comments_image -

Looking at Human Rights

Surina Khan, a Pakistani native and advocate for gay and lesbian human rights, shares her views on America's war on terrorism.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

As a native of Pakistan working full-time in the field of human rights, Surina Khan, executive director of the San Francisco-based International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC), has a lot to say about America's war on terrorism. Her family fled Pakistan in 1973 after her uncle, Air Marshal (Retired) Asghar Khan, began laying the groundwork to run for president. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who was then the Pakistani president, retaliated by accusing Surina Khan's father, who owned a business that was a subsidiary of a U.S. corporation, of being a spy for the CIA. Asghar Khan later ran for prime minister against Bhutto in 1977. He lost and was placed under house arrest. Bhutto was eventually overthrown and hanged.

Khan's family, which relocated to Connecticut, maintained its ties to the country. Her father kept his business, and Khan went to junior-high school in Pakistan. Most of her siblings have moved back to Pakistan or elsewhere in South Asia. Her cousin Omar Asghar Khan is now a member of General Pervez Musharraf's presidential cabinet. But Khan and one of her brothers, a lieutenant colonel in the US Marines, have put down roots in the U.S. She is one of the nation's leading experts on the political strategies of the Christian right, and at IGLHRC -- which defends the human rights of all people who are subject to discrimination because of their sexual orientation, gender identity or HIV status -- she works with the United Nations and human-rights groups around the world.

Khan spoke to the Phoenix from her office in San Francisco.

Q: I know that things have changed in Pakistan since you were there in late January [for a conference organized by Pakistan's Sustainable Development Policy Institute], but do you have any sense of how long Pakistan will be able to maintain its alliance with the United States?

A: I think it is going to be very difficult. There is enormous popular discontent and uneasiness. A large number of people of Pakistan do not agree with what the US is doing in Afghanistan. At the very least this resentment of the US has to be addressed.

Q: Do you think there could be another coup?

A: I think that this is possible, given that General Musharraf has replaced three of his generals with people who agree with him. I don't know where that leaves the three dismissed generals, but they have people they could rally.

Q: Could we reach a point where fundamentalists gain more power and take over? Obviously, the worry here is Pakistan's nuclear capabilities.

A: I think that is entirely possible.

Q: What is your immediate family's reaction to the "war on terrorism"?

A: They are generally critical of U.S. foreign policy. We are in agreement about that and agree also that the U.S. has certain responsibilities. For example: going in and bombing Afghanistan and reaching the particular goal of wiping out the Taliban is not enough. There has to be follow-up work there and in other countries, such as Indonesia, India and Pakistan, in which the U.S. has played a role. They have a responsibility to rebuild the infrastructure of a country. We also agree that the U.S. has to deal with the issues of Israel and Palestine. Beyond that, we have disagreements. I don't think that waging war on Afghanistan is a solution. Whereas some members of my family think that wiping out the Taliban will [be the answer] -- as long as the U.S. follows through on rebuilding the country.

But I think that even if the U.S. were successful in wiping out Osama bin Laden and all of his terrorist cells in Afghanistan, and presumably here in the U.S. and in Germany and how many other countries in which they exist ... which would be very difficult ... there is still a younger generation of 15-year-olds who will grow up and be even more resentful of the US. And until we deal with that issue of resentment from generation to generation, the answer is not more military attacks but, rather, a just foreign policy and general respect for everyone in the international community. That is what it essentially comes down to.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]