Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Marijuana Reform Is Part of the Progressive Agenda, So Why Are Obama's Drug Cops Already Making Pot Raids?

By Paul Armentano, AlterNet. Posted January 28, 2009.


Pot-reform activists have swarmed Obama's Change.gov, and huge majorities voted for pot reform in election '08, but no change yet from Obama.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Paul Armentano

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This past August, House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., during a live interview with CNN, did something quite remarkable. She spoke candidly and openly about her support for marijuana-law reform. But rather than demanding her colleagues in Washington take the necessary steps to end the federal government's seven-decade war on weed, she instead called on the public to act.

"We have important work to do outside the Congress in order for us to have success inside the Congress." Pelosi said. "[W]e need peoples' help to be in touch with their members of Congress to say why this (marijuana law reform) should be the case."

As the saying goes, "Ask and ye shall receive."

In the past few months, the public has expressed its support for marijuana law reform in unprecedented numbers. The election of former pot smoker, Barack "I inhaled frequently; that was the point" Obama, coupled with a sagging economy, has stimulated tens of thousands of Americans to demand their government stop spending its limited state and federal law enforcement resources on efforts targeting, arresting and prosecuting marijuana smokers.

For example, in December the question: "Will (President Obama) consider legalizing marijuana so that the government can regulate it, tax it, put age limits on it and create millions of new jobs and create a billion dollar-industry right here in the U.S.?" beat over 7,300 public-policy issues to claim the top spot in Change.gov's inaugural "Open for Questions" poll. (Change.gov, now WhiteHouse.gov, was the official Web site of President Obama's transition team.)

The first-place finish was hardly a fluke. The public's demand to "legalize the medicinal and recreational use of marijuana" also finished first in a two-month-long Web poll hosted by the liberal-leaning social-networking Web site Change.org and Washington's Case Foundation -- finishing some 5,000 votes ahead of the next most popular idea.

More recently, 26,000 visitors cast their vote in a CNBC online poll asking, "Do you favor the decriminalization of marijuana use?" More than 97 percent of those who voted said yes.

Perhaps most impressively, in a follow-up poll conducted by the Obama administration -- commissioned under the guise of creating a Citizens' Briefing Book for the new president -- the public's call to "stop imprisoning responsible adult citizens" finished first out of 44,000 policy proposals. But that was far from the only marijuana-related question to resonate with the public. Amazingly, a separate question calling on the new administration to "stop using federal resources to undermine states' medicinal marijuana laws" finished in third place.

Critics of the recent poll results are quick to note that online polls are not scientific and that arguably more Americans are concerned about other pressing social issues -- such as rising unemployment, for instance -- than care about reforming the United States' pot policies. But those who interpret these results so superficially are missing the bigger political picture.

As the popularity of the marijuana issue in these polls indicates, there is a significant, vocal and identifiable minority of American society that wants to see an end to America's archaic and overly punitive marijuana laws. Politicians, particularly progressive politicians, would be well-advised to acknowledge this interest group and respond accordingly.

Further, a majority of the American public is ready and willing to engage in a serious and objective political debate regarding the merits of legalizing the use of cannabis by adults, even if their elected officials are not. One only has to log on to the thousands of public comments, both for and against, marijuana legalization on the message board of Change.gov and Change.org to see that Americans are pining for, if nothing else, an honest review of our nation's so-called war on drugs.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: marijuana, obama, war drugs

Paul Armentano is the deputy director of NORML and the NORML Foundation. He is also the co-author of the forthcoming book Marijuana Is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People To Drink?, to be published in 2009 by Chelsea Green.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lowest Law Enforcement Priority Policy in Fayetteville "means nothing"
Posted by: indradawn on Jan 28, 2009 1:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...according to the lawyer representing two dear friends (a very sweet married couple who just had their first baby) who were arrested, processed and jailed, and are awaiting prosecution for the possession of a small personal amount of marijuana and some rolling papers. They were targeted, as were others arrested the same night, by Fayetteville cops on New Year's Eve.

While they will not do any prison time, this working family will likely be heavily fined and owe an attorney a lot of money. Their records may be expunged after one year, but even beyond that officers who may pull them over for even a minor traffic violation will be privy to this information and according to their attorney, will assume they are carrying and search their vehicle. The lawyer recommended they give up using marijuana for good, as they will always be treated differently by law enforcement and will always be subject to search and seizure at any time. My friends, understandably, are afraid to drive down the road. "I envision myself standing on the side of the road holding the baby while they tear apart my car, just for having a headlight out."

So even after what they've already endured, even after the thousands of dollars they will have to spend, after the public embarrassment and being treated like petty criminals, even after they've paid their dues, their nightmare will never end because they will always feel that they are under the thumb of law enforcement.

It is still unclear whether or not my friends, both of which are trying to finish their degrees while they work and raise a family, will lose their student aid.

It is time for responsible adults to stand up and demand an end to this war on our own citizens and this underhanded means of social control.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

January 21, 2013
Posted by: RevolutionNet on Jan 28, 2009 1:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's when marijuana will be legalized.

Legalization will bring every tinhorn moralist in the nation out en masse. The people who will benefit will be too busy watching Comedy Central to go to the polls.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: January 21, 2013 Posted by: Jayzer
» how he calculated the date Posted by: deborama
» RE: how he calculated the date Posted by: jroth420
» UH... I DOUBT IT Posted by: nikolai
» RE: UH... I DOUBT IT Posted by: GatoPreto
» RE: UH... I DOUBT IT Posted by: kungfuma
» RE: how he calculated the date Posted by: Sister_Lauren
We Should Take Nancy Pelosi at Her Word, But....
Posted by: Jayzer on Jan 28, 2009 1:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should take Nancy Pelosi at her word and pressure members of Congress to honor the votes of the people in the various states who passed laws enabling the use of marijuana for medical purposes, but we needn't stop there. Given that the Justice Department has, in the past, decided to ignore the openly expressed will of the people and has used illegitimate force against the people, I see no reason why we must restrict ourselves to letters, phone calls and faxes to make ourselves heard.

In states where medical marijuana initiatives have been passed but have been ignored, self-defense squads should be formed both to expose official abuses of power and to block such abuses by any means necessary.

When agents of the government see fit to ignore electoral results, they have already demonstrated their illegitimacy. While it is true that the zealousness with which the "War on Drugs" (really a War on the People) can be attributed to Bush holdovers, it is not necessarily the case that the Obama administration will act in a timely manner to block abuses.

Of course, we must allow the new administration time to correct its course, but steps should also be taken to expose, to block and to strike back against any "law enforcement" abuses----preferably with propaganda weapons, but also with actual weapons. It is no small thing to lock someone away in a prison for the distribution or use of an herb---this is a serious human rights abuse and as such, we should no longer be willing to accept it as such.

Make no mistake: I am NOT advocating a premature resort to violence, but I AM speaking out in favor of reasserting our right to self-defense, even when it involves men and women acting as representatives of a government that we had elected. I know one thing: I did NOT vote in favor of continued abuses by authorities who knock down doors, slam people around, handcuff and imprison them for smoking or eating an herb.

Rational discussion of the pros and cons of the legalization of "drugs" (I consider marijuana to be an herb, not a synthetic "drug.") is all well and fine, but when voters have already expressed a willingness to allow themselves and others to treat themselves with an herb, but the government chooses to ignore that vote, then the government is no longer to be trusted.

Government should be there to serve us, not to harass and imprison us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I AGREE WITH YOU, BUT... Posted by: nikolai
Priorities
Posted by: Ashoka911 on Jan 28, 2009 3:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, Obama has been in office for what....less than a week?!

Second, his administration takes over, but there is massive inertia in government that needs to be overcome...especially when Bush has laid so many land mines.

Finally, I would rather he tackle problems like the Middle east and whatever this economic mess is if prioritizing is an issue (and I am sure that it is)

But all that aside, it is time to raise hell about this so that when he thinks the time is right, he will fix this with grace, but not get shot down before he builds up the capital needed to execute a real solution.

Remmeber Clinton and his "Dont ask dont tell"? That pissed of congress, the military, and others, was a half solution at best and may have cost us a national health care system.

I don't know when Obama will decide to do what, but he is intelligence and compassion at work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Priorities Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Priorities Posted by: musclecarfreak
» RE: Priorities Posted by: kungfuma
Nancy Pelosi....
Posted by: gandolfshep on Jan 28, 2009 3:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This past August, House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., during a live interview with CNN, did something quite remarkable. She spoke candidly and openly about her support for marijuana-law reform. But rather than demanding her colleagues in Washington take the necessary steps to end the federal government's seven-decade war on weed, she instead called on the public to act.

Nancy I do believe 97% of the people have made a very strong statement. I believe those non-violent individuals now serving time in prison have acted. The cost of this stupid law alone is a numbing statement considering the recent robbery by Wall Street and the Bush crew.

Nancy, the public have acted or are you blind. Can you remember that it's you and your co- workers that make the laws which outlawed Marijuana and not the public?

Should you forget your duty, which you seem to have done, than we the public, or at least the large majority of thinking public have decided to pass a law making it legal. Will you and yours accept our decission, of course not because all you do is talk.

You elected officals are paid obscene salaries and benefits to serve the public so do your job. Or would you prefer we do your job and still continue to pay you for going against the will of the people you are paid to serve?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well put Posted by: aahpat
» Ok, Nancy, NOW what? Posted by: nikolai
» RE: Ok, Nancy, NOW what? Posted by: pelican beak
Hemp medicine is not new!
Posted by: neilemac on Jan 28, 2009 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The farce has gone on too long, time to enlighten lawmakers. Here's an excellent beginning and solution....

Hemp medicine is not new!

Rick Simpson's Cross-Canada Crush Cancer (with Hemp Medicine) Tour

Peace in all dimensions please, pleas welcomed!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not about the facts concerning cannabis
Posted by: be marc on Jan 28, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's about people greedy for power over others, and entrenched interests like the criminal injustice, law enforcement, drug testing, and prison industries.

Many thousands of people would lose power, profits and employment if cannabis were legalized or simply decriminalized. The repercussions would be huge, and the potential losers, at every level, would fight a bitter battle to ensure it did not happen.

It is a national disgrace that citizens of this country cannot legally receive medicinal cannabis or even effective medical care. That this is the case only indicates the shameless degree to which the special interests are willing to go to retain their power and profits.

Since when does the US Congress represent the will of the People? Congress represents the interests of the industries who own them, through the legal system of bribery called campaign contributions, and whose lobbyists literally write the laws.

Don't expect that to change anytime soon. The system is rigged in favor of big $$$. Until the people who financially benefit from that system are willing to show some integrity and change it, business as usual will prevail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama
Posted by: beandang on Jan 28, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL, I bet Obamas presidential pot is some of the best around! You KNOW he fires up a big fat one on a regular basis.

RT
Is your ISP watching?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: Thank you for posting a warning Posted by: Sister_Lauren
10,000 industrail uses.. no chemical fertilizers required
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 28, 2009 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can you enslave humanity when they can grow a plant that provides for most of their needS??? this is the NWO game plan.. make people dependent

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am Afraid all this talk is for Nothing Because
Posted by: madmax427 on Jan 28, 2009 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Obama Adminstration has yet to curtail or even address the NSA Illegal Wire Tapping and Hacking the Bush Adminstration started!

I know Personally becasue last night I TRIED to post a derogotory post about Gates on My website, only to see it disappear. it also took Me over an hour just to get back on My website creator to post a response.

The "Return to Rule of Law" so far is just ANOTHER Farce!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The endless war on pot & other drugs is a scam to...
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jan 28, 2009 8:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
provide cops, lawyers, judges, prison industry, politicians, etc., with: make-work, job security & growth, bonuses, promotions, smuggling revenue, etc.

Our government eagerly drags harmless pot smokers into "their system" & disrupts or destroys their lives!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all about chemtrails!
Posted by: sausage on Jan 28, 2009 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See, Obama is really an Illuminati under direct orders from the Bilderbergers to eradicate marijuana by fueling every commercial jetliner and all military jets with paraquat laced jet fuel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's all about chemtrails! Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: It's all about chemtrails! Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Wrong, it was Bush holdovers, not Obama
Posted by: jennymac on Jan 28, 2009 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do a google on Bush raid Lake Tahoe and you'll see the truth, this had already been ordered by Bush in advance and his guys carried out the orders. Nothing to do with Obama policies - which, of course, we hope change course....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tell me something, Pollyanna Posted by: GuitarBill
Delusional
Posted by: aahpat on Jan 28, 2009 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is purely delusional to think that the raid by the CEA on the California medical marijuana facility was a last gasp of the previous administration. It was obviously the inaugural act of the Obama drug warriors.

One of President Obama's first acts as president, on January 20, was to appoint a career drug warrior to be acting director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Long time general council to the ONDCP, Edward Jurith. Jurith came from inside the office to run the office and had to know both about the raid and about Obama's campaign innuendo about opposing such raids. The only possible conclusion is that Obama sanctioned the raid. Probably with Jim Crow Joe Biden, who coined the term "drug czar" cheering him on.

See my blog post on the appointment at my new blog 'Aid & comfort' Obama's acting Drug Czar

Obama conned the drug reform community right from the start. He used all of the social justice rhetoric that Bill Clinton used in campaigns only to then turn around and give America its first world record prison population. Obama's endorsing the new stimulus package with its $3-billion in new Byrne Grants for police and prisons promises to eclipse the Clinton record.

The only way to keep from being screwed by these lying Democrats is to stop voting for them. I stopped in 1996 in response to the Clinton drug war actions. Nader is the one social justice advocate who reflects and respects my human rights, civil liberties and social justice values so he has gotten my vote since 1996.

If you don't want to feel betrayed by Democrats and Republicans STOP VOTING FOR THEM!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry about the typo Posted by: aahpat
» RE: Delusional Posted by: Bud
» And tell them so too Posted by: aahpat
» RE: Nader hurt us by himself Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Delusional Posted by: gandolfshep
» Obama is a liar Posted by: aahpat
wondering
Posted by: 6ndi333 on Jan 28, 2009 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If marijuana is legalized in the U.S. would its citizens be able to grow his or her own?
Also, is there ever going to be a time where plants like peyote, animals like tiny brown mushrooms and other natural psychadelic material of the earth are legalized or decriminalized? Please advise.

http://periodicalcuriosity.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wondering Posted by: Sister_Lauren
There is only one answer
Posted by: Comrade Rutherford on Jan 28, 2009 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because Obama and the rest of the Democratic Leadership are under the direct control of the Republican Party.

Just because Progressives and Liberals voted in a Democratic majority does NOT mean that ANY progressive or liberal legislation will ever be passed.

The Prison industry needs a stimulus package, too. And that means keeping up pointless drug arrests for tiny amounts.

Obama and the Dems will NEVER change anything because their Republican masters will not let them, regardless of what their constituents demand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hogwash. Posted by: Beck
» Beck blowing smoke Posted by: aahpat
Police and prison unions
Posted by: aahpat on Jan 28, 2009 10:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are bigger donors to the Democratic Party than are drug policy reform advocates.

That is why there is a big new $3-billion item in the stimulus package for Byrne Grants to police and prisons but no talk about reducing the costs of police and prisons with drug policy reform.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Economy
Posted by: Femmy68 on Jan 28, 2009 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consider for a moment the state of the economy. What could the legalization of Marijuana do for the economy? Legalization means regulation, growth and cultivation, marketing distribution and taxation. Think how that could impact a financially struggling nation. Then consider how much could be saved in tax dollars by releasing from jails and prisons thousands upon thousands of people doing time for simply possession and use of marijuana. No more paying for the support of all those people, not to mention those funds going toward other more beneficial programs. Then think of the tax dollars awaiting us on taxing the product which could go toward even more beneficial programs.

Just how much are we willing to let the far right control us, to the point of struggling to survive?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ill repeat myself ..your wasting your breath...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Jan 28, 2009 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
im no big fan of the drug war either...but in our society its not just the law.. its a law of nature like gravity...

now about that CNBC poll..lets do some math .. 97% of 26000 = 25220 / 305700000 = a whopping 0.008% of the US population favours legalizing marijuana...and mark my words ..you wont find any sympathy from the 99.992% of americans that didnt answer the poll...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I disagree Posted by: asemili
So Why Are Obama's Drug Cops Already Making Pot Raids?
Posted by: GuitarBill on Jan 28, 2009 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because Obama is NOT a progressive.

Obama is a DEMOCRAT, and Democrats are not progressive, they're "conservative" right-wingers.

GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's NO Secret...Drug Money Saves Banks
Posted by: picket on Jan 28, 2009 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the Exec Director of The United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime..."we can thank the liquidity of black market drug trade money for saving some banks and maybe even some countries economic systems." [1/25/09]

How important is Cannabis? Let me count the ways. It is the biggest cash crop in how many US States? Apparently our Leaders don't care about the tax money lost, and the cruelest loss is millions of ruined lives worldwide because of Cannabis illegality.

HEMP...We may need it to survive famine in this country ...FOOD and FUEL. The Train has left the station and the wreck is already inevitable. Do the Politicians hear the wails and screams of "the people"? No !! POWER & the Love of Money rules !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only one way to end the Drug War
Posted by: aahpat on Jan 28, 2009 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The War on Drugs was started by Richard Nixon for one reason and one reason only, as a cover for federal and local police to attack dissidence and nonconformity in America. They used the drug laws to go after anti-war and pro-civil rights protest leaders.

The political dissidence stigma has been attached to drug use ever since allowing Jim Crow police to oppress minority communities with impunity and mass disenfranchise mostly the poor and minorities of America who have the most to be dissatisfied with in America. This has served to shove America to the right as the electoral base has had fewer and fewer voters representing the poor and minorities of America.

The ONLY way for drug policy reformers to get the politicians to change the war on drugs anti democracy policy is mass protests in the streets of America.

The only other way to end the war on drugs is for the general public to stand up a oppose the terrorist funding and crime fostering prohibition economy created by the war on drugs policy. SEE: Barack Obama's Vietnam

And my inaugural day letter to: the new president

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If the people lead, the leaders will follow...
Posted by: vasumurti on Jan 28, 2009 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Election Day 2008 was a success for marijuana initiatives across the country, thanks to the work of the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), and numerous state and local groups.

In Massachusetts, voters decriminalized the possession of up to one ounce of marijuana. A campaign led by the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy and organized by MPP resulted in a 65 percent to 35 percent victory for the initiative.

In another state-level win, Michigan voters approved a medical marijuana initiative by a similarly lopsided margin. The campaign to pass that initiative was led by the MPP-backed Michigan Coalition for Compassionate Care.

At the local level, two initiatives to make make adult marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority won big. One, in Hawaii County, Hawaii, was led by Project Peaceful Sky. The other, in Fayetteville, Arkansas, was led by a coalition called Sensible Fayetteville.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what is left
Posted by: SCJake on Jan 28, 2009 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've elected officials supporting marijuana reform (or at least not opposed(Boehner, Pelosi)). We've passed nearly every medical marijuana bill. We've come out in droves to voice our opinion on every medium we can (change.org, change.gov, etc). We've e-mailed, snail-mailed, and called every representative we can(I know I have and I'm in SOUTH CAROLINA I'm surprised they haven't lynched me). What else is left? Are we going to be forced to protest? Are we going to have to give someone's campaign a huge donation? That seems to be the only way anyone will listen. Supporting reform is automatic at getting you at least SOME votes (I will never again vote for a candidate that is not publicly supporting reform) so why can't we get a little love? At least stop DEA raids. State laws > Federal Laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what is left Posted by: Sister_Lauren
IT'S ALL IN THE PLAN
Posted by: nikolai on Jan 28, 2009 12:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pot will remain illegal. Some decriminalization may occur if the citizenry gets fed-up enough, but that's about it. Loss of control you see, is unacceptable to the elite, and they will quash any attempt at power real or perceived. They like things just fine they way they are now with big profits for them on the legal and illegal side of the MJ laws. Believe it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IT'S ALL IN THE PLAN Posted by: MisterWu
Make July 4th a mass protest day
Posted by: aahpat on Jan 28, 2009 12:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for drug policy reform in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive????
Posted by: gellero1 on Jan 28, 2009 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you can always "hope"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Quoting Obama's Acting Drug Czar
Posted by: aahpat on Jan 28, 2009 1:10 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edward Jurith:

"The 2000 DAWN report shows the undeniable health consequences of substance abuse. Drugs often touted as harmless, such as marijuana and Ecstasy, are obviously dangerous and addictive, and the numbers prove it," Jurith said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public Pressure
Posted by: ClassAct on Jan 28, 2009 2:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one issue where there has already been an on-going public pressure for the last 40 years … to absolutely no avail. The reason is that those who smoke pot are held to be moral inferiors by conservatives and, given the wide-spread failure of the conservative agenda, is an issue where the conservative movement can always regroup – the moral superiority that they shamelessly confer upon themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Public Pressure Posted by: Morganx
Obama Could Have Stopped This
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Jan 28, 2009 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What President doesn't have a whole host of orders ready to be given the moment he enters office?

One would think he would have orders for every executive branch agency under his control.

He could have had orders for the DEA to cease any and all activities related to medicinal marijuana investigations in states that had approved it. He evidently did not.

It seems that he either:
A) Has no intention of following through on that campaign promise.
B) Had not thought to give any orders to the DEA yet.


His first public act was revoking the global gag rule about abortion but he could have done a wide variety of acts the moment he was sworn in if he had chosen to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Give it time
Posted by: asemili on Jan 28, 2009 3:04 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's team will tackle the DEA's crap. It's just going to take time. Probably a year or more. The failed "drug war" isn't very high on his priority list. Let him nail down the war in Iraq, take every measure he can to shore up the ecomony (short of creating a new industry by legalizing pot - that's the last thing they are going to do, and the first thing they should), and get his healthcare promises delivered. Then he'll probably start doing the policy changes on sentancing disparities between crack and powered cocaine, and work on the drug courts. If he gets a second term, the chances of pot decrim become much higher because he won't have as much to lose politically. Also, the house is going to start talking about Barney Frank's bill to decrim pot federally, so that will probably open up the forum down the road. Be patient. Allot is going to happen this year, but most of it won't happen till later in the year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL! Posted by: aahpat
» RE: Give it time Posted by: mlang52
» RE: Give it time...NO! Posted by: aahpat
Because Obama is not a Progressive
Posted by: Morganx on Jan 28, 2009 3:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As much as I like him, Obama is not a Progressive.

His Cabinet is full of Iraq Hawks, including Biden. His economics team is full of the people that lead the deregulation that caused the crash.

Don't paint Obama as a progressive that way you won't get disappointed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Obama is as LIBERAL as Eisenhower Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Positive Offensive
Posted by: ph0ed1n on Jan 28, 2009 4:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I sympathize with all venting their frustration here, we must compose ourselves and figure out how to establish sufficient power to expose the corruption.

Focusing hard on persuading the government hasn't worked. With all due respect, I hope leaders in the reform movement start discussing a major shift in strategy.

Our strength is our ability to win any debate on the issue, and we need to firmly go on the offensive with that strength, hitting comments sections in prestigious online publications, the blogosphere, and any prohibitionist stronghold. We must take our opposition to their turf, online and off.

We need a positive, strong public relations campaign to improve our public image in the mainstream. Prohibitionists are winning, because of their image as community leaders. We need to clearly demonstrate that we are respectable citizens in the minds of the public mainstream. The drug culture has been thoroughly demonized, so we must put that presentation style away for now.

Proper word selection is critical to winning.

Please stop using the words "war on drugs" or "drug war" run by "drug warriors", because it's always a big negative to surrender in wartime - especially on the Conservative side where more people need converting, and the word warrior has a positive meaning to many who need converting.

This is drug prohibition, and the deceivers are prohibitionists. This word selection makes sense, because then we instantly associate them with that other well-known, failed prohibition.

We are right. We need to present ourselves right.

Rise and shine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Private Sector Power
Posted by: ph0ed1n on Jan 28, 2009 4:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many powerful people in the private sector hate the 1937 abrupt and radical change in the judicial interpretation of the Commerce Clause, the one still in effect today giving Congress authority to regulate anything having a substantial affect on commerce.

Human thought, which determines what, when, why, where, and how we buy and sell, always has a substantial affect on commerce.

This abrupt and radical change gives Congress the authority to selectively regulate human thought. For example, if one uses drugs, one is having a substantial affect on commerce.

Perhaps we can gain powerful private sector support by publicly attacking this obviously corrupt move by the 1937 judicial branch, restoring the original Commerce Clause interpretation for the sake of the unalienable right to liberty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a tad disturbing
Posted by: blujay42 on Jan 29, 2009 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the above post, all except the "BY ALL MEANS NECESSARY" comment. If you're implying we go up in arms over a plant, then you are no better than the corruption we fight every day. No blood should be shed over this issue.

And if you use the defense that they often kill innocent civilians? It does happen, but two wrongs do NOT make a right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a tad disturbing Posted by: ph0ed1n
Marji
Posted by: Marji on Jan 29, 2009 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are too many good reasons to legalize marijuana and end the insane "War on Drugs" to give up now. We will win. Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop funding democrats -- they will soon start listening
Posted by: Brinna on Jan 29, 2009 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Simple solution, which all cannabis activists should adopt: Since the January raids on cannabis providers I have been answering all phone calls and mail I get from Democratic fundraisers with this response:

"I will not give another cent to the Democratic Party until they support a completer overhaul of our drug policy; stop the Federal persecution of medical cannabis users, providers and caregivers; and remove Cannabis from its present Schedule I classification.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yes weed should be legalized
Posted by: tophertoker23 on Jan 30, 2009 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
obama wants to put more jobs,more money and make the economy better. and one way to do that is to legalize marijuana because the government can tax,put an age limit,create millions of new jobs, which then wil create billion dollar industries here in the U.S. The marijuana plant. also known as the herb,or cannabis is good for the economy due to the fact that the plants produce photosynthesis twice as much as normal plants.

P.S. you can not overdose on marijuana!!!

around 450,000 people die a year from cigarettes and no one has died from smokin marry jane. i smoke weed and im very athletic and im very active in my community and i have 20 20 vision...and im very smart!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pathetic
Posted by: xmvince on Feb 1, 2009 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't Obama say he wouldn't spend any more resources on marijuana raids? I'm pretty sure I read that somewhere on this site within the last couple months. He's been in office for less than a month and he's already busting people for weed? Can we please grow up?? I'd expect a little bit more respect from our own government.. A war against its own citizens - that's why this country is so fucked up, so many wars and pointless garbage going on. People need to mind their own damn business and realize what's really important - and I can tell you, a personal choice to enjoy marijuana is not something anyone else can decide but the individual his/herself. PLEASE, GET RID OF THE IGNORANCE!! IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama wants to get Cops killed
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Feb 2, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Concerned Citizen's for Police Safety suggests;

Hemp Legalization = Police Safety

Ok, I know some of my friends are thinking I've just lost what few braincells I had left and may probably be writhing on the floor,foaming at the mouth. That might happen someday but let's delve into my alledged lunacy for a second.

The most dangerous call the cops have to make,by their own admission, are calls for 'Domestic Distrubance'. They're walking into an already hot situation andanything really can happen. Sometimes people wind up injured or worse. Not just the domestic combatants but the cops too. That's why they hate making these calls. Besides not really wanting to get involved with someone's marriage/family troubles,they don't want to get zapped by someone who thinks the last thing they need is a cop for marriage advice.

Now a long time back,in the 1920's, there was a group that was successful in getting drunken abusive husbands court ordered onto 'Hashish Therapy'
because it cooled a hot temper. The group was, The Women's Temperance League. Good job Ladies!!!

I know what you're thinking, 'Why the hell aren't we in the 1920's? Damn that was a time to live in!'. No...it wasn't.
Besides our time is now. Booze is legal so we need a new approach to the 'Legalization Situation'. Barney Frank has a good idea with his Bill, H.R.5843,keeping marujuana use limited to consenting adults,but it needs a kicker that will make it through the criminal justice committee's it gets sent through. They are the ones responsible for keeping hemp bills from becoming Hemp Laws. Forget the 'schoolhouse rock' bull,that's not how bills become law,so it's a lie.

We need to draft a 'act' that may be easier to pass. This 'act' could be called something like 'The Police Safety and Domestic Tranquility Through Hemp Legalization
Act'

For the increased safety and psychological wellbeing of attending officers,on domestic violence calls,the most dangerous calls to said officers,and for the fostering of domestic tranquility where alchohol leads to domestic confrontations, we undertake to increase the safety of both the Police Officers involved and the domestic participants by legalizing the use,possesion,non-profit transfer,shareing and growing,of cannibas hemp.
Because of it's long,5000 year history as a pacifying agent and it's low risk of zero overdoses,that for the safety of the Police and the society,we make,for consenting adults,HEMP LEGAL

I think this could be a very workable approach. In America "Cop Safety' goes a long way.
This could be the biggest populace movement in history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flounding Faders
Posted by: MisterWu on Feb 2, 2009 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's sure a good thing that the money generated by the number one crop in America instead of benefiting states' balence sheets through control and taxation is all going to mexican gangs and the street economy. What would happen if a State like California got 50billion of hemp money and empty it's prisons of non violent drug offenders. Why without the budget collapse there won't ever be a revolution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Flounding Faders Posted by: xmvince
Pelosi's craven attitude toward legalization
Posted by: socrates2 on Feb 3, 2009 11:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Nancy meant was "I will only vote on legalization if it does not amount to political suicide and I want to see the numbers guarantee that I will keep my office in perpetuity..."
She is as addicted to power as your typical junkie is addicted to heroin, your alcoholic to booze, or a nicotine addict to cigarettes.
What a political coward! How could she rise to this position of leadership with such a craven attitude?
"The more things change, etc."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank YOU for........
Posted by: Jolly Pirates on Feb 11, 2009 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
noticing the obvious.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement