Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Next Real Estate Crisis: Shuttered Stores and Empty Malls

By Paul Craig Roberts, CounterPunch. Posted January 23, 2009.


The 1,120,000 lost US retail jobs in 2008 are a signal that the second stage of the real estate bust is about to hit the economy.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: Almost All U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison For Non-Homicide Crimes Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Paul Craig Roberts

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For a picture of the US real estate crisis, imagine New Orleans wrecked by Hurricane Katrina, and before the waters even begin to recede, a second Katrina hits.

The 1,120,000 lost US retail jobs in 2008 are a signal that the second stage of the real estate bust is about to hit the economy. This time it will be commercial real estate -- shopping malls, strip malls, warehouses, and office buildings. As businesses close and rents decline, the ability to service the mortgages on the over-built commercial real estate disappears.

The over-building was helped along by the irresponsibly low interest rates, but the main impetus came from the slide of the US saving rate to zero and the rise in household indebtedness. The shrinkage of savings and the increase in debt raised consumer spending to 72% of GDP. The proliferation of malls and the warehouses that service them reflect the rise in consumer spending as a share of GDP.

Like the federal government, consumers spent more than they earned and borrowed to cover the difference. Obviously, this could not go on forever, and consumer debt has reached its limit.

Shopping malls are losing anchor stores, and large chains are closing stores and even going out of business altogether. Developers who borrowed to finance commercial ventures are in trouble as are the holders of the mortgages, derivatives and other financial junk associated with the loans.

The main source of the economic crisis is the infantile belief of US policymakers that an economy could be based on debt expansion. As offshoring moved jobs, incomes, and GDP out of the country, debt expanded to take the place of the missing income. When the offshored goods and services were brought back to be sold to Americans, the trade deficit rose, adding another level of financing for an economy that consumes more than it produces.

The growth of debt has outpaced the growth of real output. Yet, the solution offered by Obama's economic team is to expand debt further. This is not surprising as Obama's economic team consists of the very people who brought on the debt crisis. Now they are going to make it worse.

The unexamined question is: Who is going to finance the next wave of debt?

The US budget deficit for fiscal year 2009 already appears to be on a path to $2 trillion, and that is before Obama's stimulus program. What we are looking at is a $3 trillion budget deficit if Obama's program is enacted in time to impact the economy this year.

Foreign countries can finance a $500 billion US budget deficit out of their trade surpluses with the US. But foreigners do not have the funds to finance a US budget deficit in the trillions of dollars, and they would not finance such a deficit even if they had the funds. Foreigners are over-weighted in dollar holdings and prefer to lighten their holding than to add to them. America's economic prospects are dim as are the dollar's prospects as reserve currency. An annual budget deficit in the trillions of dollars makes the dollar's prospects appear even dimmer.

The federal government's likely solution to the debt problem will be to monetize the debt, that is, the government will finance its deficit by printing money. Debt will be inflated away. But for those Americans without jobs or whose incomes do not rise with inflation, life will be cruel.

Life is already cruel for Americans living on retirement savings. Not only has the stock market bust reduced their wealth by half, but also their remaining assets are producing no income. Interest rates are so low that debt instruments produce no income, and there are scant capital gains in the stock market. Retirees are living by consuming their capital.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, foreclosure, real estate, commercial real estate

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Paul Craig Roberts Hits the Nail on The Head ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 23, 2009 12:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"There are more intelligent ways to try to escape from the current crisis. However, the financial gangsters and their shills that Obama has put in charge of economic policy are thinking only of their own interest. What happens to the American people is not a concern."

This sure seems to be the case ... everything is pointing in this direction.

I would add to Paul's solution that we nationalize all banks, including the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve. We need a Public Central Bank that creates our currency and credit for the benefit of the public who underwrite its value and shoulder the risk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We need a Public Central Bank Posted by: chance garden
contracts
Posted by: oar on Jan 23, 2009 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We cannot simply declare contracts null and void.
We can however let those go bancrupt who have sold credit default swaps that now oblige them to pay sums they do not have.

This will also educate the party on the other side of the contract about counterparty risk.

In this manner a new appreciation of all sorts of risk will be gained by many.

This is the way capitalism functions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

slightly off topic, but going to toss this in anyway...
Posted by: ellie on Jan 23, 2009 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
banks are melting faster then the polar ice caps and taking the entire economy down with it...

credit unions are supposed to be a mess also al la tarp...

why is it that our credit union that also does mortgages and other loans by the way... here in this area we have been hit hard with foreclosures both commercial and private and we found out last night that things are so bad here with corporate closings (a gm plant and everything that supported it plus DHL gone) that we gained a spot on the MSM program for this sunday '60 minutes'...

back to the point, our credit union (it's a big one not a 1 storefront operation) did such a great job last year managing member accounts that they had $3 million in extra profits... everyone got from $10-25.00 bonus deposited in their savings account last week???

if a credit union can do this in a horribly depressed area right now, what the hell is the problem with the big guys???

as a side note, we are also seeing a rash of bank robberies around here being committed by people OVER 70!!! not kidding!!!
back to coffee...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And yet out here in St Louis people still spend like drunken sailors like there's no tomorrow.
Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield on Jan 23, 2009 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But if what the article suggests does happen, then I wouldn't be surprised to see people move from big cities to the rurals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Is What Happens When...
Posted by: bryangalt on Jan 23, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The economic meltdown was inevitable once the restraints on outrageous and risky investments were removed at every level in the financial system. Let's get real here. Why would anyone be allowed to bet that a company is going to go belly up and then make money from that bet? That is but one of many odd and frankly irresponsible financial instruments that were being used on Wall Street over the past decade (or more).

But we also have to consider the fact that American corporations have slowly but surely been abandoning the American workers by moving their operations overseas, thus allowing them to take advantage of near slave-labor wages in places like China, Thailand, Mexico, etc.

This process also helped to fuel the fire for the rise in debt as the wages from production now became the profits of outsourcing. This will probably sting the Republican reading this, but I think it's pretty much a proven fact that 'trickle-down economics' is a voo-doo way of saying "f*** everyone" that can't afford my country club!

The idea that keeping the rich in the riches will somehow inspire their greedy asses to spend money keeping the economy moving was a magnificent public relations ploy that worked like a charm. Now look at us, on the verge of becoming the international equivalent of a homeless bum thanks to the systemic greed that we all played a part in, even if it was something as simple as buying stuff at Walmart--Made In China's direct marketeer to America!

I do agree that the credit swaps should be nullified, and that the mortgages in jeopardy should be immediately rewritten at a rate that keeps people in their homes. Frankly, the banks shouldn't have a voice in the matter since they have had a greater role in the overall financial crisis than the homeowners. Plus, in real world economics, it's the trickle up effect that drives economic growth, not the other way around. The banks aren't going to lose any money by taking less interest than they were originally. They certainly will if they keep up their arrogant and irresponsible behavior towards the citizens of this country by continuing to keep the foreclosure crisis in motion.

It makes good economic sense to bring all the troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan immediately and to cut off at least 25% of the defense budget for the next 4 years. Those two actions alone would save almost $2 trillion dollars in four years.

The clear and present danger to the security of the United States cannot be met with more military spending and continued expeditionary force deployments overseas. It also cannot be met by borrowing more money from our international creditors nor borne on the backs of the middle-class and the poor.

And finally, ABSOLUTELY charge dramatically higher tax rates to corporations that import goods and services to the US that could be produced here, with the stipulation that these surcharges could not be passed on to the end user, they would have to a non-tax deductible expense charged to the corporations bottom line. Then give lower rates to the companies that do hire American workers and produce goods for sale here and abroad. Is it unfair? You bet. Is it needed? Absolutely. Will it bring jobs back? If greed has a say in the matter, then yep, I have no doubt about it.

Bryan Galt's Blog

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The megacorporations replaced the small entrepreneurs...
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Jan 23, 2009 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And in typical historical fashion, they formed cartels to control prices across the board, to rig bids for government contracts, and also to influence local & state & federal policy, legislation and judicial decisions.

What is really needed is investment in domestic agriculture and manufacturing - and an end to anti-democratic trade policy and capital liberalization. What cities and states should be doing right now is making sure that their local agricultural and industry is supported, and that their local water supplies are being maintained, and that their local power utility is switching to renewables that don't have to be shipped in from abroad.

In other words, states and cities in the U.S. need to learn how to insulate themselves from the wildly fluctuating global markets, or they'll be forced to sign IMF agreements that gut local services and education... no kidding, there's even talk of Britain having to turn to the IMF for a bailout - it's either that or raise taxes on the wealthy...

For example, how about bumping the capital gains tax up to 35%, which is where it is for a person with a $100,000 a year salary. Isn't that odd? You can be lazing around all day with $2 million stashed away, earning 5% ($100,000), and you get taxed at half the rate of someone who works a job around the clock all year long - yet, we call that the American way...

Obama should be strongly encouraged to repeal the tax cuts that Bush introduced immediately, as Pelosi suggested. However, that won't do the economy any good at all unless there is a complete review of U.S. government contracting policy - personally, I'd say that states and cities should have a far greater say over where those taxes go - so one other option is for states to raise income tax, while federal tax is kept low.

This is actually a good form of tax protest - send half of your IRS check to your state government, citing the incompetence and fraud at the federal level as justification. You will have paid your taxes, right? The state can always send it along if it wants to - but at least the point has been made.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our economic system is BEGGING for a purge. It needs to take a dump.
Posted by: DCostello2 on Jan 23, 2009 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry for the crude language but basically our economy is full of crap and needs to take a rather large dump. The banks, insurance companies, real estate companies, etc, need to be allowed to FAIL. If we just 'prop things up' for a bit, like we're currently doing with TARP and whatever the new plan will be called, then we're just pushing out the inevitable to some further date. We're postponing the disaster until most of us die so WE won't be here to suffer through it. However, our children or our grand children WILL BE. Some of these institutions would have failed years ago, if they'd been allowed to. Pushing if off only makes the number of companies who will EVENTUALLY fail larger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» eh, simply stated Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
The unexamined question is: Who is going to finance the next wave of debt?
Posted by: billwald on Jan 23, 2009 11:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our kids and grandkids will finance the debt through price inflation. They will be working twice as long to have half the consumer goods. The day of the large middle class is over. We will revert to the world historical norm of 75% working poor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AMERICA IS BLEEDING....
Posted by: stopthemaddness2 on Jan 23, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America is bleeding, and the question is, where is the surgeon, the sutures to make it stop!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The answer is before us... http://www.themoneymasters.com/mra.htm
Posted by: Fog on Jan 23, 2009 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

Go here to read how simple it would be to fix our monetary system and get rid of this poisonous fractional reserve system that the bankers invented for themselves:


http://www.themoneymasters.com/mra.htm

Monetary Reform Act - A Summary (in four paragraphs)

This proposed law would require banks to increase their reserves on deposits from the current 10%, to 100%, over a one-year period. This would abolish fractional reserve banking (i.e., money creation by private banks) which depends upon fractional (i.e., partial) reserve lending. To provide the funds for this reserve increase, the US Treasury Department would be authorized to issue new United States Notes (and/or US Note accounts) sufficient in quantity to pay off the entire national debt (and replace all Federal Reserve Notes).

The funds required to pay off the national debt are always closely equivalent to the amount of money the banks have created by engaging in fractional lending because the Fed creates 10% of the money the government needs to finance deficit spending (and uses that newly created money to buy US bonds on the open market), then the banks create the other 90% as loans (as is explained on our FAQ page). Thus the national debt closely tracks the combined total of US Treasury debt held by the Fed (10%) and the amount of money created by private banks (90%).

Because this two-part action (increasing bank reserves to 100% and paying off the entire national debt) adds no net increase to the money supply (the two actions cancel each other in net effect on the money supply), it would cause neither inflation nor deflation, but would result in monetary stability and the end of the boom-bust pattern of US economic activity caused by our current, inherently unstable system.

Thus our entire national debt would be extinguished – thereby dramatically reducing or entirely eliminating the US budget deficit and the need for taxes to pay the $400+ billion interest per year on the national debt - and our economic system would be stabilized, while ending the terrible injustice of private banks being allowed to create over 90% of our money as loans on which they charge us interest. Wealth would cease to be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands as a result of private bank money creation. Thereafter, apart from a regular 3% annual increase (roughly matching population growth), only Congress would have the power to authorize changes in the US money supply - for public use -not private banks increasing only private bankers' wealth.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Raise interest rates?
Posted by: SlyGuy on Jan 23, 2009 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Encourage savings? Huh? Assuming there is income available for savings, higher interest rates on CDs etc. might, might encourage saving. But I think not. Making the rent or mortgage, keeping body and soul together is the order of the day for millions, and millions more each day. A little reality goes a long way.

On the other hand, author points to a problem that is integral to the prospects for a Keynesian approach. To prime the economic pumps with federal debt, one must assume there will be takers for that debt, AND that future growth will be such that it can be paid down and retired to acceptable levels. What if global warming impacts, peak oil, and other factors do not paint a rosy enough future for that to happen? The contractions being experienced now will ultimately worsen, and if capitalism/growth economies ultimately begin to fail on a wide enough scale, there will be suffering, upheaval, and yes violence the likes of which have been known to prompt revolutionary movements.

We have allowed ourselves and our leaders to bring us to a precipice. Will a stimulus/rescue package, however well designed to meet multiple goals of reducing GHG emissions, improving employment, targeting infrastrusture needs, and getting the reins of a runaway train of foreclosures,etc. work to buy time?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gangsters Is Right On
Posted by: cherylholmes on Jan 23, 2009 11:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The banks are stealing from us like crazy, while still collapsing no matter how much moola they get from the taxpayers..which by the way is illegal in the first place to "enslave" taxpayers this way reducing us to indentured slavery...

Bank of America is still building a bank on every corner as I type this in San Antonio Texas...and most are across the street from the BRAND new Wachovia banks also being built. Citibank is building and improving their sports stadiums, buying into sports teams and as always still ripping off consumer credit card holders, paying huge salaries and bonuses to CEO's and upper management, just like every other banking institution...

They will never lend out any of the taxpayer bailout money to anyone in this country because most people have trashed their credit ratings, has or will be losing their jobs meaning no way to ever pay their loans back etc etc...so, go ahead Washington, keep throwing money at the sinking ship because it isn't going to help anyone except the super rich just like always...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paul Craig Roberts - a real truth-teller & 9/11 Truth Activist
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Jan 24, 2009 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But what is Paul Roberts doing at Alternet? A site that recycles MSM corporate lite twaddle as if it was some original challenge to de facto Fascist extortion rule.

Seems someone actually woke up at Alternet.

(Let’s hope it isn't a temp)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at any small town
Posted by: gandolfshep on Jan 24, 2009 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is already happening in many small towns around the country where Wal-Mart's and other big box store have opened.

The day of the Mom and Pop stores are vanishing to the benefit of large ugly box's that buy their goods from overseas at prices that reflect dirt cheap labor and no quality control.

Many downtown areas are now similar to ghost towns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lots of people
Posted by: Jamison on Jan 28, 2009 11:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lots of people are unemployed nowadays because of the economic crisis that we are facing. Though there are people that are still they find it hard to meet their ends because they spend more that they earned. A family would struggled hard especially if they are still renting a house. Home prices are falling faster than people can get no credit check payday loans. The floor has been dropping out of the housing market for a long time – the last 28 months have consecutively seen drops. The TARP has failed to do much until lately, when the Federal Reserve stepped in and performed loan modification on some mortgages belonging to some failed companies that were 60 days past due on payments to make them sustainable. Instead of giving the owners no credit check payday loans, the interest rates or principals have been cut to make the mortgages more payable. Read more about housing and no credit check payday loans at the Money Blog.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the "perfect storm" economic tsunami coming in, fast and hard
Posted by: charles000 on Jan 30, 2009 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a serious "perfect storm" brewing in the world around us.

National "official" unemployment figures are approaching 5 million in just the past year, but I would submit the real figures are at least 2 to 3 times that number, and are increasing daily, by the 10s of thousands.

The handwriting is on the wall. I don't care what set of numbers one wants to pretend are the reality of the moment - the truth is coming up hard and fast. We are looking at a serious, systemic economic pathology which is only getting started.

The next layer of catastrophic failure is going to be commercial real estate, as major franchise chains begin shutting down en masse, and shopping malls start to go dark, and remain empty.

Many of these over developed mall installations were heavily leveraged on fake growth projections that had nothing to do with reality, but were great for inflating the purported equity valuation of the debt, the paper that was then sold as fiduciary instruments to investment brokers around the world, just like the fake equity residential mortgage backed securities that we are already witnessing the damage thereof.

Most ordinary folks out there aren't aware of this, yet . . . but even a small amount of research into the economic trade journals and technical newsletters quickly make this point quite obvious.

This recession is not bottoming out, it's just getting started.

Sorry, that's simply how it is.

As for the evil scumbags on Wall Street who conspired to create this "mother of all Ponzi schemes", visions of prisoners heading off to a Devil's Island penal colony or a gallows come to mind . . . but I digress

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solving credit crunch.
Posted by: Colten A on Jan 31, 2009 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is nice to hear that there are new regulatory reforms. Well, there are lots of cases of crimes that can't be solving immediately. Most of the victims don't get the appropriate justice. But people use to do things in a wrong way because of desperation. Then some people go off the deep end and rob payday loan stores. There has been a rash of robbing payday advance loan outlets in the last year all over the country. When these thieves are caught, they'll need a payday advance loan for a lawyer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement