Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

We've Got to Fight the Naysayers Against Obama's 1$ Trillion Stimulus Package

By Robert Kuttner, Boston Globe. Posted December 25, 2008.


While there's no shortage of good uses for a huge stimulus package, there's going to be plenty of opponents standing in its way.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Robert Kuttner

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

President-Elect Obama wants an economic stimulus bill on his desk when he takes office. But first he will need to contend with naysayers and win over public opinion so that he can bring along wavering legislators.

One naysayer argues that now is not the time for government to be spending more money. Republican Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee said of a proposed stimulus package in the range of a trillion dollars, "I don't even want to think about a number that big." However, with so much of the private economy in free fall, substantial public spending is the one source that can restore demand while the banking system is nursed back to health.

Others contend that government is not capable of spending large sums efficiently in short order. "It's ... hard to spend $700 billion quickly," says New York Times columnist David Brooks. "If you've got a tiddlywinks hall of fame, they're going to fund that thing."

Excuse me, but state and local governments and school districts are likely to suffer a revenue shortfall approaching $200 billion by next year. All the federal government has to do is write a check to cover that amount, and not a single policeman, firefighter, teacher, or first-responder need be laid off; not a single human service office closed; and not a single public project deferred.

These are not new projects that take time to conceive and plan. This is about preventing layoffs and shutdowns of existing public services. And while Washington is at it, the feds could help nonprofit social service agencies that are reeling from cuts in charitable giving and foundation endowment losses.

According to Anne Gelbspan, a Boston nonprofit community developer, finance for "shovel-ready" affordable housing projects has dried up. That's because Congress foolishly structured the nonprofit housing system to depend on tax credits for private financiers -- who are now too traumatized to lend. If Washington substituted direct lending, these projects could move forward.

And even if universal health insurance is too heavy a lift for Obama's first hundred days, part of the stimulus could go to community health clinics, which are already stretched to their limits.

An emergency infusion of federal cash could make public universities affordable again, and increase the value of Pell Grants. It's far better to have young people attending classes (and not graduating saddled with huge debts) than to have them clogging unemployment rolls.

Another easy way of raising purchasing power is a temporary cut in the payroll tax. That's a quick 6.2 percent after-tax raise for all workers. To qualify, businesses would have to resist the temptation to cut wages or employee benefits.

Still other doubters worry about increased deficits rekindling inflation. However the main worry today is deflation, ruinous falls in prices that leave assets worth less than their debts.

Amazingly, the government's current borrowing cost on 30-year bonds is around 2.5 percent. That means private investors are willing to lend the government money for 30 years at a very low yield. If markets anticipated inflation, they would be demanding higher rates.

The government should sell lots of these bonds, and lock in a low rate. The national debt is going to have to rise for a time -- the alternative is a depression -- and the government might as well finance that debt cheaply.

Once recovery comes, more credit will begin flowing to private investments again. There will no longer be a stampede into the safety of Treasury bonds, and government borrowing costs will rise. By then, the government can begin paying down debt, as it did after World War II.

So there is no shortage of good uses for a $1 trillion stimulus package, and no shortage of funds to finance it. There may, however, be a shortage of political will. And that's where the exceptional leadership of the new president will face its first big test.

Christmas 2008 is looking like the work of Ebenezer Scrooge. With some luck and leadership, Christmas 2009 may feel like a season of renewed hope.

 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, stimulus plan

Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect. His new book is "Obama's Challenge: America's Economic Crisis and the Power of a Transformative Presidency."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nurse the Banks Back to Health ?
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 25, 2008 12:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kuttner "while the banking system is nursed back to health."

Yep, Japan tried that and they were dead in the water for 10 years. But, we don't have the trade surplus nor the savings rate that Japan did at the time ... Our fate would be even worse. Then there are the derivatives.

At least 5 of our 10 largest banks are insolvent, bust, kaput or so says Nouriel Roubini, the man widely credited with calling this financial crisis two years in advance. Insolvent means, in debt, cannot get out debt ... ever.

To make matters worse, these Wall Street Banks have between them roughly $150 Trillion in derivatives on their books. Derivatives are nothing more than bets made with educated guesses. We have seen how educated the banks guesses have been lately .... hundreds of billions in write offs with no end in sight ...

Mr Kuttner would better spend his time defusing the banking time bomb in CDS and other derivatives of over $150 trillion by advocating a bank nationalization under a Swedish Plan or an FDR Bank Holiday than worrying about a paltry the several hundred billion Obama might spend.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I appreciate your Posted by: marid
awake awake
Posted by: richholland on Dec 25, 2008 1:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the USA political system and the belief in certain values brought us war andrecession.

instead of babbling in the border line;
could it be possible that if a few families are soooo rich and soo many people are poor
another system of believe should be able to save the USA and the world.???????

The superrich should give their crazy properties to the State.

USA should try to became a peacefull society
and regain respect.
But no alternetter dares to oppose to the useal american myths and legends and propaganda...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Should They Get Away With Murder?
Posted by: jbpazz on Dec 25, 2008 2:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A wrongful death that occurs during the commission of a felony becomes first degree murder. A Madoff investor took his own life after he was defrauded of $1.4 billions. The Vice President admitted ordering harsh torture methods that violated human rights [felony] and led to wrongful deaths [murder].
Without punishment crime pays and will continue to flourish.
If Obama desires his recovery program to pass in the Congress, he might get better traction if he orders the DoJ to pursue the murderers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A nation of junkies
Posted by: peppylapew on Dec 25, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trying to spend our way out of a debt crisis is irrational. The government is broke, beyond broke. The inevitable result of borrowing trillions from foreigners in a vain attempt to keep partying like it's 1999 can only be higher taxes, much higher taxes. That the federal deficit is going to grow exponentially as a result of this crisis is a foregone conclusion. Rather than spending deficit funds on an orgy of "infrastructure" improvements which are no talisman of economic recovery (except maybe Mexico's), we should try to ameliorate the social consequences of economic weakness: unemployment among the working poor and distress among small businesses, neither of whom are going to benefit much from throwing money at civil engineering projects.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A nation of junkies Posted by: justAnEgg
» RE: A nation of junkies Posted by: Livemike
Stephen F. Thiel
Posted by: AJR Journal on Dec 25, 2008 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Milwaukee, our leaders want to use the economic stimulus package to fill the potholes in our neglected streets. WOW, will that be a shot in the arm!! Maybe we can buy some more road salt, while we are at it.
The liberal/big government crowd won the last election and are entitled to squander large sums of public money as they see fit.
Do not get your hopes up that they will be successful. These big "stimulus" packages rarely work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stephen F. Thiel Posted by: Livemike
» RE: Stephen F. Thiel Posted by: yellow
It is not going to be easy
Posted by: Binnsb4tyrs on Dec 25, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posted to truthout: US Economy Shrinks as IMF Warns of Great Depression




If it were only that easy. The mogels of the Wall Street are already ahead of the game. Just ask Paulson, he is one! Why else would GW give him immunity on day one? Before $1 was spent on the TARP money, aka the Trap money?

Wall Street should have been under tight reins eons ago. It's nothing more than legalized institutional gambling, couched in years of greed. That coupled in the fact that congress has gone on a spending spree the past 8 years additionally funding Bushie’s war, Iraq, that never should have happened. Then the investors of the world, mainly China, invested their billions we gave them to build just about anything we could get them to build with their cheap labor; China then took their billions and went to Wall Street. China and many other investors put their billions in T-bills.

Then all that new money made Wall Street drunk. Then Wall Street went to the mortgage bankers, i.e. Countrywide and said “Hey boys do we have a deal for You!”. With billions in new investor’s money, Countrywide came up with the Pick-a-payment mortgage that is burying the housing market. Yes Countrywide also fueled the sub prime debacle as well. You see Countrywide had their own sub prime division, and it was huge. Countrywide is what is called a “Market Maker”! They literally sold this pick-a-payment idea to 100’s of banks. Chase, Wamu and many other banks are now gone thanks to Countrywide.

I can see what the past 8 years of greed and corruption has done. It broke our economy. The US of A will never, and I mean, never be the same again.

Will we be able to pull the rabbit out of the hat with this so called fiscal stimulus idea? No, that is only going to crush what is already broken even more.

What happens went we, the ordinary working stiff, spends more than we have? It means we do without. It’s not going to be any fun but there is no way out of this drunken spending stupor that we have been on for a long time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Insanity
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Dec 25, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is attempting to spend your way out of debt by printing money that you do not have. Insanity is continuing to spend hundreds of billions on wars and military empire by printing money that you don't have. Insanity is thinking, even for a minute, that you can "spend" 800 billion dollars that you do not have and must borrow from already reluctant foreigners on public works and not devalue the dollar to zero. Oh gee, Paul Krugman won the Nobel Prize! So that makes him a real genius, eh? How about the two morons from LTCM that won the Nobel Prize for their work in derivatives and swaps just before that house of cards collapsed? YOU CANNOT PRINT YOUR WAY OUT OF DEBT!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It is our money . . . Posted by: dustdevil
» deflation will precede inflation. Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: Insanity Posted by: yellow
Barbara, Michigan
Posted by: avidAmerican on Dec 25, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, if anyone has better ideas, bring them forward. Right now the new President Obama is the only one trying to get this country and our economy back on track again. The buffoons in the soon to be last administration spent 8 years bringing this country down, and it will take some time to lift it back up again. Don't see anyone else picking up the reins and trying to fix all the wrongs done to us. Shame on Bush and his gang of thugs, led by the King Thug himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A better idea? Posted by: rafaeltoral
You want an answer?
Posted by: douglashoyt on Dec 25, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Elect people who will tax property to eliminate the wealth of the 1 percent who control the Overwhelming preponderance of real value in this nation.

But you think that unfair? What about the unfair economic conditions that the citizen has been the victim of?

OK, suckers, vote Democratic or Republican again, you will get what you want. You are fools.

Merry Christmas.

Scrooge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Progressive Taxation is important... Posted by: Fred Flintstone
Someone answer this question
Posted by: douglashoyt on Dec 25, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do you continue to vote for the same liars?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Latter-day whigs
Posted by: willymack on Dec 25, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Whig party was formed as an anti-slavery force. Abe Lincoln was a former Whig. The Whigs couldn't agree on most important issues, and although they elected four presidents, none of them were notable. We have something similar today, in that one coalition wants to preserve business as usual, and the other wants to go in a different direction. I think it's time for a brand-new and firmly united party. Call them the Social Democrats if you will. If our current split along economic philosophies continues, it could shatter our whole political process and precipitate a new Civil War, just as the disolution of the Whigs, and the election of Lincoln did in 1860. The issue may not be the legality of slavery (per se) this time, but it comes pretty damn close.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The next time a Republican preaches about wasteful spending,
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 25, 2008 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
put them on the defensive by forcing them to admit to reckless military spending which even the military leaders and troops are admitting aren't working out. And if that's not enough, nail them on tax breaks for the wealthy/corporate elite, tell them the rising lists of well known CEOs and even famous rich folks speaking against these reckless government tax breaks. From there it will be easier to get to a stimulus bill that really works.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sure print up another imaginary trillion.
Posted by: rafaeltoral on Dec 25, 2008 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of 40 percent inflation over the next year we can have 50 percent. YAY!!!!!

Fuck the banks, they are the number one reason why the world is as fucked up today as it is.

Most importanly FUCK THE CENTRAL BANKS, which are privatly owned by who? The same elitist parasites who have been running this world for their own benefit and to the detremint of the rest of us for centuries.

If you havent heard about all of the active duty military personel being deployed in OUR OWN COUNTRY, they are there in preparation for the impending fall of the economy to establish martial law.

This is all part of the plan towards TOTAL enslavement of the entire world.

If Obama were serious about change he wouldnt have put the same old assholes who ran this world into the ground into his cabinent. Obama is just another distraction. Another corporate shill.

You alternet people bother me the most. You seem like you should have an idea about whats really going on but in effect you are the polar opposite of the right wing religious nuts. Neither of you are concerned with the truth or real solutions. You just dont have the balls to accept truth. You will never come up with any real solutions because you fail to acknowledge any real problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Society of Civil Engineers
Posted by: marid on Dec 25, 2008 5:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the people who build our country have a list of several trillion in maintenance and improvements that need to be made. We don't have to dream up projects.

One problem is the availability of constuction equipment. New construction will be limited because these construction companies have huge investments in equipment. To pay for this equipment takes decades and so there is actually a limited pace at which these projects can progress.

Funding tuition, schools, hospitals and such could give a faster start with existing systems already in place.

WE are at a nexus point in history also, we have a chance and necessity to invent, research, produce and deploy a new system of energy production and tranmission. Out of most bad thing come some good. This new system could help us to win back a positive position in the world more in line with what Americans like to believe about their country.

Will we take the opportunity or let the Merhants of Death and the powers behind the curtain control us? How much guts does Obama have?

Stay tuned for the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you are right. Posted by: rafaeltoral
What this country needs:
Posted by: shipmate on Dec 26, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A currency reform like the 1948 job in Germany with a limited amount per person. Ill gotten gains should be used to settle National debt and trillions should be reduced to millions. For instance athletes who are under Zillions of contract money would be receiving reasonable wages and the ordinary Joe could go to the games for a buck or two instead of hundreds. That would hold true for the cost of living. The crooked dealers at the markets would have to learn to make an honest wage by working for their living instead of ripping of those who produce values.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A TRILLION here, a TRILLION there...
Posted by: Fred Flintstone on Dec 26, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pretty soon it adds up to real money.

Hey sheeple wake up...the Government DOES NOT create wealth or jobs. In fact THIS government is sucking all the air out of the room making it impossible for the citizens to create jobs and wealth. So you really think going another TRILLION into debt providing job training and building bridges to nowhere is going to fix this problem?

"Oh please mister government spend more of my Grand Children's future income to save my sorry ass"...Americans are PATHETIC and none too bright!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I call them like I see them. Posted by: rafaeltoral
Yay lets spend another trillion and make our kids pay for it.
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Dec 26, 2008 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some may think deflation is a bad thing but to those looking to buy a house and seeing the still way too high above historical prices housing market, we need deflation in that industry.

Our economic system is idiotic. It requires ever increasing consumption of goods and services in order to keep all of us employed so we can all afford the basic necessities.

In the future automation is going to eliminate most of the service industry jobs. Machines will be making our fast food, machines in restaurants will take your order and notify you when it is ready so you can go pick it up like they do at a salad bar, the only place with actual waiters will be Hooters. Walmart, Best Buy will just have delivery vehicles dropping off goods and if you actually go to the store the entire process from finding your product to buying it will be automated.

And there is no way our current economy can function when this becomes a reality.

We should start planning now to ensure everyone has the basic necessities without having to be employed because sooner or later hardly any of us will be employed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement