Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Soul-Crushing Malaise of the 1950s Killed the American Dream

By Michael Bader, AlterNet. Posted January 31, 2009.


Barren suburban yards, drunk dads, dowdy moms, strained frivolity, deep depression -- let's hope the '50s don't make a comeback.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Michael Bader

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

My parents have been dead for years, but Hollywood has recently resurrected them. Last week I saw the new film "Revolutionary Road" and then came home and watched reruns of the television show "Mad Men." I confess that I was a little freaked out finally to see an accurate portrayal of my 1950s baby boomer childhood, one that was neither "Father Knows Best" nor "The Twilight Zone". Leonardo DiCaprio's character, Frank Wheeler, and Jon Hamm's Don Draper are so much like my father that it hurts to watch them. Like my father, each live lives of quiet desperation as upwardly mobile white-collar executives commuting to unsatisfying jobs in which they've traded passion for privilege. And, like my father, each left behind wives vainly struggling to find meaning in domesticity. Although Mrs. Wheeler (Kate Winslett) self-destructs and Mrs. Draper (January Jones) files for divorce, while my mother merely became bitter and depressed, all three struggled with the combination of emptiness and isolation that Betty Friedan called "the problem with no name." Seeing it depicted so perfectly was unsettling.

Behind the exuberance of post-WWII consumption, suburban expansion, upward mobility, and a Good Housekeeping vision of family life lay a psychic misery that couldn't be articulated but that damaged everyone involved. Whatever one thinks of the excesses and distortions of the cultural and political movements of the 1960s, they did manage to express the healthy determination of boys like me to avoid the lot of Don Draper and of girls to escape the fate of April Wheeler. The reason these productions are so disturbing to many people my age is that they depict with brutal and tragic clarity how our parents made a bad deal when they traded their higher aspirations for economic security. And perhaps they make us wonder if we're in danger of doing the same thing.

Long after they divorced and shortly before each of them died, my parents told me a story about their courtship that captured the essence of this "bad deal." My mother was a popular girl growing up and, immediately following the war, got a series of office jobs that she enjoyed immensely. She fell in love with my father just as WWII was ending because he was "different" from other boys. He had dreams. He was smart. In fact, when they first met, my father aspired to be a radio announcer or actor. The son of German immigrants, he rebelled against his strict and dour family and saw in my mother the type of sexy vitality and buoyancy missing at home. In the midst of post-war American exuberance, my parents entered a life together full of possibility.

The week before their wedding my mother told my father that she was quitting her job because it was now his job to support her, and that her mother had told her that "women don't work." This was, in fact, true. The concept of the "family wage" in the 1950s meant that men would be paid enough to support their families. So my mother quit her job, my father gave up his dreams of radio and went to work in the corporate world, and together they started a family in a new suburb. Unfortunately, both my parents privately enjoyed the independence that working had given my mother and were disappointed when she gave it up. While my father accepted my mother's pronouncement readily, he was secretly resentful. The weight on his shoulders began to grow. He started drinking more and began to see other women on the side. My mother became a martyr, burdened and frustrated in domesticity. And yet neither could have possibly chosen otherwise. Like the Drapers and the Wheelers, they gave up their dreams for the American Dream.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: women, men, 1960s, 1950s, mad men, revolutionary road

Michael Bader is a psychologist and psychoanalyst in San Francisco. He is the author of "Arousal: The Secret Logic of Sexual Fantasies" and "Male Sexuality: Why Women Don't Understand It -- and Men Don't Either." He has written extensively about psychology and politics.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
1950s were better than 1960s!
Posted by: Jay Randal on Jan 31, 2009 2:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was born and raised in a small town in California, in the 1950s, known as Claremont. Probably one of the best places to grow up in during that time. I have fond memories of it. Yes the 1950s seem strange looking back at it, especially after the Vietnam war period of 1960s and those crazy Hippie years. I never liked having a crew-cut hairstyle as a kid, so loved the later rebellion of growing hair longer before cutting it. It's never possible to go back in time for our nation, but perhaps we can hope for a peaceful future someday. At the moment the nation is in another depression. It might resemble the 1930s, but really it cannot be the same. It could be worse?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I Grew up in La Verne! Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Baloney Posted by: navy-vet
» RE: Baloney > REPLY. Posted by: Jay Randal
Just what is "The American Dream"???
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Jan 31, 2009 3:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems there is a Lot of talk lately about "The American Dream" and depending on who is using the phrase, it seems to take on a different meaning for each. Personally, I'm not sure what the American Dream is... While the author seems to be pointing to the false socialital belief of the 1950's as a depiction of this dream he seems also to be saying that actually Having a Dream may be the dream as well, so it is easy to be confused by so many different descriptions of the same idea.

For my parents it was trying to "Keep up with the Jones" all the while working round the clock to try and pay for it... Both of them worked, but never were able to afford the material things they invested in. Being the last of five children, the only thing I knew of the so called "American Dream" was represented by the debtors who haunted our lives when I was a child. It was never a time of plenty and seldom even a time of having enough to get by. If that is "The American Dream" it doesn't play very well for me. Not then, not now, not ever...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hello Beck... Posted by: ~Fiona~
50's mom
Posted by: alphabovine on Jan 31, 2009 3:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was married in 1954 and my husband and I bought into the whole 50's mystique. He had a corporate job and commuted to New York. I was a stay-at-home mom and devoted myself to taking care of my children, providing a gracious home, and supporting my husband's career. It worked for about 15 years. Our shared goals made for a harmonious family life and I look back on those years as some of the happiest in my life. In our case, it all came crashing down. He wasn't as successful as he expected to be, and I ultimately was bored and unfulfilled at home. Instead of changing and creating a more satisfying life, we divorced. I reinvented myself, adopted a totally different lifestyle, and have managed to be happy. I believe our children look back on their 50's and 60's childhood of cookie-baking mom, good schools, Little League, swimming and tennis lessons, and so forth as a good and happy time. That period in our history wasn't all bad. And I don't blame the 50's mystique for the failure of our marriage. We just couldn't change enough to adjust to reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sounds like 50's mom Posted by: Alternutty
» RE: Sounds like 50's mom Posted by: helenahanbasquet
» SalB Posted by: helenahanbasquet
Not Mad Men!
Posted by: Yankeeinexile on Jan 31, 2009 3:28 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've seen episodes of Mad Men, and talking to my mother who worked for a large corp. during the 1950's, there is no way that level of sexual harrassment would have been tolerated. She witness one executive who was accused of harrassing a secretary and he was promptly shown the door.

But then when the company found out my mother was pregnant, she was promptly fired. So much for fairness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You do not know Posted by: navy-vet
» RE: Not Mad Men! Posted by: Gracews
» RE: Not Mad Men! Posted by: Sushi
back in the future
Posted by: richholland on Jan 31, 2009 4:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1950 in Europe people were recovering from the War...USA was the land of the future..
Unbelievable.... workers had their own houses, skilled workers had cars.
Our socialistic politicians allready explained that capitalisme needed wars to excist and that every 60 years in a natural way it would lead to crisis enemployment and misery.

But for overworked women (10 hours a day) in the factory ,mariage was an escape and it was the pride of my parents the salary of the father was enough for health care, housing, food, sending the kids to school.
Many women used their time for keeping a vegatable garden, knitting beautifull sweaters, raising the kids.
Materialisme is the drug for emptiness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: back in the future Posted by: astockton
Not the fault of the 50's.
Posted by: BeckyD on Jan 31, 2009 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, my parents also married just after the War. My mother worked in a store to help support them as my father went to college on the GI bill, and then together they worked through the 1950's to build his business, which eventually became 2 drugstores he sold in the early 1970's to go to work for the local university.

After my dad graduated, my mother never 'worked' outside the home until long after their kids were grown, but she always worked, covering at the stores when needed, keeping the books, volunteering to keep the books for a couple of local organizations and at the local school library. She was active in bowling and golf leagues and my dad had his activities too, and there was never any of that malaise or Friedan self-indulgent crap, because my mom and dad had come out of relative poverty and understood how good things were for them and as adults and parents, they understood that they had obligations to things larger than their own whims and desires. They were married over 50 years when she died of cancer and their love and commitment has been a model for me in my own 24 year marriage.

So don't blame the 50's. Plenty of people made it through the 50's with their dreams and marriages intact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No Friedan crap? Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: No Friedan crap? Posted by: luzmejor
Otto .
Posted by: otto on Jan 31, 2009 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article, but the situation was not all that different from mine ten or twenty years before...depression and post depression. My parents were married in the earlly 20's, my dad was athletic and loved to write. He did early newspaper work, then chose security at Fords for the next 35 years, getting some inspiration from being a small cog in the union movement. Lots of tension over the years, but they stayed together til their deaths in the 70's and 80's. As things change, they remain the same too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

beatniks
Posted by: bad penny on Jan 31, 2009 5:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a little memory. Some friends down the road were having a 50's party. Everyone was to dress up and act as they did in the 50's. I thought "to hell with this.....I hated the 50's" so I just came as myself.
All my friends had their ponytails, their bobby sox, their crewcuts and their dance moves. I stood to the side with a couple of friends, two to be exact, who were also not dressed in the 50's costumes.

Then I realized that we were the beatniks. I was also still playing my 50's role.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: beatniks Posted by: Beck
alterneters always find something to complain about
Posted by: gellero1 on Jan 31, 2009 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it wasn't that bad....a workingman could support a wife that actually stayed home to raise kids.

Every city had an industrial base. You could own a car and not have 'insurance' because trial lawyers couldn't advertise. In fact, the term 'trial lawyers' hadn't even been invented.

illigitamacy among blacks was not 50%. Most people stayed married.

Cities were not overrun by cheap 'undocumented ( AKA illegal ) immigrants'.

HighSchool kids could find a well paying summer jobs in factories and restaurants.

You were proud to be a Boy Scout. You could tie a bowline knot.

All the stuff in your garage said 'made in USA' and you knew it would last forever.

Your money was backed by the GOLD in Fort Knox. Your dollar bills said 'silver certificate'. Other paper money always said "PROMISE TO PAY THE BEARER ON DEMAND xxx DOLLARS". The coins in your pocket were SILVER, went 'ching' when you dropped them instead of the 'thud' of zinc.

People invested in stocks & bonds for DIVIDENDS, not capital gains.

Every telephone supplied by the phone company monopoly lasted forever. You were not a slave to a beeper ( remember those ) or cellphone.

You shopped downtown for quality merchandise. Chain stores hardly existed. The pharmacist OWNED his store. You didn't need 'insurance' to buy medicine or visit the doctor. BlueCross was truly 'non-profit' and was only used if you had to have an operation.

"TRUTH, JUSTICE and the AMERICAN WAY" really meant something to citizens and was the ideal of the world.

When Roy Rogers and Gabby Hays shot a bad guy, they just fell down...there was never blood or violence. Every kid had a cap gun. Made in the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL..... Posted by: gellero1
» and. . . Posted by: kegbot1
Fifties??? Well.....
Posted by: SagesseNoir on Jan 31, 2009 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My picture of the 1950s is vague because I was born in the 50s. It is the 1960s and 70s that I remember most clearly.
From talking with my parents, they didn't find the 1950s especially charming either. But the reasons were different. Mother couldn't have been a stay home mom if she wanted to. Dad was simply too poor to afford it. And he didn't even have the option of selling his soul for security.
You see, my parents had escaped the Jim Crow South in the 1940s; and most black women certainly worked, though usually under conditions of dire poverty. Conditions in the urban North were certainly better at that time, but not exactly humane.
The suburban nightmare described by the author would have seemed a paradise to my parents. They were certainly alienated, but theirs was a less privileged alienation.
Indeed, I once heard my mother say (in so many words): "What's so great about working away from home? Those white ladies can have my job--providing your father can have their husbands' job. But we know that's not going to happen, and we know WHY too."
And yet I, a first generation college grad, can clearly believe that the suburban dream was (is?) indeed a nightmare, though a different sort than that my parents knew. It was a kind of hell, though privileged compared to the hell my parents knew.
There's truth in the biblical saying that "man does not live by bread alone." But he/she is most aware of this after having eaten.
Why must anyone sell his or her soul to eat or live decently?
Why must others be denied the right to eat and live decently they regardless of whether they work?

Why?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fifties??? Well..... Posted by: fred_53_99
I'm going to reference this in my urban studies classes
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on Jan 31, 2009 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on the outside people just might see this a simple bitching however there is some great design social points. Will this stop people from moving to da burbs, maybe not however we can use a new revolution on City Living.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The 1950's
Posted by: Steve Stone on Jan 31, 2009 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm always amused when someone who has not actually lived through the Fifties attempts to analyze them.

Born in the first year of the Thirties and having lived through the Great Depression AND the Dust Bowl, I can assure Mr. Bader that the Thirties make every other decade bleeding marvelous by comparison.

The Forties were, over all, a major step upward despite the agonies of World War II and the deaths of a quarter of a million American fighting men. (This fact alone should tell you how bad the Thirties were.)

The Fifties were a vast improvement over the Forties in almost every respect, even with the Korean War and its 58,000 dead American fighting men, not a few of which were my good friends. (I was drafted but not sent to Korea.)

The first half of the Sixties seemed like Nirvana compared to the Fifties, but the assassination of President Kennedy (and a little later his brother Bobby and MLK) put an end to the feel-good part of the Sixties.

The latter half of the Sixties and the Seventies featured Watergate in Washington DC and Lost-Our-Identitygate in the rest of the country, and this bled into the ReaganMessiahgate eighties.

Mr. Bader might feel much better about the Fifties if he were just a tad bit older.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The 1950's Posted by: luzmejor
Too Simplistic
Posted by: Gravitas on Jan 31, 2009 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think he is basing his criticisms on a "Father Knows Best" stereotype of the 1950s! Positive things happened in the 1950s too, like Brown vs. Board of Education.

Furthermore, maybe the "homemaker" role was very constricting to women. But one of the real reasons they entered the workforce was economic changes and overconsumption that made one income very difficult. Many lament the devaluation of the homemaker role. What is really so darn great about working for someone else? Almost ALL the mainstream jobs I ever had had some element of dishonesty about them. None were morally pure. Except community college instructor where I made less that $40000 a year. There is nothing wrong with being a homemaker; in fact, it should be considered honorable for both genders.

And lets not forget in the 50s, there was still a greater sense of community in most neighborhoods. True, there was probably more gossip if you let your lawn grow too long, but you also knew someone would call the cops if they saw something suspicious.

The corruption of U.S. culture is far too complicated to be blamed on the 50s. They were just a symptom of far more complicated social dynamics. The author is a psychologist. He should read a little sociology and history!!!

p.s. Some of us think "paunchy" men are sexy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Women back in the workforce Posted by: BlueTigress
The 50's
Posted by: crazy carlos on Jan 31, 2009 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
man, I don't know where the hell most of your heads were that are raking the 50's. Music--After WW II, you went from Benny Goodman to Kenton, Basie, Charlie Parker and the big band from Cuba Machito. You had R&B, The first struggling start of Rock and Roll, and jazz with all the new expermenting of Miles, Mulligan, Brebeck, Coltrane all competing for airtime. The Rendevous Ballroom in Balboa, Tito Puente in L.A.

Transistors, which made for portable music at the beach. Work after school and in a year have enough to buy some wheels.

Bad mouth the 50's!! From the early 50's to the early 70's the U.S. was the place to be. Now we are the drain plug in the center of the toliet. Carlos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We rake The 50's Posted by: BlueTigress
Same photo without the desperation
Posted by: mrxls on Jan 31, 2009 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My 1950's family looked the same, suburban house, dad with a white collar job, stay at home mom, me with that wretched crew cut, my sister sported bangs, not pigtails. So why does our family photo, taken by one of those traveling photographers who came to your house, exude pride and peace with our lot as opposed to quiet unfulfilled desperation?

I think one answer is that the 50's and 60's were about achieving goals that seemed lofty by the standards of the impoverished 30's. The mindless 90 minute commute on the LIE (world's longest parking lot) simply rolled off my dad like water off a ducks back when he got home to pull crab grass out of the lawn by the roots. He owned that lawn, the refrigerator was full and he could look foreward to finishing the basement some day.

It was not enough for me and by the late 60's the incomprehension of the generation gap rent a hole in that complacent universe but that's another story. For the period it existed the 50's provided deep satisfaction to millions of people who came through the depression and the war. Some unfortunate souls were tuned to goals too lofty for their generational circumstances, like the author's parents, and they suffered. I believe that the proper perspective puts them in a minority.

The 50's and 60's satisfaction and complacency took place within a context of almost clildlike ignorance. The world isn't like the American Dream and now everybody knows that. So there is no going back to Eden. Unfortunately for the author his parents were expelled from there very early.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1950s
Posted by: elsuno on Jan 31, 2009 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up in the perfect 50s setting, Lynbrook, Long Island. Mother was a stay at home wife, Dad a fairly successful business owner. I had everything I wanted, but somehow I wanted more - and more - and more. Never understanding why I felt so unfulfilled, there came upon the scene the movie "Rebel Without a Cause". There it was. We didn't know why we felt the need to rebel, but the parents in the movie looked so clueless, we identified. The next generation took it from there. Now, I look back on the 50s with sadness for the loss of innocence, but as Mad Men depicts, there was no way to really stop it. Speaking of Mad Men, I was one of the secretarial pool in New York City and, yes, the sexual harassment was there, but we weren't really offended at the time - rather, we felt vulnerable and embarrassed. Now that I remember it, thank God we grew out of that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's the point of an American Dream anyway?
Posted by: Jason Jordan on Jan 31, 2009 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's a dream, it cannot happen. Instead of creating illusions of the yada-yada Dream, why not turn it into reality? That said, why not just focus on AMERICAN REALITY and concentrate on repairing it? The 1950s is totally different from today although one wouldn't see that out here in the Gem state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imperialism and Racism killed the American Dream
Posted by: Wichita on Jan 31, 2009 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sixties, as unpleasant and agonizing as they were to many, were the period of discovery of the hollowness of the American Dream. It killed Hamlet to learn about the hypocrisy of his life: "There's something rotten in the state of Denmark." And it agonized all of us who had loved Democracy, Equality, Justice for All when we saw Little Rock, Birmingham, and the deaths of Cheney, Goodman, Evers...and then Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and Bobby Kennedy. Young Americans coming home in body bags. My Lai. The searing photo of a 9-year-old girl running clothed only in Napalm Flame.

Why look for other reasons? The demands that we as a nation learn to act ethically were created by these and other hideous revelations such as the reality of Slavery, the Genocide of the first nations, the theft of half of Mexico, and the general sordid history of European Conquest which we had studied as Exploration and Discovery.

Those demands have not yet been met, despite the thrilling fact that an African-American president could be elected, and that the race for President and Vice President featured women as well as African-Americans. But the last eight years prove that the American Dream's secret contents--unlimited greed and arrogance and cruelty and hypocritical lies--are still with us.

That American Dream which "serves as paste and cover" for American atrocities against nature as well as against the poor and less powerful must die.

Juanita Rice, Nebraska

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The dreaming _ Posted by: yirrp
depression became very common in home mom's...
Posted by: ellie on Jan 31, 2009 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you worked during WW II, you were let go as soon as men began returning from the war...

if you were in college or grad school, you were pushed out to make room for men coming back with the GI bill...

most 'starter homes' in the US were built to accommodate the GI bill, so they all look the same...

in the '50's if you got married, you were expected to leave work and become happily pregnant asap.. when it became known that you were pregnant at work you were fired...al la the happy home maker...

maternity homes for teenagers were hidden in many communities with forced adoption as part of the terms...

if you revolted your dad or your husband could commit you to a mental institution for as long as THEY wanted, subjecting you to ECT and meds until you changed your ways to earn a psych release...

this was the heyday of tranquilizers for women to stifle the rage inside...

it's a miracle these men and women survived the quiet desperation... read C. Wright Mills, "White Collar, the American Middle Class"...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ba
Posted by: mnstra on Jan 31, 2009 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the end of WW2 the ruling elite took more and more of the wealth of the American people. Their appetites were and are insatiable.as long as there is this small group controlling most of the countries , this worlds wealth, America will further deteriorate into a feudal system, full of crime and murder. Yet the ruling elite need the military to keep their power and control. Furthermore they need suckers AKA solders to do their bidding for them like they have done during the last world wars.
I enjoyed the movie ,The Lost Weekend, where alcoholism was still in the closet like the problem that has no name - 1950s early feminism.The three martini lunches of the business class was the image I recall for the depression resulting from stifled lives as they did their bidding for the upper classes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Physician, heal thyself.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 31, 2009 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bader’s memories of growing up in the 50s are personal and necessarily anecdotal, so claiming them as an identity for a whole period is problematic. But are there people who are successful, understood as prosperous, yet disgruntled and unhappy?

“Quiet desperation” and “silent melancholy” have been around at least since Thoreau and Emerson indentified them. They blamed them on the inability of Americans to enjoy the opportunities of the New World in preference for the Old World hangovers of ambition. Freud cut his eye-teeth on his patients’ anxiety. Becker says it is the denial of death that cramps our lives.

What such diagnoses have in common is that all point to one or another source of insecurity. So which is more important: Being secure? Or being happy? Or whatever?

So long as we accept alienation as necessary, we will be lonely. So long as we are lonely we will be unhappy. Just that long will we continue to read and require the services of helpers like Bader, who at least has the honesty to portray his own need for help rather than hide behind some professional distance.

However, diagnoses come cheap, as does rejection of what others did. What's the treatment program, doctor?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They're ... baaaack!!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 31, 2009 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Barren suburban yards, drunk dads, dowdy moms, strained frivolity, deep depression -- let's hope the '50s don't make a comeback."
- - - - -
With water shortages and drought, alcohol consumption up because of screaming anxiety over the future, little income for anything but essentials, let alone style, massive distraction by idiot programming from the media, and – what was that last one? – depression, the 50's HAVE come back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

when....
Posted by: pjl on Jan 31, 2009 10:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we stop believing that we are so entitled to fullfilment threw our work and start finding fullfillment threw our breath and gratitude for what we do have and stop the envy of what we dont have, we will then find the peace we all deep in our soul are searching for. just being alive and breathing, the american dream is a myth and a lie to keep us in the wanting to keep us in envy to keep us trapped in the mind set that the job i have sucks ! if u cant be with the one you love then love the life your with! just love the life you have !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh sure. Be a contented serf! Posted by: navy-vet
» RE: when.... Posted by: lindawageck1
How right you are!
Posted by: navy-vet on Jan 31, 2009 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 1950s were the worst decade of my lifetime, just plain brain-dead. At least in this awful decade we've had some action that raised a lot of people out of sheepdom, but the sheep stayed asleep in the 50s. Nobody in my family drank, but my parents both smoked too much (I picked it up for 9 years in 1956) and mom had a bout of depression. My sunburnable dad detested having to move to Florida, but he was nearing retirement so he hung in there--and got skin cancer. At least he wasn't in an ad agency. Even worse than the Florida climate, they disliked the national social climate. Dad loathed Joe McCarthy. Mom said that people used to help each other, even strangers at the door, which they no longer did. Everyone seemed afraid of strangers. Both of them utterly despised fundamentalist evangelism. Later I realized it was caused by the Cold War mentality which turned us anxious, greedy for materialism and willing to live in timidity. From the end of WWII we made the wrong choices: materialism over ethics, "American Century" imperialism, TV crap (with rare exceptions like "Omnibus" and Ernie Kovacs),the rise of right-wing pseudo Christianity & much else.

I could NEVER be nostalgic for the 50s. They were not the Happy Days but the Sappy Days & Crappy Days. I get tired of emails telling me how little we paid in the 50s for stamps, a steak, a car, etc.--meaningless unless people's salaries (by race and gender) are included. Both dad & mom said the 1930s were much more enjoyable than the 50s, even though his appliance store went bankrupt and he'd had to work as a mechanic, lost that in a layoff, then sold used cars, each time for much lower pay. Mom managed to keep her Depression job (at half-pay) but in the 50s a woman's job didn't pay much more. Her 1962-65 job in downtown Miami paid $35 a week with no increases, though bus fare & lunch had to be deducted. She quit and rented out my bedroom to a college student. After promotion to Navy LT I was shocked to learn that I now earned more than Dad after almost 20 years with the same company, including promotions and (tiny) salary increases! At least he had a pension.

In 1957 one of my profs tried to put together a group to push for civil rights action at U of Miami--where I graduated since I'd been active in civil rights at UF and told not to return. I attended the first meeting when no more than 10 showed up, Cuban-Americans who hated Batista and got social consciences from rooting for Castro. A friend was Afro-Cuban from Cuba. No US blacks, but by 1956 the UM campus had a Nigerian prince I never met and about 5 dark-skinned Cubans, all very wealthy! My friend said she was about a quarter African, but UM avoided it since her dad was a big businessman in Cuba. She resented the race & wealth hypocrisy. The prof saw how few we were, especially American-born students, and yelled, "What a godawful generation this is!" Anyway, we didn't get arrested and maybe the small protests paid off, since the first US black student was admitted not long after I graduated.

Take if from someone who lived through that dreadful decade, improvements were glacially slow. Nothing broke the ice-jam until the 60s, which plus the 70s turned out to be the most amazing decades of my life, truckin' in the right direction--but not on all fronts. The war in Vietnam destroyed our chances to lock in positive changes and move ahead. The "Me Generation" of Reagan's 80s were a repeat of the 50s but worse, and the 90s stood still or skidded backward. NOW, AFTER EIGHT MORE WASTED YEARS, WITH BARACK OBAMA, WE FINALLY A CHANCE TO MOVE AHEAD AGAIN! Attitudes seem to be moving toward realistic assessment of our needs, and the times really may be changing. Today's young people could end up the Greatest Generation--for peace, human rights & economic justice, not for war. The 50s? God help us, never again!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The 50's Were Brilliant
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jan 31, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a lovely girlfriend Susan who I used to play with in the sandpit, and we had Listen With Mother and Watch with Mother, Andy Pandy and The Flowerpot Men - and Little Weed

The BBC were programming us to grow everthing nice in our gardens and there was no more bloody war and I used to play in the bombed out mills doing incredibly dangerous things with my mates.

There was no health and safety and no political correctness

We had Perry Como, The Everley Brothers, Elvis, Cliff Richard and Adam Faith

But the 60's were better - we had the Beatles and the Rolling Stones and the Beach Boys and Jimi Hendrix and discovered some new functions between our legs - that we weren't quite sure about before.

The 70's however were even better.

We started earning loads of money and could actually go and see Led Zeppelin and Neil Young and get completely out of our heads and the girls were lovely.

Fuck me - what the hell are you complaining about?

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Greedy bastards Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Greedy bastards Posted by: tony_opmoc
Writer2
Posted by: Writer2 on Jan 31, 2009 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am deeply offended by this article. I was born in 1955. My parents both got their Master's degrees in the thirties. My mother went to Boston University and my father went to Boston college. My mother stayed at home with us until I reached kindergarten (I was the youngest) then she went back to work as a school teacher. She was then available to me after school since we had the same schedule. Basically, I grew up in the sixties. We had several family tragedies( like the death of my brother at eight years old) and it is to this I attribute the problems my parents had. My mother was very happy to be with us as children before my brother's death.
I am offended by your article because before we had our first child, my husband and I agreed one of us would say at home with the kids. I was was to be an architect and I wanted desperately to be at home. I have two BA's and my husband went to UC Berkley and studied architecture and has been an architect for thirty years. We have struggled over the years to make ends meet. We too got caught up in the money grubbing days of the eighties. But, I did not want my three daughter's in daycare. I wanted to see them take their first step. I wanted to be there when they came home from school. I wanted to have them tell me they lost a tooth. There is no "quality time". It takes being at home and being in the house with your children and conversations happen when they will. You cannot make them happen with "quality time". I made the choice to stay home for my own reasons and because we both felt that raising our children was the most important thing we could do. We are very liberal in politics and yet we live this traditional lifestyle. The fifties and sixties were a simpler time. It was OK to have one TV, a one car garage, a smaller house. People now want more and many therefore have to work two jobs. My children are grown now two in college and one has graduated. Don't tell me that it is the only choice for many women to work. Don't whine about wanting to stay home but you just can't. If you really can't or if you'd be completely miserable, then work. But working costs money-clothes, transportation, lunch. I feel my life has been well spent raising my children. In fact, it was for selfish reasons as well. I love being a Mom. Right now I am faced with empty nest syndrome. I just took the LSAT and am hoping to start law school in the fall.
My mother was happy as a mom as well until things changed dramatically in my family. The thing is I feel your article is an attack on women who choose to stay at home. All of my friends are stay at home moms. I worked some during their childhoods but only part time, only doing things I loved and only if it fit around the girls schedules. Do not tell me my time with them was wasted. My husband and I have been happily married for thirty year and yes my parents had their problems. My father drank but I attribute that more to our family history and the fact that there was no counseling at the time. All the moms in our neighborhood were at home and it was wonderful to play and go from house to house. I can hear your comments now. "well goody for you". Yes, our family had problems, but don't blame it on the traditional nuclear family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Writer2 Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Writer2 Posted by: wrinklemomma
» RE: Writer2 Posted by: Writer2
» Children Come First. Posted by: tony_opmoc
You had to be grown in the 1950s to get it
Posted by: lindawageck1 on Jan 31, 2009 11:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can't just be a kid growing up in the 1950s. Oh it helps to have grown up in the 1950s if you want to understand SOME of the things back then.

But only if you came from out of the 1930s and 1940s can you actually 'get it' as several of the comments have already stated.

I'm old enough to remember the 1940s and it's only this remembrance which puts the 1950s in it's appropriate perspective. I live in Texas.

What I remember most about the 1950s was how blacks AND women were treated so bad. I, myself was fired for being pregnant in the mid 1960s.

I think it's just too hard for some people now, to try to imagine how insulting it was for a female to be alive especially if trying to survive out in the workplace around men.

I've enjoyed reading the article but even more, the comments here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Writer2
Posted by: Writer2 on Jan 31, 2009 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way,I too watch Mad Men and plan on seeing Revolutionary Road this week with my daughter. Also, people now are afraid to let their children go out and play. Kids miss out on Saturdays in the neighborhood playing hopscotch, jumping rope, waiting for the ice cream man. My current neighbor freeked when my dog got out of our yard and went in her front yard. "My children play there", she said. We used to step in it, try to scape it off on the curb and then kept going. Yes, this whole thing struck a nerve with me. The fifties and sixties were not all bad. It depends on your perspective.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Writer2 Posted by: LeeAnnG
Damn fine read - a thought
Posted by: kegbot1 on Jan 31, 2009 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It struck me as I read this - isn't it peculiar that, with each succeeding generation, the more you strive to fit inside the American ideal for your time, the more miserable you get?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GROWING UP IN THE FIFTIES
Posted by: HBoyer on Jan 31, 2009 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I TOO GREW UP IN THE FIFTIES, IT WAS A TIME OF EXPANSION FOR THE YOUNG, THE UNIONS HAD MADE THE MIDDLE CLASS, COLLEGE WAS A DISTANT DREAM UNLESS YOUR PARENTS HAD MONEY.

MY FATHER AND MOTHER BOTH WORKED. KEEPING UP WITH THE JONES WAS A FAD I THINK EVERYONE WAS BRAIN WASHED TO BELIEVE.

MOST OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE ADULTS IN THE FIFTIES CAME OUT OF THE DEPRESSION AND HAD A ROUGH TIME GROWING UP.

SO WHEN THE OPPORTUNITY CAME TO MAKE MONEY AND BUY A NICE HOME THEY TOOK IT.

BUT THE SIXTIES WAS THE GREATEST TIME TO BE ALIVE IT WAS "FREEDOM" TO LIVE AND EXPRESS YOUR THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Fifties just plain SUCKED
Posted by: willymack on Jan 31, 2009 12:31 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For me, anyway. I was born in 1939, just two months after hitler invaded Poland. I still have memories of gasoline ration stickers on cars, crushing tin cans for recycling, turning bacon grease in to the butcher, and the great swing jazz bands, the Bennie Goodman Quartet, and Woody Herman's unforgetable "Caladonia, Caladonia, what makes your big head so hard?". Bill Haley ushered the '50s and rock 'n roll in in 1953 with "Crazy, man, Crazy, and jazz went to small groups. Only in Japan and France did it remain truly popular. Ozzie and Harriet showed us the ideal American family. Ozzie had an unspecified job, and Harriet awaited him at home in a Paris evening gown. They slept in seperate beds, and probably didn't even go to the bathroom. They had two well scrubbed sons, and all the insultingly banal "problems" they encountered were happily resolved within the show's time frame. Macarthyism was the word of the day, and we were taught to "Duck & Cover" in case of nuclear attack from our ficticious enemy, the "evil" Soviet Union. The hypocrosy was as thick as mould on month-old bread, and most of the rock 'n roll music was PUTRID. One saving grace the fifties had over what we have now was that the majority of us were functionally LITERATE, thanks to much better schools than we have now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1950s were not as bad as the George W. Bush Years
Posted by: US Citizen on Jan 31, 2009 12:46 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think we have to worry about a recurrence of the 1950s now. The Fifties were a time of rising prosperity. We are in a downward spiral now. Also as far as soul-crushing times, the 1950s don't compare with the eight years of the George W. Bush administration, that time of SUVs, white man swagger, unnecessary wars, torture, union destruction, hostility to any original compassionate ideas. George W. Bush was the top soul crusher of all US Presidents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The American Dream Survived Well Into The 1980s...
Posted by: Scalpel on Jan 31, 2009 1:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My nuclear family imploded 15 years ago and I've been living with the fallout ever since.

I am 33 years old. My parents were part of the boomers generation but carried the same flawed dreams that the author's parents had. Both survived episodes of abuse--in my father's case, emotional and physical abuse, in my mother's case, sexual. They were never given a chance to express their pain, so they bought into the American Dream like so many others in 1980s. My father made a very good living with TVA (which he recently retired from) and my mother did her best to raise myself and my sister. But their pain and stiflement burned inside them. Drugs, alcohol, and extramarital affairs were the results of that denial. The bottom fell out during my senior year of high school, right after my mother's mother died from a long bout of cancer.

There is something unsaid and malignant about the social fabric of the last half of the 20th century. If I had a name for it, I'd give it. Malaise, alienation...the words hint at it, but that's all. I wonder...on the eve of what may very well be a new age, what was the nightmare that made so many people hide behind the American Dream? The final words of Max Allan Collins' "Road to Purgatory" are worth considering: "He just prayed that he never woke up screaming from [the American Dream]."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Robert Heinlein had it right
Posted by: RickW on Jan 31, 2009 2:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."

And THIS is what we cut out of the equation, very much to our detriment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: obert Heinlein had it right Posted by: wrinklemomma
» RE: obert Heinlein had it right Posted by: willymack
Whose American Dream?
Posted by: kogwonton on Jan 31, 2009 3:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I look back on my youth, raised by a single mother from 1966-82 in upstate N.Y., in a very poor household. I recall watching Hollywood versions of the American Dream on television and feeling as if we weren't as good as other families who had fathers who knew best and mothers who cooked breakfast for their children every day. I remember visiting with some well-to-do relatives in S. California and getting a chance to see real people living a life that I had only seen on television. There were manicured lawns and sidewalks so smooth you could skateboard on them for days. There were swimming pools and kids who said things like 'gee whiz'. I never really thought about all of it till I was older, and it didn't really occur to me how much harm the Hollywood version of the American Dream did to me. And I know plenty of people whose lives were far more difficult than my own, and what could the effects of that kind of propaganda have been on them?

Recently I found myself really angry at the main goal of the education system. I had gone back to school to get a degree and I found that the primary focus was to teach students to 'get a job' working for some corporation or other. For some reason I had the mistaken notion that Americans were independent minded, sought self-sufficiency, and wished to be their own bosses. I thought Americans were Entrepreneurs. I was shocked to see that such thinking is so discouraged.

I think that it is a soul killer to have commerce determine normality. The Brady Bunch should be destroyed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a child, I loved the 50s
Posted by: badkitty on Jan 31, 2009 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was born in 1950, the child of a graduate student who played piano in bars for a living and a mother who stayed at home and occasionally typed for money. Although my family never had a lot of money (when I was five, my father finally got a teaching job), my parents were frugal, and we always had enough to eat (steak on birthdays!) and my parents always spent a lot of time with us. I am the last of the non-TV children (my parents didn't get a television until I was 26), so in the evenings we read, drew, played games, and did puzzles. My parents were never influenced by popular norms, so I don't remember anything deadening about their lives or the 50s. I remember it as a safe, secure time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Would not have come out differently
Posted by: BlueTigress on Jan 31, 2009 4:20 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Odds are after the author's parents married, Mom would have gotten fired because it was seen as the duty of married women to start humping up children.

If she were lucky, "Mom" would have been able to hang onto her job until her first pregnancy started to show. After that it was off to the home front. And forget about trying to juggle children and a job. That just wasn't done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who are the people who derailed the 90s and beyond?
Posted by: titusoye on Jan 31, 2009 4:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though, not an American and can hardly say much about the American of 50s, but my question is who were the people who derailed the 90s and beyond and caused the American dream to be lost, if it was ever lost? Were they not those born in the 50s or who at least were in their adolescence in the 50s? These are the people in economic and political power today.

Since no one can actually point to the American Dream, but just speak in praise of that uncertain dream, may be one can assume it was the "expectation of a happy married and successful family" at least by the picture painted by Mr. Bader and other commentators to his article. One can assume that this is true because people who have contributed to this debate are always using family life as the basic measuring rod.

Perhaps, another question to ponder is if economic insecurity was the cause of family malaise in the 50s and beyond, what was the cause or source of life insecurity today, 50 years later? Is the cause still the same or a different one?

Or to put the question another way What was it that crippled the capacity of family life or people to live together peacefully in the years beyond the 50s? Or was it the fear of the unknown future that forced families and the people to insure their future securities in the hands of the irresponsbile?

Or is it a new era that is forcing itself upon humanity? New eras may bring new civilizations, but all civilizations are like thin veneer that conceal the debasement or depravity of humanity. Our individual relationship to whatever era is given or forced upon us will dependend on our status at any given time, depending on whether we are a dweller, a sojourner or a mere traveler in that particular era. May be it is time to dreaming another dream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting autobiographical essay. The relevance to today, except in the author's mind, is...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 31, 2009 6:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
highly questionable.

I'm sorry his parents didn't love him more?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

options
Posted by: HSencillo on Jan 31, 2009 7:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Options is what took these lives down the dusty path. When you have all those options open, you find you're left with no options at all.

This may sound totally vague or bogus or whatever, but the "American Dream" that Madison Avenue sold us down the river with was all about options. Choices. Well, choices are finite. The choices ran out way before it was even visible to people, who pine and think that the future is always bright. Bullshit, sez I. The future is and has been for 50 years tied to and fettered to an agenda and mindset that knew at the bottom of its blackened heart that offering "options" to unsuspecting people is to entice them with candy while waiting to rob them once they took the candy.

Options" and "future" has nothing to do with hope. Hope is what the 30s knew. By the time the 60s came along, all that morphed into "future" and "options" and "choices" that were hollow to begin with. Oh, yeah; we were all gonna be riding around in flying cars, remember?

I dunno; I ain't got no answers. All I know is that fair is fair, and fair got cynically siderailed in the 60s. There ain't no equality anywhere; fair? now that's another possibility. All I want is my three squares and a house and a decent job with dignity, and for the crooks that raise interest rates to 30% to go to fuckin' jail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I still see my job as a matter of independence
Posted by: SalB on Jan 31, 2009 9:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an educated professional making more than both my parents combined, I definitely see my job as independence. My colleagues are all baby boomer women who have been with my comapny for over 30 years. The stories they have are incredible and I can't believe they lived through it. Women were forbiddden from the labs, and there were areas with stairs that you could see through from the bottom which was a real issue since women were forced to wear skirts to work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

read John Cheever
Posted by: riotoustanpdx on Jan 31, 2009 11:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The master of the art ... The stories of John Cheever revealed the dark side of the Baby Boomer Times and recorded the events from a contemporary point of view. He was the detached observer with all the flaws he wrote about, perceiving them in himself and the people around him. No one can equal Cheever in recording the Fifties and Sixties as they were.

There is much that was good about the period, so I agree with many above who assert the same thing. It was a very good time.

However, two phenomena also occurred that weigh on the dark side of the war generation: The fact that the horrors of the war assimilated deeply within the psyches of the (mostly) men who witnessed the death and destruction closely were not dealt with or externalized but buried within had its toll on those persons deeply effected. And, unknown at the time and little understood in its impact on American life, was the influx of more than ten thousand "former" Nazis into the Corporate Powers of America. The influence that this Nazi group had on the psyche of the corporate world was enormous, though it may have been subtle. It is still prevalent today.

Ruthless efficiency as a goal in itself always comes at a price in human lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The 'Camelot' generation coming into Power
Posted by: Purple Girl on Feb 1, 2009 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always been astounded a Scoilogist got away with claiming the 'Boomer' generation spanned '45 to '63. What a sham which probabaly made that hack millions. I was born in '63 by parents who were too young to be involved in WW2. They were the younger siblings of the 'Greatest Generation'- another very distinct generation, far more molded by big tailfin cars and sock hops than the atrocities of war, or even concerns of impending war- they were too young when WW2 broke out to comprehend the global implications.
I was born at a time when the President was the Youngest ever, who asked not what your country can do for You, but what you can do for your country- Not whether of not you were a 'Commie'. In fact I never remember having to duck under our desks because of possible air raids, but for Tornados.
What seems to have happen to the 'Boomers' is their parents had seen the threats of global war, the atrocites and decided their children would ever want for anything. My older cousins went to private schools, owned a horse, or Lived & shopped in the exclusive areas. I and my sisters went to public schools, picked up stray cats and lived in the neighborhood of Blue collar workers, shopped at the local mall. Our parents aspired to their siblings Wealth, but instilled in us we were less 'affluent' then our cousins. these realization it don't come into focus until much later. We were told more about the 'Starving children in China' or 'Stop crying or I'll give you something to cry about'..aka things could be worse, so appreciate what you have. My older cousins always look to gain more, to be 'somebody', to Show their accomplishments with material belongings.My cousin took my parents to a 'exclusive' neighborhood (BlackHawk) and grocery store on their visit to CA. I had taken them into SF, down the coast to show them the beauty of the area, not the wealth. I had invited them to see the majesty of nature in the area, she wanted them to see her house and Gym in Danville.
"Boomers" are a product of WW2- about '38 to '50..After that shit began to change in peoples minds and in society in general. I am NOT a Boomer , and neither is Our new President, were 'Camelot' Kids, aspiring to societal nor monetary gains. We were too young to buy the latest Beatle album, but old enough to buy the latest Lennon release. We weren't listening to 'Money (that's all I want)' were were listening to 'Working Class Hero'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American Dreamers Gradually Awaken To Reality...
Posted by: gazooks on Feb 1, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...of both actuality and denial progressing and regressing in the evolution of human society.

The dream basis lies, I think, in our Constitutional "right" to entertain as possible and then strive to realize "life, liberty" and the elusive "happiness", framed within the premise of equality and freedom for all.

Justice and equity remains only a dream for those disadvantaged through a complex of circumstance, race, gender, health and means in the context of a generational continuum.

The nightmarish part is when one persons or one social class' dream imposes it's will on another that's less aggressive or more socially, economically and politically vulnerable. The capacity for self interested inhumanity manifests in the micro of interpersonal relationships and the macro of international warfare.

In-between the extremes of scale is the constant effort to understand and find balance away from the destructive influences of inequity as is evidenced throughout the postwar period of the 50's and 60's. The personal experiences as described above are all testament to the process of positive adjustment through cultural growth. A predominately painful process for many, but a progression towards equity measured in movements of artistic expression, scientific understanding and expanding human tolerance and expectation.

The excesses of the current period have eroded the hope that many of us have held as a gift from an ideal conveyed from our parents pre and postwar experience. Their sacrifices during war formed their aspirations thereafter often at the expense of the happiness so sought. But they did, for the most part, the best that they could in the best ways that their experience allowed.

It's worthy to yearn and to work for ideals of justice and liberty. To witness their absence or the threat of their disappearance is critical to their survival. Reflection on where we've been is critical to appreciating their value to our lives today. We all want to live and experience a fulfillment of emotional, intellectual and material needs, just like our parents, just like our children.

The threats to deny the success of that fulfillment are the same for us today as they were for our parents and grandparents. Our methods in countering those threats today must employ a collective wisdom spanning those generations to enable those successive a renewed opportunity to get it right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's Another Simplistic Explanation
Posted by: BobBrrz on Feb 1, 2009 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Industrial Capitalism used the 50's Family the way it used National Defense: a place to dump the surplus. The 50's saw the end of Mom making clothes for the kids and Dad making furniture with hand tools. Through the 60's and 70's we had Progress--we had a Revolution! The Market threw out the Family when something better came along. All those kids in single-parent homes became a bonanza! Why sell one refrigerator, car or stove per couple when you can sell one per adult? The malaise of the 50's and the malaise of now are closely related: they're both way stations on the stumbling march of The Economy toward universal want and environmental disaster.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Killed the American Dream...
Posted by: motamanx6 on Feb 1, 2009 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..was the GI with the Zippo putting the torch to that Viet Nam hooch: "destroying the village in order to save it." That, for me, was the tell that we were terminally screwing up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No era is all bad
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Feb 2, 2009 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recently a young friend told me she didn't want to have a baby because she didn't want to bring a child into this world. I heard a lot of people say exactly the same thing when I waw young in the 60s. I imagine there were Romans and probably Greeks, too, who thought the world was just too corrupt, greedy, and decadent to bring a new baby into it.

What about the Inquisition, World War II, the Great Depression, the Dark Ages? For a person of color, any time in America up to at least the 1960s had to be pretty difficult.

Certainly there were some good things about the 50s, as many posters here have articulated. Many workers made a living wage; the middle class came into its own; working people had cars, sewing machines, and refrigerators.

At the same time, we had segregation and lynchings, sexual harrassment, gender oppression, McCarthyism, the Cold War, and a multitude of other hidden problems.

My mother told me that her mother-in-law advised her not to get a job after she married my father, even though she had a nursing degree. The reason was "if you start out working, he'll get used to your income and you will always have to work."

My mother gave me the same advice when I was a teenager, although she revised her thinking as she got older. By the time she had granddaughters, she was telling them to make sure they could support themselves so they didn't have to rely on a man.

When I was a child and teenager during the late 50s and the 60s, many of the adults I knew had difficult marriages. The husbands were either overbearing, had affairs, or were distant and uncommunicative. The wives were often strident, discontented, or extremely submissive. My friends were mostly afraid of their fathers.

I firmly believe that one main reason there are so many divorces now is that people don't feel obligated to put up with abuse and betrayal. My parents were very close friends with a couple with whom they spent a great deal of time. Although I was quite young, I was always aware that the husband was a womanizer. If I knew this, so did the wife. But instead of confronting him, she simply put up with it her entire married life.

My mother lived through my father. They had an extremely difficult relationship, and it was probably not either one's fault entirely. But she was never a whole person, and she resented it. However, she liked being married to an artist and, since she had no separate identity or self-assurance, she was never going to strike out on her own. Lots and lots of women were like that because they were told their place in life was to find a husband and make him happy.

My husband grew up in an Ozzie and Harriet type of family. But he and his brother both seemed to react to the vanilla atmosphere with rebellion and a need to find greater intellectual and artistic stimulation.

So, is it somehow better to be a child of the 60s or 70s than of the 50s? I believe each era, each decade, each century has its upside and downside. We have more racial, ethnic, and gender equality. We have better communication and more understanding of science and human nature. We have less happy innocence, more economic instability, and greater awareness of crime and terrorism.

Life is a dangerous, marvelous, surprising, terrible and wonderful place to be. That never changes; it's simply the nature of what's terrible and what's wonderful that changes. The 50s were no different.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

**FASHION MAGS & 'Star' TV** killed culture...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Feb 2, 2009 2:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*gimme! gimme!*

*you're never enough!!*

that killed culture & society.

The 50s weren't the problem: it was the American sense of entitlement because they had the wherewithall to nuke 2 cities.

yup: 'we've got the bomb, screw everybody ELSE!'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have you ever watched MadMen?
Posted by: maximumbob on Feb 3, 2009 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you had, you'd know what a load of crap this article is. The people who grew up in the 50's and 60's knew freedom that the well-kept, repressed, groomed, and coddled currently living could only dream of.

Freedom from conformity, freedom from social pressure, freedom from the flavorless paste that we have all been reduced to. We all listen to the same music, watch the same blather on TV, and get trained to cow tow to the same bleating voices of political correctness. We are all bounded by a cage of 'nice' and 'fair' and take a profoundly uncritical view of 'forward thinking' which would make a quaker/victorian blush.

Watch it some time and you'll see what I mean.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions
Posted by: ClassAct on Feb 3, 2009 2:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 1950s might be remembered as a time of prosperity, but one should keep in mind that were more labor strikes in the 1950s than in any other decade of US history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The day the music died
Posted by: the director on Feb 4, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Soul-Crushing Malaise

Let’s consider other reasons why the 1950s can be considered the beginning of the end of happiness.

The time line is always interesting when we realize our behavior has changed.

To properly consider the 50’s we have to consider the preceding decades carefully. The war years were an example of greater cooperation following both the Great Depression and the WW2. The economy began serious growth with increased prosperity. We made stuff. An Industrial nation

In the 20 and 30s the use of psychiatric medications were added to the talk therapy of the Freud. The first of these mood drugs were the amphetamines and too many of our children are still being addicted to speed and “Meth” thanks to our giving them Ritalin.
“On Speed” by Nicholas Rasmussen is a good reference.

After the war the drug companies trying to incorporate what they gained from the German drug companies, Bayer was Farbin in Germany.

But before we consider the drug companies role in this malaise we must consider the role of the chemical industry and how it has altered our food both in processing and in the additives allowed by the FDA. Preservatives not only preserve the self life of the food we purchase but they also preserves we who eat it.

In 1954 a very important though overlooked event occurred. Ezra Taft Benson as Sec of Agriculture “bailed” our his rich oil friends with the mandatory Chemical Fertilizer Rider to the Farm Subsidies Act of the New Deal legislation of 1946. Use chemical fertilizers or don’t get paid to grow certain crops, or any at all.

This is where discussion must get technical being that sulfur is a necessary mineral if we want to make our own mood altering compounds. Endorphins, serotonin, and other amino acids like glutathione are all sulfur dependent.

The use of chemical fertilizers has broken the sulfur cycle in two ways:
These chemical plant food contain no sulfur. The sulfur in crude oil is vaporized when these fertilizers nuggets are “crackled” 100 degrees above the vaporization point for sulfur. The increased levels of sulfur dioxide in the upper atmosphere could be the result of our fertilizer production.

Once the chemicals are applied to the soil these same “plant foods” bind up any organic sulfur from rain fall making that organic sulfur non bio available to the plants and to animals, we are animals.

Mad Men is significant for cigarettes. The most advertised drug on television. Advertising of prescription drugs would not happen for another 25 years. The FDA said cigarette smoke was not hazardous to our health after the cigarette companies proved it.

Drinking booze was one way to to come down from the amphetamines. Pharmacology provided the next wave of mood drugs with barbiturates and sleeping pills so that we could relieve the pain of the depression too many of us experienced.

We are what we eat. When we eat incomplete chemical compounds which our bodies can not metabolize those “wastes” have to go somewhere and often plug up the works getting there.

We study Organic Sulfur and have observed depressed individuals who discontinued taking their anti depressants soon after adding sulfur to their diets. Their children who were who were taking Ritalin and added sulfur to their diet stopped taking Ritalin, and were
no longer “Zombies.”

If we want to changed the day the music died, demand no more chemicals on the ground or in our soil, added to our food, in our water, and especially in our air. We spend the money.

Patrick McGean

Live Blood and Cellular Matrix Study

organicsulfur@sisna.com

Born 1946

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Angst that nothing like a nice long GreatER Depression won't cure
Posted by: xbj on Feb 4, 2009 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You worst fears realized: Those postwar 1950's are going to look damn magically wonderful to your kids and their kids if they are lucky enough to have them recur, after living through one, perhaps two decades of the worst Depression to ever hit the world.

Those who live through it will appreciate the 50's and their recurrence (if they might be SO blessed) with an entirely new perspective.

P.S. People who said no to alcohol and needless prescription drugs were, for the most part, perfectly happy during the 50's. And in any other time, for that matter. The problem wasn't the times; the problem was weak character. And people like that have problems in ANY decade. Ask the swimmer... what WAS his name? I've forgotten already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ahhhh yes, the 50's........
Posted by: marizara on Feb 5, 2009 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I remember correctly, the 50's heralded in the advent of the "Madison Avenue - Consumer Manipulation" mentality. -- That is where all those rich companies got the idea of how to hoodwink everyone in this country, and in the World. -- Now that we have all had our "clocks cleaned", do you think perhaps we can learn to not be so profoundly gullible??? -- Madison Avenue taught the business world that the common person can be made to salivate, just like a dog being offered bacon. -- Darn, if we didn't take the bacon, hook, line, and sinker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement