Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is Obama Getting Bad Advice on His Appointments?

By Greg Palast, Huffington Post. Posted December 11, 2008.


Joel Klein is being considered for secretary of education, which would make as much sense for our schools as Michael Brown did for disaster relief.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Greg Palast

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Has Barack Obama forgotten, Michael "Way to go, Brownie" Brown? Brown was that guy from the Arabian Horse Association appointed by President George W. Bush to run the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Brownie, not knowing the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain from the south end of a horse, let New Orleans drown. Bush's response was to give his buddy Brownie a thumbs up.

We thought Obama would go a very different way. You'd think the studious senator from Illinois would avoid repeating the Bush regime's horror show of unqualified appointments, of picking politicos over professionals. But here we go again. Trial balloons lofted in the Washington Post suggest President-elect Obama is about to select Joel Klein as secretary of education. If not Klein, then draft choice No. 2 is Arne Duncan, Obama's backyard basketball buddy in Chicago.

Say it ain't so, President O.

Let's begin with Joel Klein. Klein is a top-notch antitrust lawyer. What he isn't is an educator. Klein is as qualified to run the Department of Education as Vice President Dick Cheney is to dance in "Swan Lake." While I've never seen Cheney in a tutu, I have seen Klein fumble about the stage as chancellor of the New York City school system.

Klein, who lacks even six minutes experience in the field, was handed management of New York's schools by that political Jack-in-the-Box, Mayor Michael Bloomberg. The billionaire mayor is one of those businessmen-turned-politicians who think lawyers and speculators can make school districts operate like businesses. Klein has indeed run city schools like a business -- if the business is General Motors. Klein has flopped. Half the city's kids don't graduate.

Klein is out of control. Not knowing a damn thing about education, rather than rely on those who actually work in the field (only two of his two dozen deputies have degrees in education), Klein pays high-priced consultants to tell him what to do. He has blown a third-of-a-billion dollars on consultant "accountability" projects, plus $80 million for an IBM computer data-storage system that doesn't work.

What the heck was the $80 million junk computer software for? Testing. Klein is test crazy. He has swallowed hook, line and sinker Bush's idea that testing students can replace teaching them. The madly expensive testing program and consultant-fee spree are paid for by yanking teachers from the classroom.

Ironically, though not surprisingly, test scores under Klein have flat-lined. Scores would have fallen lower, notes author Jane Hirschmann, but Klein "moved the cut line." That is, he lowered the level required to pass. In other words, Klein cheats on the tests.

Nevertheless, media poobahs have fallen in love with Klein, especially Republican pundits. The New York Times' David Brooks is championing Klein, hoping that media hype for Klein will push Obama to keep Bush schools policies in place, trumping the electorate's choice for change.

Brooks and other Republicans (hey, didn't those guys lose?) are pushing Klein as a way for Obama to prove he can reach across the aisle to Republicans like Bloomberg. (Oh yes, Bloomberg's no longer in the GOP, having jumped from the party this year when the brand name went sour.)


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, hurricane katrina, fema, michael brown, obama administration, obama cabinet, joel klein, arne duncan, secretary of education

Greg Palast is the author of the New York Times bestseller The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
back to the future
Posted by: johnorford on Dec 11, 2008 2:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The comments on testing didn't surprise me. This is just what Britain has done and where did they get the idea? They stopped bothering to solve problems long ago - they just say "What do they do in the USA? They've got a big army and lots of money so they must know better than we do." As you say, time that should be spent on teaching is wasted on testing - the only reason for which is to provide reassurance for teachers and smug satisfaction for administrators who don't believe anything exists unless it can be quantified. It also pleases those who say "They don't learn nothing in school these days".
It's usually thought that moving the pass-line was done for the A-level results, A-levels being exams done in schools at the age of 18. Universities rely on A-level results and have noticed with alarm an apparent drop in student quality.

It's interesting that people who want the very latest in video-cinema, cars and kitchens are quite happy to have education for their children that dates back at least to the 1950s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Actually, you weren't Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Actually, We Were Posted by: gar1948
» RE: back to the future Posted by: ciccio
Bad advice? How could someone so obviously brilliant follow bad advice?
Posted by: Blink on Dec 11, 2008 4:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought he was The One...The Messiah...a brilliant thinker who was going to Bring Change to America. Why would he not be the Ultimate Decider in his appointments? Why would someone so brilliant succumb to bad advice, especially so early on?

"Well, uh, you know, uh, the, uh, notion that I uh, wasn't ___ [insert boilerplate phrase here; e.g., "...the worst economic situation since the Great Depression" or "I'm saddened and sobered by this situation" or "that isn't the _ _ _ _ that I knew".]

Yes...we are the change we've been waiting for. Indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First, let's kill all the lawyers - followed by the MBAs and the "think tank"
Posted by: thekidde on Dec 11, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
gurus and gazillionaire CEOs/execs. These "Butts in Seat" jackasses have screwed this country, its' middle class, its' education system and its' manufacturing base(the backbone of an economy)until we resemble a banana republic with a dictator (Bush) in charge and a mis-guided saviour (Obama) in the wings ready to take us down the same path with different rhetoric. Unless Obama gets his shit together, this country is bound for revolution and the first to get chopped will be the right-wing, republican rapists of the middle class.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Retired school psychologist from failing Harlem middle school who want to work again next year
Posted by: psychobob on Dec 11, 2008 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with this writer. Linda Darling-Hammond represented Obama's side in a debate from my alma mater, Teachers College, and she was sensible in her approach. Joel Klein likes to brag, but he hasn't brought good results as much as he and Bloomberg have boasted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What are we doing wrong?
Posted by: Yankeeinexile on Dec 11, 2008 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aren't we a bit too trusting anyway? I spend more time teaching my own children in addition to sending them to the public schools. Why? I don't trust them, especially since NCLB. Why, as citizens, do we feel that learning is only restricted to classrooms and colleges?

We are only stupid if we choose to be. The smartest thing we could all do is practice what we preach. If education is important to you, start learning and teaching yourself and your family. The educational system is broken just like our industries, finance, and healthcare. But that doesn't mean you have to play along and be stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two Tiered Education
Posted by: peacelf on Dec 11, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palast is wrong about one thing: The rest of the world is not kicking our butts educationally. Every other industrialized nation has a striated educational system that sorts kids at an early age into college bound and vocational bound (or low wage work) categories. Only kids proven college bound test for college.

The U.S., on the other hand, allows all who graduate from high school to take the ACT or SAT, therefore the system SEEMS fair. In reality, we sort those who go to college by income. Parents who live in wealthier neighborhoods have separate and unequal schools than their ghetto counterparts.

Wealthy kids are afforded a high quality, creative and experiential education, while the poorer kids get a boring rote, repetitive worksheet education that prepares them for their boring repetitive adult work lives.

Then, college is made unaffordable to any poorer kid who might beat the system and say self-educate enough to compete with wealthier kids.

Testing is the instrument by which schools sort the worthy from the unworthy, and we know who always loses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about JEREMIAH WRIGHT for Secretary of Education ?
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 11, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, he's religious but he wouldn't force religion into education plus he's honest compared to Joe Klein !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The aftermath of the failed school ideology is the root cause (educational romanticism)
Posted by: Social liberal on Dec 11, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The need for educational reform is imminent.

The US is spending tremendous amounts of monies on inner city schools, employing new teachers. The result is dismal, more tax dollars is spent and the results decline.
Two persons have taken on the challenge of change and it is the mayors of Washington D.C. and the mayor of New York. Both have had excellent managers to make this change come through Joel Klein and Michelle Rhee. It is a sign of great hope that one of these individuals are chosen to lead the future of school reform.

The key issues these individuals are addressing is:

1. Tenure, you should be able to fire incompetent teachers and promote excellent ones

2. Merit pay, teachers should be paid for teaching children.

3. Teacher, student and principal accountability

4. Value-Added Assessment (VAA, an alternative methodolo¬gy that evaluates educational progress based on the growth of each student’s knowledge base, rather than the attainment of particular test scores.

5. School vouchers, one of the best systems to achieve higher quality schooling for all in particular minorities. It has been implemented in Sweden and the results are good. However because of the ideology of educational romanticism Swedish schools as US schools are failing on a larger level, but Charter schools and the voucher program has stopped the decline

Mr Klein will have his work cut out fighting the educational romanticist among the democratic party, educational professors and first and foremost the Teachers Union. (It will be the hardest fight since the Teachers Union is the largest single lobbyist to the Democrats as well as the single largest political donor, 10 % of all campaign money. It is no wonder that there has been so little educational reform in the US and that so much tax payers money is wasted for so little result.)

But foremost you must get rid of the ideology of Educational romanticism that all students can become college students no matter their inherent abilities. You must accept that there are students that you cannot help no matter how much money you spend, or rather the cost of helping the lowest 20 % will take up 80 % of the resources.

A society cannot afford that, it must make choices. In the past when the economy was in double digit growth as up until the 1970s you could sustain almost any kind of expenditure but now that the economy will grow at 2 %, you must get your priorities straight, in fact most of the entitlements in social security will have to be cut, they were based on a plus 4 % annual growth ratio, not the current 2 % estimate.

It is like living entirely by Credit Card debt knowing that you always will get an annual raise that will pay of your credit card debt. All of a sudden you get no raise, you cannot pay of your debt. You have to save and cut spending to adapt to the new conditions. The US has to stop living on debt and face reality a nation is no different than a person. There is however one difference and that is that you can consume today and let future generations pay the bill, this has got to be stopped.

Everybody has to live on their means.

The choice of Joel Klein is excellent, it has nothing to do with the perception that Obama has to stand up to the Teachers Union. It is vital with educational reform; action not perception.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Living Within Our Means Has Many Options
Posted by: bryangalt on Dec 11, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that we cannot afford to educate our young (or even our old for that matter) is almost the dumbest comment I've ever read. The followup that we have to make "hard choices" has me a little steamed too.

Let's look at the places where the real hard choices should be getting made before we consign our society to a never ending spiral of stupid is as stupid does mentality:

1. Department of Defense: If there ever existed a BLACK HOLE of money expenditures, this is it. Current DOD allocations over $1 trillion this year. DO YOU FEEL SAFER THAN LAST YEAR?

2. Department of Homeland Security/DOJ: FBI, DEA, Federal Corrections System, Courts: We wasted hundreds of billions of dollars on pointless drug interdiction programs world wide and hundreds of billions more incarcerating people for pot right in in the US. It is a FACT that we have the world's highest prison population, both in physical bodies in jail and per 1,000 stats. Nearly half of the people we have in jail are there on drug charges.

3. THE REST OF THE FED'S FAT ASS BUDGET: If we looked at all the programs that are in effect right now, we would probably be stunned at how many of them are just wasted cash. Of course, we need some educated peeple to add up them nummers right? Yeah right.

EDUCATION is the key to America's success historically and it is essential to America's survival in the future. You don't have to be a college PHd to see the correlation between the drop in education spending and the increase in prison spending.

We have the choice to make, that is clear. Will we continue to allow ourselves to get stupider by the day or will we stop, ponder and conclude that without education for everyone, we are dooming our future generations to be nothing but a bunch of couch potato dipshits who will find the high point of future careers working for Walmart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMG, Greg, you're a barbituate leftie!
Posted by: DaBear on Dec 11, 2008 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch out! Tim Wise is gonna deck you, Greg!

How dare you say Prez-O is bein' stoopid! He's the messiah for frack's sake!

Seriously though, this is just owning-class wisdom at work out in the open. I'm sure Obama has his verses from the Secret memorized, has his little pictures of how great 'Merkuh is... oops sorry, how 'Merkuh is the greatest nation on the earth, how eddicshun will improve with Joel Klein, he' believes therefore it'll come to pass. Positive thoughts, optimism [said with the Denobulan grin].

The same class of people who brought the economy down cannot possibly be the same group of people to save it. Same for education, the same asshats who brought us NCLB and standards-based education cannot possibly be the ilk that will solve it the craptasm they created.

Wake up, 'Merkuh! Ya' been done bamboozled by the owning class dog and pony show. JDFU (Hugo! Where are ya?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He should of utilized John Edwards
Posted by: even(nik) on Dec 11, 2008 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edwards really shock things up in the early primaries greater than many people realize against big odds, and is a very good and competant public relations face. He also showed when push came to shove that he was loyal to his party and dropped out.
Obama and Edwards would know each other quite well and be comfortable with each other, and he would be a good ally for Obama to have as he would add to the popularity of Obama or be able to be wheeled out when needed for that at least.
His sex scandel was over before he really hit his stride in his bid, and i think was at a time when Edwards was shedding an older skin of sorts. Edwards will be personally better for having gone through that although i'm sure wishes that he hadn't gone through it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Trust Our Democratic Leaders at Our Peril
Posted by: jimswanson on Dec 12, 2008 12:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
James A. Swanson, Los Altos, CA
www.bushleagueofnations.com [For FREE download of entire book]

It’s difficult to imagine that anyone Obama would appoint could prove to be as bad as Michael Brown was in disaster relief.

Nevertheless, I read Greg Palast’s intelligent article with interest because I was already alarmed by Obama’s appointment of so many center-right, business-as-usual politicians.

Would Obama take the same approach with something as important as education?

In any case, let’s remember that real progressive transformation of our nation must be driven from the grassroots up, not from the “top down” by business-as-usual career politicians.

Electing Obama was the easy part. The real work begins today, and again tomorrow, and again each day thereafter.

We must stay engaged, take names, and never give up. Let’s redouble our efforts.

Republican Neanderthals in Congress can be counted on to be, well, Neanderthals. They are thus “reliable.” But as for our Democratic leaders, we trust them at our peril.

We must keep our friends close, our enemies closer, and our Democratic leaders closest.

Jim Swanson, Los Altos, CA
www.bushleagueofnations.com [for FREE download of entire book]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Testing is a Tool
Posted by: gar1948 on Dec 12, 2008 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Testing, like computers or books, is just a tool. Should all computers be condemned because some parents allow their children to use them strictly for "shooter" computer games? Should all books be burned because some are pornographic?

Testing is like anything else. I personally believe it has its place in education. However, it is just a tool. Like any tool, it can be misused and abused by fools and charlatans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

realitygirl
Posted by: realitygirl on Dec 12, 2008 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are some schools in this country that are excellent. They are well run without the contradictions of what a teacher is expected to do and without a reformer who comes in to harass and fire teachers. They produce low test scores only to justify the behavior as an improvement. Teachers have always been fired. In the past many teachers were hired and retained based upon unprofessional reasons. The tenure laws came about for teachers as was done for lots of jobs in this society because of unfair treatment in the same way which is done today by REFORMERS- hire teachers at the beginning of the year and fire a teacher at the end of the year without any just cause. Accountability is expected from the top down. The same applies to education. If administrators HARASS and ABUSE teachers (and students) without any reason except that they can no longer take the heat (most often in high poverty and very political schools), then they should get out of the kitchen or get fired. The education system does not need burned out professionals or new professionals without an education background(children are not factory parts in a business). Educators need administrators who create an environment for learning, supplies in the building w/out using teachers' personal money, and a great curriculum that has not been watered down like the "No Child Left Behind" standards. That curriculum is for students who are not up to the grade level. Money has not been given to this program (there goes the supplies) and those students in mostly affluent areas benefit because money is given to the money areas for better teachers, better buildings, more varied courses, and sometimes excellent principals. Please remember that lots of affluent schools are in white neighborhoods.
Students from low performing schools fail because there is a lack of support from everyone. All of these parents are not partying. Some cannot read and cannot help their children in basic courses.
I am tired of failing schools left behind because teachers do not want to go there, incompetent principals are sent to these schools to cause more failure (even a low performing student can fire people).
The schools do not need more incompetent leaders who are REFORMERS TO FIRE PEOPLE. The schools need stable, consistent, and educated people(not a business person) to run the schools and increase student learning. The No Child Left Behind is like the economic meltdown with everyone grabbing at straws.
I agree, the schools do not need another Reformer which is very much akin to AIG with too much abusive power, no regulation for a budget, and no accountability to teachers and students.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]