comments_image -

Desert Storm Disinformation

As the United States embarks on a war on terrorism, both the Pentagon and the press would do well to reflect on the disturbing lessons of the Gulf War.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

A note from The Public i:

With the United States on the brinkof a new war, this time against terrorism, it is useful to recall the restrictions on the news media imposed during the last occasions the United States was on war footing.

After the U.S. adventures in the Persian Gulf, Grenada and Panama in the 1980s and 1990s, the Center for Public Integrity examined the consequences of those government impositions in a 1991 report, "Under Fire: U.S. Military Restrictions on the Media from Grenada to the Persian Gulf."

In this edited summary, the report concludes that information about Defense Department activities . . . [was] restricted or manipulated not for national security purposes, but for political purposes -- to protect the image and priorities of the Defense Department and its civilian leaders, including the president.

The recent war in the Persian Gulf has been perceived as a major triumph for U.S. military forces and foreign policy. Victory parades have made front-page news, Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf has become a new national hero, and President George Bush has received some of the highest public opinion ratings in history. But one aspect of the conflict has received less attention.

The Gulf War included unprecedented restrictions on the press by the military, and an extensive campaign by the White House and the Pentagon to influence public opinion by presenting Americans with carefully controlled images and information concerning the conflict and the issues surrounding the Bush administration's decision to use U.S. troops to resolve the crisis. The result was a defeat for the First Amendment guarantee of press freedom and the public's right to independent information about the political decisions that can lead to U.S. military involvement abroad, and the ramifications of such involvement. This study examines the controversies surrounding restrictions on the media during the Gulf War and two major U.S. offensive military operations in the 1980s: the invasions of Grenada and Panama.

"Disturbing Pattern of Escalating Control"

Extensive research about military restrictions on the press and the political factors that have contributed to these restrictions during the past 10 years reveals a disturbing pattern of escalating control over media access to information on and off the battlefield. The evidence shows that, increasingly, information about Defense Department activities is being restricted or manipulated not for national security purposes, but for political purposes -- to protect the image and priorities of the Defense Department and its civilian leaders, including the president, who is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

This pattern is not simply a clash of mentalities between the military and the media. Many crucial decisions about information policies have been made by civilian leaders in the Pentagon and the White House over the objections of military officers who have fought hard to maintain journalists' access to the field and armed forces personnel, and have worked around the clock during operations to assist reporters' and photographers' efforts to present independent information to the American people.

The techniques used by the government to limit and shape news coverage -- which have included prohibiting access to military operations and releasing misleading data about U.S. successes and casualties -- bring up issues that go far beyond the obvious need to balance military secrecy requirements with the public's right to know. This information-control program has distorted accounts of what occurred during the military operations in Grenada, Panama and the Persian Gulf, has led to false perceptions about the operations' short- and long-term impact on these regions and on U.S. policy, and has threatened the historical record.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Washington State Governor Signs Same-Sex Marriage Bill

By Igor Volsky | ThinkProgress

 
 
Student Activists Fight Tuition Hikes at Vibrant Protest in North Carolina

By Sarah Jaffe | AlterNet

 
 
The New Southern Strategy: Quote Ayn Rand to Blame the Middle Class

By David Atkins | Hullabaloo

 
 
Maine Becomes Third State to Divert Foreclosure Settlement Funds Away from Homeowners

By Sarah Jaffe | AlterNet

 
 
Pepsi Slashes 8700 Jobs While Raking in Record Profits

By Marion Nestle | Food Politics

 
 
Grocery Store Workers Rally in Brooklyn for Overtime Pay--PHOTO & AUDIO

By Sarah Jaffe | AlterNet

 
 
Disgusting: Racist Fox Commenters Spit Invective Over Whitney Houston's Passing

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Naomi Klein and Joshua Holland Talk the Keystone Pipeline—Take Action Today

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Dallas School Segregates Kids by Gender on Black History Month Field Trip

By PZ Myers | Pharyngula

 
 
Krugman: How Did Conservatism Turn Out This Bad?

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
 
Russ Baker, WhoWhatWhy.com
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]