Women Are Not 'Pork'
Belief:
How the Religious Right Stole Christmas
Sandhya Bathija
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Digital Dollars: Why the Marketing and Ad Industry Are Afraid of New Regulatory Watchdogs
Jeffrey Chester
DrugReporter:
DEA Forced to Scrub Misleading Info on the American Medical Association's Position on Marijuana
Charmie Gholson
Environment:
Burn a Tree to Save the Planet? The Crazy Logic Behind Biomass
Joshua Frank
Food:
The 6 Weirdest, Scariest Processed Foods
Brad Reed
Health and Wellness:
25 Years Since the Bhopal Disaster, We've All Become Victims of the Chemical Industry
Gary Cohen
Immigration:
Italy's Media Wrestle With Immigrant-Bashing
Sandip Roy
Media and Technology:
10 Biggest Sports Sex Scandals of All Time: How Does Tiger Woods Rate?
David Rosen
Movie Mix:
Disney Apocalypse: Why 2012 Sucks
Alexander Zaitchik
Politics:
Are Liberals Pathetic?
Chris Hedges
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
What Happened When an Anti-Choice Catholic Woman Needed an Abortion at Dr. Tiller's Clinic
Amanda Mueller
Rights and Liberties:
Four Men Leave Guantanamo; Two Face Ill-Defined Trials in Italy
Andy Worthington
Sex and Relationships:
Why Fake Optimism Is the Worst Way to Deal with Life's Problems
Liz Langley
Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders
Water:
What the Frack? Poisoning our Water in the Name of Energy Profits
Peter Gleick
World:
Over 1,000 Delegates for Peace Will Mark 1st Anniversary of Gaza Invasion, Protest Ongoing Israeli Siege
Medea Benjamin
That same morning, New York Times columnist Bob Herbert asked “Why anyone listens to [Republicans]?” Why, indeed. They want the Democrats to fail. They want the new president to fail. And so they described women’s bodies as “pork” and asked that the funding be cut for contraception.
Women’s groups are legitimately outraged at what has happened. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America called the measure a “victim of misleading attacks and partisan politics.” Mary Jane Gallagher, president of the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, said: “Family planners are devastated that President Obama and Congress have decided to take funding for critical family planning services out of the stimulus. Their willingness to abandon the millions of families across the country who are in need is devastating.”
“The Medicaid Family Planning State Option fully belonged in the economic recovery package,” said Marcia D. Greenberger, co-president of the National Women’s Law Center. “The Republican leadership opposition to the provision shows how out of touch they are with what it takes to ensure the economic survival of working women and their families.”
While Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) defended the measure as recently as last Sunday, President Barack Obama and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, bowed to Republican pressure and agreed to drop the measure. And although the Senate has not yet voted, it’s unlikely that funding for expanded family planning will be approved. In short, the Democrats decided it just wasn’t worth fighting about. According to the Washington Wire, one House Democratic aide said, “It ended up being a distraction and it will be removed.”
So, poor women who want reproductive health care and contraception are both “pork” and a “distraction.” Is this the change we have dreamed about?
President Obama certainly believes in contraception for poor women and girls on Medicaid. He won the election, as he recently pointed out. He doesn’t have to cave in to Republican demands to restrict women’s choices and health care.
The best way he and Democrats can handle this terribly misguided decision is to pass legislation to fund expanded family planning as soon as possible, before half the population wakes up and realizes that once again, women have been treated as expendable, and that their bodies have been bartered for political expediency.
See more stories tagged with: gender, economy, family planning, reproductive justice, stimulus
Ruth Rosen, a journalist and historian, is professor emerita of history at the University of California, Davis and a visiting professor of public policy and history at UC Berkeley. For 11 years, she wrote op-ed columns for the Los Angeles Times, and from 2000-2004 she worked full-time as a political columnist and editorial page writer at the San Francisco Chronicle.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.