Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Critics Blast Bush's Call for "Lengthy Campaign"
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Is It Time to Rethink State-Ownership of Corporations?
Jay Walljasper
Democracy and Elections:
Big Presidential Vote Count Error Found and Fixed in New Mexico
Steven Rosenfeld
DrugReporter:
Marijuana Is Real Medicine
Paul Krassner
Election 2008:
Obama Surges Ahead in Florida
Paul Harris
Environment:
We Are One President Away From a Future of Fossil Fuel Addiction
David Sassoon
ForeignPolicy:
Chomsky: "If the U.S. Carries Out Terrorism, It Did Not Happen"
Subrata Ghoshroy
Health and Wellness:
Will the Economic Meltdown Undermine Interest in Health Care Reform?
Niko Karvounis
Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman
Immigration:
Legal Immigration? Anyone?
Media and Technology:
The Growth of Talking Points Memo: A Case Study in Independent Media
Joshua Micah Marshall
Movie Mix:
The "Battle in Seattle" and Beyond
Stuart Townsend
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Our Next President Will Transform the Supreme Court
Ellen Goodman
Rights and Liberties:
Robert Fisk: For the Muslim World, It Will Make No Difference Who Wins the Election
Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez
Sex and Relationships:
New Poll: Parents Overwhelmingly Support Age-Appropriate Sex Ed
Scott Swenson
War on Iraq:
The End of Iraq's "Awakening"?
Robert Dreyfuss
Water:
New Information Shows How Climate Change Will Affect Water
When President Bush took the national pulpit on September 20 to address a joint session of Congress, he faced perhaps his greatest challenge since his inauguration.
Mainstream media pundits spoke at length of his need to rise to the occasion - to solidify the nation's commitment to fighting terrorism. With the chamber's applause still audible, the reports were already coming out. Bush's approval rating had risen ten more points, to an astronomical 91 percent. His singling out of common citizens - some of whom sat in the audience - had captured the allegiance of skeptics. His calls for justice constituted the uncompromising stance that United States politics needed to embody during such a period of national crisis.
Amidst all of this praise, numerous critics spoke out against the presidential call for war.
"In Bush's speech we got no doctrine, no strategy, no evidence," said Phyllis Bennis, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. "What we did get was a lot of Wild West rhetoric - dead or alive material."
Matt Rothschild, editor of the Progressive magazine, seized on another aspect of the president's rhetoric. "Bush said that America was targeted 'because we embrace freedom,'" Rothschild stated. "Not knowing with any certainty who the attackers were, it's hard to speculate on their motives. But many groups in the Third World have grievances that are more specific than the ones Bush mentioned."
After declaring war on Al Qaeda, the terrorist syndicate headed by Osama bin Laden, and "every terrorist group of global reach," Bush turned to an examination of the reasoning behind anti-Western sentiment: "Americans are asking 'Why do they hate us?"
G. Simon Harak, a Jesuit priest from New York City who has visited the Mideast numerous times, issued a rejoinder to President Bush's query. "When I've spoken to families in Iraq who have suffered from the economic sanctions and bombings; or with Palestinian fathers and sons tortured by an Israeli government which we back - they asked me the same question: 'Why does America hate us?'"
"Many have opined that a distaste for 'Western civilization and cultural values' fuels terrorism, but large numbers outside this country believe that Western civilization has hurt them badly," said Edward Herman, professor emeritus of finance at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
According to Herman, the blame for this sentiment rests largely with the U.S., whose command of corporate globalization "has unleashed an impoverishment process on the Third World, through the ruthless imposition of a neoliberal regime that serves Western transnational interests and is buttressed by a willingness to use unlimited force to achieve Western corporate and political ends."
With the President calling for "a lengthy campaign unlike any other we have ever seen," other critics expressed apprehension about the impending war.
Bob Jensen, author of Writing Dissent: "The last time the U.S. responded to a terrorist attack, on its embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, it was innocents in Sudan and Afghanistan who were in the way. We were told that the U.S. missiles hit only military targets but the Sudan target turned out to be a pharmaceutical factory. There are calls for a 'massive response' but let us not forget that, if the pattern of past U.S. actions holds, such a response will kill innocent people like the ones in New York and the hijacked airplanes."
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
We Are One President Away From a Future of Fossil Fuel Addiction Environment: America's energy and climate future will be determined by what the nation decides to do with its deposits of oil shale. By David Sassoon, SolveClimate. October 6, 2008. |
Will the Economic Meltdown Undermine Interest in Health Care Reform? Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: The current bailout is costing us only a third of what we pay each year for chronic illnesses like cancer, diabetes and obesity. By Niko Karvounis, Health Beat. October 6, 2008. |
Obama vs. McCain: How the Underinsured Would Fare Under the Candidates' Health Plans Health and Wellness: Some 25 million Americans may be underinsured; that is, their insurance, good or bad, does not cover all their medical care. By Trudy Lieberman, Columbia Journalism Review. October 6, 2008. |