at once (AIDS, crime, overcrowding in the prisons, and even the attractiveness of drugs to foolish young people) should give rise to skepticism." LOL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ain't gonna happen, children
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Mar 10, 2009 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too many agencies are getting too much funding and sheer power from the WOD to let go if it all voluntarily. I suspect it'll be a case of prying it out of their cold, dead hands, or leaving things as they are. Not to mention that some of those cops, DEA and local, have been drinking the Kool Aide so long and continuously, they really do believe all the propaganda. So whatever the law says, those will always feel justified in setting up and nailing "addicts" by their definition, no matter how much they have to lie, cheat and bend or even break the law to do it. And as of now, of course, they essentially hve official sanction.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "War on Drugs" does more harm than drugs ever have.
Posted by: rasmus11 on Mar 11, 2009 2:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ridiculous "War on Drugs" has done far more to corrupt law enforcement worldwide than anything else.
The moronic "War on Drugs" does much, much more harm to families and society than drugs ever have.
The vast majority of what is described as "drug related crime" is actually prohibition related crime. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DRUGS ARE NOT ILLEGAL
Posted by: rasmus11 on Mar 12, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drugs are not illegal.
Only certain drugs are illegal.
Alcohol is nothing more than a legal recreational drug.
It used to be an illegal recreational drug.
When it was illegal, mobsters sprayed the streets of Chicago and New York with automatic weapons fire in their attempt to control the black market created by alcohol prohibition.
Law enforcement was corrupted by the prohibition of alcohol.
Now, adults can legally purchase alcohol and the violence associated with alcohol prohibition vanished when alcohol prohibition ended. The arguments against the prohibition of alcohol are equally valid when applied to Drug prohibition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gil Kerlikowske; Shill For Drug Gangsters, Cartels & Terrorists
Posted by: aahpat on Mar 14, 2009 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Obama appointed Gil Kerlikowske (transcript) as the latest drug czar, or Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. In other words Kerlikowske is the latest shill for the cartels and drug gangs of the world. The ONDCP is the U.S. government's official voice for preserving and protecting the drug gangster business, drug cartels and stateless terrorist armies that all thrive on profits derived from the continued illegality of drugs.

(more) at my blog, Aid & comfort

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough said.
Posted by: xmvince on Mar 17, 2009 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now end it PLEASE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement