COMMENTS: 103
Big Booty Beauty and the New Sexual Aesthetic
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
The many names, affectionate and derogatory, we use in reference to female buttocks suggest the range of ambivalent associations they elicit.
"Booty" holds the promise of illicit pleasures. "Fanny" desexualizes the female behind, turning it into a sweet but inconsequential body part. The command to "get off your fanny" is less hostile than "get off your ass." A "tush" is small and tight, a "rump" is round and fleshy, a "can" is fat and lazy. Sander Gilman points out the "buttocks are an ever-shifting symbolic site in the body. … Never do they represent themselves." Female buttocks function as metaphors for traits that a society values or rejects. Their meanings vary between cultures and among ethnic groups; while a bounteous butt may bring out disgust or disdain in some social circles, it evokes a range of positive associations in others.
In mainstream U.S. culture, "bubble butts" have typically been associated with "lowly" subject positions or "vulgar" sexuality. Calling too much attention to one's behind is considered uncouth in polite society, a nasty reminder of forbidden or distasteful acts. A big butt is associated with "unnatural" sex, excrement or the excess and physicality identified with "darker" races. This body metaphor helps us constitute social identities and subject positions.
Like most females growing up in America, I learned early on that bodily attributes such as butt size, hair texture, skin color and body shape could convey a woman's status and desirability. During my teens, achieving the "all-American girl" look that graced the covers of fashion magazines meant dieting the butt into submission. A woman's failure to rein in an unruly butt connoted her lack of discipline and self-control, and by association, her inferior moral character. It also marked her place in the social order: "high class" women did not carry excess baggage in the trunk. A skinny ass identified you with the elegant and never too rich, never too thin social elite; big butts with the mammies and maids.
But growing up in Miami, where Latinos compose a majority, meant that I also had to negotiate another repertoire of butt metaphors and associations. While my American girlfriends dreamed of acquiring bigger breasts, the Cuban women in my family stressed the value of a bounteous derrière. Thus, in my Little Havana neighborhood, a generously endowed backside earned appreciative glances or wolf whistles. I knew that the size and shape of my butt identified the degree of my cultural assimilation. Thus buttocks registered a cultural divide: flat butts signaled conformity to American beauty standards, voluptuous hips expressed ethnic pride.
To my mom, my refusal to put more meat on my bones seemed a deliberate form of rebellion, another sign of my increasing distance from her native culture. Straightening my hair and speaking without an accent helped downplay my ethnicity, but nothing screamed "Latinness" like an unabashedly big ass. After all, my mother and her friends delighted in their fulsome booties. A skinny ass provoked pitying looks from the matronly Cubanas, for whom it portended sterile, passionless marriages and unfaithful husbands. But to their more assimilated daughters, big culos were associated with "cubanazas" -- those too loud, too fat, "too Cuban" women who were the butt of our jokes. An older generation of Cuban women considered abundant buns an asset, but to those of us who came of age with Twiggy images, a fat ass was a shameful reminder of our ethnic difference.
JLo Curves
In recent years, however, Americans have been enjoying a butt fling. Voluptuous female buttocks have become a valuable commodity, exploited in advertising campaigns, music videos and specialty men's magazines. This butt appeal has produced a profitable commercial market for "bootyful" women. What sparked mainstream culture's lusty fondness for women with big butts? Angharad Valdivia credits the famous JLo butt, arguing that Jennifer Lopez single-handedly ushered in a butt focus within contemporary U.S. culture, intervening "into codes of beauty and femininity, which until quite recently … relied exclusively on that nearly buttless look …" One London magazine reported that Lopez's rounded posterior made "curvy bottoms trendy" and created "a demand for silicone buttock implants" (Daily Mail 2003). In an article in Vanity Fair, Ned Zeman claims that Lopez "created a phenomenon in which a pair of buttocks became, in and of themselves, a cultural icon. Entire news articles would focus on The Lopez Ass, as if it were a separate life-form."
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobson on Jan 6, 2009 1:25 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
secondly, they have never been "in" or "out" because some will always like a big booty and some will not, some will like both, its just down to a personal preference, always has, always will. What you see in mainstream popular culture does not mean anything.
sorry that you spent so much time on this when I just summed it all up in a few words
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: what
Posted by: debjbaba
» The fashion industry hates big (female) butts
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» RE: The fashion industry hates big (female) butts
Posted by: i'mhere
» RE: The fashion industry hates big (female) butts
Posted by: WizardofOhm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: monalisanot on Jan 6, 2009 2:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Definitely
Posted by: Tombo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bronxborn on Jan 6, 2009 2:21 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bronxadelphia
Posted by: lee56
» RE: Wrong!!
Posted by: Tombo
» RE: Wrong!!
Posted by: lee56
» What about Asians?
Posted by: pnsuitec
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on Jan 6, 2009 2:22 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you recall Anna Nicole Smith's first Playboy centerfold (May 1992)? She was curvy and gorgeous, but did not (at least not then) sport a bubble butt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 'member Anna Nicole Smith?
Posted by: Moodotv
» RE: emember Anna Nicole Smith?
Posted by: lee56
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 6, 2009 2:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyhoo, let's hope that butts are here to stay, and that it's not just a trend. Every man can do his part: Next time your Mrs. asks you if an outfit makes her butt look big, say "Yes, I think you should wear that one." She'll call you an idiot, and pick the other dress, but at least you got a few words in.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Booty
Posted by: lee56
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jan 6, 2009 3:00 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even I am only 38 inches around the hips and I am 5'11' and 190 lbs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I like big butts and I cannot lie, but there's got to be a limit!
Posted by: morticia
» RE: I like big butts . . . Uhhh ... what other measurments cubcakes?
Posted by: Nightstallion
Comments are closed-
Posted by: colinmeister on Jan 6, 2009 4:10 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fanny?
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: Fanny?
Posted by: soundman
» RE: Fanny?
Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: Fanny?
Posted by: monalisanot
» RE: Fanny?
Posted by: lee56
» RE: Fanny in bold?
Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: Fanny? Ya, found that a bit disconcerting when I read
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» RE: Fanny?
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Fanny?
Posted by: maestra
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FREE SPEECH on Jan 6, 2009 4:22 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big butts (along with wide hips and large breasts) are important fertility cues and as such we respond to them instinctually/viscerally - and that's why they provoke the strong reactions mentioned in this article.
I have always much enjoyed the beauty of women with these fertile features as long as they maintain the self-respect and self-discipline to not slip in to sloppy overweightdom. As I said, there is a clear line between being healthily thick with nice curves versus being overweight and consequently unattractive.
Good article - thank you AlterNet for running this one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Poor excuses to justify being fat pigs
Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: A nice round bubble butt is definitely a very sexy thing on most women...
Posted by: greenPuker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jan 6, 2009 4:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Stupid Article
Posted by: enriquethepenguin
» RE: Stupid Poster
Posted by: lib3288
» RE: Stupid Article
Posted by: debjbaba
» RE: Stupid Article
Posted by: greenPuker
» Hey guys
Posted by: WizardofOhm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chloelin on Jan 6, 2009 4:39 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: slang and extraordinary obsession with anal sex
Posted by: monalisanot
» RE: slang
Posted by: greenPuker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cyberfactotum on Jan 6, 2009 5:39 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ZPaul on Jan 6, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But a "big" butt, in itself? Personally I don't see it as being attractive in itself in a woman, simply because of being big. But this is something so personal, so subjective -- who am I to judge for everybody else?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eric.gent on Jan 6, 2009 6:58 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 6, 2009 7:02 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Jan 6, 2009 9:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some people like voluptuousness and celebrate it, as Duke Ellington composed in a song called "Volupte."
We know about that famous "Baby Got Back" ditty, and to me I think the female butt is very erotic and sensous; and my current girlfriend thinks hers is big and is ashamed of its size, a size 10. She's a little insecure about it. I tell her it's a matter of genetics.
After all, I know we all have certain likes and different standards of beauty, and we know women like well-hung men; so I am attracted to big butt women.
Therefore, let's not demonize a woman's body parts. There, I said it; it's behind me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Seyazou on Jan 6, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I like a full-figured woman (breasts, hips and booty), and yes I do have a thing for a big-booty woman. I think it is important to realize that even in white American society; voluptuous women were once the ideal. Look back to the Victorian era (latter half of the 19th century) white women both here in America and in Europe wore a bustier to heighten the size of their backside. Even Queen Victoria herself was known to sport her cleavage (not the butt, but breasts, but you see my point – could you see the current queen showing cleavage?). Later on, by the 1950's, Marilyn Monroe was known just as much for her backside as she was for her breasts.
So it is an illusion and really a recent phenomenon that white society is so pre-occupied with thinness. Believe me, there are quite a few white men who like a big booty too, but are afraid to admit it in public.
This has always been the case. You wonder why us Black folks are all kinds of shades, because generations of white men doubtlessly found their curvy African and African-descended servants, slaves and nannies appealing. The late Senator Strom Thurmond (the segregationist South Carolina Dixiecrat) found his maid's ass appealing enough to tap it in 1925 – hence his love-child daughter who came to the surface after his death.
A white man lusting after Black women (mainly because of sistas’ legendary backsides) has been going on for centuries, if not longer.
If anything, the pre-occupation with breasts, especially in America, has become so perverted that any Google-search of "big boobs" gives you an array of garish and totally artificially enhanced breasts on artificially skinny and air-brushed frames.
Most in the Black community - both men and women based on my own conversations about this subject - agree that the big booty is "more natural" meaning that you don’t see Black women running out to get breasts implants and certainly not butt implants. Sistas have - for the most part - God-given derrieres.
One more thing - I'm glad to see that someone else noticed what I've noticed too, that Michelle Obama, the incoming First Lady, has a Ba-donka-donk! For those who may have said that President Barack was not "Black enough", you certainly cannot say that about his wife. Here you have a perfect combination of a dark-skinned woman with brains, wit, strength, and hips and ass to boot (nice thick long legs too).
For better or worse, I am just glad to see that the parameters of American beauty being expanded beyond the tall, skinny fake boobed variety.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Fashions
Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: In Black Culture, the Butt has always reigned
Posted by: Dimitri
» RE: In Black Culture, the Butt has always reigned
Posted by: stopthemaddness2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dimitri on Jan 6, 2009 9:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never thought I would be commenting on Big Booties on a website like this.
A good friend of mine has a bumper sticker that says:
"I brake for monster booty"
I still laugh about that one and he's had it on his car for well over a decade.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: morticia on Jan 6, 2009 9:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Big Booties on parade!
Posted by: phatkhat
» RE: Big Booties on parade!
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Big Booties on parade!
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stopthemaddness2 on Jan 6, 2009 9:58 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
May be by that time, Cultures will have melted and blended so well, we will just be male and female.... all seeking fulfillment and love.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sirios on Jan 6, 2009 10:57 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» When will this pathological obsession with body image cease?
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: BIG DUMB ASS
Posted by: theamazingatheist
» RE: BIG DUMB ASS
Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: BIG DUMB ASS
Posted by: Deathbunny
» RE: BIG DUMB ASS
Posted by: WizardofOhm
» RE: BIG DUMB ASS
Posted by: Deathbunny
» RE: BIG DUMB ASS
Posted by: WizardofOhm
» RE: BIG DUMB ASS
Posted by: Deathbunny
» Response part 2
Posted by: WizardofOhm
» RE: esponse part 2
Posted by: Deathbunny
» RE: esponse part 2
Posted by: Cathyblj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Libertine on Jan 6, 2009 11:22 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a boob man all the way
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not a Butt, Man; a boob, man!
Posted by: Beck
» Don't worry, Libertine...
Posted by: hurricane hugo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 6, 2009 1:25 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I tell Mrs. DaBear all the time, "if it slaps nice, it's fine." My PT used to tell me I had "ribbony glutes" and I'd tell her, "I got a flat ass, come on, just say it! I can take it." The point is I wish I had a butt, flat-ass is one of the leading causes of plumber-crack, that and a beer belly. Damnable malted beverage. Plus your legs go numb sitting on a bus bench with a flat butt... now that's a problem to worry about.
Alrighty then, nuff about the butt-shit... we got Republikaans to prosecute.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: celebrate the boo-tay
Posted by: Deathbunny
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Jan 6, 2009 1:26 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A well written, thought provoking article ! She forgot to mention economic changes though. An extremely thin ideal is popular in opulent periods when we can afford to laugh in the face of Mother Nature because we are sure we will never need a little extra stored energy. But the times ARE a changing and we are not laughing anymore!!!! In fact, Mother Nature is laughing at us!
I loved the way she ended it. Let us celebrate the beauty of ALL women: thin, fat, tall, short, light dark, old, young! Better yet, lets look at the inner beauty of a soul.
"He who judges another by the size of their rear keeps his own brains there."
More fat girl comebacks:
http://tinyurl.com/6qfom3
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hip Hip Hurray
Posted by: Deathbunny
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero1 on Jan 6, 2009 2:42 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Look at History
Posted by: perri6
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dickinseattl on Jan 6, 2009 5:52 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Authur needs to stay within her area of competence, women.
Posted by: Dickinseattl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jan 6, 2009 6:15 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thin is still in.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dickinseattl on Jan 6, 2009 6:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Jan 7, 2009 12:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Landbaron on Jan 7, 2009 12:47 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theamazingatheist on Jan 7, 2009 4:09 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnorford on Jan 7, 2009 5:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I thought AlterNet was serious
Posted by: greenPuker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dougo on Jan 7, 2009 6:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.myspace.com/buffiethebodydotcom
http://www.buffiethebody.com/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Buffy's booty
Posted by: greenPuker
» isn't it funny
Posted by: WizardofOhm
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vangogh69 on Jan 7, 2009 12:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IMHO, the only people interested in size zero women are fashion designers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» and most fashion designers
Posted by: WizardofOhm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lib3288 on Jan 7, 2009 12:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daniel35 on Jan 7, 2009 4:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In pretty much all man-on-top positions that involves hip movement, the man's movement hinges at the knees. Since the vagina, or whatever, is pretty much in line with the body, therefore usually horizontal when being intimate with a friend, some of the best hip movement is with the knees somewhat below the hips so the hips can move back and forth rather than just up and down. Therefore in face-to-face positions the big butt often takes the place of a pillow, also often used to raise the female's (whether man's or woman's) hips. Maybe the desire for the thighs-vertical position also came from when we walked on all fours, and did most other things with at least our hind legs automatically pointed down.
Personally I like a lot of skin contact, so big and well-cushioned all over is fine with me.
Now if I could just figure out what value there ever was in wearing a necktie, other than the general oneupsmanship of wearing clothes in general.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jbushkey on Jan 8, 2009 7:55 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WizardofOhm on Jan 10, 2009 6:45 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the racial differences can be a provocative issue, it is hard to stomach an approach to this subject that completely ignores the evolutionary implications of supple hips. A healthier angle would be to focus on the traditional attraction of voluptuous women as having productive child bearing features (strong, wide hip bones suggest a higher rate of survival for both mother and child, thus ensuring the survival of the species) as opposed to the deviated modern obbsession with frail annorexic bodies. This would be the most rational starting point for a dissertation on the racial differences in sexual attraction. It could be argued that since "darker races", in the author's words, are more evolutionarily endowed in the art of bearing children, white people have in response developed a counter productive instinctual sexual attraction in a psychological effort to compensate for their natural short comings. That argument at least would have been interesting.
Also, did anyone notice the "sources' used in this artictle? The publisher of Sweets is the definitive source on human sexuality and racial variations. Even better; a writer for SALON MAGAZINE proclaims, with all her expertise, that Hillary Clinton's campaign faltered because of her ass (and I'm not refering to her husband). As a young male in my sexual prime, I am suprised to find out that Hillary Clinton even has a butt, let alone what a large impact it has had on her political life.
I've never read American Sexuality Magazine, nor will I ever thanks to this enlightening article, but it appears the editors of Alternet were decieved by the cunningly formal title into thinking it was more than a trashy gossip mag. Apparently, it's not.
The conclusion, however poorly expressed, is the only semi-redeeming part of the article. Imagining a world without objectification seems peachy-keen... if you want a world without sexuality, that is. People objectify each other, it is how we judge whether we percieve somebody as a genetically suitable mate or not. Men do it to women, and women do it to men just as often- society just glorifies the objectification of women on a purely physical level, while encouraging women to objectify men on a financial and possession based level. It shouldn't be that oversimplified, but that is the media's fault. American Sexuality Magazine included.
I feel dumber after reading this article, thanks Alternet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Clarification
Posted by: WizardofOhm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dumdumboy on Jan 11, 2009 9:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I don't necessarily share R. Crumb's fascination, I do wonder whether or not another cliche - unmentioned in this article - is at play here; "The bigger the cushion, the better the pushin'."
I also wonder why such trivial nonsense gets so much attention here, even though it got mine. Has everyone who read this also read today's Frank Rich column? Then again, we all need some comedic relief, especially in these times.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mahalias on Jan 12, 2009 5:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
My Experience with a Psychedelic Plant That Thousands Have Used for Release from Severe Addictions
Is Using a Checklist the Answer to All Your Problems?
On Anniversary of Iraq Invasion, Time to Rethink Anti-War Activism




