Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

U.N. Dead Wrong About Engineered Crops

By Anuradha Mittal, AlterNet. Posted July 24, 2001.


The U.N. says that genetically engineered food will end hunger in the Third World. Then why are so many developing countries banning GMOs?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Anuradha Mittal


Related Stories

Food is a Human Right, Not a Charity

Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about GMOs, But Had No One to Ask


Related Links

Food First Report on GMOs for the Third World: An Appropriate Response to Poverty, Hunger and Lagging Productivity?
This report explains why genetic engineering cannot reduce hunger in developing countries.

U.N. Human Development Report
The controvertial U.N. report on human development and technology.

UN Shocks Neo-Luddites!
Read an opposing viewpoint.

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Comments about genetically engineered (GE) crops expressed in the just-released "Human Development Report 2001," the flagship publication of the United Nation Development Program (UNDP), and in accompanying press statements, reveal a shocking degree of Northern arrogance in tone and content.

The authors of the report urge rich countries to put aside their fears of genetically engineered (GE) food and help developing nations unlock the potential of biotechnology. UNDP head Mark Malloch Brown, praised the report, saying that it has moved in a new direction by challenging some cherished opinions about what the Third World needs. Yet as a citizen of India I ask, who nominated Mark Malloch Brown, in his New York office, to speak for the needs of poor countries and to say what we need?

The UNDP report accuses opponents of genetically-modified food of ignoring the food needs of the Third World. It goes on to say that the movement is driven by conservationists in rich countries, and claims that the current debate mostly ignores the concerns and needs of the developing world. Western consumers who do not face food shortages or nutritional deficiencies, or work in the fields are more likely to focus on food safety and the loss of biodiversity, but farming communities in developing countries emphasize potentially higher yields and greater nutritional value" of these crops, the authors say.

Obviously the UNDP and Mark Malloch Brown have done only part of their homework. While they have read up on the genetic engineering debate in the U.S. and Europe, they have ignored the even louder debate going on in the Third World. In my country, for example, the debate pits mostly U.S.-trained technocrats, seduced by technological fixes, against farmer organizations and consumers who overwhelmingly say no to genetically engineered crops. Surely it is worth noting when the people who are to use the modified seeds and eat the modified food want nothing to do with them?

This UNDP report further fails to acknowledge that despite overproduction, even a country like the United States faces massive problems of hunger with over 36 millions Americans food insecure and ignores the lives of millions of farm workers in the fields of this country, while converting all Americans into consumers of unlabelled modified foods.

The report rehashes the old myth of feeding the hungry through miracle technology, the mantra that has been chanted forever, whether it was to push pesticides or genetic engineering. The famous green revolution of Northern technology sent to the South may have increased food production, at the cost of poisoning our earth, air and water. But it failed to alleviate hunger. Of 800 million hungry people in the world today, an estimated 250-300 million live in India alone. Its not that India does not produce enough food to meet the need of its hungry, it's the policies that work against the working poor -- slashing of social safety nets, for example, at the behest of Northern agencies like the IMF, that are the root cause of today's hunger.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

From Gitmo to the U.S.: How 17 Uighur Prisoners Could Be Let Into the United States
Rights and Liberties: The story behind last week's stunning ruling on the fate of 17 Uighur prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.
By Andy Worthington, AlterNet. October 11, 2008.
McCain's Erratic Health Strategy: Now He's Slashing Medicare
Health and Wellness: When a candidate suddenly, almost whimsically changes the way he proposes to handle $1.3 trillion, it's time to get nervous.
By RJ Eskow, Huffington Post. October 11, 2008.
Troopergate Investigator: Palin 'Unlawfully Abused Her Authority'
Rights and Liberties: The news isn't good for the Republican vice presidential nominee -- and is an unpleasant reminder of the power abuses of the Bush years.
AlterNet. October 11, 2008.

Advertisement