comments_image -

A Stimulus Right Now, Aimed at Lower-wage Workers

With the country spiraling toward recession, those hurt the most are lower-wage workers sure to be the first to lose their jobs.
October 1, 2001  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has told Congress to wait and see what happens before enacting a stimulus package. Congress is heeding his advice. It shouldn't. A stimulus is needed right away.

Even before the September 11th terrorist attack, American consumers were in a deep funk. Personal savings rates were nearing a 70-year low, and debt was at record heights. Jobs were already disappearing. No wonder that, according to the Conference Board survey released this week, September marked the largest one-month drop in consumer confidence since October 1990, and almost all that survey was done before the terrorist attack.

As consumers pull back from spending and the economy falls into recession, the people hurt the most are those likely to lose their jobs first and have no cushion to fall back on. I'm talking about retail store clerks, restaurant workers, janitors, hotel cashiers and other low-wage service workers. It's estimated that more than 100,000 of them in New York City alone have lost or will soon lose their jobs directly as a result of the disaster.

But the jobs of millions more are now jeopardized, not to mention hundreds of thousands of blue-collar jobs now at risk. Most of these lower-wage workers have no health insurance and no savings to fall back on. And America's safety net has gaping holes. Welfare won't be available to many of them. Most won't even qualify for unemployment insurance because they haven't worked long enough in the same job, or they're part-time or contract workers.

Unemployment insurance now covers fewer than 40 percent of job losers. Congress should immediately add $30 billion to the unemployment insurance trust fund and instruct states that they can gain access to it if they widen eligibility during this economic emergency to cover anyone who's lost a job. Next, cut payroll taxes by half, starting now and continuing for 12 calendar months. There's no better way to get additional cash into the hands of lower-wage workers because most pay more payroll tax than income tax.

Finally, restore some funding for people about to be dropped from the welfare rolls. Otherwise, millions of needy Americans face a future with neither jobs nor social aid.

These may not sound like wartime measures, but they are. Not only will they help boost consumer confidence and thus strengthen the economy, they'll also help the people who are hurting the most in this downturn and thereby demonstrate that we're all in this together.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Republican NLRB Member Accused of Leaks to Romney Campaign Resigns

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos Labor

 
 
Record 45% of Iraq and Afghanistan Vets Have Filed for Disability

By Muriel Kane | Raw Story

 
 
President Obama's Memorial Day Address: "Honoring Those Who Made the Ultimate Sacrifice"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
"Tubes": What the Internet is Made Of

By Laura Miller | Salon

 
 
Students at Stuyvesant Take Issue With Sexist Dress Code

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Chris Hayes on Memorial Day: Glamorizing and Justifying War with the Term "Hero"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Cory Booker vs. Philly Mayor Michael Nutter on Mitt Romney

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
How Florida Governor Rick Scott Could Steal The Election For Mitt Romney

By Judd Legum | ThinkProgress

 
 
Renowned Economist Simon Johnson Calls for a National Safety Board for Finance Ticking Time Bomb

By Lynn Parramore | AlterNet

 
 
Veterans' Gap

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]