A Prescription for Peace

By Maia Szalavitz, AlterNet. Posted October 12, 2001.

"Patriots Don't Use Heroin," was the headline on a recent column in the Cincinati Post, discussing the creation of a new anti-drug task force by the House. As Ohio Congressman Bob Portman, one of three co-chairs of the committee put it, "By Americans spending money on their drug habits, we are helping to support the Taliban government, which protects terrorism."

Or, as the Post's Washington Bureau chief Michael Collins wrote: "Real Americans don't do drugs." Leaving aside the questionable truth of that assertion -- 50 percent of us are physically dependent on caffeine, over half of adults have tried marijuana, 29 percent smoke cigarettes and half the population drinks alcohol regularly -- there certainly is something to the idea that black market drugs fuel large criminal organizations, including some that sponsor terrorism.

But calling on the patriotic fervor of deeply-troubled heroin addicts -- who are hard-pressed to stop to avoid losing their relationships with loved ones or even to avoid prison -- is unlikely to get many to quit. And worse, demonizing addicts creates an atmosphere which tends to preclude offering them the best treatment -- one of the few real and politically viable ways to shrink drug demand and the profits of criminals who benefit from it.

The State Department estimates that 72 percent of the world's heroin supply originates in Afghanistan. Unlike with cocaine, however, the West has a great weapon for fighting opiate addiction. Maintenance prescribing -- whether of heroin itself or of substitutes like methadone -- can be dramatically effective at reducing crime and returning addicts to productive lives.

For example, data from DATOS, the most recent major national treatment outcome study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, shows a 64 percent drop in weekly or more frequent heroin use and a 48 percent drop in cocaine use after one year of methadone treatment. Illegal activity fell 52 percent. Compared to other types of treatment, methadone has been shown to be most effective for heroin addicts. And given in a steady dose, opiates like methadone do not impair addicts mentally, emotionally or physically: the worst side effect is constipation.

Between 1994 and 1996, the Swiss government conducted a study of another form of maintenance: providing heroin itself to addicts. Following over 1,000 participants, who were amongst the most impaired heroin addicts in the country, researchers found that after 18 months of treatment, only 5 percent of patients were using cocaine in addition to heroin and 9 percent were using benzodiazepines. Rates of permanent employment doubled-- and one third of those who started on welfare did not require benefits after 18 months. The number of criminal offenses committed by those in treatment dropped 60 percent during the first six months alone.

With those kinds of numbers, rapidly expanded maintenance prescribing could dramatically affect drug markets. But in order to work, such prescribing must be done right -- and in the right places.

Current U.S. and European regimes tend to stress avoiding diversion of drugs from patients into a "grey" market -- often at the cost of making barriers to treatment high and treatment itself a limit on freedom. (You can't travel, for example, if you have to appear at a clinic every day at a certain time to get your drugs.) As the Institute of Medicine put it in a 1995 review of the methadone regulations, "Current policy ... puts too much emphasis on protecting society from methadone, and not enough on protecting society from the epidemics of addiction, violence and infectious diseases that methadone can help reduce."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »