Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

A $50 Billion Con Job Rocks Wall Street

By Danny Schechter, AlterNet. Posted December 24, 2008.


Outlaws used to rob banks; now banks rob us. Meet the new poster boy for Wall Street excess and larceny.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Danny Schechter

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Every era has its bad guy, its high-profile criminal who flames into public view through media circuses and tabloid headlines. In the 1930s, there was Al Capone brought down by the taxman. In the '40s, Willie Sutton was a big bad guy who once said he robs banks because "that's where the money is."  In the 1950s, the Mafia seized our attention, while here in New York, we had George Metetsky, the mad bomber. In the '60s -- well, you know the saying: If you can remember that era, you weren't there ...

Many of these larger-than-life gangsters were anti-social outlaws robbing banks and the like. Now the banks are robbing us. Until he is outdone, we now have a new poster boy for Wall Street excess and larceny: the bland personage of Bernard Madoff, the consummate Wall Street insider, philanthropist and pillar of the financial community. He has now been credited in this credit crisis for the biggest theft in history.

Madoff seems to have won the gold medal for absconding with the most gold -- to a tune of $50 billion and counting. It was all, he admitted, a Ponzi scheme. He was a perverted Robin Hood: he took from the rich and enriched himself in a lifestyle festooned with many houses, boats and stays at $5,000-a-night hotels.

The Notice

Go to the Madoff.com Web site today and there is this notice that thousands of investors are reading while holding back tears and outrage:

On Dec. 15, 2008, the Honorable Louis L. Stanton, a federal judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, appointed Irving Picard as trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investments Securities LLC (BMIS) pursuant to the Securities Investor Protection Act as set forth in the attached order.
Mr. Picard supersedes Lee S. Richards, the previously appointed receiver for BMIS, and all claims by customers of BMIS will be processed by Mr. Picard as SIPA trustee. Customers and claimants should refer to the Web site of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation for information about the processing of claims: sipc.org.
Mr. Richards continues to serve as receiver for Madoff Securities International Ltd. pursuant to the attached order. The trustee Irving Picard has engaged Lazard Frères & Co. LLC to assist in the sale of the trading operations of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC.
Should you have further questions, please contact the trustee at the following number: (888) 727-8695.

In short: Good Luck at Getting Any of Your Money Back.

Whistle-Blower Rebuffed

Of course, this dry legalistic language doesn't tell the whole story -- the story of the failure of the regulators to act, or about the submission to the SEC on Nov. 7, 2005, of a 19-page, detailed document charging that "The World's Largest Hedge Fund Is a Fraud."

It was written by financial expert Harry Markopolos and sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission with a request for deep confidentiality. He exposed the man now being called "Made-off." The title of his report: "The World's Biggest Hedge Fund Is a Fraud." It projected scenarios including this one:

(Very Likely) in bold, "Madoff Securities is the World's Largest Ponzi Scheme." He believed that "this would be another black eye for the brokerage industry."

Bingo!

Victims We Can Relate To

That black-eye punch was never thrown. Instead, it was three years before Madoff went down. He continued to operate his con game, defrauding customers worldwide. At the same time, the investors he ripped off later became "sympathetic victims" in our media -- like Steven Spielberg -- as opposed to subprime home borrowers, who were often demonized as schemers and told they were naïve and should have known better. A CNBC "documentary" showcased a parade of wealthy Madoff victims.

Madoff was a high-flyer, a part of a clubby and incestuous elite world of golf clubs, resorts and philanthropy with tax benefits. He was a leader of the Wall Street world, at one point the chairman of NASDAQ. Universities invited him to lecture on how markets work. He was admired, considered a role model, a genius. His firm handled l0 percent of all stock exchange trades.

His niece married an SEC regulator. Mary Schapiro, Barack Obama's pick to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, previously appointed one of his sons to a regulatory body that oversees American securities firms. Madoff himself said he had often visited the SEC, where he complained of over-regulation.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: wall street, madoff, scam, ponzi scheme

News Dissector Danny Schechter is making a film based on his book Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity and the Subprime Scandal. Send comments to dissector@mediachannel.org. Watch the trailer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
elite group who should have known better
Posted by: ibolyap on Dec 24, 2008 1:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Madoff was able to play his investors with his claims of extraordinary return on their investments. They allowed him extraordinary privilege in handling their paperwork related to those investments. No one (except for a few) examined how he did his magic as long as he was providing statements that showed consistent earnings. This exclusivity and the extraordinary amounts he was handling allowed him to do his dirty work. Any investor, regardless of how much they are worth, needs to be vigilant and not just take someone's word for performance figures. Believing that you getting something that other investors are not is usually the first sign that something nefarious is going on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hindsight is 20/20 Posted by: donl51
bussiness as usual
Posted by: prfctsolar on Dec 24, 2008 2:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whistleblower Rebuffed

Of course this dry legalistic language doesn't tell the whole story -- the story of the failure of the Regulators to act, or about the submission to the SEC on November 7th, 2005 of a 19 page detailed document charging that "The World's Largest Hedge Fund Is a Fraud."

It was written by financial expert Harry Markopolos and sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission with a request for deep confidentiality. He exposed the the man now being called "made-off." The title of his report: "The World's Biggest Hedge Fund is a Fraud." It projected scenarios including this one:

"(Very Likely) in bold, "Madoff Securities is the World's largest Ponzi Scheme" He believed that "this would be another black eye for the brokerage industry."

I think the investors should sue the SEC and thier bosses, and how is the man out on bond useing houses he bought with stolen money what planet am I on.
what ever happened to PUBLIC servants I guess we've chosen SELF service.
J mcmurphy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good Luck suing the SEC Posted by: east bay
» Amen to that! Posted by: orda
Stephen Wong
Posted by: Stephen888oz on Dec 24, 2008 2:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are many puzzles to this fraud. The most important one is: where did all the money, $50 billion, go? It seems that Madoff, very wealthy as he is, did not pocket all the money. Some of the money did go back to the investors in the form of dividends, even though these came from their principals. So, not all investors are losers, some of them may even be winners through high dividends and redemption before the fraud was discovered. Who are these winners? Finally, why did he do it, knowing that he must be caught eventually.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stephen Wong Posted by: bluepilgrim
» RE: Stephen Wong Posted by: Zeugitai
Old saws.
Posted by: folkie on Dec 24, 2008 3:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of adages like, "If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is," and "You can't cheat an honest man," people clung to things like, "Greed is good," and "He who has the gold, makes the rules."

I think it's ironic. Madoff has probably done more to decrease consumerism in the U.S. than any other individual. As for all those charities that are closing their doors because their biggest donors were defrauded by Madoff, if they'd simply replace their highly paid executives with volunteers, many could stay open. But that's not something they're likely to consider. Greed was good for them while it lasted and I don't feel badly for them now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Happy Christmas, America!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 24, 2008 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, this is a fine how do you do, is it not? Christmas 2008 finds our once great nation being looted by the plutocracy. Did you ever think it would get this weird?

I don't envy President Obama, that's for sure! Not since FDR seventy-six years ago has a president entered the White House with such a mess to contend with.

Keep your fingers crossed and your hands folded for the guy.

A Long Ago Christmas Moon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The rich want to get very rich without breaking a sweat. Too bad.
Posted by: thekidde on Dec 24, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kids in Darfur eat dirt cookies to ease hungers pains - that breaks my heart. Rich people losing money because they're lazy and greedy - who gives a shit. Others who lost money need to get a brain - if it sounds too good to be true - it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good riddance!
Posted by: and_abottleofrum on Dec 24, 2008 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I read of that suicide in the news, I called my relatives to relay the good news. Most of them found it interesting and had no sympathy for the suicide, and I enjoyed reading about that guy's demise. He was probably a greedy fuck like the other Madoff investors trying to make quick, easy money. The world's better off without him.

I hope to celebrate more suicides on Wall St. in the coming months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Michael Fiorillo
Posted by: MFiorillo on Dec 24, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd hold off on the sympathy for President Obama, at least temporarily, since he has appointed some of the prime enablers of our kleptocratic elites to high-level economic positions.

Geithner, Summers, et. al. do not portend a big change from government of, by and for Goldman Sachs. Take a look at Obama's major list of campaign contributors and you'll see that finance capital was quite eager to invest in him.

Will he pay off on their investment? My guess is that their verdict thus far would be, "so far, so good."

Please recall that Obama received the nod from the Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffet (why do so many of these references allude to cult-like and religious terms?). Mr. Buffett is unusual among his class for being candid, as he certainly was when he said,"You bet there's a class war, and my class - the rich class- is winning it."

Obama is a very intelligent and competent man, with attractive personal qualities, but please don't let that confuse you into believing that he's another FDR. For that to happen, if it can happen, we need to see an upsurge in activism and militantcy among rank and file citizens.

Don't expect a lot from an Obama administration absent the re-emergence of a culture of resistance, exemplified by direct action in the form of strikes, foreclosure and eviction moratoriums, and similar street-level expressions of democracy. Power concedes nothing without struggle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Money is Gone
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 24, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, sorry, this is mixed in with the responses about the $50 billion Madoff ripoff which finally collapsed. I was talking about Uncle Sam's much bigger scheme. You know about that endless river of money? Well, -

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Greed and Arrogance make you stupid...
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Dec 24, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Need any more proof that money and materialism is the path of folly and delusion?

Happy Fantasy Day(s)...

More proof comes quickly....

Peace and Wisdom...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for Investor Bill of Rights
Posted by: mikebppa on Dec 24, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolute bottomline, the SEC is totally ineffective at monitoring the operations of anything that has the words investment tied to it. Shut it down, and shut it down now should be the cry.

Investor Bill of Rights should be the cry of the land. We here in the USA are becoming known throughout the world as the land of thieves. Only real leadership can change that.

Over the past eight years, what we have witnessed is the greatest thieves of all time are getting rewarded. It begins with the Bush-Cheney presidency, and contracts to certain companies that were not placed for bid, and it carries through to everything.

First, outlaw golden parachutes or any form thereof. Too many executives are leaving companies with multi-million dollar parachutes and the company in shambles, and the SEC does NOTHING! So, end it already.

Second, it is GREED ONLY that drives executives, and the hand picked boards they have selected to sit and make decisions about their compensation. Bring the POWER for compensation for executives to the hands of the investors ONLY. All executive compensation has to be voted on by the shareholders. No bonus money issued or stock options or any other form of additional benefit beyond base salary for executives in a year where the stock does not meet expectations. Why are we rewarding people that do not deliver?

Third, the Madoff's would not exist today if we had appropriate penalties in place for white collar criminals. Stealing more than a preset number should be a capital crime. Set a theft limit of $100,000. Anything above that number becomes a capital crime. And it would not be optional. If found guilty, you are executed, and executed swiftly.

That would end white collar crime as we know it.

And Madoff with an ankle collar. So typical of a judicial system that is more corrupt than the thieves themselves. End lifetime judgeships NOW!!!! If ever there is someone that is a flight risk, Madoff fits. With $50 billion stolen, he has money hidden all over the world.

If we do not execute this man as a society, then he should be cast into the ocean on a dingy, 1,000 miles from land with no water and no food. All his property and that of his wife and children should be confiscated unless they can prove they paid for it with money they earned in a job separate from any of his enterprises.

Wake up America and begin demanding leadership from the thieves you keep returning to office over and over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dick
Posted by: rtmyth on Dec 24, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greed trumped all. The investors were greedy, but many thought that because they were Jews, Madoff, also a Jew , would be trustworthy. I wonder what the other religious investors thought, then and now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dick Posted by: JSquercia
Let's try telling that to the IRS
Posted by: sonofloud on Dec 24, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Think you could borrow money from a bank without saying what you were going to do with it? Well, apparently when banks borrow from you they don't feel the same need to say how the money is spent.

After receiving billions in aid from U.S. taxpayers, the nation's largest banks say they can't track exactly how they're spending it. Some won't even talk about it.

"We're choosing not to disclose that," said Kevin Heine, spokesman for Bank of New York Mellon, which received about $3 billion.

Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in emergency bailout money, said that while some of the money was lent, some was not, and the bank has not given any accounting of exactly how the money is being used.

"We have not disclosed that to the public. We're declining to," Kelly said.

http://hosted.ap.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change we can believe in?
Posted by: dover23 on Dec 24, 2008 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mary L. Schapiro?
headed the Financial Services Regulatory Authority, Wall Street’s self-regulator, since 1996... oy vey


Lawrence Summers?
uh oh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» same old same old Posted by: madashell8683
Chump change
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Dec 24, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bernie's little 50 bil swindle is chump change compared to the monumental sums that were stolen in the Iraq and Afghanistan debacle, not to mention the ongoing gold-plated scam of injecting liquidity into failed banks. And, if the backers of Mr. Obama have their way, the incredible looting of the US treasury will continue with a rigged stimulus package that will certainly "stimulate" the connected banks and contractors. Bernie was just a small time crook; a two-bit punk among mob dons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My feelings on credit cards and the credit reporting agencys
Posted by: donl51 on Dec 24, 2008 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Firstly,credit cards [banks']should go back to putting a limit! on what you make and can actually afford,or at least make you sign a waiver showing you have adequate funds to payoff what you owe...we should also reinstitute the lay-away plan...their are today but a handfull,back to banks and credit cards...the fed rate is ultra low today...the tax payer shelled out big time to help banks so what is our reward?look at your credit card bills...15%//up to 19%..even beyond...what is this called?...''fuck you folks''gotcha!!.....I say when you're offered a credit card tell them you want a set limit of 500-1000,tops!,and at a much lower interest rate,once of course you get beyond the language barrier,which is usually out of INDIA....I had one fellow who just couldn't grasp the please ''close'' my account,..ok end it!!...ok terminate my account,kaput!,get rid of...give me your freaking manager!!...that did the job!...I learned French through life w/English,I learned some some Spanish as well,and Vietnamese in the milatary as part of my job...sorry!!..I missed Indian!..who knew?..credit cards cater to our weakness and we need to watch this...I learned a long time ago,how to deal with these banks and their credit cards....be ademate!...you lose ..yea! but you also win...then theirs the 3 credit reporting agency ''cluster fucks'' do we really need them"...do we really need a credit score?....a credit reporting agency if not right up on your credit,can ''ruin'' your life ,another thing...the more credit you have,..and you could have 50 cards!...the better your credit score,....the less even if you pay regular or pay them off the lower your rating....how about ,john doe has 3 cards and pays them off on time or owes nothing therefore credit score is excellent...nope!..I've actually seen this!,even my own..I keep what is owed low,or pay off and don't show any high scores either...hopefully we'll all learn from this bad news recession and the greed in the banks and on wall street...to be a tad smarter!...and not feel its our god given right to be pigs!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you guys got me bent when it comes to greed and weath
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on Dec 24, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
shouldn't ya'll be jumping for joy over something like this? One guy dupes many over the years in the biggest scam possible? That should teach the yuppie scum, right?
Don't get me started on how this guy gives money to your favorite Democrats! If you have Senator Chuck Schumer on speed dial in your blackberry you are not much is going to happen to you.

two years max in a medium security fed prison tops!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Madoff: The True Honest Crook
Posted by: shinseiji on Dec 24, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Exactly. We should be jumping for joy! In Madoff the American people - in fact the world - has a concrete, easily understandable example, representing no more or less than how the entire finance-dominated economy has been "operated" ever since Reagan got into office.

The U.S. centric financialized global "economy" has finally blown up, and Madoff is nothing but its perfect exemplar.

And morally, Madoff has one-up on the rest of them - at least he confessed!

It is the "legal" crooks that have yet to be rounded up and thrown in the slammer - for life one hopes. On the contrary, some of them have regouped behind the Obama Administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do you bet the Taxpayer covers Madoff losses via TARP...?!
Posted by: fallawayjumper on Dec 24, 2008 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody remember Long Term Capital Management..? The big Hedge Fund that tanked back in '98 was deemed to large to fail so all the rich folks seeking extraordinary returns were compensated by the Treasury to the tune of Billions. Heads the 1% wins, tails we lose.

All the blame Christopher Cox is putting on his SEC is just a setup...we'll see a partial remuneration of say 50% to the Madoff victims...particularly since there's also international political implications--Bank of Spain $3.1B, Bank of Scotland $1B etc. Not to mention all the politically connected folks stateside like Speilberg etc.)

So, add another $20B to the Bush crime family's epic looting of the treasury made possible by the Cheney designed destruction of the Republic...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hedge Funds Inherently Ultra High Risk
Posted by: gradioc on Dec 24, 2008 1:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really have zero sympathy for the "poor" victims of this scam. Hedge funds are called that because that's where you hedge your bets. That means you bet a lot one way, but, just to be safe, you bet little the other way, especially if the contrarian bet has a big payoff. Hedge funds take wild risks and often lose money, but when they hit, they hit big and often when other investments are tanking. That's the nature of the beast. If somebody's telling you they have a hedge fund that wins all the time you simply have to know this is a lie. I blame no one for throwing a little of their money at hedge funds, but if you put all your money there you are going to lose, even without theft. If they gave Madoff their money because they thought he was crooked and they wanted a piece of that, I'm absolutely thrilled they lost their ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

madashell8683
Posted by: madashell8683 on Dec 24, 2008 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should make sure these rich assholes don't get a nickel of our tax money. Everyone should refuse to pay taxes until we get a full accounting of these corporate bailouts. This is the only way the CONGRESS will take notice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You want to know why this happened?
Posted by: Longdream on Dec 24, 2008 1:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because SEC, FINRA and NASD compliance is busy looking at the little guy, and telling him that having a picture of paper money and coins on his website is "promissory", and that he can't say "guaranteed income" when describing an annuity which has a feature for--GUARANTEED INCOME.

I work with a couple of good investment professionals who advise my clients on the financial aspects of estate planning. Those are true examples of compliance micro-managing things that don't matter in small practices while letting guys who run hedge funds and play with billions of dollars go without oversight.

This schmuck also didn't pay income taxes--this is a pet peeve of mine--hedge fund profits are taxed at the capital gains rate.

His sons turned him in as soon as he confessed to them. They both had invested money with their father, and lost it. He took his own sons' money, and threw it away down the line in his ponzi scheme.

Thanks, Dad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Levitt
Posted by: LetsSaveDemocracy on Dec 24, 2008 1:44 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and what about this guy Levitt who was at SEC, that investigated his friend, Madoff, and discovered nothing and is now working for Carlyle Group? this is a little smelly. some of those guys at Carlyle, Bush, for example, the whole family, have often been involved in these sorts of fleecings in broad daylight. But why call this the biggest theft in history? Maybe by one guy. But there has been a progressive economic assault on Americans. this is precisely what the Nazi did in their earlier incarnation, before the kinder gentler ones we have today...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ba
Posted by: mnstra on Dec 24, 2008 4:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the SEC is asleep. do we think that our FDIC deposits are safe?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Moral of the Story
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Dec 24, 2008 11:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely there is something morally wrong with people who shuffle paper involving all sorts of dodgy, convoluted schemes around making millions, or even billions, of dollars a year when a third of the world doesn't have clean water or enough to eat. Surely people who make things of value, such as cars, clothing and houses, contribute more to our well being than Wall Street types. Surely it's wrong to lock a ghetto kid up for 5 years for snatching someone's purse when nearly all white collar criminals go scot free.

The old-fashioned but still valid precepts of hard work, honesty, accountability and equality before the law may yet make a comeback.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This HORRIBLE,EVIL OLD MAN NEEDS LIFE IN A FEDERAL PEN!
Posted by: joeocho88 on Dec 24, 2008 11:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He KNEW what the hell he was doing!
He was another one of the illusion-creators using the GREED and EGOS of the Ruling class to take their money from them and spend it --where?

HOW COULD HE HAVE POSSIBLE WASTED/HIDDEN $50 MILLION ?????

THIS MAN IS BEYOND MERE EVIL!
He has destroyed thousands of lives, charitable foundations and for WHAT?

And he sits in his posh mansion under "HOUSE ARREST." WHAT DOES HE KNOW ABOUT WHO THAT KEEPS HIM FROM GOING TO PRISON?????

This slimy OLD BASTARD needs to get what he DESERVES!

What DID he do when he was consulting with the Federal Government?

I HOPE HE ROTS IN HELL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement