comments_image -

Debunk This

The recent, misguided media attacks on the National Organization of Women for linking its agenda to 9/11 have been shown to be dead wrong.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

These days, there are all-too-few-positive talking-head television moments worth noting. That's why Kim Gandy's meeting with conservative Sean Hannity on the Fox News Channel's "Hannity and Colmes" program, was such a special moment. Gandy, president of the National Organization for Women (NOW), sat down with Hannity on Tuesday, January 8, and cleaned his clock. She was sensational. Give this woman her own television program!

As is his wont, Hannity was all revved up -- notes piled in a neat little stack on his desk. He was ready to ambush Gandy, accusing NOW of producing a video, which Hannity charged advocated taking money meant for the victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks and distributing it to feminist causes. The problem with Hannity's opening verbal sortie was NOW had nothing to do with the production of the video or the organization that put it together. Gandy clarified that before Hannity could get the charges out of his mouth.

In fact, the video, titled "The Women at Ground Zero," and was put together by the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund (NLDEF), an organization that was established in 1970 by the founders of the National Organization for Women but has been independent from NOW for the past thirty years (Gandy proudly admitted to sitting on its board). "Women at Ground Zero" is a 12-minute video documenting the heroic actions of women in the face of the September 11 disaster. According to NLDEF's website, the organization "pursues equality for women and girls in the workplace, the schools, the family and the courts, through litigation, education, and public information programs."

Before Hannity could get his juices flowing, Gandy corrected him on the facts and in doing so, seized the reins of the interview. Gandy obviously understands the "Hannity and Colmes" gestalt, and how the best way to deal with the bully-boys of conservative television talk is to go on the offensive and stay that way until it's time for a commercial. I may be exaggerating here, but only a little. If you are liberal or progressive guest on "Hannity and Colmes," "The O'Reilly Factor," "Hardball" -- you know, the programs where the hosts are passionately in love with the sound of their own voices -- take it from me, the best defense is a strong offense.

Hannity's information probably came from a column by Wendy McElroy, headlined "Feminists Hit Ground Zero With WTC Funds Grab." Posted at the Fox News Channel's website on Tuesday, January 8, McElroy charges NOW with crassly promoting its feminist agenda on the backs of the victims of September 11.

Who is Wendy McElroy? She is the editor of ifeminists.com and the author of "Individualist Feminism of the Nineteenth Century: Collected Writings and Biographical Profiles." Her new book, an anthology, "Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the 21st Century," is scheduled to be published this year by Ivan R. Dee/Independent Institute. McElroy also runs her own website, WendyMcElroy.com, which she declares is a site for Individualist Feminism and Individualist Anarchism. She claims individualist feminism "was based on the theory that all humans should be treated as sovereign individuals, regardless of gender, race, or religion."

McElroy quotes a speech "on how women should respond to the war on terrorism" delivered by Gandy on December 11 at the National Press Club. During the speech, Gandy spoke out against "people who cynically take advantage of a tragedy to their own ends." According to McElroy, and confirmed by Gandy during her Fox appearance, the list of people exhibiting shameful behavior by attaching "their own agenda to Sept. 11" included Jerry Falwell, Rush Limbaugh and Laura Schlesinger.

Right off, McElroy charges NOW with hypocrisy: "It is intellectually stunning for Gandy to suggest that her proposals are not part of a political agenda. Especially when NOW's cash-starved hand is reaching out to snatch at the federal relief money intended to aid people in the recovery from terrorism." Then she excoriates NOW for pushing affirmative action during the recovery process: "NOW wishes to use relief funds to promote affirmative action of women to nontraditional recovery-related jobs, such as firefighter and police officer, in which women comprise less than 25 percent of workers."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Grocery Store Workers Rally in Brooklyn for Overtime Pay--PHOTO & AUDIO

By Sarah Jaffe | AlterNet

 
 
Disgusting: Racist Fox Commenters Spit Invective Over Whitney Houston's Passing

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Naomi Klein and Joshua Holland Talk the Keystone Pipeline—Take Action Today

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Dallas School Segregates Kids by Gender on Black History Month Field Trip

By PZ Myers | Pharyngula

 
 
Krugman: How Did Conservatism Turn Out This Bad?

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Wall Street ‘Likely To Set Records’ For Political Spending Aimed At Defeating Obama In 2012

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Fear of Deportation Kept L.A. School’s Parents From Reporting Sex Abuse

By Jorge Rivas | Colorlines

 
 
Awesome Amendment to "Personhood": the "Spilled Semen" Clause

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Could Santorum Win the GOP Nomination?

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Obama Anchors Budget on Tax Hikes for the Rich

By Agence France Presse

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]