Terrorism and Drugs: What's the Real Connection?
Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Labor Against the War Shifting Sights to Afghanistan Occupation
Jane Slaughter
DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower
Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth
Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan
Health and Wellness:
When Sex Hurts, and No One Can Tell You Why: The Mysterious Condition Called Vulvodynia
Carey Purcell
Immigration:
What Denying Unauthorized Immigrants Health Insurance Will Cost You
Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames
Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler
Politics:
Just When You Thought It Was Safe: 3 Potential Obstacles to Health-Care Reform
Adele M. Stan
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why the New Breast Cancer Guidelines Are Racist
Devona Walker
Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse
Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley
Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders
Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick
World:
Will There Be Justice for the Victims of El Salvador's Jesuit Massacre?
Pamela Merchant
"It's important for Americans to know that trafficking of drugs finances the world of terror, sustaining terrorists; if you quit drugs, you join the fight against terrorism."
- George W. Bush, December 14, 2001
The message is clear - BE AMERICAN, DON'T DO DRUGS. The government's opportunistic link between drugs and terrorism attempts to bolster the failing war on drugs by riding the wave of patriotic sentiment and was just given a huge push in the public with the airing of the 3.5 million dollar ads during the Superbowl. Equating drug trafficking and use to terrorism will conveniently allow the government to extend the drastically expanded police and prosecutorial powers of the war on terrorism into the war on drugs.
As the dust settles on the military actions in Afghanistan, it is important to reflect on the legacy of the past few months and examine where the war on terrorism leaves us here at home. In response to the horrifying terrorist acts of 9/11, the government has put in place extraordinary laws and procedures to fight terrorism domestically, but has done so at the gouging expense of a widespread assault on civil liberties. The recent measures expanding police and prosecutorial powers -military tribunals, freezing assets of suspected associates of terrorism, eavesdropping on client-attorney privileges, easier access to email and phone taps - are all extensions of the very kind of tools that the American public has rejected in the war on drugs.
Yet these measures do not make society safer at an acceptable cost. With the exchange of our liberties for the false sense of security in the increased ability to wiretap, detain and deport individuals, we have unknowingly fortified our failed war on drugs in a time when the public has lost faith in the tools used. As military action in Afghanistan comes to an end and the Administration is attempting to side-step the Geneva Convention on Human Rights, we are left with the machinery of the domestic war which will need to transition into something new to sustain itself. Or something old - like the war on drugs.
The transition will be easy. The domestic tools of the war on terrorism will be applied to major drug traffickers, fortified by the claim that the illegal drug trade funds terrorists. The traffickers will soon become terrorists in public perception. We see it in the advertising campaign launched during the Superbowl blaming people who use drug for supporting terrorism. A glance into the not so distant future: International drug traffickers will be tried as narco-terrorist in military courts, deprived of stringent requirements to prove guilt and appeal a conviction; defendants in drug related cases will be deprived of attorney-client confidentiality when prosecutors claim that they may have knowledge of future exchanges that could eventually "fund terrorism"; international drug rings will be easy targets for wiretaps, initially over financial connections to terrorism, but as with mandatory minimums, the low-level buyers and sellers rather than "kingpins," will bear the brunt of the prosecutions and excessive penalties. Drug use does not constitute terrorism, nor really have anything to do with it, although current rhetoric would have you believe otherwise.
Although the number of actual "terrorists" affected by the loss of rights may be slim, as soon as these measures are employed by the war on drugs, millions of Americans will be denied constitutional rights. In the U.S., 76.3 million people have tried marijuana and in 2000, there were 1,579,566 drug law violation arrests. These are our neighbors, associates, friends, and relatives and their lives and liberties will be directly impacted by the abridgement of rights pursued in the name of anti-terrorism.
If we are truly concerned about drug misuse, lets take this moment of increased national compassion to work to shift our national drug policy away from the punitive war on drug and towards solutions which address the harms caused by drug use.
By protecting civil liberties, we are protecting America and the principles which make us an open society rather than a repressive regime.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
Labor Against the War Shifting Sights to Afghanistan Occupation World: Because of domestic issues like health care reform, many unions have remained silent about Afghanistan. That's about to change. By Jane Slaughter, Labor Notes. November 23, 2009. |
What Denying Unauthorized Immigrants Health Insurance Will Cost You Politics: Call it a "nativist tax." AlterNet. November 23, 2009. |
Just When You Thought It Was Safe: 3 Potential Obstacles to Health-Care Reform Politics: Harry Reid may have gotten the Senate to move his health-care bill forward, but a handful of conservative Democrats could still keep the bill from getting a final vote. By Adele M. Stan, AlterNet. November 23, 2009. |
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.