Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Republicans Petrified That Economy Will Improve

By Dean Baker, AlterNet. Posted January 27, 2009.


If the economy begins to turn around on Obama's watch, the GOP can look forward to decades in the political wilderness.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Happened to That Prosperity Tax-Cutters Promised Us?
Sam Pizzigati

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
10 Tips for a Sustainable Thanksgiving
Sarah Newman

Health and Wellness:
Is the House's Health Bill Really Worse than Nothing?
Joshua Holland

Immigration:
Hate Group, FAIR, Is Looking for "Ethnically Ambiguous" Actors to Amplify Its Racism
Adam Luna

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
Just When You Thought It Was Safe: 3 Potential Obstacles to Health-Care Reform
Adele M. Stan

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Obama Quietly Backs Renewing Patriot Act Surveillance Provisions
Willam Fisher

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Obama Will Announce 34,000-Troop Escalation in Afghanistan 'Within Days'

More stories by Dean Baker

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The anti-stimulus crowd is getting desperate. The possibility that a young, charismatic new president will push through an ambitious package that begins to set the economy right is truly terrifying to this crew. After all, if the economy begins to turn around and has largely recovered in three or four years, the Republican leadership can look forward to spending most of their careers in the political wilderness.

President Obama will cakewalk to re-election and even his designated successor will be able to benefit from the glow of his success. If the New Deal serves as precedent, Congress will stay in Democratic hands long past the time that the current leaders of the Republican Party start collecting their pensions.

This explains the need that many Republicans feel to block the stimulus package. This desperation led them to fabricate a report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which purportedly showed that most of the stimulus would not be spent in 2009, or even in 2010. Based on this report, they argued that President Obama's stimulus would do little to boost the economy out of recession. The Republicans managed to get a story to this effect in the Washington Post, in addition to extensive coverage in other major news outlets.

The only problem is that there was no CBO report. CBO had done some very preliminary analysis of a package that was loosely modeled on a portion of President Obama's program. This preliminary analysis was done at the request of members of Congress to give them what was available at the time. It was not a full analysis that had gone through CBO's normal review process, and was not posted on its website where it could be assessed by budget analysts and the general public.

In short, this analysis was clearly not ready for prime time. But, when you're as desperate as the Republican leadership, you take what you can get. Unfortunately, many in the media got taken by this ploy and now have egg on their face as well.

CBO will produce an analysis this week that examines the most recent version of the full stimulus bill. This analysis will provide a much more serious basis for assessing the proposals than the CBO "report" invented by the Republican leadership. It will provide a full analysis of the proposal, including an explanation of the methodology that CBO used in its calculations.

In this respect it is important to caution against one possible limitation of the CBO methodology. CBO typically relies on rules of thumb in calculating spend-out rates for types of projects.

For example, as a rule of thumb, the spending for highways in the first year after an appropriation may be just a small percentage of the total cost of the highway, with spending in the second year being a little bit higher. It takes time to plan a highway and to bid out contracts. Based on analysis of the time between the passage of appropriations and the actual spending, CBO can project the time period over which a wide range of appropriations will actually be spent.

However, these rules of thumbs are likely to understate the spend-out rate for the projects chosen as part of the stimulus package. These projects are being selected specifically because they are ready to go, with plans already in hand and contracts ready to be submitted for bids.

Furthermore, because of the severity of the economic downturn, contractors are likely to be able to move much more quickly than would usually be the case. Typically contractors will have to find time to fit a government project in their queue of other work. With the sharp downturn in the construction sector, there are likely to be plenty of contractors who are ready to move almost immediately after a contract is signed.

Finally, the bill threatens state and local governments with the loss of funding if they do not move quickly to spend any money appropriated. For these reasons, CBO's rules of thumb on spend-out rates may substantially understate the amount of spending that will be carried through in the next two years.

The Republicans have raised a serious issue in questioning the rate at which the stimulus will be spent. The plan should be scrutinized to determine if there are not ways to get money into the economy more quickly. But this effort requires looking at evidence and data, not invented CBO reports.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, republicans, economy, obama, stimulus, new deal, financial crisis, cbo

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Exactly Why We Need Medicare For All ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 27, 2009 12:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
UPDATE 1-Stimulus bill falls short of Obama goal-CBO report

Not so fast Baker ... Reuters~

"WASHINGTON, Jan 26 (Reuters) - The Democratic stimulus package the U.S. Congress will weigh on Wednesday falls billions of dollars short of President Barack Obama's goal to pump most of the money into the economy quickly, a report released on Monday showed.

The $816 billion package will pour some $525.5 billion, or 64 percent, via spending and tax cuts into the ailing economy within 19 months, according to the report issued late on Monday by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.

Last week, Obama's budget director, Peter Orszag, told lawmakers the administration's goal was to pump at least 75 percent of the money from the stimulus package into the economy by Sept. 30, 2010.

The report expands on another from the same office Republicans had touted last week as showing that less than 40 percent of the stimulus money would filter into the economy over the 19-month period. Democrats complained report was a partial review and CBO on Monday concurred."

Dear Mr. Baker, even if this report is preliminary the fact of the matter is that this stimulus will NOT work for at least 18 months!

Being the skeptic that I am, this stimulus looks like it really starts kicking in just before the 2012 elections. What a coincidence!

This is exactly why we need Medicare for All. We could have the stimulus within a year ... everybody with health care coverage, businesses helped, the under and uninsured helped with state and local government coffers being filled once again. But NO, the Dems are playing politics with the lives of the American people to have a big spending spree for their reelections.

Doesn't Pass the Smell Test Baker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A good economic stimulus package should...
Posted by: peacelf on Jan 27, 2009 2:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
provide a social safety net for those who are sure to fall in this economic slide downward; we should place most of the tax burden on those in the upper 15-20% income bracket, and prepare all americans (the superrich included) for a more simpler lifestyle that greatly reduces our dependency on autos; we must restructure communities to end urban sprawl, and the bulk of the stimulus should build a mass transportation system that rivals Europe.

Meanwhile, the economy needs to be localized! A local economy is the inevitable outcome of the end of our dependence on fossil fuels. No longer can we transport goods half way around the world just to save a consumer a penny and allow a producer/seller to make a dollar. We all have to accept less as good. Americans need to have enough foresight to chose wisely.

The Native American philosophy of The Seventh Generation should be our mantra and guiding principles for any economic planning--How will our actions today effect the seventh generation? This is the unavoidable stimulus package ideology. Embrace it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bill Targets Working People
Posted by: Obama-Mamas.com on Jan 27, 2009 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After spending the better part of the day plowing through this stimulus package, I have concluded that this stimulus is just out of the park, even the tax cut portion. We’ve got new tax credits for solar water heaters, wind energy and geothermal pumps, for businesses and homeowners. We’ve got new tax credit bonds that will go to municipalities for schools, housing weatherization, alternative energy, transit and more. Businesses will get credits for hiring veterans and disconnected youths, for energy retrofitting, bonus depreciation and more. The recently unemployed can get up to 65% of their COBRA health premium paid, and the unemployed under 200% of poverty can apply for Medicaid. There are 27 major tax cut or credit provisions

http://www.obama-mamas.com/stimulus-tax-cuts.htm
http://www.obama-mamas.com/blog/?p=165

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Republics simply can't be happy no matter what they get!
Posted by: Quannah on Jan 27, 2009 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard this morning that a full 40% of this stimulus package is tax cuts.

You'd think that would be enough to make the Republics happy, but... nooooooo! That's more tax cuts than even Bush enacted! Jeeeezus! What would it take? (Oh... that's right. It would take them getting EVERYTHING they want to make them happy.)

Obama and the Democrats need to hammer home who won the election in November! And the Republics are so short-sighted, they don't even realize that they will be blamed for the economy worsening because of their foot-dragging measures.

Talk about traitors! Why do they hate the American people? No wonder they lost so many seats in Congress in November! Guess they want to lose even more in two years... which would be fine with me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's a good question. Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: That's a good question. Posted by: Quannah
Patriotism, winger-style
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jan 27, 2009 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there any doubt that every Republican in America is praying for things to go bad?

If the last eight years have taught us anything, it's that the right are traitors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Patriotism, winger-style Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Patriotism, winger-style Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Patriotism, winger-style Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Patriotism, winger-style Posted by: Quannah
Decades in the wilderness ? Not!
Posted by: fred_53_99 on Jan 29, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP will be back with a vengence. It might take four years, eight if Obama turns this crap around. Why? One: the GOP sound machine is working 24/7/365 and the Left dosen't have one that simple minded persons can understand.Two: never underestmate the GOP's trump card ,hate, fear and the idea that old white men know everything.Three: the DEms have a long history of circluar firing squads. As Will Rodgers" I don't believe in Organized polilcal parties Im a Democrat".I may be wrong but if the Dems dont start working to capture the imagnation fo the American people they wiil lose. Example when the GOP called the stimlus packet a liberal wish , the Dems should make the GOP what items they are talking about and explain how that is the case. In short have the balls to call em on thier crap. They won't and thats how they will lose in the long run

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dean Baker
Posted by: reportergary on Feb 3, 2009 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paltalk.com at 5 PM New York time Wednesday February 4.

To talk to him please go to http://www.garybaumgarten.com and click on the Join The Chat button.

Thanks,

Gary

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement