comments_image -

George W.al-Mart and the Corporate Grab at Your Tax Rebate

No sooner are Bush's $300 bribes in the mail than corporations are scheming to take the cash out of your hands. Fortunately, the "Donate the Rebate" campaign is taking off.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

You've probably gotten yours already. The white perforated envelope promising you your share of Bush's benevolent tax rebate. $300 if you're single, $600 if you're married: These notices let you know when your windfall is due and who to thank for it.

And no sooner are Bush's self-congratulatory bribes in the mail than the corporate money grubbing has begun. Companies like Home Depot and Wal-Mart have already started advertising their (entirely selfless, of course) recommendations of how to spend all that free money.

Hoping to cash in on the dual political dramas of tax rebate and energy crisis, Home Depot's new radio and TV ads suggest buying energy efficient products -- thermostats, home insulation and energy-saving windows -- at Home Depot superstores. Meanwhile, Wal-Mart is promising another sort of green. It's offering a free check cashing service for all rebate checks, because heavens forbid you'd have to trek all the way to the bank when you could just stop over at your neighborhood mega-conglomerate.

"The main driver [for the check cashing promotion] is customer service," says Wal-Mart spokesman Tom Williams. "The other driver is we love to have people in our stores." People spending money in those stores surely has nothing to do with it.

There is, of course, a variety of ways you could spend this money that would do more than fatten the Depots and Marts of the world. I, for one, am joining the growing number of taxpayers rejecting the rebate and donating the money to a worthy charity. It's safer than going to the next G-8 conference, more reliable than voting in Florida and even easier than trooping down to Wal-Mart to cash it. All you need do is sign the rebate over to the services that need it. From Planned Parenthood to your local homeless shelter, you can help either those fighting Dubya's economic agenda or those being hurt by it.

And you won't be alone. Web sites like DonateRebate.org, TaxRebatePledge.org and RejectTheRebate.org are seeing a swelling refusal of the tax rebate. TaxRebatePledge.org has so far received almost $274,000 in pledges from over 800 taxpayers and RejectTheRebate.org, a site ran by United for a Fair Economy, has received another $100,000.

Going against the corporate grain, Working Assets long distance service is encouraging tax rebate pledges by matching any $300 or $600 donations on their GiveForChange.com site, up to one million dollars. Along with matching your donation, the site allows users to greeting cards to the president, telling him how they used their tax rebate.

"This is just about the most popular thing we have ever done," says Michael Kieschnick, president of Working Assets. "The messages people are sending to Bush are profound. People are politically frustrated and this gives them a way to act." So far, Working Assets has received $28,000 in donations, and that's before any rebates have actually been sent. "We have no doubt we will get the one million we have pledged to match," says Kieschnick.

Just as important as considering where the money will go, is where the money came from in the first place. The primary reason Dubya sent out his rebates (beyond the perk of having his name attached to wad of cash) is to jumpstart a stalling economy. By doling out $39 billion dollars in rebate money, he hopes people will pump it back into the system and help ease what is currently a bad re-election environment.

Dandy idea for sure, but there's no proof it'll work. According to ex-Treasury Department official and National Center for Policy Analysis senior fellow Bruce Bartlett, it didn't happen in 1975 when Ford signed a 10 percent tax rebate and it probably won't happen now. "The way these rebates are structured, it's not going to people with low incomes -- not to the people who are most likely to spend the money. It's going to the people who are predominately well-to-do, making the probability even higher that these rebates will be saved therefore providing no economic stimulus."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Listen to The AlterNet Radio Hour with Naomi Klein, Sarah Posner and Dean Baker!

By Joshua Holland | AlterNet

 
 
San Francisco Police Department Releases 'It Gets Better' Video

By Tara Lohan | AlterNet

 
 
Occupy Protesters Mic-Check Palin During CPAC Speech

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Apple, Accustomed to Profits and Praise, Faces Outcry for Labor Practices at Chinese Factories

By Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez | Democracy Now!

 
 
Could Santorum Actually Beat Romney? And Would the Obama Campaign be Ready?

By Steve M. | Booman Tribune

 
 
Bill Moyers: The Economy Has Been Engineered to Screw Over Millennials (With an AlterNet Shoutout!)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Maher: Conservatives Are the Ones Dividing the Country

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
In Kansas, Is Catholic Church Trying to Destroy A Victim's Advocates Organization?

By Julie Cain | Ms. Magazine Blog

 
 
Obama vs. the Concern Trolls on Nonsense "Religious Liberty" Issue

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
At CPAC, Santorum Surges Despite Idiotic Claims; Romney Poses as 'Severe' Conservative; Gingrich Makes War on GOP

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]