Health Care Reform: Good for Patients, Good for Workers, Good for Women
Share and save this post:
AlterNet Social Networks:
Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill
DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox
Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon
Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food
Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols
Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.
Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns
Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler
Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann
Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor
Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond
Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders
Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox
World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin
In my last column of 2008, I built on Linda Hirshman's idea that an economic stimulus package offered under the Obama administration should focus on making sure that job creation equally benefits men and women. We should applaud the Presidential transition team for embracing the idea of green jobs, but, as Hirshman points out, the jobs that have been proposed are mostly blue collar jobs in industries dominated by men. Hirshman suggests that the Obama administration additionally prioritize building our educational system, which would employ more women. I suggest that the country should view health care reform as an economic investment that can create jobs women are likely to take.
Forty-six million Americans currently go without health insurance, and most of them have patchy access to health care, avoiding preventive services and only seeing a doctor when lack of prevention lands them in an emergency room -- perversely, this creates the very long lines we're told to fear if said people instead receive basic health care. Under most universal health care proposals, these 46 million would be able to purchase health insurance, dramatically elevating the labor demand for doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other health care providers. With doctors alone, this improves women's employment prospects, since female medical school applicants outnumber male applicants. But with the increasing emphasis on prevention, the demand for nurses and other medical staff will rise even faster. These are professions in which women are predominant.
Obviously, the incoming administration has an opportunity to kill two birds with one health care reform stone. Applying the green job reform model to health care -- creating a demand for labor and creating a means to fill it -- will work nicely for health care. We have a nursing shortage in America, but it's not for a real lack of actual human beings who need the jobs. Most of the women who might find nursing a good job can't quite seem to get into it, because cobbling together the time and money for the training falls just outside of their means.
Making the leap from a minimum wage service industry job into a higher income nursing job means, for many women who would like to make that transition, finding money to pay for it, and dealing with increased child care costs to cover their hours working their normal job and the hours at school. For many women, these are costs they simply cannot afford. But our federal government can easily provide both the tuition money and the child care. It's been demonstrated in this country's past, that if need be, the federal government can create child care programs to free up women's time so they can take jobs that must be done. During World War II, the federal government set up 24 hour day care centers for female shipyard workers taking jobs that men couldn't fill. This would have the added benefit of employing more women, since child care workers are largely female.
See more stories tagged with: health, feminism, women, economy, health care, health care reform, jobs
Amanda Marcotte co-writes the popular blog Pandagon. She is the author of It's a Jungle Out There: The Feminist Survival Guide to Politically Inhospitable Environments.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
EMAIL
PRINT
8 COMMENTS
