Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Confessions of an Evangelical Tree Hugger

By Matthew Sleeth, Sierra Club Books. Posted December 26, 2008.


It took us a thousand years to prove this biblical truth: that trees are, indeed, the breath of life.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Matthew Sleeth

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

 

This essay is reprinted from Holy Ground: A Gathering if Voices on Caring for Creation, recently published by Sierra Club Books.

Sometimes we must lose ourselves in order to find our way.

I live in a small college town near Lexington, Kentucky. One summer, my wife and I and a couple of friends were invited to share the evening with a group of families who dwell together in an intentional manner, about sixty miles from our home.

The road there narrows from four to two to even fewer lanes. A blue mailbox comes up on the right. Make a left, and then proceed up the drive, whose high spots are blazed by the low-hanging undercarriage of cars like mine.

A dog comes up to greet us. Overdressed for these hot evenings, he pants and accepts a rub on the brow and a scratching behind the ears. I watch his tail sweep arcs of canine fellowship on the dusty ground.

Adults come out to greet us, and their children appear from places in the yard and barn. These children are different. Their point of intersection with life is not a touchpad or a screen. Because the adults in their lives are worried about the death of nature, they are raising their children close to it.

It quickly becomes clear that these families spend much of their days in the woods, meadows, and gardens that surround this small cluster of homes. Children cannot protect what they do not know; they will not give up their convenience, much less their way of life, for what they do not love. I realize that these children are being raised as the guardians of tomorrow.

Before we break bread, Margie (one of the adults) takes us on a tour. She points to the roof of their home. Its long axis points south. The sun riseth, and goeth down, and hastens towards its zenith in the summer. In winter, when the sun is lower in the sky, it comes in their south-facing windows and provides free heat.

The term eavesdrop comes from hiding under the eaves of the house to listen surreptitiously to conversation. This is an eavesdropping home, but the conversation to be overheard is the chatter of rain. It flows from gutter to downspout to a cistern under the back porch. It is pumped up into the kitchen sink to wash dishes and then flows to the gray-water tank. Then the rain continues its journey downhill to the garden, where it hydrates the interstitial spaces in the lettuce of our salad, which we wash in the sink before dinner.

“How do you do it? How do you keep things going?” I ask this group of young and old, married and single, Catholic and Protestant people. The Lutheran pastor among them understands: I’m not asking about technology, or the lack of it.

“We pray.”

Prayer: it is what has brought them through the beginning years of adjustment to living in community; through the illnesses, the job changes, and the roller-coaster ride of children entering their teen years.

“We share the legacy of the people raised to live alone but needing each other.”

“How?” I press.

“We’ll show you, if you’d like to join us,” they offer.

After dinner we retire to a room set aside as a chapel for vespers—one prayer book for every two people, a “novice” partnered with a community member. Hands slip back and forth between pages. Our collective voices sing songs written by French monks. We close with a period of free-form prayer, giving thanks, praying for mercy, and asking for help.

Outside, the children run about capturing grasshoppers, crickets, and other jumping things between cupped hands. Those creatures do not escape by the explosive movements of muscles coiled in their legs, but by quietly crawling through the whistle gap between the children’s thumbs.

Inside the chapel there is a moment of quiet. We sit with God and tilt the ears of our souls toward the eternal voice of reason. On the wall hang a crucifix bearing Christ’s body and a simple, unadorned cross, both symbols of suffering and triumph. For my part, I accept both. It is not by accident that Christ died on a tree, nor that he worked with wood in his father’s shop. Nor is it a coincidence that the word tree is mentioned more than five hundred times in the Bible. The human story begins with the tree of life in the garden. The last chapter of the Bible tells of two trees of life and an unpolluted river that flows between them. The leaves of these trees, we are told, will heal the nations.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: religion, environment, evangelicals

Matthew Sleeth, MD, is the executive director of Blessed Earth. His essay appears in Holy Ground: A Gathering of Voices on Caring for Creation, recently published by Sierra Club Books. For more information, visit Sierra Club Books.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where are clear directions in Bible how to treat wild land, apart from domesticating it?
Posted by: pelican beak on Dec 26, 2008 3:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bible gives plenty of clear directions how we should orient toward God, and toward each other. It tells how we should treat domesticated animals, gardens, and food fields, but no clear directions how to orient toward wild life, apart from demands to domesticate it.

Also, can anybody cite where the phrase, "steward of the earth" is found in the Bible? Many claim it is there, but no one seems able to find it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Otto .
Posted by: otto on Dec 26, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Basically, I liked the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Save Trees
Posted by: weathered on Dec 26, 2008 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't buy newspapers, they no longer serve the public, they take their marching orders from the darkside.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A LOAD OF SHIT
Posted by: charlieparisek on Dec 26, 2008 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess the regular editors are off for the holidays. Or maybe they decided to do something “seasonal.”

But this? A syrupy, clichéd, and embarrassingly sophomoric attempt at a re-connect with nature a la Christian awakening?

Dumb as the shit from the “overdressed” dog Dr. Sleeth offers up.

I loved his grasshoppers, though they are definitely a different sort than the variety I’m accustomed to, who use those powerful leg muscles to haul ass whenever they see a break. Maybe his are blessed. (Mine are just kind of regular.)

I guess Christians think they have a lock on nature, and that the kids they spawn are so wonderful. So special.

Fucker.

As for your Prius (with GPS), get a clue.

If you really cared, you wouldn’t be driving in the first place.

Happy New Year!

Charlie Parisek

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A LOAD OF SHIT Posted by: Beck
» RE: A LOAD OF SHIT Posted by: jstepp590
» YOU’RE SWEET! Posted by: charlieparisek
» RE: YOU’RE SWEET! Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: A LOAD OF SHIT Posted by: xgop
» RIGHT... Posted by: charlieparisek
Nice Change ...
Posted by: stellabloo on Dec 26, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... from the usual image of 'savage nature red of tooth and claw'.

The 'cruel nature' image is normally flogged by both camps. Atheists say that nature is cold and uncaring and that proves there is no God. Christians start with the expulsion from Eden and go on to condemn nature as bad (we were put on earth as punishment), women as bad and sex as very, very bad.

I guess I would consider myself an educated pagan. It is a view not inconsistent with gnostic christianity. I like my high-speed internet but I've done my stint without power or running water. I've been living and working in the wilderness for 25 years and the novelty never goes away. People need to get out of the city more. This article was a nice change, even if it was written by city slicker ;.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nice Change ... Posted by: laurenaislinn
2nd Creation story in Genesis
Posted by: laurenaislinn on Dec 26, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Little-known, but there is a 2nd creation-'Garden of Eden' story in the Book of Genesis (no I don't recall the passage verse and line #s, but it's there). It's this 2nd version, in which the order of things created differs from the first and 'Adam's' first companion (they were 1st implicitly 'as children')/'wife' was 'Lilith'-Not 'Eve'. This is the creation story which is much more Earth-friendly that the 1st and 'well-known' version. It was placed 1st out of church-political considerations which played-down the less powerful faction which saw God best represented in nature-much as the Transcendentalists. The reigning political faction also forbade the word "Earth" from being capitalized, lest it be used in place of God.
I'm a 'tree-hugger' myself and seem to have been from birth. I wad raised by free-thinking chritian parents and in a fundamentalist school, much less open-minded than they. I'm also Native American, an early hippie and a retired scientist. By age 10 I rejected the beliefs of the school that attempted to brainwash me into hatred of all people and things not white, German, protestant and capitalist (the early church was Communistic--hence hippie communes). Native American peoples, without benifit of the Bible, have always understood that trees are the essential creatures which link Mother Earth and Father Sky (i.e., thus, bringing oxygen).
Science also knows that 3/4 of all oxygen today is produced by Algae and the remainder by plants-much of these being grasses. Furthermore, for 3.5 billion of life's 3.8 billion-year history, All oxygen was produced by Algae. We owe our existnce to 'pond-scum'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shame they couldn't have thought of all this
Posted by: Bob Doublin on Dec 26, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
before they cut down all the sacred trees and groves THROUGHOUT NOT JUST EUROPE BUT THE WHOLE DAMN WORLD. It's a little late like about 1300,1400,1500 years-read the accounts of what those wonderful missionaries did in Gaul, Ireland, Saxony, Uppsala etal on and on ad infinitum ad nauseum ad vomitum. The fact is that Christianity will always be the Johnny-come-lately to an appreciation and proper worship of the natural world. Give me Artemis, Our Lady of the Wild Things anytime.
I'm totally UNIMPRESSED.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I forgot to add
Posted by: Bob Doublin on Dec 26, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Notice the typical Christian arrogance that trees being the breath of life is a BIBLICAL truth, implying that those ignorant,benighted satanic scum from other religions never thought of it AT ALL. News Flash!! Pagans, Hindus, Buddhists, Taoists, Shintoists (etal), EVERY SINGLE practitioner of an indigenous religion have been deeply,intimately LIVING with this belief from the very beginnings of their respective religions-some probably back more than 50,000 years. The last thing we need is for a Christian to annoint us from on high with this knowledge-especially given the historical reality of what I mentioned in my first post. Thank you very much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bible believers should be vegan
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Dec 26, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"15. And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food." And it was so."

Finally, proof that bible readers should be vegan (we secular folks already know this).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hey now
Posted by: jstepp590 on Dec 26, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, I liked this story so everyone who's a hater for no reason (or clue) lay off!

I will say that I'm not the most religious person in the world. However, when I heard about the common vision found between religious and environmental groups I was so excited! To have these powerful spheres work together to protect what nature and God left us is the kind of vision that can truly change our self destructive habits and speak powerfully enough to have the most powerful "pro" business lobbyists shake in their boots.

I'm not a tree hugger but a conservative. What that means is that I do not believe that nature should be left as pristine as the day God made it. I believe that we have a responsibility to leave something better for our children than what we inherited from our parents for us to enjoy. I also believe that we do not have the right to destroy any life form permanently, to cause extinctions on such a scale, as it makes us as a species poorer.

In no worldview, be it religious or environmental, is deforestation and mercury pollution and mountaintop removal mining and overfishing etc. an ok philosophy. Only by finding that common ground with groups that we may not share worldviews with, but are discovering the same truths from different directions, will we find the strength to make the changes we all see as needed.

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year everyone, whether you believe in God or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hannukah and kwaanza Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: hannukah and kwaanza Posted by: Beck
» RE: hey now Posted by: Bob Doublin
» RE: hey now Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: hey now Posted by: Bob Doublin
» ARE YOU RELATED... Posted by: charlieparisek
» RE: ARE YOU RELATED... Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: hey now Posted by: xgop
C.S. Lewis
Posted by: vasumurti on Dec 26, 2008 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“There is no religion without love, and people may talk as much as they like about their religion, but if it does not teach them to be kind to beasts as well as man, it is all a sham.”

---Anna Sewell, author, Black Beauty

“I care not for a man’s religion whose dog or cat are not the better for it...I am in favor of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the way of a whole human being.”

---Abraham Lincoln

Dr. Sleeth mentions C.S. Lewis. Christian writer C.S. Lewis noted that animals were included in the first Passover. The application of the “blood of the lamb” on the doorposts, not only saved a man and his family from death that night in Egypt, it saved his animals as well. Lewis put forth a rational argument concerning the resurrection of animals in The Problem of Pain. His 1947 essay, “A Case for Abolition,” attacked vivisection (animal experimentation) and reads as follows:

“Once the old Christian idea of a total difference in kind between man and beast has been abandoned, then no argument for experiments on animals can be found which is not also an argument for experiments on inferior men. If we cut up beasts simply because they cannot prevent us and because we re backing up our own side in the struggle for existence, it is only logical to cut up imbeciles, criminals, enemies, or capitalists for the same reason. Indeed, experiments on men have already begun. We all hear that Nazi scientists have done them. We all suspect that our own scientists may begin to do so, in secret, at any moment.

“The victory of vivisection marks a great advance in the triumph of ruthless, non-moral utilitarianism over the old world of ethical law; a triumph in which we, as well as animals, are already the victims, and of which Dachau and Hiroshima mark the more recent achievements. In justifying cruelty to animals we put ourselves also on the animal level. We choose the jungle and must abide by our choice.”

“I am not a Christian,” wrote one animal rights activist in Animals, Men and Morals (1971), “but I find it incomprehensible that those who preach a doctrine of love and compassion can believe that the material pleasures of meat-eating justify the slaughter it requires.”

In 1977, at an annual meeting in London of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), Dr. Donald Coggan, the Archbishop of Canterbury, said, “Animals, as part of God’s creation, have rights which must be respected. It behooves us always to be sensitive to their needs and to the reality of their pain.”

Dr. L. Charles Birch, an Australian “eco-philosopher,” has long urged the churches to preach conservation of nature and respect for other living creatures. In July 1979 he argued at a conference of the World Council of Churches in Cambridge, Massachussetts, that all living creatures should be valued because of their “capacity for feeling.” Dr. Birch has also condemned "factory farming" -- the overcrowded, confinement methods of raising and killing animals for food -- as “unethical,” and declared that “the animal rights movement should be supported by all Christians.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Compassion Over Killing
Posted by: vasumurti on Dec 26, 2008 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A diet that can lead to heart attacks, cancer, and numerous other diseases cannot be a natural diet," writes Keith Akers in A Vegetarian Sourcebook. "A diet that pillages our resources of land, water, forests, and energy cannot be a natural diet. A diet that causes the unnecessary suffering and death of billions of animals each year cannot be a natural diet."

I understand there are conservative Christians who fear vegetarianism...which is kind of like being afraid of nonsmoking, nondrinking, or recycling. Ronald J. Sider of Evangelicals for Social Action, in his 1977 book, Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger, pointed out that 220 million Americans were eating enough food (largely because of the high consumption of grain fed to livestock) to feed over one billion people in the poorer countries.

A pamphlet put out by Compassion Over Killing says raising animals for food is one of the leading causes of both pollution and resource depletion today. According to a recent United Nations report, "Livestock's Long Shadow," raising chickens, turkeys, pigs, and other animals for food causes more greenhouse gas emissions than all the cars, trucks and other forms of transportation combined. Researchers from the University of Chicago similarly concluded that a vegetarian diet is the most energy efficient, and the average American does more to reduce global warming emissions by not eating animal products than by switching to a hybrid car.

A 2007 journal published by the American Dietetic Association found "meat protein production required 26 times more water than vegetable protein on rain-fed lands." The journal further states that dieticians "can encourage eating that is both healthful and conserving of soil, water, and energy by emphasizing plant sources of protein and foods that have been produced with fewer agricultural inputs."

"Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today's most serious environmental problems. Urgent action is required to remedy the situation."

---Union Nations' Food and Agriculture Assocation

A single dairy cow produces approximately 120 pounds of wet manure per day, which is equivalent to that of 20 to 40 humans.

70% of the grain grown and 50% of the water consumed in the U.S. are used by the meat industry. (Audobon Society)

On average 990 liters of water are required to produce one liter of milk. (United Nations)

Over 260 million acres of U.S. forest have been cleared to grow grain for livestock. (Greenpeace)

Farmed animals produce an estimated 1.4 billion tons of fecal waste each year in the U.S. Much of this untreated waste pollutes the land and water.

The number of animals killed for food in the United States is 70 times larger than the number of animals killed in laboratories, 30 times larger than the number killed by hunters and trappers, and 500 times larger than the number of animals killed in animal pounds.

“If anyone wants to save the planet,” says Paul McCartney in a PETA interview, “all they have to do is stop eating meat. That’s the single most important thing you could do. It’s staggering when you think about it. Vegetarianism takes care of so many things in one shot: ecology, famine, cruelty. Let’s do it! Linda was right. Going veggie is the single best idea for the new century.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vitamin B-12 Posted by: vasumurti
Xtns do better to worship nature...........
Posted by: tap17x on Dec 27, 2008 12:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
......than to help destroy it. But who are the nature wreckers in the U.S.? the more literal- minded CHRISTIANS, overwhelmingly! Who ignores global warming? Same answer! Who thinks that churches should preach only salvation and ignore the needy? Fundies! The original poster should get a clue and realize that the Bible is Bullshit, Jesus was a pathological Jackass, and Christianity is worse than Cancer or Communism!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are clear directions in Bible how to treat wild land, apart from domesticating it?
Posted by: gandolfshep on Dec 29, 2008 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your correct in that there are many good rules as to how we treat each other but you argument on the steward of the earth is missing a bit.

Must it say exactly as you to get your point across? It does not say steward of the earth but in Exodus 9:29 it clearly says ... "thou mayest know how that the earth is the Lord's." And Psalm 33:5 does not state servant but it does say "...the earth is full of the goodness of the Lord."

Now I am not an overly religious man but I would never and I ask you if you would cause damage to the earth, our only home, that is full of the goodness of the Lord.

Because it does not use the exact words you choose does not make your point correct.

Simply because it doesn't say in a 2000 plus year old book that we are the stewarts of the earth does this give us the right to treat what is the Lords with contempt.

Domesticating does not mean do as we please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Xtns do better to worship nature
Posted by: gandolfshep on Dec 29, 2008 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Xtns do better to worship nature...........
Posted by: tap17x on Dec 27, 2008 12:33 PM
......than to help destroy it. But who are the nature wreckers in the U.S.? the more literal- minded CHRISTIANS, overwhelmingly! Who ignores global warming? Same answer!

Literal Christians ignore global warming? Is it possible you meant to say liberal.

While I am not a avid Christian but a student of many different religions I find your post assine and pointless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement