Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Obama Should Worry About the Bush Family Tentacles Undermining His Plans

By Russ Baker, AlterNet. Posted January 22, 2009.


Bush may be gone, but his influence -- and the forces that put him in office -- aren't.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Happened to That Prosperity Tax-Cutters Promised Us?
Sam Pizzigati

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
The Real Scandal Over Climate Change Isn't About Hacked Emails But the Media's Coverage
Alex Steffen

Food:
10 Tips for a Sustainable Thanksgiving
Sarah Newman

Health and Wellness:
Is the House's Health Bill Really Worse than Nothing?
Joshua Holland

Immigration:
Hate Group, FAIR, Is Looking for "Ethnically Ambiguous" Actors to Amplify Its Racism
Adam Luna

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
Just When You Thought It Was Safe: 3 Potential Obstacles to Health-Care Reform
Adele M. Stan

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Obama Quietly Backs Renewing Patriot Act Surveillance Provisions
Willam Fisher

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Obama Will Announce 34,000-Troop Escalation in Afghanistan 'Within Days'

More stories by Russ Baker

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As George W. Bush leaves office and Barack Obama takes over, we are in danger of missing the opportunity for change our new president has promised -- unless we come to grips with what the great historian and Librarian of Congress Daniel Boorstin called our "hidden history," not just of the past eight years but of the past half-century and more. 

President Obama will face a staggering array of challenges, most, if not all, of which stem from the policies of Bush. But efforts at reform will fall short if we fail to probe and confront the powerful forces that wanted this disastrous administration in the White House in the first place -- and that remain ready and able to maintain their influence behind the scenes today.

Like most people, I took the failings of George W. Bush at face value: an inattentive, poorly prepared man full of hubris, who committed colossal blunders as a result. Then I spent five years researching my new book, Family of Secrets and came to see that the origins go much deeper. This backstory is getting almost no attention in the talking-heads debate over the Bush legacy. Yet it will continue to play, affecting our country and our lives, long after Bush leaves office.

A more profound explanation for the rise of George W. Bush came as I studied the concerted effort  to convince the public that he was  independent of, and often in disagreement with, his father. The reason for this, it turned out, was that exactly the opposite was true. W. may have been bumptious where his father was discreet, but in fact the son hewed closely to a playbook that guided his father and even his grandfather.

Over much of the last century, the Bushes have been serving the aims of a very narrow segment from within America's wealthiest interests and families -- typically through involvement in the most anti-New Deal investment banking circles, in the creation of a civilian intelligence service after World War II, and in some of that service's most secretive and still-unacknowledged operations.

Through declassified documents and interviews, I unearthed evidence that George W. Bush's father, the 41st president of the United States, had been working for the intelligence services no less than two decades before he was named CIA director in 1976. Time and again, Bush 41 and his allies have participated in clandestine operations to force presidents to do the bidding of oil and other resource-extraction interests, military contractors and financiers. Whenever a president showed  independence or sought reforms that threatened entrenched interests, this group helped to ensure that he was politically attacked and neutralized, or even removed from office, through one means or another.

We are not dealing here with what are commonly dismissed as "conspiracy theories."  We are dealing with a reality that is much more subtle, layered and pervasive -- a matrix of power in which crude conspiracies are rarely necessary and in which the execution or subsequent cover-up of anti-democratic acts become practically a norm.

In 1953, 23 years before he became CIA director as a supposed neophyte, George H.W. Bush began preparing to launch an oil-exploration company called Zapata Offshore. His father, investment banker Prescott Bush, had just taken a Senate seat from Connecticut; and his father's close friend Allen Dulles had just taken over the CIA. A staff CIA officer, Thomas J. Devine, purportedly "resigned" to go into the oil business with young George.

Bush then began to travel around the world. His itineraries had little apparent relationship to his limited and perennially unprofitable business enterprises.  But they do make sense if the object was intelligence work. When his company at last  put a few oil rigs in place, they ended up in highly sensitive spots, such as just off Castro's Cuba before the Bay of Pigs invasion.

As part of his travels, Bush senior even appeared in Dallas on the morning of the Kennedy assassination, although he would famously claim that he could not recall where he was at that historic moment. After leaving the city, he called the FBI with a false tip about a possible assassin, pointedly emphasizing that he was calling from outside Dallas. It is also intriguing to learn that an old friend of Bush's, a White Russian émigré with intelligence connections, shepherded Lee Harvey Oswald upon his return to America in the year preceding the assassination. In any event, when Lyndon Johnson replaced Kennedy, the oilmen and the intelligence-military establishment once again had a friend in the White House.

The pattern continued. New evidence suggests that Bush senior and his associates in the intelligence services, far from being the loyalists to Richard Nixon they claimed to be, had turned on the 35th president early in his administration, unceasingly working to weaken and eventually force him out. These efforts culminated in what appears to have been a deliberately botched Watergate office burglary -- led by former CIA officers.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, george w. bush

Russ Baker is an award-winning investigative reporter. He has written for the New Yorker, Vanity Fair, The Nation, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Village Voice and Esquire. Baker received a 2005 Deadline Club award for his exclusive reporting on George W. Bush’s military record. Information on his new book, Family of Secrets: the Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America, can be found at www.familyofsecrets.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So, the Bush family might continue to rule
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Jan 22, 2009 1:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Baker, this is a chilling, frightening presentation of the Bush crime family's political grip on this country to present time. Of course, this corrupt group is not going to fade into oblivion, and your article should be out there for all to read. When I see the events unfold as you have presented them, there is no doubt in my mind that the Bush backers and cronies will do everything they can to continue the US's world domination and who can/will stop them?

The question: how does Obama fit into this picture? What will he be allowed to do with this group behind the scenes. Is he a part of this picture that we don't know about? As you illustrated, look what happened to people in power who have gone against their will. Please keep writing about this as it is hugely important to our country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I would worrie about the Clintons before the Bushes Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Jeb an't a Clinton or a Kennedy Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Fascinating, but Posted by: pierrot
» RE: Fascinating, but Posted by: fbear0143
elegant summation
Posted by: Zuma on Jan 22, 2009 1:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the simple and concise clarity of this has great impact. more than compelling and beyond ringing true, it strikes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When the facts delineate a conspiracy, it is not a theory, but a certainty
Posted by: LeftWright on Jan 22, 2009 1:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Mr. Baker seems terrified of being labeled a "conspiracy theorist" (as is intended by those who have wielded the term for decades), his book carefully charts some of the conspiracies that the Bush family and their cohorts have engaged in for most of the last century.

What is truly curious is Mr. Baker's reluctance to even look at some of the more obvious, and recent, activities of the Bush family and their assorted cronies and accomplices. His book completely skips over the attempted assassination of Pres. Reagan, for instance, even though there are clear ties between the Bush family and the Hinckley family and VP Bush was running a Continuity of Government exercise that very day. He also carefully slides around G.H.W. Bushes involvement in the October counter surprise in 1980, his role with Noriega, and his role in the Iran/contra crimes.

Most significant, however, Mr. Baker doesn't even dare to approach the serious questions about George W. Bushes total failure as commander in chief on 9/11/01, his treasonous role in the ongoing cover-up and the very real possibility that the Bush family was deeply involved in the 9/11 operation itself.

Considering the fate of people like Sen. Wellstone and others, this is understandable, if regrettable.

The book is a worthwhile, if not always easy, read; even given its curiously incomplete account of the Bush crime family.

It should be noted that Robert Gates, who Mr. Obama has kept on for the time being, has been closely involved with the "hidden" Bush agenda for decades, and has also committed numerous acts of treason.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't you think love is the answer? Posted by: Icewaterchrist
» I don't know anything about Icke, Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: I don't know anything about Icke, Posted by: Icewaterchrist
It's US, not THEM!!
Posted by: heinzib on Jan 22, 2009 2:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree heartily with what this author reports to us. I am certain that his research is quite competent and the findings are provocative because they are so unbelievably true. But this isn't new either; that the truth never sufaces in a way that there developes a atmosphere wherein it can breathe and not get suffocated.
Such conditions prevail over many, many years, and in the future a report will inform us how and why we stumbled in the here and now, contolled by the likes of the Bush family or their replacement.What I am getting to is that we, the public, the voters, create what we eventually reap, socially and politically, what we have sewed. For instance, and more significant for me, FDR has been the hero president over many eras. He saved this country from almost total collapse. And his methods of operation actually benefitted this nation, preventing it to collapse both economically and socially.But what about his "underbelly?" I, a Holocaust survivor, suffered because he was in power. I don't claim or know whether any other person in power would have done anything differently, but, I do know that because of Mr. Roosevelt's actions, many Jews who were eager to escape the Hitler regime were trapped because there was no safety to be found. We were all told to go away and find other destinations where perhaps safety might be found. And for us, as it turns out, there weren't. Roosevelt helped to save, yet he was equally guilty of helping Hitler kill the Jews. I know. I lost my mother and grandmother because we were told to go away at a time when we desperately needed some semblance of reassurance that our lives might continue past this "killing of Jews" time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: Only in America... Posted by: davidg
» RE: Do The Numbers Posted by: pawheel
Yes, since you have done the research please keep writing...
Posted by: paulmagillsmith on Jan 22, 2009 2:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...about this. Anyone who has taken the time to investigate smells the rat which is the Bush family altogether.

From the insidious beast, Prescott Bush, who conspired to finance the Nazis even after America was at war with Germany in WWII, to his son GHW Bush, implicated in first introducing crack cocaine to this country to illegally fund the Nicaraguan forces against US imperialism, to the grandson, GW Bush, this is a seedy family, with too much financial clout.

GHW Bush headed the Carlyle Group-reported as the largest arms dealers in the world, and Bush 41 is now a billionaire from this.

Through insider positioning, by invading & threatening members of congress (one reason Bush Jr probably left peacefully is revealed in Rep. Brad Sherman's statement on the Congressional floor that threats were made about the invocation of martial law unless the TARP was passed-so the Bush's & their banking friends made off with undisclosed billions before he flew back to Midlands TX-the toady inept son had successfully completed the devious task the father sent him to Washington to accomplish for the fascist Nazi grandfather), to their kissin' cousin relationship with the Saudis (15 of 19 'supposed' 911 terrorists were Saudis, so why didn't we invade them instead of Iraq?), Bush world & the oil world (as well as Zionist tasks) were completed.

After all the hooplah about, "We haven't had a foreign attack on our shores since 911" (and neither did Bill Clinton from 1993 to 2001, the same length of time), I now expect the Bush family to orchestrate an attack in the near future (probably nuclear this time) against an American city), just so they can claim, "I told you so!".

Does anyone even remember that a Bush was meeting with Osama Bin Laden's brother at the moment 911 happened? Or that Mossad agents were celebrating while filming the plane crashes into the towers, but were very suspiciously deported immediately following the event?

WTF, all these crooks, criminals & deviants got away. As Bush 43 was flying away the crowds on the mall were cheering & singing, but I have no doubt that dry drunk was likely toasting because he had accomplished the mission of his grandfather & father with the ruination & enslavement of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flying Through Midnight
Posted by: Zuma on Jan 22, 2009 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from Sen. Wm. J. Fulbright's 1973 book, 'The Crippled Giant':
(9 TCG images)
http://zuma.vip.warped.com/crippledgiant206-207.jpg

Links to Webster Tarpley's Bush family bio:
http://zuma.vip.warped.com/z/#tarpley

On John Halliday's book, 'Flying Through Midnight':
http://zuma.vip.warped.com/x/

Nick Turse's book is essential reading imo:
http://www.nickturse.com/excerpts.html

During Bush's tenure (or reign) we did hew together, even in repulsion. many, like the lakota nation thought of and moved toward secession. others considered [re]constitution conventions. others gathered in places like Two Peaks, N.M., getting off the grid and out of the system. repression provokes blowback. antiestablishmentarianism taken further. And leaders have arose, like Dennis Kucinich and Ron paul who speak softly but carry the water. We as a nation must completely disavow any more disingenuous politicking or artful centrism that does not frankly address the wrong of repairing a predatory reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 'Predatory' is the perfect word... Posted by: paulmagillsmith
www.consortiumnews.com
Posted by: shill on Jan 22, 2009 3:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The above website has long been critical of the Bush family's exploits and they have written several books on the subject. The Bush family is definitely a force to be reckoned with and is one that the mainstream media refuses, for the most part, to expose, for good reason. They are powerful, and have no scruples about destroying anyone who might pose any serious threats to their agenda and power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Many thanks for this post.
Posted by: racetoinfinity on Jan 22, 2009 3:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, thank you, thank you for this important post.

We need to keep a vigilant eye on the Bush & c*o. crime family and associates, and you sound like someone who has done the research and and will keep that vigilant eye open. Please post there regularly, and keep up the good work. I have to reluctantly but realistically believe that Obama has aready been touched by this cancer, given his economic appointments, and other centrist ( and "post-partisan") moves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Many thanks for this post. Posted by: racetoinfinity
The Great Enabler
Posted by: StillStanding on Jan 22, 2009 3:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an excellent article, outlining some of the known crimes of the Bush Crime Family. However, in my view it makes Obama's reticence to pursue criminal investigations of these ghouls highly suspicious. He seems all too willing to let the Bush cabal ride out of Dodge with their plunder intact and with no legal repercussions. This makes him an enabler and abettor of their felonies ... a co-conspirator, in fact.

When he voted for the FISA reauthorization, Obama was willing to let the telecoms off the hook for their illegal spying on Americans. That should have been the warning sign that he has no intention of holding his corporate pimps accountable for their treasonous assault on the Constitution.

While I haven't completely given up on Obama, I think it's about 98% certain he's just another corporate shill. If he thwarts Conyer's proposed hearings, then it will be a 100% certainty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh ye of little faith ... Posted by: J4761
» RE: Oh ye of little faith ... Posted by: StillStanding
Dirty Tricks
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jan 22, 2009 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans know their history.

When FDR came into office on March 4, 1933 he presided over an administration that was so successful, the GOP were not able to reclaim the White House for another twenty years.

The GOP is going to do everything possible to ensure that President Obama's administration is a complete and utter failure. We must start focusing on the 2010 mid term elections. We have to make sure that it is a landslide for the Democrats. That will be the only way that Barack Obama will be a success.

The so-called "party of Lincoln" must be rendered as deader than old Abe himself.

Cocka-Doodle-Do, America!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dirty Tricks...... Posted by: MausMasher54
Know thy enemy
Posted by: 2thepoint on Jan 22, 2009 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some just need to feed the conspiracy machine.. even if it's to sell a book.. Who to look out for.. the Clintons. forget the past an who served where or when.. The Clintons are here and now. With a past that involve obstruction of justice, stealing classified documents, questionable deaths etc..etc could that be why Obama struck the deal and kept the devil close!

And lets not hold up the New Deal as the Holy Grail. It played a part in 1933 but came no where near pulling the country out of the depression which was still going on right up to WW2. FDR's legacy is that he had leadership and exercised it during two crises - The depression and WW2. Both had to run it's course

If you want something to complain about how about the near ruination of Social Security.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Know thy enemy Posted by: scared
» RE: Know thy enemy Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Know thy enemy Posted by: praedor
» RE: Know thy enemy Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Know thy enemy Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Know thy enemy Posted by: 2thepoint
» we do. Posted by: Beck
» RE: we do. Posted by: 2thepoint
Dictator Bush
Posted by: beandang on Jan 22, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh yeah, rest assured that Bush has far reach, even from his new multi million dollar mansion in Texas. Sad, but true.

RT
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Courage and Conviction
Posted by: CDrago on Jan 22, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Russ Baker writes of the trepidation he experienced as he paused at the Rubicon demarcating mainstream journalism and "conspiracy theory," he recognizes the implicit threats to livelihood and reputation that have sent two generations of reporters scurrying for cover behind 26 volumes of Warren Commission lies.

Anyone with reasonable access to JFK assassination evidence who does not conclude that a criminal conspiracy took the president's life is cognitively impaired and/or complicit in the crime.

Period.

Mr. Baker, fully cognizant of his action's consequences, has crossed his Rubicon. In so doing he has demonstrated courage and conviction, and now it is for us to support him by displaying similar personal qualities.

Charles Drago
co-founder, The Deep Politics Forum
www.deeppoliticsforum.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is rife with too many conspiracy theories and refuses to mention CONGRESS.
Posted by: jwverez on Jan 22, 2009 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Complain all you want about Bush's influence crippling Obama but as long as you continue to reelect the same pols in Congress, nothing will change for the better. If the author cared to post a useful article, he might have stressed the need to pay attention to Congressional races and quit leaning on corporate media polls and pundits. REFORM Congress by forcing challenges on DLCers, Blue Dog Dems, social liberal only Dems, and even partisan Republicans of supposedly safe districts and Bush's influence will be removed. Otherwise, shut up and quit making up conspiracy bullshit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I THINK THE PRESIDENT KNOWS ALL THIS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 22, 2009 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush's get mad AND get even. They are vindictive, mean and hate to lose. I'm sure that Omaba has his personal watch list and has everything under control. But they are just plain creepy. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deliberately botched?
Posted by: Urstrly on Jan 22, 2009 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, but I think this gives the wealthy and privileged but not-so-smart Bush family far more credit than they deserve. Funny that none of the Kennedy assassination probes picked up anything about Bush 41, and it strains credulity to think of the botching of the Watergate burglary as deliberate.

If we assume the Bushes simply bump off anyone who gets in the way of Big Oil, we may as well throw in the towel now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deliberately botched? Posted by: praedor
» RE: Deliberately botched? Posted by: YHShVH
» RE: Deliberately botched? Posted by: dragonlady620
Frank's mom
Posted by: goodwinds@aol.com on Jan 22, 2009 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am happy to see someone is finally putting this story to print. It seems to me that Frontline had a special years ago during "W's" first year that outlined this whole line of thinking. Some how (we all know how) it was suppressed. At the time I wish I had taken notes to look it up so I could better quote to what was intimated about what the Bush Family was really about. Too bad the movie "W" wasn't more accurate as to the real role Rove played in this whole debacle. Thank you for putting the story into print.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Frank's mom Posted by: dragonlady620
Conspiracy? I think not!
Posted by: sausage on Jan 22, 2009 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
O.K., what Russ Baker is doing is reiterating what Robert Parry of ConsortiumNews.com, in Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, and Kevin Phillips, in his book American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush, have documented.

The rise to prominence of George H.W. Bush, an intelligent though uncharismatic and often tongue-tied son of a U.S. Senator and Wall Street financier, to the highest office in the land is one of American history's most curious cases.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very good..getting closer!!!
Posted by: Zimbly on Jan 22, 2009 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice investigative journalism work..stuff that really Seymour Hersh or Bob Woodward should be writing about ....but somehow step short of getting to the real source of this rot.

I believe the author is getting very close to putting his finger on the REAL SOURCE and real criminal cabal behind the scenes.
After all that's who these folks are, criminals.

Unless this "group" is identified, exposed and brought to full public scrutiny, they will continue to undermine even possibly destroy democracy in the USA....... to protect us from enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC...its just that many "naive" Presidents have no idea "HOW DOMESTIC" the danger is.

Oliver Stone, tried as best he could in movies like Kennedy and Nixon( Nixon being too"psychological" for the critics)..dropping hints...even bringing you into a Texas magnates home...hint , hint.....

Lastly to quote Peter Dale Scott...to understand 911 you need to understand the Kennedy assassination

Follow the money
Lastly the CIA, when it was formerly established, was founded by Wall street Bankers and lawyers..that should tell you something about the function of the CIA.

Kennedy was right, he was on the right path, but he underestimated his enemy, how internecine and dangerous and how close they actually were.

Question is, how do you get the dangerous vipers out of the "system"...without getting your head blown off , as President?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» this "group" is identified.... Posted by: chance garden
Most Americans, know, but don't want to............
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jan 22, 2009 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that most Americans have secretly known that there is a small treasonous cabal of people that have been greasing the wheels of their own interests for years, but they just don't want to admit it, either out loud or to themselves. Unfortunately, for all of us those same people voted little Georgie in the second time! While he may be a "nice guy", the little savant had no business being in charge of this nation!

I can only hope that as a nation we have learned our lesson, and treasonous cabal not withstanding, we the people need to come together to stop them and their ruthless, ransacking and destruction of this nation, disregard for laws, and disregard for it's people!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agreed...the question is...How? Posted by: chance garden
We should be more concered w/Emanuel
Posted by: weathered on Jan 22, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a weasel and a zionist. Nothing good can come from this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another family quote...
Posted by: Gisele on Jan 22, 2009 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"If the American people really knew what we had done, we would be chased down the street and lynched."

President George H.W.Bush to White House correspondent Sara McClendon, 1992

Yeah, probably.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So what had they done.. Posted by: chance garden
» RE: So what had they done.. Posted by: weathered
» RE: So what had they done.. Posted by: chance garden
Bush Crime Family
Posted by: tpfleming on Jan 22, 2009 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Baker's book has exposed the truth that the mainstream media refuses to touch. Investigative journalism at our largest media outlets is dead. Only independent writers can now expose the real history of America.

Tim Fleming
www.eloquentbooks.com/MurderOfAnAmericanNazi
http://leftlooking.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush Crime Family - That's Right Posted by: left_libertarian
Vicious Bush Family Shadow Government
Posted by: US Citizen on Jan 22, 2009 12:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Bush family shadow government has been operating in the US for a long time. They were responsible for two of the most vicious dictators the world has ever known - Trujillo in the Dominican Republic and Pinochet in Chile. These dictators were as vicious as Caligula, and were only in power because the US supported them. Thus anything that George W. Bush said about spreading democracy in the world or in Iraq was a vicious lie. Time will only tell if Obama has the courage to stand up to the vicious Bush family shadow government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush and Cuba Posted by: chance garden
Paranoia Will Destroy Ya
Posted by: dockboy on Jan 22, 2009 1:03 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is paranoid BS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Paranoia Will Destroy Ya Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Paranoia Will Destroy Ya Posted by: dragonlady620
» RE: Paranoia Will Destroy Ya Posted by: serafino
"Obama Should Worry About the Bush Family Tentacles Undermining His Plans"
Posted by: joe_is_in_the_room on Jan 22, 2009 3:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should murder not be on the playbooks of everyone who care for this country.

Give us names and addresses, change will come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RED ALERT !! RED ALERT !! KISSY FACE OBAMA JUST GAVE BIG OIL A MAJOR MAJOR "VICTORY" !!!
Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield on Jan 22, 2009 3:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Offshore drilling plan to go ahead: Interior Dept
Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:29pm EST
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A proposal issued in the final days of the Bush administration to expand offshore drilling in previously banned areas will move forward under the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama, an Interior Department spokesman told Reuters on Wednesday.

Shortly after being sworn in on Tuesday, Obama ordered all federal agencies and departments to halt pending regulations until they can be reviewed by incoming staff.

Hugh Vickery, a department spokesman, said the department has been notified by the White House that it will be able to proceed with a proposed draft of a five-year plan to lease areas in the Atlantic and Pacific waters for oil and natural gas drilling.

The preliminary plan would authorize 31 energy exploration lease sales between 2010 and 2015 for tracts along the east coast and off the coasts of Alaska and California.

When the plan was unveiled last week, the department said it would provide the Obama administration with the option to begin leasing recently opened areas in 2010, two years before the current leasing plan is set to end.

The department issued a notice Wednesday requesting public comments on the plan. The comment period will be open for 60 days. After that, the Obama administration would have to decide whether to proceed with an official proposal, make changes or scrap it.

Both presidential and congressional bans on drilling in most U.S. waters ended last year.

The Interior Department estimates that the Outer Continental Shelf holds 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas that have yet to be discovered. It is possible U.S. offshore areas, which have not been explored in 25 years, could contain more oil and gas.

Separately, Vickery said the department's plan to develop oil shale fields in the western United States would also continue.

(Reporting by Ayesha Rascoe and Tom Doggett; Editing by Christian Wiessner)


[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Veracity
Posted by: vvvci on Jan 22, 2009 6:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great commentary about the extent of the private-fortunes/big-biz/CIA's tentacles into American politics and foreign policy, BUT! -

#1. Recent computer-aided forensic and ballistic re-creations of the JFK assassination indicate an extremely high probability that Oswald truly was the gunman. Had there been gunmen on "the grassy knoll" shooting from Kennedy's righty, Jackie would have been drenched in his blood - if not killed by the bullet passing through her husband.
#2. Dan Rather didn't get around to investigating (then) Lt. Bush's Texas Air National Guard "AWOL" record until long after it would have been helpful - the summer of 2000. By the time Rather got to the story, Bush was already president. Anyone who read anything about Bush's real bio, was aware of his __never showed up for Alabama ANG duty" record long before Nov. 2000.
#3. Bush Jr. didn't fall far from the family tree. Like father, he liked invading hapless nations (Panama, Grenada under Reagan); like papa he was friends with the Sauid royals (and looked the other way to their corruptions); like daddy's Iran-Contra Junior like _outsourcing_ wars and occupations to ruthless armies and hired warlords; like the Contra wars and "Office of Americas", he had a soft spot for torture; and of course like daddy Bush and the S&L scandal > Bush-1 Recession, Junior loved tax cuts for the wealthy, monster deficits for everyone else to pay - the modern version of rounding up the sharecroppers and locking 'em down on the farm.
Oh - and don't forget, the PNAC/AIPAC connection - just visit the PNAC manifesto, to realize without PNAC, there would be NO Iraq war or botched occupation of Afghanistan.
http://newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
http://newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» POINT ONE: BEYOND NONSENSE Posted by: CDrago
» Re: #1 Posted by: stiffette
Nonsense!
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jan 22, 2009 6:42 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You libs have more conspiracy theories than an episode of the X-Files.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nonsense! Posted by: serafino
» RE: Nonsense! = Soft On Crime Posted by: left_libertarian
» RE: Nonsense! Posted by: motamanx6
A must-read on this topic
Posted by: DetachedObserver on Jan 22, 2009 8:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I strongly urge anyone interested in this extremely important topic to read a new book by James W. Douglass called JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE; WHY HE DIED AND WHY IT MATTERS. Using interviews with long-silenced witnesses from that era as well as documents newly available through the Presidential Records Act, Douglass meticulously puts together a thoroughly-documented, in my view irrefutable case for Kennedy's assassination being the handiwork of the CIA -- i.e. the same evil force that, as Baker points out, has served so well the Bush crime family. I haven't yet read Baker's book, but it sounds to me, from this essay, that the two books are completely in sync on this matter.

This being the case, I suspect that Obama -- being as smart as he is and as schooled as he is in Chicago politics -- is well aware of the danger and knows that if he confronts it head on, he will be eliminated just as JFK and RFK (and MLK too) were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A must-read on this topic Posted by: chance garden
» RE: A must-read on this topic Posted by: tpfleming
Caligula, the Borgias, and the House of Usher
Posted by: willymack on Jan 22, 2009 8:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pale in comparison to the psychotic evil of the bush clan.Their foul deeds are well documented and PROSECUTABLE. All that's needed is people with the courage and moral fibre to get the ball rolling. Vincent Bugilosi and Dennis Kucinich come to mind. They're only two people, but with the proper encouragement and support, they'd probably be enough. The crimes of the bushies cry out for justice; there is simply too much blood on their hands for us to ignore or forgive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A must read
Posted by: gandolfshep on Jan 22, 2009 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm looking for the book in the morning and should I find it I will most definitely read it.

I know the Bush family secrets go much deeper than you were able to put in only two pages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» gandolfshep - Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: gandolfshep - Posted by: chance garden
Dr. Richard Cummings
Posted by: cummings01 on Jan 23, 2009 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ten days before he was assassinated, John F. Kennedy said the following: "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight." The source is Columbia Univesity. It is clear from this that Kennedy found out about the secret government that had as its objective the end of liberty as American had known it in the interests of the very wealthy and powerful. Richard Nixon continued the plot, only he directed it at the ones who had fomented it in the first place. The American right backed Nixon believing it could control him, but when they realized they couldn't they did what was necessary to get rid of him. Russ Baker's contribution to our understandng of this though his excellent "Family of Secrets," must be a beginning of a process to unravel the secrets that have brought about the American empire and its militaristic policies. This is the only way to save the republic from those who would end it in their own interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Not a Cure, But...
Posted by: dragonlady620 on Jan 23, 2009 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there any chance the Bush family will throw Karl Rove under the bus?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's Not a Cure, But... Posted by: left_libertarian
CarrierPilot
Posted by: CarrierPilot on Jan 23, 2009 10:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As one of the many sources for Russ Baker's new book Family of Secrets I can attest [from personal experience] to the ongoing problem that we face in light of the corrupt lawyers who have been appointed to the bench by the Bushes. When I refused to cooperate in the cover-up of BinLaden funding of the Bushes political and business undertakings, I was inundated in frivilous litigation. I was told that I would never get my day in court because Bush would call the Republican Texas State District judges handling the cases and instruct them to dispose of the cases adverse to my interests. That's exactly the way things played out. I never got my day in court, or to tell what happened to a jury, as the judges exercised their "judicial discretion" to make the cases simply "go away". Federal law enforcement agency investigators looking into the matter had their investigations shut down by Bush political operatives invoking "national security" as the rationale. The crooked lawyers who carried out this litigation harassment campaign have all been rewarded with Bush appointments to government agencies and judgeships. The honest lawyers who attempted to get the facts out into the open [through the discovery process] had their efforts thwarted and never received payment for their legal services. Unfortunately, these corrupt Bush sycophants are still in positions of power and are ready and willing to do the bidding of the Bush family and their sponsors any time they are called upon. Until the news media is willing to expose these people [as in naming names and describing what they did] and prosecutors prosecute them for their crimes, nothing will be done to remove them from positions of authority and our Contitutionally derived liberties will remain in jeapordy. The Obama's of this world will find themselves hamstrung until such time as the Bush family's rats nest has been cleared.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How interesting
Posted by: podbabe on Jan 23, 2009 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it interesting and curious that the writer fails to state that George H.W. Bush began military and intelligence budget cuts while he was in office. If he was so wrapped up in this family's conspiracy, why would he do this?

Also, Mr. Baker states that Clinton "...instituted virtually no significant reforms in, or issued challenges to, either the intelligence or military establishments." This is a blatant mis-statement of the truth. Clinton DID in fact cut the intelligence and military budgets by billions of dollars, leaving our intelligence agencies crippled.

Former CIA Director George Tenet wrote in March, 2004:

The record shows that despite the well-documented resource reductions we took in the 1990s and the enormous competing demands for our attention, I and a series of DCIs before me saw to it that the resources committed to the counterterrorism effort were not only protected but also enhanced.

The cost of the post-Cold War “peace dividend” was that during the 1990s our intelligence community funding declined in real terms, reducing our buying power by tens of billions of dollars over the decade. We lost nearly one in four of our positions. This loss of manpower was devastating, particularly in our two most manpower intensive activities: all-source analysis and human source collection. By the mid-1990s, recruitment of new CIA analysts and case officers had come to a virtual halt. NSA was hiring no new technologists during the greatest information technology change in our lifetimes. Both Congress and the Executive Branch for most of the decade embraced the idea that we could surge our resources to deal with emerging intelligence challenges, including threats from terrorism.

From a budget perspective, the last part of the 1990s reflects CIA’s efforts to shift to a wartime footing against terrorism. CIA’s budget had declined 18 percent in real terms during the decade and we suffered a loss of 16 percent of our personnel (this is slightly less of a cut than the 1 in 4 cited for the Intelligence Community as a whole earlier).

Tenet also said in April, 2004:

By the mid-1990s the Intelligence Community was operating with significant erosion in resources and people and was unable to keep pace with technological change. When I became DCI, I found a Community and a CIA whose dollars were declining and whose expertise was ebbing.

We lost close to 25 percent of our people and billions of dollars in capital investment.
The pace of technological change and a $3 trillion telecommunications revolution challenged the National Security Agency’s ability to keep up with the increasing volume and velocity of modern communications.
The infrastructure to recruit, train, and sustain officers for our clandestine services—the nation’s human intelligence capability—was in disarray.
We were not hiring new analysts, emphasizing the importance of expertise, or giving analysts the tools they needed.

Does this sound like virturally NO reforms or challenges to intelligence???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How interesting Posted by: serafino
» RE: How interesting Posted by: DetachedObserver
Bushes: The biggest crooks of all!
Posted by: bettyn on Jan 23, 2009 1:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This bunch is worse than any Mafia! They must be stopped by any means possible and the sooner the better! Leon Panetta must completely FUMIGATE the entire CIA, even if it means closing down the agency altogether. NO ONE associated with that organization and NO ONE associated with this family should be trusted. They all belong in prison for TREASON!

Talk about "HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS"! What more proof do we need? No one associated with this family should ever be allowed near any government position again.

Keep your eye on Jeb. He is surely up to something with his crooked Cuban pals in Florida. Never let this man run for any office anywhere. He's the worst of the bunch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A lovely bunch of coconuts
Posted by: annasdad on Jan 23, 2009 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You may be right about the entrenched culture, but where do people get the idea that Obama wants to change anything.
"Change we want, Change we need, Change we can believe in." Slogans- not commitments.
Just another wholly owned representative of American Imperialism, corporate greed and the military economy. The color has changed, but not the philosophy. Obama will not tackle the "real" issues. He's at best a John Kerry clone. Americans don't really want change. If they did they would be voting for Kuchinich's and Huckabees not the nominees of corporate greed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barking up the wrong conspiracy
Posted by: independent1 on Jan 25, 2009 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eh, claiming that there's a grand conspiracy to enslave the lowly, non-millionaire majority may be "accurate" but doesn't need a book to detail how it's being done.

Observation of the Republican Party shows that they do in fact follow a trail of deceit which is undermining our freedoms. But it's entirely by betraying / redefining / inverting their stated principles (like freedom for individuals, laissez fare economic policy). Any fool could have seen years ago that these two "principles" in particular had been bent to create a new class of mega-criminals: those who work "in private" free from oversight and kept from the public view.

Going back to the Enron scandal: this has been the way of it.

We all know that the original meaning of laissez fare was intended to free the "merchant class" and those who "create" factories and jobs from too-burdensome (and often draconian) government. As we have seen: no one can be trusted with that much freedom. We "lower class" individuals are not allowed the same freedoms as the super-rich. The current economic melt-down was inevitable. We are made beholden to the insanely rich corporate royals for our jobs, our very sustenance.

"Freedom" was what allowed the Arab terrorists to succeed on 9/11/01.

Even though Ayn Rand's book, "The Virtue of Selfishness" clearly stated the contrary: these Republicans have bent that ideal to their own purposes and made misuse of the notion of individual freedom part of our culture. To her credit, Ayn Rand emphasized the idea of exchanging "value for value" in economic contracts - but she was a naive little Russian immigrant who in the end abetted the rise of
the capitalist oligarchs with her simple "faith" in human honesty.

The overview is this: any ideology can be hijacked and ideologies are "best promoted" through misleading advertising (read, "propaganda").

We are guilty of forgetting something else Rand used to say: One cannot live a contradiction. When you see someone contradicting their statements and claims through their actions: you know you have a crook in your sights. We failed to see the obvious: All the yapping about freedom and the honesty of business tycoons was contradicted by Bush 43's resort to war time powers and the consistent anti-labor stance he and all Republicans adopted since the Reagan years. As of this hour, their efforts have put America under corporate control for all intents and purposes.

Has the Bush family been complicit in this? Most certainly - and that's the simple truth. There's no need for elaborate and impossible to prove "theories." By serving the super rich, they are enriched. By violating the presidential oath, Bush has ensured that he will always be wealthy and will always have Secret Service protection in addition to all the other entitlements. (Ironic that Republicans use "entitlements" as a pejorative term, eh?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FighterPilot
Posted by: CarrierPilot on Feb 2, 2009 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kudos to Russ Baker re: "We must begin to take seriously, and speak openly about, the true nature of the forces behind the Bush family enterprise." I can attest to the need to clean up the system from personal experience. Back in the late 1980's I was warned that I would by robbed blind using the judicial system unless I agreed to cooperate in the cover up of Saudi BinLaden family funding of Bush family political and business ventures. The specific threat was that Bush would call the judges handling the harassment cases and instruct them to exercise their "judicial discretion" to make the cases go away before trial on the merits. That is precisely what happened in every case as there was no trial, no jury, and no due process. My business, income, home, savings and retirement were all stripped away thanks to a compromised judiciary. Bush followed up by rewarding the complicit trial lawyers with appointments to US Government agencies and judicial posts. Now that there is an expanded cadre of politcal sychophants sitting on judicial benches across American we need to be concerned about the undermining of our judicial system and ever more mindful of the forces behind the Bush family enterprise that put them in power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FighterPilot Posted by: LindaJoy
23fggyrt
Posted by: megal_1 on Feb 5, 2009 9:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-——————————
Flv Converter for Mac

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement