comments_image -

REICH: Sacrifice or Spend?

Despite being asked in the name of patriotism to spend, consumers are holding back. Perhaps Americans are realizing the economy exists to support us and the standard of living we choose, not the other way around.
October 19, 2001  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Typically in times of war, the public is asked to hold back and forebear from purchasing so there's enough productive capacity left to meet the military's needs. If they don't do it voluntarily, government imposes rationing. Not this time. Even as we wage war on terrorism, our political and business leaders are asking Americans to go out to the malls and buy more. It's our patriot duty, they say. `We mustn't let the terrorists intimidate us from continuing our spending binge.'

The fact is we're almost certainly in a recession, which means there's plenty of spare productive capacity, enough both to wage a war and also produce all sorts of consumer goods. Indeed, the recession is likely to worsen unless we utilize more of that capacity. There's no way projected outlays for fighting the war on terrorism will come close. That's why consumers are hearing patriotic calls to spend more.

What has economists worried is that, particularly since September 11th, consumers are holding back. Retail sales are way down. Sales of large-ticket items, like appliances, cars and televisions, are in the cellar. Sales of vacation homes and cruises and holiday packages have almost dried up. Consumers don't want to spend right now, and that's perfectly understandable. People are deep in debt. Savings are at a 70-year low. And they're worried about keeping their jobs and concerned about the future, so naturally they're pulling in their belts.

But there's also a deeper reason. People just don't feel like splurging right now. It feels almost unseemly, given the national emergency we're in. In fact, the terrorist attack and worries about future attacks have caused a lot of people to consider reordering their priorities; to conclude that buying a lot of stuff and working all hours to afford it is less important than leading a full life, finding time to be with the people you love, slowing down and appreciating all the things in life that don't cost a lot of money.

This is something economists don't like to hear. If this war is causing Americans to reorder priorities and become a little less materialistic, the national economy could suffer.

But we don't live to support an economy. The economy exists to support us and the standard of living we choose. And if terrorism reminds us that what we can buy is less important than the lives we want to lead, that's OK with me and probably OK with you.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
"Tubes": What the Internet is Made Of

By Laura Miller | Salon

 
 
Students at Stuyvesant Take Issue With Sexist Dress Code

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Chris Hayes on Memorial Day: Glamorizing and Justifying War with the Term "Hero"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Cory Booker vs. Philly Mayor Michael Nutter on Mitt Romney

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
How Florida Governor Rick Scott Could Steal The Election For Mitt Romney

By Judd Legum | ThinkProgress

 
 
Renowned Economist Simon Johnson Calls for a National Safety Board for Finance Ticking Time Bomb

By Lynn Parramore | AlterNet

 
 
Veterans' Gap

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
"Hero of War"–Rise Against Song Captures Iraq War Veteran’s Tragic Experience

By Amy Goodman | Democracy Now

 
 
Japan Govt Bears Most Blame for Fukushima: ex-PM

By Agence France Presse

 
 
The Stunning Truth About Health Care Pricing

By Deep Harm | DailyKos

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]