Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Monroe Doctrine is Dead, as Latin America Breaks Free

By Benjamin Dangl, The Progressive. Posted February 3, 2009.


A group of left-leaning South American leaders is effectively replacing Washington's presence in the region.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Labor Against the War Shifting Sights to Afghanistan Occupation
Jane Slaughter

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
10 Tips for a Sustainable Thanksgiving
Sarah Newman

Health and Wellness:
Is the House's Health Bill Really Worse than Nothing?
Joshua Holland

Immigration:
What Denying Unauthorized Immigrants Health Insurance Will Cost You

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
Just When You Thought It Was Safe: 3 Potential Obstacles to Health-Care Reform
Adele M. Stan

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Obama Quietly Backs Renewing Patriot Act Surveillance Provisions
Willam Fisher

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Obama Will Announce 34,000-Troop Escalation in Afghanistan 'Within Days'

More stories by Benjamin Dangl

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Five years ago, when Evo Morales was a rising political star as a congressman and coca farmer, I met him in his office in Cochabamba, Bolivia. He was drinking orange juice and sifting through the morning newspapers when I asked him about a meeting he just had with Brazilian President Lula. "The main issue that we spoke about was how we can construct a political instrument of liberation and unity for Latin America," Morales told me.

Now President Morales is one of many left-leaning South American leaders playing that instrument. This unified bloc is effectively replacing Washington's presence in the region, from military training grounds to diplomatic meetings. In varying degrees, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Paraguay, and Venezuela are demonstrating that the days of U.S.-backed coups, gunship diplomacy, and Chicago Boys' neoliberalism may very well be over for South America. The election of Barack Obama also gave hope for a less cowboy approach from Washington.

While many of the current left-of-center leaders in Latin America were elected on anti-imperialist and anti-neoliberal platforms, the general scope of their policies varies widely. On the left side of the spectrum sit Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, Evo Morales of Bolivia, and Rafael Correa of Ecuador. They have focused on nationalizing natural resources and redistributing the subsequent wealth to social programs to benefit the countries' poor majorities. They have also enacted constitutional changes aimed at redistributing land and increasing popular participation in government policy, decision-making, and budgeting. Chávez, Morales, and Correa were also more outspoken than other leaders in their critique of the Bush Administration.

Lula, Michelle Bachelet of Chile, and Nestor and Cristina Kirchner of Argentina have been more moderate in their approach toward confronting neoliberalism, but have been trailblazers in human rights and in their dealings with the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and World Trade Organization. Though they haven't been as radical in their economic and social policies, they have shown solidarity with Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador.

A conflict in Bolivia this past September proved to be a litmus test for the new regional unity. Just weeks after a recall vote invigorated Morales with 67 percent support across the country, a small group of thugs hired by the rightwing opposition led a wave of violence against Morales's supporters. The worst of these days of road blockades, protests, and racist attacks took place on September 11 in the tropical state of Pando. A private militia allegedly funded by the rightwing governor, Leopoldo Fernández, fired on a thousand unarmed pro-Morales men, women, and children marching toward the state's capital. The attack left dozens dead and wounded.

Just before this violence hit a boiling point, Morales kicked U.S. Ambassador to Bolivia Philip Goldberg out of the country, accusing him of supporting the rightwing opposition. Morales said of Goldberg, "He is conspiring against democracy and seeking the division of Bolivia." Numerous interviews and declassified documents prove that the U.S. Embassy has supported the Bolivian opposition. Goldberg denies these charges. At a protest in which effigies of opposition governors and American flags were burned, Edgar Patana, the leader of the Regional Workers' Center of Bolivia, spoke to reporters of Morales's decision to kick out Goldberg: "If he hadn't expelled him we would be tearing down the U.S. Embassy today." Chávez followed Morales's lead and kicked out the U.S. ambassador in that country. The Bush Administration responded by ejecting both nations' ambassadors from Washington.

When Morales arrived at a meeting of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) in Santiago, Chile, following the conflict, he condemned the rightwing violence in his country as part of a "civic coup d'état." UNASUR is the most recent, and perhaps most effective, new coalition of South American nations. It emerged in its present form in 2007 to ensure, among other things, sovereignty, peace, and solidarity in the region. At the emergency meeting held to resolve the Bolivian conflict, the region's presidents unanimously backed Morales, condemned the opposition's violent tactics, and emphasized that they wouldn't recognize the separatists.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: chavez, bolivia, latin america, evo morales

Benjamin Dangl is the author of The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia (AK Press, 2007). He is also the editor of TowardFreedom.com, a progressive perspective on world events, and UpsideDownWorld.org, a news website uncovering activism and politics in Latin America. Email BenDangl(at)gmail(dot)com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There's Still Some Work Ahead
Posted by: rg on Feb 3, 2009 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The embargo of Cuba must end without pre-conditions, particularly those set by Washington.

Puerto Rico is overdue to join the rest of Latin America as a free and independent nation; it's economy is in tatters and it can certainly benefit from free trade with its sister nations and the rest of the world, rather than relying on the dole.

An all-out effort by the rest of Latin America to help Haiti.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Grandmamma...
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Feb 8, 2009 1:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...lived for many years, in Harlem. Hugo Chavez of Venezuela saved her life--and the lives of most people on her block by selling the landlord REALLY discounted oil to heat the furnace. When the landlord didn't pay Chavez' sent the oil anyway.

Everybody cheered when the CITGO truck pulled up. The men would get out and set the hoses up. The kids would yell "YAY" and the guys would yell back "HOLA!" Knowing that another cold week would be averted.

One year six trucks pulled up. Six other buildings needed heating oil. The men looked grim as they set up the lines. "Don' worry," the people standing around were told, in heavily accented English, 'Heat from our boss, Hugo Chavez. Chavez says, "nobody starve and freeze in the dark while he has oil to share."

So when I hear that Chavez is "anti-American" and a "Dictator" I know it's not his people calling him that. Unless it's the RICH people who wanted to grab their country's oil for themselves. Lately, gas was #5/gallon at the pump in Brazil. In Venezuela, gas at the pump is Twenty-Five CENTS a gallon.

You can imagine the cross-border traffic...Chavez' view is that the oil is a resource for the People of Venezuela, so he officially nationalized it.

Imagine that...nationalized gas for our poor, too! After all--we've gone and socialized the banks by bailing them out--but somehow that's OK, and nationalizing our own gas & oil, somehow, WILL NOT BE OK? Well--explain to us again, how you American rich, want to work that one. LOL!

We're not jerks anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Grandmamma...
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Feb 8, 2009 1:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...lived for many years, in Harlem. Hugo Chavez of Venezuela saved her life--and the lives of most people on her block by selling the landlord REALLY discounted oil to heat the furnace. When the landlord didn't pay Chavez' sent the oil anyway.

Everybody cheered when the CITGO truck pulled up. The men would get out and set the hoses up. The kids would yell "YAY" and the guys would yell back "HOLA!" Knowing that another cold week would be averted.

One year six trucks pulled up. Six other buildings needed heating oil. The men looked grim as they set up the lines. "Don' worry," the people standing around were told, in heavily accented English, 'Heat from our boss, Hugo Chavez. Chavez says, "nobody starve and freeze in the dark while he has oil to share."

So when I hear that Chavez is "anti-American" and a "Dictator" I know it's not his people calling him that. Unless it's the RICH people who wanted to grab their country's oil for themselves. Lately, gas was #5/gallon at the pump in Brazil. In Venezuela, gas at the pump is Twenty-Five CENTS a gallon.

You can imagine the cross-border traffic...Chavez' view is that the oil is a resource for the People of Venezuela, so he officially nationalized it.

Imagine that...nationalized gas for our poor, too! After all--we've gone and socialized the banks by bailing them out--but somehow that's OK, and nationalizing our own gas & oil, somehow, WILL NOT BE OK? Well--explain to us again, how you American rich, want to work that one. LOL!

We're not jerks anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement