Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health Care Reform: Good for Patients, Good for Workers, Good for Women

By Amanda Marcotte, RH Reality Check. Posted January 5, 2009.


Health care reform would give us the opportunity to create jobs that pay us back tenfold.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
7 Reasons for Atheists to Celebrate the Holidays
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Stephen King Meets the Estate Tax
Bill Gates, Sr., Chuck Collins

DrugReporter:
Congress Gets Its Act Together: Repeals Ban on Syringe Exchange Funding, Allows D.C. to Enact Medical Marijuana Program
Bill Piper, Naomi Long

Environment:
Copenhagen: Historic Failure That Will Live in Infamy
Joss Garman

Food:
Corporations (and Sarah Palin) Are Cyborgs Sent to Scuttle the Fight Against Climate Change
Rebecca Solnit

Health and Wellness:
Women Soldiers Forced to Resort to Back-Alley Abortions: Why Are Their Reproductive Rights Denied?
Kathryn Joyce

Immigration:
A Rogue Sheriff in One Arizona County Is a National Problem
Eric Ward

Media and Technology:
Is Handwriting Going the Way of the Dodo?
Anne Trubek

Movie Mix:
James Cameron's Wizardry in 'Avatar' Movie Demands Being Witnessed on the Big Screen
Wajahat Ali

Politics:
Naomi Klein: 3 Biggest Blown Opportunities of Obama's Presidency
Naomi Klein

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Men: Invisible Allies in the Struggle for Choice
Claire Keyes

Rights and Liberties:
Pockets of White America Are in the Throes of an Existential Crisis
Rich Benjamin

Sex and Relationships:
Sexy Mormons, the Joy of Vibrators and Sticking it to Puritans: 10 of Liz Langley's Best Pieces
AlterNet Staff

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
NASA Report Highlights Need to Retire Drainage Impaired Land in California
Dan Bacher

World:
Afghan National Army: Afghan Police Are Doing More Harm Than Good
Ahmad Kawosh

More stories by Amanda Marcotte

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Should the demand rise high enough, the government might even invest in on-the-job training programs for female health care workers, so they can start drawing a salary immediately, reducing their need to hold down an outside job while receiving the training to be a nurse.  Right now, one of the biggest barriers between the many women (and men, too) who would like nursing jobs is the long waiting lists at nursing school.  Again, the federal government can attack this problem, funding an expansion of the educational apparatus to increase the number of graduates coming out of school and meeting the growing demand for this kind of health care.

Just a couple of years ago, the idea of widespread federal investment in infrastructure for the purpose of investment and job creation seemed a marginal idea that had been abandoned once we recovered from the Great Depression.  That changed in pretty short order, and if things go as planned, historians will mark this as a time of a great paradigm shift.  And thank goodness. If this is a country that really is committed to the equality of all, the federal government should consider the needs of the working class to obtain and maintain decent work to be at least as important as the desires of the wealthy to keep their stock holdings from plummeting precariously when the latest economic scheme collapses.   

Federal job creation is a good unto itself, so long as the work is real and dignified, but we have a unique opportunity to create jobs that really do pay us back tenfold.  Green jobs that set the standard for a modern environmentalist society are one way to get our investment back beyond just the standard good of full employment, and health care job creation does the same thing.  Everything in our society will improve when our citizens are as healthy as possible. 

And we can do all this without compromising feminist principles that advocate for an economy where women don't depend on men, and aren't forced, as I argue in this week's podcast, to make compromises like staying in abusive marriages because they can't afford to escape.  In opposition to the New Deal of the 1930s, which glorified the nuclear family and female dependence, we really can create a new New-er Deal that supports female independence and truly healthy families formed out of full consent, economic and otherwise.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, feminism, women, economy, health care, health care reform, jobs

Amanda Marcotte co-writes the popular blog Pandagon. She is the author of It's a Jungle Out There: The Feminist Survival Guide to Politically Inhospitable Environments.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bravo,a great idea
Posted by: lewb on Jan 5, 2009 5:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes so much sense to implement a program like this. I am a senior citizen who prays for programs like this.The benefits will multiply exponentially throughout society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jime
Posted by: jime on Jan 5, 2009 6:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a Single Payer National Healthcare System, you are so correct if implemented it will provide jobs in every position in healthcare . It's a win win plan ! write to all elected officials and demand a single payer system. The present system is killing us literally and financecially.
Thanks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bill
Posted by: mycuz on Jan 6, 2009 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it interesting that all talk about health care reform centers around universal coverage. For real health care reform we have to start with reforming the FDA.
We have to change the current medical paradigm from diagnosis and prescriptions to prevention. The money saved by adopting a health care system based on prevention would more than pay for coverage for all Americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is past time
Posted by: wolfgangmo on Jan 7, 2009 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a clinic owner who might see a [slight] pay cut if universal health care passes, I am all in favor of it as are the docs at the clinic.

I'm afraid that if it doesn't that we are looking to relocate our clinic, our medical staff and our families to .Canada

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is past time
Posted by: wolfgangmo on Jan 7, 2009 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a clinic owner who might see a [slight] pay cut if universal health care passes, I am all in favor of it as are the docs at the clinic.

I'm afraid that if it doesn't that we are looking to relocate our clinic, our medical staff and our families to .Canada

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Health Care Jobs Good for America? Maybe Not.
Posted by: Urgelt on Jan 8, 2009 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think Amanda Marcotte has even begun to make her case.

I've been on this Earth long enough to have seen changes in health care, and they aren't good changes.

-- Doctors have had to hire more staff to sort out the endless hassles and roadblocks put in the way of payment by insurance companies. That's bloat.

-- Drug companies have thousands of workers who generate slanted science and aggressive advertising campaigns on behalf of drugs, most of which will eventually be removed from the market because they are dangerous or ineffective or both. That's bloat.

-- Hospitals routinely arrange cozy business deals on the side with doctors - special investment opportunities, for example, which are noncompetitive - so that those doctors will consent to affiliation. That's both corruption and bloat.

-- Charities, such as the American Cancer Society with its billion-dollar-plus surplus and large staff, serve as mouthpieces for industry. You will never hear a peep out of them about the billions of tons of industrial carcinogens and other toxins produced annually which are largely responsible for the rise in cancer and other diseases. Failing to address the direct causes of diseases causes health care bloat.

-- Ambulance-chasing lawyers have multiplied like rabbits in 19th Century Australia. Malpractice insurance can costs hundreds of thousands of dollars annually for ONE DOCTOR. Juries don't know squat about medicine, but they figure doctors are rich and insured, while patients are poor and had a bad health outcome. It's unbalanced, and it's produced... you guessed it... bloat.

-- The FDA refuses to endorse the message that Americans should eat less, because the food industry doesn't want to hear those words. If the FDA ever got serious about health, jobs would be lost in both advertising and industrial food processing. Bloat, bloat, bloat.

-- In the 1990s, the long-offered promise of computer-generated productivity gains was finally fulfilled in visible economic terms. That is, it was fulfilled in virtually every industry, save one. In health care, the computer age hasn't had a payoff yet. Patients are portable, but their data isn't. Doctors still rely mostly on what's in their heads. Instead of real-time diagnostic equipment, what we mostly get is laboratories with slow turn-around. This *will* be fixed, eventually. I don't know if I'll live to see it, but when it is, lot of job bloat is going to be shrunk right out of the industry.

Corruption, waste, greed, dysfunction, lost opportunity. I could go on and on, but you get my point, surely? The health care industry is a *service* industry, and it's grown too large relative to the rest of the economy to be affordable. It's bloated. You cannot meaningfully reform health care or contain its costs unless you shrink it.

The very idea of pumping up the health care industry with more jobs makes me squirm in my seat. More jobs is not reform. More jobs would just make the whole thing even less affordable.

Reforming health insurance will eliminate jobs in both the insurance industry and in doctors' offices. Ending corruption, banning drug advertising, banning toxins, pushing for eating less (and better quality), leveling the legal playing field, cutting out bloat - these are the things we should be talking about.

If we are successful, there will be far fewer jobs in a health care system, but they will be providing higher quality care at lower cost to more people who need it less often.

Reducing the health care slice of the GNP will unburden the rest of the economy and help it to thrive (and make us all feel better, too). That is the only way forward that makes economic sense. I disagree with Ms. Marcotte; she has (again) missed the point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No way, how are these people gonna keep their lifestyle?
Posted by: Landbaron on Jan 8, 2009 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 25 Highest Paid HMO Executives 1996 Annual Compensation
Exclusive of Unexercised Stock Options

Stephen Wiggins, CEO, Oxford Health Plans, Inc. $29,061,599
Wilson Taylor, Chairman and CEO, CIGNA Corporation $11,568,410
David Snow, Executive Vice President, Oxford Health Plans, Inc. $10,403,451
Robert Smoler, Executive Vice President, Oxford Health Plans, Inc. $10,085,972
William Sullivan, President, Oxford Health Plans, Inc. $7,823,076
Joseph Sebastianelli, President, Aetna, Inc. $7,394,506
Michael Cardillo, Executive Vice President, Aetna, Inc. $7,069,969
Leonard Schaeffer, Chairman and CEO, WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. $7,010,698
George Jochum, President and CEO, Mid-Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. $6,526,065
Ronald Compton, Chairman and CEO, Aetna, Inc. $5,813,287
Wayne Smith, Former President, Humana, Inc. $5,166,575
James Stewart, Executive Vice President, CIGNA Corporation $4,832,799
Richard Huber, Vice Chairman, Aetna, Inc. $4,801,841
Roger Taylor, Executive Vice President, PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. $4,103,864
Daniel Crowley, CEO and President, Foundation Health Corporation $3,849,023
Gerald Isom, President, Property and Casualty, CIGNA Corporation $3,778,293
Alan Hoops, President and CEO, PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. $3,221,602
Daniel Kearney, Executive Vice President, Aetna, Inc $3,189,272
D. Mark Weinberg, Exec. Vice President, WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. $3,009,944
Donald Levinson, Executive Vice President, CIGNA Corporation $2,985,017
Ronald Williams, Exec. Vice President, WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. $2,827,381
Allen Wise, Executive Vice President, United HealthCare Corporation $2,697,751
Jeffrey Elder, Senior Vice President, Foundation Health Corporation $2,235,783
H. Edward Hanway, President CIGNA HealthCare, CIGNA Corporation $2,217,711
Kirk Benson, President and COO, Foundation Health Corporation $2,104,414

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bfreewithrp
Posted by: beauley on Jan 19, 2009 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only Disease Prevention along with Health Freedom will solve the U.S. health care crisis. We will absolutely save untold billions[that's billions with a "B"]dollars very shortly after it is implemented. Let the people decide how they treat their own bodies. Let them use alternate ways to "prevent" and treat disease as was done over a hundred years ago. There was very little sickness and disease then until vaccines arrived on the scene.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement