Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Media Hysterics About Supposed Cancer Link Nothing New

By Paul Armentano, NORML. Posted February 11, 2009.


So why does the mainstream media continue to get the story wrong when it comes to pot?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Paul Armentano

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

According to Google News, more than 750 media outlets — that’s 7-5-0, folks — have now weighed in on this week’s pot scare story du jour: “Smoking marijuana causes testicular cancer.”

So is there any truth behind the provocative headline? Some, but hardly enough to justify the media’s feeding frenzy.

Researchers at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research in Seattle matched 369 men with of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) with 979 healthy controls. Here’s what they found.

Men who self-reported having “ever used” marijuana had no statistically significant risk of testicular cancer compared to healthy controls who never used pot.

Men who reported currently using marijuana at least once per week, and who had started smoking pot prior to age 18, had an elevated risk compared to controls of contracting a type of testicular cancer known as nonseminoma.

Sounds scary, huh?  Well here’s the catch.

According to the federal government, millions of people smoke marijuana regularly. By contrast, diagnoses of nonseminoma, which typically affects males between the ages of 15 and 34, are extremely rare.

How rare?

Nonseminomas account for fewer than one half of one percent of all cancers among American men.

Further undermining the study’s hypothesis is this: Since the 1970s, the percentage of American males smoking pot has climbed dramatically. By contrast, incidences of nonseminoma have risen only nominally during this same time period.

Of course, this is hardly the first time the mainstream media has jumped ugly on cannabis. Around this same time last year, news outlets from Reuters to Fox News declared that marijuana posed a greater cancer risk than cigarettes. Only problem was that the study they were reporting on actually demonstrated the opposite.

So why does the mainstream media continue to get the story wrong when it comes to pot? Good question. You can read my abbreviated answer here. And while you’re on NORML’s site, get the skinny on what the scientific literature really has to say about any potential links between marijuana and cancer here, here, and here.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: marijuana, cancer, medical research, testicular cancer

Paul Armentano is the senior policy analyst for the NORML Foundation in Washington, DC.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nothing new here
Posted by: robertmc on Feb 12, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Same lies (slightly altered), same bullsquat, different decade.
...and they wonder why no one believes them

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why does the mainstream media continue to get the story wrong when it comes to pot?
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Feb 13, 2009 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good question, I think we should ask them. This story should be forwarded to the different media sources editorial departments with a query as to why they work to maintain this ignorance and anti-Hippie cultural bias.

I would hazard a guess it is a religious perspective. It will be found in the exact same places and proportions as the pro-Israeli and other pro-warmongering positions and messages.

It is their bias, their religious (and political) bias.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: five copies for my mother... Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Eight arrested in Phelps bong case
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Feb 13, 2009 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eight arrested in Phelps bong case

We've now learned that since investigators began trying to build a case, they've made eight arrests: seven for drug possession and one for distribution. These are arrests that resulted as the sheriff's department served search warrants.
We've also learned that the department has located and confiscated that bong.

Sources say the owner of the bong was trying to sell it on eBay for as much as $100,000.

The owner, who wasn't even at the party, is one of the eight now charged.


From the comments,

Phone the Sheriff and give them you(r) opinion!
rcsd.net/bio.html

(803) 576-3000 phone
(803) 576-3195 fax
sheriff@rcsd.net


Be sure to mention to the Sheriff how he is discriminating against us for our religion, that really flummoxes them. Oh, and document it so there is a record that they were informed.

Then it is on record for what it really is - ethnic cleansing.

Sister Lauren
THC Ministry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stimulus Bans Religion at Colleges and Universities
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Feb 13, 2009 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stimulus Bans Religion at Colleges and Universities

Apparently part of the "stimulus" package has a provision that says that any funds used for colleges and universities cannot be used to renovate buildings where any religious gatherings are held. In other words, if a College Union has once a semester non-denominational service in a room, that building is excluded from repairs. It makes no difference if that building holds thousands of other meetings.

This is a clear swipe by the Democrats to continue the assault on religion in our nation. And tragically, they use a government "stimulus" package to do it. The Democrats know that schools will have no choice but to ban religion in favor of the funding.

My recommendation is that religious groups on campus hold meetings in the favorite places of professors and administrators, thus deeming those buildings excluded from government funding. Only then will administrators fight on behalf of religious freedom.


I replied to him,

Are you aware that they are actually acting to try to protect everyone from having any opportunity to come in contact with anyone practicing my religion? It is preemptive religious bigotry to keep us down.

Sister Lauren
THC Ministry


I know the prohibition of pot (and the weird laws to control it) are - ALL ABOUT RELIGION!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only thing 'criminal' about 'hemp' is the law against it.
Posted by: neilemac on Feb 14, 2009 5:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, the only thing criminal about 'marijuana' is the law against it. Hemp could save the planet ...as well as you. Note below is courtesy of Run FROM the Cure.... Hemp medicine is not new!

Who will speak out?

With no one to speak up about the truth, and with the press under control, governments are able to use propaganda to cloak their activities.

They use special phrases like "volunteers whose mission it is to eradicate cancer" and "help other scientists" to conceal programs of genocide. They encourage people to believe that they are working in their best interest.

They have Cancer Societies that profess to encourage research to reassure patients and lull their suspicions even though death is planned for them.

The research funding received flows directly into the coffers of the pharmaceutical companies. These governments refer to "hope" and mouth platitudes as they usher us into the chemotherapy chambers.

They use language and misdirection to deceive and confuse their own people and the patients at one and the same time."

Cross-Canada Crush Cancer (with Hemp Medicine) Tour

Know the truth. Peace in all dimensions, pleas welcomed!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why? Simple
Posted by: aahpat on Feb 15, 2009 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"So why does the mainstream media continue to get the story wrong when it comes to pot?"

Very simple.

This is a 'throw them to the wolves' pandering issue for most media. They feel that they need to pander to their sources in government and police and they do that by simply lying and blindly supporting the drug war.

Most people in the media today are graduates of the DARE education programs of the past twenty years and this propaganda is all that they know.

When a young journalist is hired for a job the first thing that happens is that they are subjected to a piss test. After having been sexually emasculated at the outset of their career by exposing their genitals for a piss test then, throughout their subsequent career, they are in fear of losing their job, their 401-K and their physical privacy with a random drug test and so they capitulate to the right-wing authoritarian status quo of America. They report like blind parrots whatever crap the government and drug warriors force feed them.

This friends, is how our democracy and free press have been subverted and perverted by the drug war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bogus reporting
Posted by: aahpat on Feb 15, 2009 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As reported by Scientific American Marijuana might lead to increased risk of testicular cancer

- It was a statistically insignificant sample.

"Researchers from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle found that about 72 percent of 369 men, ages 18 to 44"

- Almost no one even gets this form of cancer.

- It is a very curable form of cancer.

"But the scientists acknowledge the study did not prove a connection between pot and a heightened risk of the disease, which strikes about 8,000 men in the U.S. annually and has a high survival rate, according to the American Cancer Society."

- And aside from this bogus study, experts assume that the risk of this cancer is developed in the womb.

"The prevailing belief has been that a man's chances of developing testicular cancer is largely determined in the womb, as cells in the fetus are developing and those known as germ cells (which later develop into sperm cells) fail to mature properly."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pseudo science gets government $$$$$
Posted by: aahpat on Feb 15, 2009 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to do real science like proving the efficacy of medical pot for something you will not get government or corporate research funds.

But is you do this propaganda pseudo science the government will throw millions of $$$$ at you no questions asked.

This is why I don't trust Obama. The current corrupted NIDA and Science Foundation grant giving system is the system that he depends on when he says that he will follow the science rather than base public policy on politics. And Obama knows this too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Pickle
Posted by: drmanhatten on Feb 16, 2009 2:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've often wondered about this myself. I know plenty of journalists and have met very few who didn't partake of a joint from time to time, and yet the news stories get written anyway. It's down to the editorial policy, what journo is going to tell his Ed. to go boil his head over something like a marijuana story?

Comes down to Career vs. Conscience, and most journalists know that there's no damn point having a conscience if you're broke and nobody's listening to you...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

quid pro quo
Posted by: marsmath on Feb 20, 2009 11:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle receives more funding from the federal government than any other cancer research facility in the country."

I ran across that fact after a little research. Their lobbying efforts are also very interesting.

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?

year=2008&lname=Fred+Hutchinson+Cancer+Research+Center

Now, the 'study' starts to make sense. When will our government stop all the lies , propaganda and misinformation from their biased studies?

There are somewhere between 20-50 million Americans that use Cannabis. Where are all of the testicles with cancer?

Someone with more recourses than I should be looking into the influence that the Feds had in this 'study'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now you hear of this.
Posted by: maddydigrazia on Feb 24, 2009 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I been hearing this about cigarettes my whole life. Its stops your growth and reduces sperm counts did someone replace it with the word marijuana

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement