Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Rick Santelli 'Tea Party' Controversy: Article Kicks Up a Media Dust Storm

By Mark Ames and Yasha Levine, eXiled Online. Posted March 3, 2009.


Debate heats up: How much are Rick Santelli and the Tea Party protests he inspired part of a project orchestrated by right-wing groups?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Mark Ames Yasha Levine

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note:  "I hope that the president and the final stimulus plan succeed." So writes CNBC pundit Rick Santelli in a recent public statement, one that's very much at odds with his on-screen persona as an instigator of a right-wing protest movement against Barack Obama's economic recovery plans. This is the man whose outraged rant against Obama's plan for distressed homeowners was viewed millions of times on CNBC.com and YouTube and sparked a backlash in the form of "Tea Parties" across the United States.

Santelli's reversal resulted from the controversy surrounding a Playboy article by journalists Mark Ames and Yasha Levine. The article, which was later taken down from Playboy's site after possible libel claims, exposed the connection between the right-wing group FreedomWorks and the online Tea Party organizers, and suggested that Santelli's tirade was a "carefully planned trigger" for the Tea Parties.

In addition to his public statement on CNBC, Santelli suffered the ignominy of canceling an appearance on Jon Stewart's The Daily Show this week, and further revelations and accusations are flying between Ames and Levine's ExiledOnline Web magazine and the New York Times and Atlantic Monthly blog, among others.

In a statement on the controversy, sent to me in the afternoon on March 3, Ames and Levine write:

"There has been a lot of speculation as to why Playboy removed our original article from its site. Let us put it this way: When you look at the fallout from our article -- FreedomWorks admits its role in the teaparty, Santelli issues a giant lawyer-penned opus about how he loves Obama, and CNBC (whose parent company is the megaconglomerate General Electric) frightens a bunch of Astroturfing Web sites into dropping Santelli's name and into revealing their own PAC sponsors -- then it's clear we hit the bull's-eye and stirred up the wrath of a very scary monster.

"Given all of this, it would not be unreasonable for one to consider the possibility (as many have) that the multigazilliondollar megabeast GE threatened the much smaller independent media company Playboy with a terrifying and expensive lawsuit, which, given the current financial crisis, is not something anyone but another GE-sized megabeast could cope with. 'Nuf said on that."

Ames and Levine summarize the controversy on their site:

"We publish an investigation into the fake-grassroots "Tea Party" protest campaign underwritten by rich Republican right-wing interests, exposing Rick Santelli's role as the launch event MC, and three days later, Santelli is bitch-slapped down by his bosses, he's canceled from the Daily Show, forced to issue a Bukharin-like confession, FreedomWorks confesses that it was behind it from the start, as we wrote, and every media outlet in the country from the New York Times on down is writing up the scandal.

"Yes, it's a victory for us and for the forces of independent journalism. Sure, we're doing a dirty chicken dance in the end zone now. But the truth is, it's a bitter victory, because we've also been forced to confront the awfully familiar face of America's own version of the Soviet Union at work: Giant scary corporations threatening and scaring smaller fish into censorship, while their bought-off minions in the media do their dirty work to try to protect the megaconglomerate's brand."

Ames' and Levine's story has also highlighted the various media conflicts of interest caused by overlapping business ties between the companies involved and reporting on the controversy. It also revealed that apparent critics of Ames' and Levine's report are tied to the subjects of the controversy. For example, Playboy has a deal in the works with NBC Universal, CNBC's corporate parent, for an upcoming film titled Playboy. The New York Times had to disclose that it has a content-sharing agreement with CNBC in its story on Santelli. While attacking the overall credibility of the original story, Atlantic Monthly blogger Megan McArdle -- who confirmed from FreedomWorks that it has indeed been involved in organizing the Tea Parties as Ames and Levine alleged in their story -- disclosed that she lived with a man who used to work for FreedomWorks and that he had engaged in the same kind of Astroturf PR stunts for the group that Ames and Levine reported on in their article. -- Jan Frel, AlterNet Senior Editor


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: santelli, koch, pr front, right-wing industries

Mark Ames and Yasha Levine are editors of eXiledonline. Ames is the author of Going Postal: Rage, Murder, and Rebellion: From Reagan's Workplaces to Clinton's Columbine and Beyond.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Damned liberal media bias!
Posted by: EinMD on Mar 3, 2009 5:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hundreds of thousands of people all over the world and in the US protest the Iraq war.. the media ignores it.

400 people tear apart ONE fracking teaback because they're afraid rich people will have to pay a slight increase in taxes and the media whores it out.

I'm getting about tired of this bullshit. For the causes of anyone who's not a Coultergeist or Dittohead to get any attention they have to start burning flags again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Damned liberal media bias! Posted by: legacyshooter
» Yes Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Yes Posted by: Bibsisis
The Tangled Web
Posted by: Malcolm Medgar on Mar 3, 2009 6:59 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US government has been hollowed out during the rise to absolute power of the corporations. Elections have become an elaborate “reality show” that plays out on corporate television for viewers entertainment. If you watch FOX, the reality is filtered through Rupert Murdoch’s Newscorp, NBC is General Electric news, CNN is Time/Warner news, ABC brings you into Disney’s world, and Viacom regularly checks the iconic CBS news department to make sure Edward R. Murrow is still dead and buried under a mountain of infotainment. That is when Viacom is not preparing America’s youth for slavery and death through MTV and B.E.T.

The actual counting of the American people’s votes is done by the corporations—giant defense contractor United Technologies recently moved to take the job off Diebold’s hands. Corporate sentinels, the lobbyists, roam the halls of government enforcing discipline among the hired hands, allowing the most servile to feed longest at the public trough. So the Congress has not passed legislation and the Supreme Court has not decided a case, in which significant wealth was involved, in favor of the people in thirty years. Each and every decision of all three branches of the US government now transfers wealth from the people to their corporate masters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Tangled Web Posted by: madmax427
Tea Party Pledge - Pass it Along
Posted by: seazen on Mar 4, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since there are so many false pretenders out there regarding the Stimulus Package, we should give them an opportunity to show how sincere they are to being against this effort. At any Tea Party event, we should simply provide them the opportunity to sign the Anti-Stimulus Pledge:


"Because Obama is turning the country into a Socialist State with the most recent Stimulus package, I hereby pledge that neither I, nor any member of my family, will ever accept any of the money or benefits contained within the stimulus package to include, but not limited to:
1. extended unemployment benefits
2. tuition benefits
3. jobs associated with the package
4. tax reductions or other benefits included therein
5.other Socialist programs including Social Security, Medicare, Food Stamps, VE Benefits, etc.
6. any other benefits not listed

Name:
Address:
Etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fire Santelli
Posted by: Democritus on Mar 4, 2009 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CNBC should do the honorable thing and fire Rick Santelli for pimping himself out to the Koch clan. While they're at it they should sack Larry Kudlow, too.

Ayn Rand is dead. Free-market capitalism is dead. Alan Greenspan and the zombie banks he created are among the walking dead. Isn't it time to pull the plug on the whole Wall Street mob?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Ayn Rand is dead" Posted by: xvictor
» RE: Can we dig her up to make sure? Posted by: wrinklemomma
To be fair to Rick.....
Posted by: xvictor on Mar 4, 2009 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While his rant may seem bias, he had lambasted Wall Street as well. He voiced strident complaints against credit derivative instruments in the video, those "financial weapons of mass destruction" as described by Warren Buffet long ago.

Quite frankly, I have to agree with his comments regarding those who bought too much house and then expect a public bailout. It may have been a simplistic argument but true nevertheless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: To be fair to Rick..... Posted by: Democritus
» RE: Opinions for sale. Posted by: jak
Where is Tyler Durden When We Need Him?
Posted by: kegbot1 on Mar 4, 2009 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The detonation scene from Fight Club: except it is GE's headquarters. And the execs are still inside.

And I would have loved to see a contingent of auto workers and steel workers wade onto the trading floor of the NYSE and beat the s**t out of Santelli and the rest of the jackals braying behind him.

Yeah, dreaming is free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is worthy of respect.
Posted by: thebeerdoctor on Mar 4, 2009 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Strange that the capitalist libertarian extremists hitch their star to the historic persona of Samuel Adams. Only the beer brewed with that name is worthy of respect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More like this
Posted by: Christian Southern Liberal on Mar 4, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Mark and Yasha. Our country needs more stories like this one. I especially like that you named names and am interested in what companies those names are linked to. We have the power to boycott the planners of these "right wing conspiracies".

BTW, I'm not wealthy, but I would donate to a media outlet that specifically targets the think tank/media connection. Especially those that send out "talking points" memos everyday to media talking heads. These practices need to be exposed. Again thank you for this investigative journalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More like this Posted by: zeek2
Just taking a page from the Obama plan
Posted by: donnal on Mar 4, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Johnson once said, "I can be fooled about many things, but I do know the difference between chicken salad and chicken shit". Believe me, more Americans are aware that these bailouts are chicken shit for those paying, and chicken salad for those who are feeding from these bailouts.

How could it possibly matter how we are pulling our voices together to organize. We have taken a page from Obama's book on winning, so expect more tea parties, protests, and voices to organize against Obama and Company.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CNBC = Cheerleading Nitwits for Business and Commerce
Posted by: gazooks on Mar 4, 2009 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's no media source more corrupting or contradictory to a rational, national sense of economic objectivity than the gushing stream of pro-corporate, perma-bull-shit-sewage ranting from the pom-pom, pro-pro-propagandists of CNBC. The FOX in the bidness henhouse.

This ubiquitous commercial megaphone of nonstop, market mania madness has been spewing it's financial fantasies to an audience ranging Commerce technocrats, top tier investment house advisors, trading floor snake-pit pros, and into the refinanced day trading dens of greed glazed retirees in a perpetual frenzy of pump and dump cyclic promotion.

CNBC is the media's hallucinogenic kool-aid stand for Wall Street scam-o-rama suck-cess. Now, junior salesman Santelli just had his spot shot at foisting the focus of responsibility defectively to the inheritors from his corporate sponsor originators in goonishly contrived emotionalism.

In a wearing strategy from erstwhile slicko media masters, decades of ever evolving disinformation and outright deception, the legacy of accessory to ruin is hopefully now to be shed. In the melodramatic theater of the CBOT as desperate incredibility now heaps, in crocodile rage, accountability on those tasked to counter effect the reality of a collapsing economy that they all promoted and cheered.

Visually, they'll have to roll out Maria Money Honey for the best pom-pom effect, alas, if only she didn't have to speak.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Looking for someone
Posted by: mike1997 on Mar 4, 2009 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excuse me people, but I'm looking for some people who seemed to have disappeared. Anyone seen the posters here who jumped all over the original posting of this story for having no evidence? Since the principles have now admitted they did it those supporters seem to have vanished?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do they even know what it means to "tea bag" someone??
Posted by: Defenestrator on Mar 4, 2009 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hilarious

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Hypocrisy of This Article Is Overwhelming
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Mar 4, 2009 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps Alternet would like to just occasionaly post a list of the organisations who fund it. A poster did some research about this several months ago and promptly got banned.

I try and be objective and non-political and attempt to understand all viewpoints. Left, Right, Up, Down etc. Some things I agree with, others I totally disagree and many I simply do not know.

It is not compulsorary to align yourself to one political tribe or faction of a tribe.

The important thing is to try and determine good sensible ideas and the truth of what is happenning and formulate solutions not based on political or ecomomic dogma - but on what is fair, just and stands a good chance of working.

I think it is fair to agree that we are currently going through a tremendous economic crisis that could have a totally devastating impact on ordinary people across the entire planet.

There are lots of ideas floating around from all political viewpoints. To just diss something because you think it has come from a political tribe that you are fundamentally opposed to is displaying your own prejudice and ignorance.

We are all rapidly disappearing down an economic black hole - maybe that is your objective. You are so convinced that our current economic system is so hopelessly corrupt that you want it to totally fail. You actually want the direst poverty and desperation.

If that is your objective - then fair enough. You may think the human race is totally destroying the planet and the only solution for the planet Earth is for the human race to destroy itself and you will do everything in your power to achieve this objective even if in effect it means your own personal destruction. You are dead - but the Whales will thank you.

With regards to criticism of the bail-outs - I have seen far more effective basic analysis and resistance even from well before November - from "right wing" sources than from the left.

If everything collapses it won't make any bloody difference what your political viewpoint is as you queue up at the soup kitchen.

But do you trust the people who are running the soup kitchen?

What exactly are they putting in the soup?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hello....? Posted by: jak
» RE: Hello....? Posted by: tony_opmoc
Has NBC come to it's senses!
Posted by: 2thepoint on Mar 4, 2009 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering much of the hardworking people in this country who do not benefit from this pork bill agree with him, I doubt anyone was pushing him to do that,other than he knew it would strike a nerve with the nation.

Also considering he works for NBC, that most liberal of stations, it surprises me they didnt come down on him for his honest opinions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Has NBC come to it's senses! Posted by: wrinklemomma
don't presume
Posted by: mike1997 on Mar 4, 2009 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gordon Brown. I'm a hopless anglophile, been to the UK a couple of times can't wait to get back. Not to mention I read anything I can get my eyes on regarding politics, political philosphy, history etc.

Why would you think I don't know the name of a major world leader?

Care to anwer any of the arguments I made against your first post?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: don't presume Posted by: tony_opmoc
parrotuya
Posted by: parrotuya on Mar 4, 2009 2:18 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't bash Ayn Rand for what these wing-nut wackos have done to our economy. These "free-market" capitalists misread the book and don't have the brain power to understand it.

"Who is John Galt?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: parrotuya Posted by: zola77
» RE: parrotuya Posted by: wrinklemomma
Protests all over the world...
Posted by: nihilozero on Mar 4, 2009 11:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, unfortunately, the wikipedia article on the current "2007-2009 financial crisis" hardly mentions it.
I've tried to add a section ==Political instability related to the financial crisis==, but I'll be surprised if it sticks -- despite the fact that threatened material security and civil unrest make up very much of the reason why this is a CRISIS. So yes... there have been serious protests about the economy all over the world but the mainstream press and even the supposedly impartial and "left of center" wikipedia casts a blind eye to the reality of the situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hello
Posted by: fartmuffin on Mar 6, 2009 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i think a tea party is a fine idea!! it is not just wealthy wall street types in favor of it, but real patriotic americans! this should be interesting to watch!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement