Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Pentagon-Media Complex Fibs about Star Wars

By Jim Hightower, AlterNet. Posted August 14, 2001.


Only recently did we learn that the last "Star Wars" test was rigged -- the "bad guy" missile had a beacon to guide the "good guy" missile to it.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jim Hightower

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

What is it about the media powerhouses that make them such suckers for Pentagon fairy tales?

One would think that multibillion-dollar media giants (from CBS to CNN, the New York Times to the Washington Post) would bring at least a smidgen of journalistic skepticism to the Pentagon's incredible claims about its technological prowess. Yet, you might recall that during the Gulf War a decade ago the media gullibly swallowed the military's daily press assertions that some 99 percent of our whiz-bang, computer-guided missiles were on-target against Saddam Hussein's forces. Month's later it had to be admitted that these gushing reports were slightly misleading -- indeed, about 90 percent of the missiles had missed their targets.

Recently the Pentagon put out another whopper ... and once again the media barons swallowed it whole, then regurgitated it to us as truth. At issue was a widely ballyhooed test of the razzle-dazzle, video-arcade, anti-missile-defense scheme known as Star Wars. The Bush team is determined to dump about 160 billion of our tax dollars into this boondoggle, even though it's so technologically flawed that military experts think it's silly.

So, the Bushites and their corporate partners scheduled a test in July in which a "bad guy" missile was fired at the US and our "good guy" missile was launched to shoot it down in mid-air. Sure enough, the Pentagon claimed that this technological impossibility had worked, asserting that our "good guy" blasted the "bad guy" out of the sky. "Success," shrieked the media in union with the Pentagon.

Only now have we learned from watchdog groups that the July test was rigged -- our "good guy" missile was programmed with information about the time and location of the "bad guy" launch, and the "bad guy" even had a beacon in it to guide the "good guy" to it.

This is Jim Hightower saying ... It's hard to take the media establishment seriously about anything as long as it continues to act as a straightman for the jokesters of the military-industrial complex.

Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Why It's Hard to Change People's Minds
A new study shows that after being exposed to information contradicting their ideas, most people still cling to their prejudices.
By Sean Gonsalves, AlterNet. October 7, 2008.
Opposition to the Bailout Will Not Destroy America
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: Instead of applauding representatives who, for once, heeded the public, the pundits blasted those who dared get out of line.
By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. October 1, 2008.
Let's Renegotiate NAFTA and the WTO Agreement
Trade is not an end in itself -- the goal is to improve people's living standards.
By Mark Weisbrot, AlterNet. September 30, 2008.

Advertisement