Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama Should Worry About Iraqi Shoes, Too

By Ben Lando, AlterNet. Posted December 18, 2008.


When Iraq's violence escalates, President Obama better not be caught on his heels when he's blamed for losing Bush's "win."

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Ben Lando

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

After four hours stuck in Baghdad traffic, I was close enough to get out of the car and walk to my hotel. I’m sure it was raw sewage I stepped in, but I didn’t ask; ignorance is bliss, I figured, or every time I take my shoes off I’ll think of what’s on the bottom.

The drive from an interview in Monsour district back to my hotel just outside the Green Zone should have taken 45 minutes, tops.

But it coincided exactly with President Bush’s farewell invasion of Baghdad, and the send-off by 29-year-old Baghdadiyah TV journalist Muntathar al-Zaidi.

"This is a goodbye kiss, you dog," al-Zaidi yelled and tossed his shoes at Bush, McClatchy Newspapers reports. "Killer of Iraqis, killer of children."

As soon as my drivers and I were routed from the main highway to side streets by U.S. troops, we knew something was up. Traffic was intense every direction we took; the boys selling candy car-to-car must have made out well.

Frustration grew as the sun went down. Every route was blocked by U.S. troops. Bush made an unnecessary visit to Baghdad and put an American’s life in danger, I thought, and Baghdadis’ lives are frozen until he leaves the country for good.

Iraqis, getting impatient, start each day dressing one shoe at a time. A draft report from the U.S. Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, leaked to the New York Times and ProPublica this week, ahead of its January scheduled release, pans nearly the entirety of U.S. reconstruction efforts here.

Stuart Bowen, the IG, recounts his first tour of the Coalition Provisional Authority: "What I saw was troubling: large amounts of cash moving quickly out the door. Later that same day, walking the halls of the palace, I overheard someone say: 'We can’t do that anymore. There is a new inspector general here.' These red flags were the first signs that the oversight mission the Congress had assigned my office would be extraordinarily challenging."

SIGIR’s responsibility was to watchdog nearly $50 billion in U.S. taxpayer dollars dedicated here by Congress.

"Over the past five years, this sea of taxpayer dollars flowed to a wide spectrum of initiatives, ranging from training Iraq’s army and police to building big electrical, oil and water projects; from supporting democracy-building efforts like elections to strengthening provincial councils’ budget execution; and from funding rule-of-law reforms to ensuring that Iraq sustains what the U.S. program provided," the SIGIR report said.

"Some of the initiatives succeeded, but, as this report explains, many did not. … beyond the security issue stands another compelling and unavoidable answer: the U.S government was not adequately prepared to carry out the reconstruction mission it took on in mid-2003."

So, parallel to, or because of, the continued insecurity, there is a lack of services such as electricity, clean water and fuel -- not to mention a deficit of human-rights protection for women and minorities, according to a new U.N. report on human rights in Iraq -- it’s not difficult to understand why a journalist threw shoes at the face of this situation.

Some here debated whether he'd be better off using his power as a journalist to explain why Bush is "a dog" -- likely, since he has not been released from custody following a painful arrest. Others said it was plain inappropriate to embarrass the prime minister and disrespect a guest in a way so offensive in Arab culture, let alone committing a crime of assault; a rally in the Baghdad neighborhood Sadr City the day after called for the immediate release of al-Zaidi, an overnight hero of the Iraqi street and the Arab world.

No one I’ve spoken to, or overheard, has criticized the motivation of the reporter, who was shell-shocked covering the bombing of Sadr City this year (and was kidnapped last year).

"Ninety percent of Iraqis supported the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, greeted American troops as liberators with flowers and candy," said a local journalist, whose office I was sharing while I was reporting this week. "Now, 90 percent feel the same way as al-Zaidi."

"Thanks to you, the Iraq we're standing in today is dramatically freer, dramatically safer and dramatically better than the Iraq we found eight years ago," the Los Angeles Times quoted Bush during his visit.

But besting Saddam Hussein shouldn’t have been this hard.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, iraq, obama

Ben Lando is energy editor for United Press International and editor of IraqOilReport.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Iraqis have more guts against Empire than we do
Posted by: amacd on Dec 18, 2008 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real irony here, which none in the MSM have apparently noticed, is the inverse relation with the movie, "Wag the Dog".

In "Wag the Dog" the propaganda arm of the American ruling-elite 'corporate financial Empire' creates a phony PR event about Pvt. Shoemaker, captured in the phony war with Albania, and honored by PR shills throwing shoes over telephone lines --- which the American people buy; hook, line and sinker from the phony MSM propaganda organs parroting the phony war 'news'.

Now, in the real war ON Iraq the real anger and contempt of an Iraqi real journalist throwing a shoe at the faux Emperor of the ruling-elite 'corporate financial Empire', which has wrecked their country and killed a million Iraqis, has backfired on Bush, the "dog", as the honest Iraqi journalist had the guts to call him.

If the American people had any sense of humor and propriety, we would throw old shoes over the imperial White House fence, mail them to Bush (as some are already doing), and throw old shoes through the windows of the lying MSM organs that helped 'sell' this immoral, illegal, and international war crime of a war ON the Middle East.

Instead of wasting time finding the best 'distractive' games to play, the American public should have half the guts of the Iraqi journalist and actually take some real action to throw shoes at Bush, the White House, the lying US media establishment, the Congress, and the looting corporate CEO crooks in their limousines. Otherwise the real joke is on us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, Obama does merit having shoes thrown at him
Posted by: logansafi on Dec 18, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, Obama is a scoundrel like Bush, and he too merits having shoes thrown at him. He is a president from the Democratic Party, which has the longest history of messing over Iraq, as well as Afghanistan and Somalia. Too bad that so many of the protests against 'Bush's War' were in fact just protests by Democrats against Bush.

As to where the shoe most deserves to be thrown? I dominate the so-called United for Peace and Justice group of Democrats here in America. They are neither unifying nor for peace and justice, and certainly aren't leaders that are capable of throwing shoes in the right direction. They have derailed protest in a manner that recalls much how David Cobb derailed the Green party of 2004 into the roadside gutter. Oops, there goes my other shoe!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree! In fact,... Posted by: slugsucker
» RE: I agree! In fact,... Posted by: logansafi
Continuing US military presence in Iraq retards political maturity
Posted by: Garvagh on Dec 18, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo! Iraq will reach its own style of stability only after the US gets out entirely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush Should Have Thrown His Shoes Back At This Guy...
Posted by: OnlyJesusSaves on Dec 18, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and would have done this if he was waging a REAL war on terror! For shame!

John Lofton, Editor
TheAmericanView.com
Recovering Republican
JLof@aol.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President Obama is...
Posted by: Josiah on Dec 24, 2008 1:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Obama is the newly elected president of the United States. However, the outgoing President Bush was put into humiliation by an Iraqi journalist Muntadhar al-Zeidi during his last surprise visit to Iraq. The Iraqi journalist felt disgusted at the U.S. President’s treatment of his country that's why he had decisively taken off his shoes and hurled them at President Bush. In Muslim culture, hit footwear fling is an insult of the highest magnitude. Good Muslims remove their shoes before taking sanctuary in a mosque. Besieged Iraqi citizens threw their shoes at the toppling statue of Saddam Hussein during liberation, so that should better explain the depth of this insult. The “Bush Shoe-Thrower” is viewed as a hero across the Middle East. A Libyan charity group called Wa Attassimou proclaims that the Iraqi authorities should release al-Zeidi and he should be honored for his deed. Bush, on the other hand, laughed it off and referred to it as a “sign of a free society,” similar to what payday loans are. The mad journalist is still in custody and the infamous footwear is being held for evidence. Check this article to read more. I just hope that when Barack Obama take-over the position he would not experience this “shoe-throwing” incident when he goes to Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We lost 3,000 - they lost close to a million and counting
Posted by: cori on Dec 26, 2008 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just imagine if us spoiled Americans had to endure what we did tothe Iraqi's

From Harold Pinter
How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand?

More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice. But Bush has been clever. He has not ratified the International Criminal Court of Justice. Therefore if any American soldier or for that matter politician finds himself in the dock Bush has warned that he will send in the marines. But Tony Blair has ratified the Court and is therefore available for prosecution. We can let the Court have his address if they're interested. It is Number 10, Downing Street, London.

Death in this context is irrelevant. Both Bush and Blair place death well away on the back burner. At least 100,000 Iraqis were killed by American bombs and missiles before the Iraq insurgency began. These people are of no moment. Their deaths don't exist. They are blank. They are not even recorded as being dead. 'We don't do body counts,' said the American general Tommy Franks.

Early in the invasion there was a photograph published on the front page of British newspapers of Tony Blair kissing the cheek of a little Iraqi boy. 'A grateful child,' said the caption. A few days later there was a story and photograph, on an inside page, of another four-year-old boy with no arms. His family had been blown up by a missile. He was the only survivor. 'When do I get my arms back?' he asked. The story was dropped. Well, Tony Blair wasn't holding him in his arms, nor the body of any other mutilated child, nor the body of any bloody corpse. Blood is dirty. It dirties your shirt and tie when you're making a sincere speech on television.

I hope you will decide that yes, we do have a conscience and that you will join the millions of Americans who say we must hold accountable those who have committed criminal acts while in government - the policy makers as well as the implementers.

Write and call the new President and the new Congress and demand official investigations into war crimes and other criminal acts committed by members of the Bush administration and join us on Inauguration day to remind the new President of his responsibilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]