Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Why Some Cities Are Getting Drier as Skyscrapers Rise

By Christina Larson, Environment: Yale Magazine. Posted February 17, 2009.


Not only are cities impacted by their regional climate, they also shape it. And they way we build cities may determine how much rain we get.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Immigrants and Health-Care: What Part of LEGAL Doesn't Washington Understand?
Marielena HincapiƩ

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Christina Larson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It might seem like a cruel irony: While the growth of cities worldwide requires more water resources, urban growth itself may be a factor in creating a drier, or different, regional climate.

Take China's Pearl River Delta region, which in recent years has gone from being a regional backwater to being the center of the global manufacturing universe. Three decades ago, this area at the southern tip of Guangdong province, where the river spills into the South China Sea, was a relatively quiet spot, where farmers waved off mosquitoes buzzing in capacious rice paddies. Today the region, strategically situated just north of Hong Kong, is the industrial hub of the world's most prolific manufacturing nation -- home to some 50 million people and thousands of factories churning out toothbrushes, toys, computer parts and just about everything else that can be packed in shrink-wrap and shipped around the world. The region's new soundtrack is a constant whir of factory machinery, loading dock whistles and construction crews building ever more roads and apartment blocks on the outskirts of town.

In Shenzhen, one of its busiest port regions, nearly everyone is from somewhere else -- from other cities in China, from foreign companies and, especially, from the countryside. More than 95 percent of the workers on the assembly line are estimated to have flocked from nearby villages, a familiar pattern across China, where millions of people each year move to the nation's fast-growing cities. As they settle into factory dormitories and new high-rises, then turn on the faucet for cooking, showering and laundry, demand for water rises. Yet in precisely the same years that skyscrapers have soared and the sky has thickened with smog, rainfall in the region has declined. Why?

To untangle the connection, a team of interdisciplinary researchers compiled readings from 16 meteorological stations in the region, which they compared with maps charting urban growth, derived from NASA satellite data. Their study, published last year in the Journal of Climate, found that between 1988 and 1996, urban land cover in the Pearl River Delta increased 300 percent -- the equivalent of paving an area the size of Rhode Island in less than a decade. Meanwhile, during the dry winter months (the subtropical region's summer is influenced by the Asian monsoon cycle), rainfall declined. The team created a statistical model linking urban growth with winter rainfall; they found that each percentage point in growth correlated with a decrease of 2.44 milli-meters in rainfall.

A growing body of research, conducted in China and elsewhere, now shows that the way a city grows can have the effect of holding an umbrella, or in some cases turning on the sprinklers, over a city. Though debate remains over which factors (land cover conversion, urban topography and pollution) are most significant, scientists agree on the underlying principle: not only are cities impacted by their regional climate, they also shape it.

"Cities are modifying their own climates," says Karen Seto, associate professor in the urban environment at F&ES and a co-author of the study. "If you want rain, you need to start thinking about the way a city grows."

It might seem as though Shenzhen and other fast-growing urban areas -- from Dubai, to Bangalore, to Lagos -- sprung into being overnight. But to understand how cities influence climate, it's helpful to look closely at the process of converting fields to factories.

Seto's research focuses on what scientists call "land cover conversion" or, what Joni Mitchell crooned, to "put up a parking lot." When a forest, prairie or wetland -- or even a sand dune or arctic tundra -- is replaced by asphalt and concrete, the ground's ability to absorb and retain moisture changes. Simply put, water seeps into soil (to different degrees depending on the soil) but washes off pavement. At the same time, sidewalks and other urban surfaces absorb sunlight, whereas natural foliage reflects it. This contributes to the familiar "urban heat island" effect, where temperatures in a city exceed those in the nearby countryside. Of course, not all newly built parking lots have the same effect. "The types of landscapes that were converted [to pavement] have an impact," she says. "What areas were lost? And what was that land previously? Was that land formerly devoted to agriculture, or forest, or desert? Did the trees and ground absorb a lot of water, or not?" she asks, noting that planners do have a choice where to locate new interstates and residential communities.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, water scarcity, rain, urban development

Christina Larson is a journalist focusing on international environmental issues. Her reporting has brought her to seven provinces across China, as well as cities and villages in Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Greece. Her writing has appeared in The New York Times, The New Republic, Christian Science Monitor, China Environment Series, and The Washington Monthly, where she is a contributing editor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Inevitable growth of urban areas?
Posted by: lulugeez on Feb 18, 2009 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Urbanists the world over have taken on the mission of preparing for the "inevitable growth" of megacities.It is assumed that human habitat will be defined as urban, so it becomes necessary to contrive "livable" or "sustainable" forms of urban human habitation.

In the many reports on the massive migrations that have de-peopled the rural areas and led to the engorgement of cities, there is seldom reference to the causes of this migration. It is as though the process were a natural inevitability of human progress, or due to an idee fixe with the romance of life on the frontiers (in this case of a garbage dumps) of cool and groovy cities.

The process of depopulating the rural and agricultural areas is anything but natural, nor are the masses (counted in billions) of humans, who constitute the new urban poor, relocating for economic opprotunity or the bright lights of the big city. Most of this migration is the cause of government land use policies that are best described as neo-liberal enclosure acts.

Some reflection on the sustainablity of this model would be helpful. Is it really in the interest of humanity to evacuate the countryside, small farms and then huddle the dispossessed into cities? A question goes begging: If we succeed in voiding rural spaces of humans, what is to be done with the land? Is it really in humanity's interests to cede this territory to transnational agricultural interests and other extractive enterprises?

Another piece of the sustainability pie is democratic process. None of these massive migrations are the result of a process wherein citizens collectively concluded that their interests would be best served by a dam that would inundate their fields, or the surrender of their land for the benefit of monocultural export crops. Who among these emigres believed he/she would be going to a far better place, removed from the confines of custom and kin? Some states do provide housing, but what of the "right to the city" meaning the right to participate in the city's governance and design of the city's future. Even cities as small as 100 thousand have difficulty with democratic empowerment of the citizenry. What are the prospects in cities of 10, 20 30 million?

There will follow many comments about the comparitive "greenness" of urban living. New urbanists contrast mac mansions with multistory buildings--generically. It is more helpful to contrast the village of rice farmers with the mechanized conurbations, like in the Pearl River Delta, then have a look at the networks supporting these environments.

Contrary to Margaret O'Mara's assertion that "urban areas are where environmental policy should start", one would hope that it begin with the decisions that seal the fate of rural populations, deprive farmers of livelihood and self sufficiency, and the planet of models for sustainable living.

In trying to ameliorate the damages done by neo-liberal land use policies and the overbuilt urban environments these policies have created, urbanists, too often, operate as collaborators in the re-engineering of human habitat to suit the needs of global capital.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement