Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

10 Big Goals for Obama's First 1,460 Days

By Mark Green, Huffington Post. Posted January 13, 2009.


If Obama wants to be credited with inspiring an era of progressive governance we have to push him to adopt a really bold agenda.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Mark Green

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Based on his 2008 campaign and 2009 exigencies, President Obama's mandate includes two huge and imminent priorities -- an unprecedented "stimulus" to revive the economy and a plan that gets us out of Iraq.

And then?

Eighteen months ago, John Podesta, head of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, and I agreed to collaborate on a volume that gathered together the best progressive scholars, advocates, and experts to specifically describe agency-by-agency what a progressive 44th president could do on Day One, Year One, Term One. Then, of course, John had to recuse himself in August after he was tapped to run Obama's official transition -- and this month CAPAF and my New Democracy published the results -- progressive leaders pooling their best ideas and practices into a program we call:

"Progressive Patriotism."

As Obama prepares to take his oath, expectations are sky-high. Rightly so. The planets appear to be in alignment for a possible political realignment: Obama won by triple Bush's last margin; conservative stock is at Lehman Bros. levels, after a preventive war of choice, a deregulated economic meltdown and the conservative compassion of Katrina; Democrats now enjoy a 10 percentage point edge in voter registration, which is likely to grow given minority, youth and suburban professional trends; Democrats appear more united than anytime in recent memory, with no obvious DLC-Moveon fights over wars or deficits; and there's an authentic crisis that trumps pious platitudes about the free market and "family values."

Now, rather than stale left-right debates, there's a new mainstream for more progressive values, as surely represented by the shift of 13 U.S. Senate seats and 54 House seats over two congressional elections. This may not be 1932 but it's a bigger attitudinal shift than the one in 1980 to Reagan and "Reagan Democrats," when National Review publisher Bill Rusher prematurely gloated that "liberalism is dead."

Anticipating this shift, our Citizens Transition Project developed scores of workable solutions built on four cornerstones: more democracy, diplomacy, economic opportunity and green collar jobs. Since ad hoc policy-making can peter out unless the public sees changes being thematically interconnected -- like the "New Deal" -- we linked proposals to these core values of Progressive Patriotism. Especially after what Jared Bernstein called the failure of Yo-Yo Conservatism ("You're on Your Own"), what could be more pro-American than the idea of progress?

Hence these 10 Big Goals by 2012 or 2016. For if you don't know where you're headed, you'll never get there.

Some stipulations: given space constraints, ideas are merely asserted -- for more development, one can go to the chapters by the authors themselves in Change for America. If proposals sound familiar, it's perhaps because a) they've been rising for years and become a consensus agenda, and b) so many of the authors have been recruited into the Transition and/or new Administration (Podesta, Carol Browner, Greg Craig, Elena Kagan, Dawn Johnsen, Josh Steiner, Van Jones, Jack Lew, Jeanne Lambrew, Christopher Edley, Jr....).

Nor do we think it useful for Democrats to fret whether it would be better for the new President to be more incremental than bold. One reply is --  the only thing we have to fear is fear itself. Frankly, where's the political will or majority now to stop an Obama initiative? And where is it written this moment will last? The only two other progressive windows of opportunity this past century --1933 and 1965 -- ended, respectively, with the continuing Depression and WWII, and Watts and the Vietnam War. Going slow risks some unanticipated event that'll snuff out the current rational exhuberance. Combining Obama's 65% popularity, congressional majorities, a supportive public, a winning program -- as well as crisis demanding that Washington rise to the occasion -- why not throw long? Again and again?

President Obama should be guided by the well known ethic, "Make no small plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood." Often wrongly attributed to Winston Churchill, this observation originated with Daniel Hudson Burnham, the noted Chicago architect who designed the 1893 World Exposition and before that helped rebuild the Windy City after its disastrous 1871 fire. So history repeats itself, as another Chicagoan makes big plans to rebuild after Bush's consuming disasters.

1. Reduce poverty a third by 2016. With poverty increasing by five million in the Bush years - and with only Great Britain having less upward income mobility than the U.S -- the country needs to reduce the 37 million indigent (nearly equal to the State of California) by a third by 2016.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: mark green, change for america

Mark Green is co-editor of the just-released "Change for America: A Progressive Blueprint for the 44th President," and president of Air America Media.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not Bad, But....
Posted by: armorypk on Jan 13, 2009 12:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"eventually move to a universal healthcare system"??
Like when? By the end of his second term, maybe? This is a national emergency. Thousands of Americans die every year because they have no health insurance. Universal coverage should be at the top of Obama's "to-do" list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not Bad, But.... Posted by: wrinklemomma
Wait a minute
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Jan 13, 2009 1:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forgiveness of student loans.....should be a major consideration for the new administration and I don't see this even mentioned in this article.

Everyone always talks about how you should get an education, but millions of Americans are unable to survive financially with their college loan payments. When you don't have enough money to avoid deferments, the interest eats you alive. I have heard many young people state openly that they feel they must consider killing themselves because they have no future with the staggering loan payments (which have multiplied out of control) that they are facing and/or struggling to make.

Considering how expensive colleges are in the US compared to the rest of the world (and with no better or even not as good an education gained), these loans should be written off. All you ever hear about, though, are fundings for head-start programs or after-school programs. Additionally, many vocational schools don't even qualify for loans because they're not on the 'approved' list.

We need to dump all the standardized tests and stop making the Educational Testing Service (ETS) one of the richest non-profit corporations in the US - what a scam they have going on with the SAT, GRE, etc. Nothing statistically shows that these tests mean anything anyway.

Overall, this list of 10 is a combination of the same ol', same ol' stuff, most of which I agree with, but not the educational part, which needs a revolutionary new approach - and forgiving student loans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Big Goals and Implementation Details Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: in full agreement, Ms Orwell!!! Posted by: georgiaorwell
RE: OBAMA MUST MAKE AMERICA LAWFULL MINDED AGAIN
Posted by: willymack on Jan 13, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I concur on all points. Obama likes to alude to "looking forward" and minimize talk of cleaning up the mess left by bushco. Maybe that's because he doesn't want to tip his hand too soon, maybe not. There is NO going forward until the bush crime family is indicted, convicted, and imprisoned. Their crimes are simply too horrendous and numerous to paper over. No forgivness, for these vile criminals, NONE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice article....BAD assumption.....
Posted by: tony12000 on Jan 13, 2009 2:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BAD assumption: Obama wants to be credited with inspiring an era of progressive governance .....

Chicken Little Politics: Moderate Obama Causes Progressive Panic

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Try Guantanamo Inmates in US Courts?
Posted by: DrBrian on Jan 13, 2009 3:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure I understand why most of the inmates from Guantanamo should be tried in US courts at all. They're actually prisoners of war, and should be handled as per the Geneva Conventions. What if other countries wanted to try our captured soldiers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Geneva Convention dose not apply to Non Uniformed Combatants Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Completely Wrong! Posted by: DrBrian
One week left
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jan 13, 2009 3:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I realize this is a tad off topic but can you believe that we have only a week left to deal with the half-witted little thug in the Oval Office?

Did you see that press conference yesterday??? It was so pathetic for a second - a brief second, mind you - I felt myself feeling sorry for the guy.

And to think that he's actually proud of himself! He said yesterday that the "burdens of the office" are in effect nonexistent and "overrated". He didn't feel the burden of his decisions, huh? That is all the proof you need to know that he's a sociopath.

Think about it.

All in the First Crime Family

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so where was the word "corporate" or "corporation" in all this? It could have and should have
Posted by: Suzon on Jan 13, 2009 3:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
appeared in almost every item on the list.

The corporation is the carrier of the disease of entitlement. It has a long history but no respectable justification. It is similar to the KKK in that it uses aggregate power to enforce rule by ruthless people.

If the corporation is an artificial person, then that person is a thug.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget election fraud
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jan 13, 2009 3:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will be all for naught if we don't break the back of Republican election fraud. Mark Crispin Miller says Obama had half his victory stolen:

"The fact that Obama won so handily has caused a lot of us to sit back and relax....In fact, the evidence strongly suggests...that Obama probably won by twice as many votes as we think. Probably a good seven million votes for Obama were undone through vote suppression and fraud, because the stuff was extensive and pervasive, in places where you wouldn’t expect it.
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/12
/22/republican_it_specialist_dies_in_plane

If we don't fix this, the Repubs will hack Jeb Bush in as our next President. We can hardly survive that.

The only real solution is to get the Repubs out of our country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"...won handily?" Obama needs to be pushed?
Posted by: johnp on Jan 13, 2009 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama actually lost to one of his "opponents," Hillary. He lost the popular vote. The "popular vote" that "he" said was the most important vote. Why are here talking about "pushing" Obama to do what he ought to be pushing us to do.
This implies an uneasiness about this dunce. Once more, I'm embarrassed to have someone for the president. I hesitate to call him "my" president. We can never be as embarrassed as we were to have "W" for the president, but Obama doesn't do much better, only a little better than Bush. It's shameful that a right wing media, right wing republicans, and corporate America, were able to persuade the voters to fall for this sham.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Everybody hates Barak Posted by: Bbear41
axe No Child Left Behind, too
Posted by: socialpsych on Jan 13, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From what I've heard, Obama is going to stick with this neocon plot to destroy public education.

Anyone out there who works in education at any level should speak up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Anna Posted by: socialpsych
» Ted Kennedy wrote it Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
Obama
Posted by: Dboy on Jan 13, 2009 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish Obama the best, I really do. But wow, the entire planet is pinning hopes on this guy that he cannot possibly fulfill. How much influence on the economy does a president *really* have? What can Obama *really* do to dig the US out of this recession/depression/implosion or whatever it is we are experiencing? Can Obama create the "next big thing" that will drive the US economy to better times? I seriously don't think so. In fact, I don't see what industry, technology, or market force will drive a new round of prosperity in the US. If there is such an industry, I'd be betting on either IT/technology or biotechnology--both of which require advanced and very specialized training. In other words some segments of the population may flourish once again (the geeks), but just about everyone else will continue to experience an almost permanent recession. And that's NOT a recipe for Obama success. Of course I hope I'm wrong and we see a huge recovery, but I just don't see where one can come from at this point. I think we're in for much darker days and Obama is in for one hell of a hard job. These "Obama Wishlist" articles seem fairly pointless to me in the current environment.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Obama Posted by: willymack
» RE: Obama Posted by: Dboy
Barbara, Michigan
Posted by: avidAmerican on Jan 13, 2009 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are all in this together. We cannot expect one man, our new President Obama to be able to right all the wrongs in a very short time. We need to look around and see what WE the People of America can do to help bring ourselves out of the Bush mess. Businesses can price their goods at an affordable price if they want to stay in business, for one thing. Oil Companies need to stop "socking" it to us. It is time for the "Screw the Consumer" mentality to end in this Country for the past 8 years. People who have jobs can buy a new car, that would help the Auto Industry to put people back to work. Those who can afford to buy stock in good companies can help in that way. There are many things we can do to help ourselves, and result in helping our Country at the same time. It is the job of each and every one of us to get off our butts and help to reclaim this country again...now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good points, but......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jan 13, 2009 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off Universal health-care should be incorporated as he is stimulating the economy! While there are at least 50 million people in this nation with no care at all, the people that do have some form of insurance are staggering under the weight of, not just the payments, but the co-pay (think: just don't get sick)! While I continue to hear about "socialized medicine" the laissez faire crew doesn't want to talk about "socialized welfare for the rich"!

How about education, while I laud the goals, college is no longer affordable for everyone! People are staggering under the weight of the loans that they have now! Maybe the President could offer a "Peace Corp" type of initiative, those that signed up to work in under-served areas as teachers, doctors, lawyers, etc. could work off some of the loans that they currently have!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good points, but...... Posted by: liblady2008
» keep the heathcare... Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
We Trust Our Democratic Leaders at Our Peril
Posted by: jimswanson on Jan 13, 2009 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
James A. Swanson, Los Altos, CA
www.bushleagueofnations.com

Real progressive transformation of our nation must be driven from the grassroots up, not from the top down by business-as-usual career politicians.

I’m alarmed that Obama has appointed so many business-as-usual politicians. Time will tell if he has the strength—and the will—to withstand their toxic influence.

Also, Big Oil, Big Insurance, Big Pharma—the list goes on—and their lobbyists have not left town.

Electing Obama was the easy part. The real work begins today, and again tomorrow, and again every day thereafter.

We must stay engaged, take names, and never give up. Let’s redouble our efforts.

We have the advantage of knowing what to expect from Neanderthals in the Republican Party. They are thus “reliable.” As for our Democratic leaders, we trust them at our peril.

We must keep our friends close, our enemy closer, and our Democratic leaders closest.

Jim Swanson, Los Altos, CA
“The Bush League of Nations”
www.bushleagueofnations.com [for FREE download of entire book]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why are so many hopes
Posted by: willymack on Jan 13, 2009 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being pinned on Obama? Because deep down inside our people KNOW how thoroughly the bushies have screwed things up, either intentionally, through criminal means, or just plain incompetence, or indifference. If the incoming administration makes even a half-assed attempt at remediation, things will almost certainly improve. The key here is for Obama NOT to squander his popularity and the good will of our citizens as bush did in the wake of 911 and Katrina. First and foremost in my mind is the exposure of the bush crime family for what it was and closing this sorry episode by way of trials for the criminals, pardons or no pardons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why are so many hopes Posted by: VZEQICVA
CHANGE vs. change
Posted by: UniversalHealthCare4All on Jan 13, 2009 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
5. Reduce the costs -- and expand the coverage -- of health care? Let's get BOLD here and rally for HR676 Single-payer Health Care system that takes profit out of the mix, covers EVERYONE, and reduces cost.

Check out Physicians for a National Health Program PNHP.org or HCHP.info for a reality check. CHANGE means CHANGE--not c-h-a-n-g-e.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CHANGE vs. change Posted by: hollyw25
Smile
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jan 13, 2009 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama Says Recession Requires Scaling Back Promises

President-elect Barack Obama said reviving the U.S. economy will require scaling back on his campaign promises and personal sacrifice from all Americans.

“I want to be realistic here, not everything that we talked about during the campaign are we going to be able to do on the pace we had hoped,” Obama said in an interview on ABC’s “This Week” program broadcast this morning.

"CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Smile Posted by: Dboy
Small Correction In Title
Posted by: Prometheus2112 on Jan 13, 2009 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The title should read "10 Big Goals for Obama's First 1,459 Days" given that in the next 4 years there will be at least one leap year.

- Bob :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Small Correction In Title Posted by: VZEQICVA
Increase citizen power with localization
Posted by: hollyw25 on Jan 13, 2009 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This isn't just up to Obama--it's up to us, acting as caring, informed, involved citizens building bridges to each other and (it's now possible again!) our government(s).

WE CAN start with getting to know and cooperate with our neighbors (sharing tools, meals, childcare, cars, etc.) WE CAN bring "Transitional Towns/Initiatives" into being in our communities (increasing conservation efforts, redesigning to reduce driving and the overall carbon footprint, increasing involvement through citizen-government dialog techniques, etc.). WE CAN localize and make transparent and efficient what is now centralized, opaque and inefficient (maximize the localization of energy production and distribution [see Avery Lovins], re-start lending money at the local level as the norm, etc.) WE CAN insist that every proposal needs to be for the benefit of workers and all ordinary citizens--not for a small coterie of financial and power brokers.

And through it all, WE CAN build bridges with the people of other nations, other beliefs, other convictions--always seeking to see and share our common humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've Got a Much Better Agenda
Posted by: bcainw on Jan 13, 2009 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've Got a Much Better Agenda
==============================

If you like what you see please pass the link on to others. The 2nd American Revolution needs to start NOW!

First off let's get real. The suggestion about more education is just a way of ignoring what really needs to be done. Stop all further immigration into the United States -- Legal and Illegal -- until the nations 10 million unemployed and another 10 million underemployed . . . are back to work at wages at or above what they had in past years, in real wages. That alone should stop immigration for about 100 plus years. We also need to insure that our population never goes above 320 million.

And here is the rest of the agenda:

NEW AGENDA FOR AMERICA: Preliminary Planks
==========================================
[Video: http://www.newagecitizen.com/NAA.htm]

(1) Universal Health Care for All American Citizens
(2) A 20-year moratorium on all immigration into the United States
(3) Legal Marijuana for all Adults and Medical Patients
(4) An immediate reversal to the Offshoring and Inshoring of American Jobs
(5) A strict enforcement on issues of Separation of Church and State
(6) An immediate move from so-called Free Trade Agreements to Bilateral Trade agreements
(7) A major R&D project to bring energy independence to the United States and the World through recycling, reuse, ending hyper-consumerism and investing in the development of sustainable energy sources (e.g., solar, photovoltaic, wind, geothermal)
(8) No further ownership of US Assets (businesses, homes, ports, stock exchanges) by foreign governments or individuals!
(9) Replace the Federal Reserve with a People's Reserve which allows public oversight
(10) Absolute support for Net Neutrality

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dude run for Congress Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
A Growing Economy
Posted by: pdxjoe on Jan 13, 2009 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is not in the interests of The People to protect the growing economy, or at least the imperative of its growth. The economy grows because it and the wider society organized around the movement, consumption and accumulation of private property would collapse if it stopped at the level of human and environmental need. The growing economy grows for its own sake only, and damned be all if the world's finite resources and humanity's finite capacity to actually enjoy the products of technology and labor are unable to fuel and run the engine of its very material existence. This is why Marx described Capitalism (not simply a greedy attitude towards otherwise neutral categories like property and money, but the very system of property and wage-labor) as a vampire. It's greed is not human greed, but patently inhuman, because it out-paces all human dimensions of want and need. What we need is a different kind of economy, one which does not have to grow in order to function at all, one which does not require us to consume more than we need just so we can have our needs met.

That change will not and cannot happen in the United States alone, for the whole world's economic stability, which is just a euphemism for the stability of the growing economy, depends on the United States and other affluent countries like it to consume, consume, consume. It is also for this reason that most liberal feel-good distributive justice, which talks of distributing money from the American rich to the American poor, falls vastly short of any coherent sense of justice. America's domestic inequality is nothing compared to the poor countries that, for decades now, have produced for the United States at wages and in conditions that are illegal in the United States. The growing economy is a euphemism for the perpetuation of just those conditions in other countries in the "bad faith" that another world simply is not possible. If another world is not possible though, then maybe this one isn't worth the trouble.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not So Hard and Probably Well Worth The Trouble
Posted by: pdxjoe on Jan 13, 2009 6:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even 25 years ago, or at about the time Clinton took office, since Obama has made so many of his points in comparison to Clinton, tuition wasn't even half of what it is now. Tuition has gone up and up because starting about 30 years ago a serious purging of State subsidization began. Of course, at the time school wasn't "free" like it still is in many Western European countries today, but it was, to use one of Obama's favorite phrases, "more affordable." What State funds did was keep costs down.

In actuality though, all of the students attending State schools last year could have been funded and then some (the then some being the slight increase in enrollment we could expect if college was more affordable, if not "free") for fifty billion dollars. Compared to many government programs and functions, this is slightly more than a drop in the bucket (maybe two or three).

Even if Obama threw billions of dollars into infrastructure projects, which will mean far less unless they go towards making public transportation a State-funded concern, all the unemployed and under employed will not necessarily have work they can do. Either people won't be qualified or it simply wouldn't make sense from a management-perspective to put so many people on the job, as it were. Lots of people could go back to school, which requires a work-force of its own that would benefit from the enrollment.

One could look at such a wave of people going back to school as an investment in the work-force, but I don't really care for such instrumental perspectives. All the humanistic stuff aside, if people are in school, perhaps studying or doing something they love, their very being involved with something of meaning, and not just staving off the depression that I know personally can come with extended unemployment (which usually means the inability to pursue hobbies too), will have positive effects in the world around them. If you ever had an older relative tell you, as a child or young person, "go do something, even if it's wrong," you might know what I mean. The irony of that remark aside, making school (if nothing else) a real option for something to do will cut down on crime and drug-abuse I am sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Goals out of priority
Posted by: Dickinseattl on Jan 13, 2009 6:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While all the goals are worthy of inclusion on a top 10 list there needs to be a better priority. The goal listed as #7 (not highlighted on my Air America E-mail-?) should clearly rank as #1. We have barely survived 8 years of fascist neo-con criminality beginning with the theft of the 2000 Presidential election, similar to earlier Congressional thefts, followed by a false flag attack and demolition of the WTC, followed by related preplaned wars of aggression against Afganistan and then Iraq, with future plans for wars against the rest of Israel's lesser enemies, Syria and Iran, all based on known lies and contrived disinformation. Control of oil was the principal motive as seen in the pre-911 Energy Task Force meetings of Dick Cheney. To even think you can ignore these genocidal crimes of wars of aggression and false flag attacks, as our so called Congressional leadership as done, and as this list also seems to imply, is to aid and abet this criminalization of our government and take over of our democracy by these fascist anti-american elements. If justice is not pursued as a first priority and found and enforced we will have no peace and have achieved nothing. Move-on will probably lead here again, and the complicit and sycophantic DLC elements, now predominent in our Cabinet starting with Immanuel, must step aside if we are to save our nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Utterly absurd article
Posted by: chlamor on Jan 13, 2009 8:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all the author is completely clueless as to who Obama is and why his corporate paymasters would chuckle at such liberal foofaw.

Secondly there is absolutely no mention of what is the patently obvious big time NUMERO UNO DELUXE prerequisite for any and all of the tepid solutions the author meekly puts forth.

And what is that thing?

#1) Cut the military budget by 80% and eliminate all US bases abroad and cut all US weapons sales to any and all other entities.

Guess how many of the other top tenners that the author puts forth we just took care of.

Oh yeah, and capitalism...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Forgot - Have a Nuremberg Trial for Bush And Cheney
Posted by: Outspokengrandmother on Jan 13, 2009 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You Forgot - Have a Nuremberg Trial for Bush And Cheney and the rest of their Administration, including Powell. You cannot risk failing to send the message that an Administration that commits war crimes, lies to the public, warrentless wiretaps, etc., etc., etc. will be punished for breaking the law. I don't care what else happens - these men have to go to jail. They have to be pilloried. Unless they are, the next time people forget what happens when Republicans get in office, we'll get to do the same thing all over again - just as we're doing with the economy. As someone recently said, "We're relearning lessons from the Depression we should never have forgotten."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at that ad gov. grants $10 billion a year...
Posted by: Landbaron on Jan 13, 2009 10:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That could take care of universal heathcare.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will President Obama Rise to the Occasion?
Posted by: radhasinha on Jan 14, 2009 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ten priorities for the in-coming Obama Administration suggested in Mark Green’s article are certainly well selected and if implemented will certainly alleviate poverty and inequities in America.

Where I find the list thin is on foreign affairs. Of course, the two most important issues, non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and fighting terrorism, are included. In my view, the most important foreign policy challenge before the new president is to recover the lost credibility of the United States as a country believing in the ‘rule of law’ in international affairs.
President Obama has to convince the world that America will hence forth abide by international laws even if it might occasionally go against American preferences.

In his fight against terrorism he must realize that terrorism, particularly the Islamic, will continue until a just solution is found for the Palestinian crisis. The president-elect’s silence for eleven days, in spite of the growing humanitarian crisis in Gaza, has severely damaged his moral high ground and has badly tarnished his image as some one who cares about humanity at-large.

With his close association with the Israeli Lobby in America, not many people in the world,particularly the Islamic world, would believe that he can have an even-handed approach in solving the Palestinian crisis. Changing his image from ‘the first Jewish president’ to a world statesman, is another of his challenges.

In stemming the tide of nuclear proliferation too, he must move away from narrow pro-Israeli stance of blaming Iran for attempting to have nuclear weapons while keeping silent on Israeli nuclear arsenal. He must start with implementing that part of the Non-Proliferation Treaty which requires nuclear power states to gradually reduce or eliminate nuclear weapons. While a voluntary reduction by the U.S.A. may be an ideal gesture, a realistic option is a negotiated reduction and ultimate elimination by all nuclear powers, including India, Israel and Pakistan. If the new president is really interested in Iran not having nuclear weapons, he should support the idea of the Middle East being declared a non-nuclear zone, an idea supported by many countries in the region.


Another major issue relates to weaponization of Space. Many countries, including China and Russia, are opposed to the weaponization of Space. It is the United States which has been reluctant to support such moves. Will President Obama take the lead against weaponization of Space?

In fact, with wide spread poverty and destitution around the world, a drastic reduction in world military expenditure is badly needed. Will President Obama’s concern for poverty be translated into a significant reduction in the US military expenditure of over $ 700 billion, almost half of the world total? Some of this can be done simply by closing down of many of the seven hundred or more military bases abroad. These bases serve no real purpose. Policing the world can be done by a reinvigorated UN system and the supply of natural resources can be sustained through trade.

Fighting against terrorism also requires a fight against poverty, hunger and deprivation. This can, to a considerable extent, be done by diverting money from defense expenditure to economic development. One way of doing this is to combine the NATO forces and the UN Peace-keeping forces under the UN banner. This would not only provide teeth to the UN operations, but also enable America to handover troubled areas like Iraq and Afghanistan to the UN without losing face.


Such decisions are not easy. However, ff the new president opts for these policies and succeeds, he will have succeeded in changing the world as promised during his election campaign and he will go down in history as one of the greatest statesmen of this century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reasonable overall, but a few quibbles
Posted by: liberallibrarian on Jan 15, 2009 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This list includes many of the things I hope to see from the Obama administration, although I have some doubts about many of the subpoints (e.g., mandating that the FDA end teen obesity, as if a federal agency has much power to change culture). The article does show its origin as a committee effort, with some significant need for an editor. A few examples:
-- universal voter REGULATION? (I assume he means REGISTRATION)
-- HUMAN oil reserves?
-- FrancEs Perkins was a woman, I believe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Raytheon going green?
Posted by: Sandunga on Jan 17, 2009 1:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Re more green collar jobs: Wouldn't it be great if these additional jobs also lessened the power of the military-industrial complex? Fantasy? Probably. However, just as fantastical seems the proposed nomination of William Lynn, Raytheon Vice-President and lobbyist, to Robert Gates’s defense team.

Some of us have noticed passing references in several blogs to what seems to be a new direction for one of the major defense industries. One blogger apparently mentioned Raytheon in a list of several companies that have begun to plan for peacetime conversión; another indicated that Raytheon had started retraining programs for their employees but didn’t say for what purpose; and, finally, another mentioned a major presentation of a new environmental program by Raytheon but didn’t indicate what , where, or when. Checking Raytheon’s website, I see that Raytheon was slated to make a presentation at the American Meteorological Society’s annual meeting this month in Phoenix. As unlikely as it might seem for the principal purveyor of Patriot and Tomahawk missiles to be toying with peace conversión, it might explain the seemingly strange move by the President-elect in seeking this nomination. Could anyone possibly shed light on the issue?

Sandunga

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is Raytheon going green? Posted by: Mitchel Cohen
Progressive...Really?
Posted by: lefty010 on Feb 1, 2009 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am going to have to disagree with the idea that this is a progressive agenda. At best it is a pathetic attempt to keep pushing a conservative, profit-driven ideas onto the people and calling it "progressive". It is a bill of goods with the expectation that because so-called "progressives" endorse it that I should to.

Problem one: Affordable health care? C'mon people, health care IS NOT A PRODUCT it is a HUMAN RIGHT. Stop trying to convince me that there should be a price on a basic fundamental human right. But this author seems proud as a peacock for this “progressive” piece of shit proposal. Ahhhh…more gift-wrapped turds for the public’s consumption. GOODY!

Problem two: The profound and insistent delusion about Iran is beyond bizarre and is totally false. Iran has more than once been open to negotiations. Iran is NOT doing anything illegal. They are allowed to enrich uranium for nuclear power JUST LIKE EVERY other state as per the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty. There is NO PROOF that Iran is developing nuclear weapons so what is so “progressive” about all the saber rattling with regard to this situation? Clue: NOTHING!!! And this type of saber rattling only further weakens US credibility abroad, which--for folks keeping score at home--is pretty snake belly low at the moment.

Problem three: I saw no mention whatsoever of our other precious little quagmire known as Afghanistan. How does that get missed on a list of what Obama should do in the first days of his presidency? I would suppose that since the mess in Afghanistan is so hugely antithetical to progressive values and Obama can’t wait to escalate, that it’s a good idea to leave it off of the “progressive” ideas list. It may not look so “progressive” to talk about an unwinnable war that is sucking up lives and money on both sides for nothing more than imperialistic ends. STOP THESE INSANE FUCKING WARS!!! I am sick in my soul from my complicity in financing the murder of innocent people around the world so a few fat-fucks at the top can get fatter. The escalation in Afghanistan is an insult to those who are true progressives. To try to push a “progressive” agenda without even mentioning the escalation plans for Afghanistan is reprehensible.

Problem four: There is no such thing as "clean coal"-there is no such thing as "clean coal"-there is no such thing as “clean coal”...Maybe if I repeat it enough it will be true...like they are doing by trying to convince a mostly uninformed population that there may actually be some kind of process that can produce "clean coal". It would all be laughable if it wasn’t so not funny. If the ideas put forth on this list are truly “progressive” then our species will surely annihilate itself. We need to move much more quickly when it comes to the planet’s energy resources and how we use them. We may already be out of time, so the idea that it is “progressive” to continue using our planet’s resources in our present manner while only minimally modifying our consumption and use (clean coal, bio-fuels, etc.) is not only NOT “progressive” it is wholly self-destructive and insane.

Please stop calling these ideas “progressive”. These ideas are so far from progressivism as to be Orwellian. A truer assessment is that these ideas are profit-driven, conservative ideas that have already proven to be profoundly detrimental to the vast majority of the global population. Quit telling me that supporting the obscene lifestyles for a few at the top at the expense of everyone else at the bottom is “progressive”.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]