Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Republicans Bring Socialism to Millionaires and Screw the Rest of Us

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted December 11, 2008.


If tough love is good enough for financially strapped families, why have a poverty program for troubled corporations?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Robert Scheer

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Let the record show that it was George W. Bush, the rich Texas Republican, who brought socialism to America, so don’t blame it on that African-American Chicago Democrat community organizer who made it into the White House. The government takeover of the banking and automobile industries not only happened on President Bush’s watch, it was also the deregulatory mania of this president’s family, beginning with his father, which took this country into such starkly unfamiliar territory.

What a betrayal of free-market capitalism. And who would have thought that it would be the candidates backed by conservative pundits Bill O’Reilly and Rush Limbaugh who made it possible? You actually could trace the destruction of corporate capitalism to the much-ballyhooed “Reagan Revolution” of the movie actor who got his main training for the presidency as a huckster for General Electric, where he honed the message of “getting government off our backs.” The revolution of unfettered corporate capitalism led to an era of unfettered corporate greed, which sowed the seeds of its own destruction.

True, the Democrats deserve much blame. The Wall Street runaway wouldn’t have happened if President Bill Clinton hadn’t cheered it on. The Great Triangulator provided seamless continuity between the administrations of the two Bushes in systematically dismantling the proven regulatory system, introduced by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, that saved capitalism from itself during the Great Depression. The danger with the incoming Democratic president is that Barack Obama has turned to some of the Clinton alums, most prominently former Clinton Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, to get us out of the mess that the Clinton administration worked mightily to create.

At least in the auto bailout there is some talk from the Democrats that the failed corporate leaders must be fired as a condition of salvaging their corporate entities -- and stock options. Both political parties are tougher in the auto bailout than they were in the Wall Street rescue, but what do you expect when leadership on this issue is coming from Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson? Like Robert Rubin, Clinton’s first treasury secretary and now Obama confident, Paulson came to government service immediately after heading up Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street powerhouse at the epicenter of the banking collapse. For the key practitioners of America’s brave new game of corporate socialism, failure has its own lush reward.

It’s enough to drive one back to the invisible hand of Adam Smith. Personally, I would rather we took our chances these days with letting the corporations sink or swim on their own without government interference. If tough love was good enough for troubled families cut off the public dole by Clinton’s welfare reform, which summarily ended the federal poverty program, why have a poverty program for troubled corporations?

Forget saving the auto companies; let them become Japanese- or South Korean-owned, but sweeten the deal with U.S. government guarantees of extended unemployment insurance, health care, retirement plan protection and job retraining for laid-off autoworkers. Be generous on the worker end, and figure out ways to reclaim the big bucks from the banking and auto moguls who ripped off the American dream. The only reason the moguls are not going to jail for their shenanigans is that they got their supplicants in Congress from both parties to rewrite the laws to legalize activities that should have been judged as crimes.

If we are to have an expansion of government on this scale, we should start with extending health coverage to all Americans rather than with government bureaucrats micromanaging auto companies. Government-insured health care works. All the doctors I see want me to be on Medicare, and not one of them is eager to deal with the medical insurance provided to me as a retiree after 30 years of employment by the Los Angeles Times -- insurance now threatened by my once-proud capitalist employer seeking bankruptcy protection. A protection, incidentally, that a bipartisan congressional majority made much more difficult for individuals to use when we get in personal financial trouble.

With the exception of my years as an undergraduate, when I sorted mail late into the night at the post office near Manhattan’s Grand Central Terminal, I have never been on the public payroll. Thanks to the Reagan Revolution, and its endgame of socialism for the rich, we all may end up on the public dole, scrambling for droppings from a too heavily laden nationalized table. Socialism for the rich is not the way to go.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, socialism, economy, health care, wall street, reagan, free market, bailout, financial crisis, adam smith

Robert Scheer is Editor in Chief of Truthdig and author of a new book, The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's Time To Do Away With The Myth Of "The Creators Of Wealth"
Posted by: ZPaul on Dec 11, 2008 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Millions of people around the world are no longer buying this monumental fraud against humanity-and their numbers are growing. We are coming to realize that the extravagant promises of the advocates of the global economy are based on a number of myths that have become so deeply embedded in Western industrial culture that we have grown to accept them without examination.

* The myth that growth in GNP is a valid measure of human well-being and progress.

* The myth that free unregulated markets efficiently allocate a society's resources.

* The myth that growth in trade benefits ordinary people.

* The myth that economic globalization is inevitable.

* The myth that global corporations are benevolent institutions that if freed from governmental interference will provide a clean environment for all and good jobs for the poor.

* The myth that absentee investors create local prosperity."

- David C. Corten, "When Corporations Rule The World"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Nationalization IS NOT Socialism!
Posted by: corey on Dec 11, 2008 2:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why Nationalization IS NOT Socialism!

All the recent chatter on radio, blogs, news and the "water cooler" spout negatively about Socialism.

Here is why the U.S.A is and is not a Socialist country already;

First - Socialism is when the people are in control of the government, as in “We the People”.

If our "representatives" actually listened to us, and did what we asked of them, this would be a Socialist country.

But they do not!
Second - Socialism is when "community" or the "commons" is shared and funded by “We the People”.

This is partially true because the public, “We the People”, pay taxes that support our fire, police, public schools, post offices, and other unities, we all share.

The unfortunate situation with this is that, corporations are avowed “personhood” while also getting tax-breaks, that are geared for a “trickle-down” effect that would allow corporations to hire more people.

But they do not !

They take these “tax-breaks”, pay their CEOs a high salary, and if the company is owned by another country, they send all the income to that country.

Not putting the money back into the community, the commons, those utilities that “We the People” fund, like the roads they drive, the fire engines that save their buildings when they catch fire, and the police that show up when they are broken into.

What is that?

That is NOT Socialism, that is Corporatism.

Many of our Founding Fathers and others since that time, warned us about this, and what a disaster this would be.

So, the USA is moving further away from a Socialist country, where “We the People” matter!

For more information about how Nationalism IS not Socialism check out this article:
http://www.coreymondello.com/NationalismISnotSocialism.html:


For more information about what the principles of the Socialist Party USA are check out this page: http://www.coreymondello.com/SocialistPartyUSA.html


Be sure to check out this informative artclce: 'Socialism, Historical Truth and the Crisis of Political Thought in the United States: http://www.coreymondello.com/SocialismHistory.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

flawed premise
Posted by: socialpsych on Dec 11, 2008 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's happening is not socialism. It is privatization of the public treasury. Rather than capitalism failing, it is thriving at the expense of the commonwealth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FUCK THE G.O.P.
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 11, 2008 3:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From "The Rant" - July 14, 2006:

They have cut the throats of the poor and the middle classes; They have looted our national treasure; They have abandonred their constituancy in favor of a muti-national corporate behemoth and an out-of-control military industrial complex; They have created a geo-political catastrophe in the Middle East that will take at least a century to remedy; They have shoveled a generation of American children into an untenable quagmire slaughterhouse in Iraq; They have engendered an economic nightmare so immense that generations yet unborn will still be bearing its burden; They have sold our beloved nation's soul to the highest corporate bidder; They have made a mockery of the First Ammendment; They have squandered a five trillion dollar surplus with a tax cut for a class of people who already had more money than they knew what to do with; They have gutted vital social programs which aid the poor and elderly that have been in place for three quarters of a century; They have turned federal emergancy management into a sick joke; They have knocked the teeth out of laws meant to protect working men and women; They have plundered our environment; They have depleted our educational system; They have hijacked out nation's political dialogue; They have ruined our international reputation; They have handed our domestic agenda over to religious fanatics; They have denied voting rights to people of color in three states; They have stolen two natinal elections; They have tramples our Constitution; They have sent our Bill of Rights through the sausage grinder....

They must never be allowed to govern our country again.

The grand old party is over.

John Lennon 1940-1980

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FUCK THE G.O.P. Posted by: DHFabian
» Do for Self Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: Do for Self Posted by: solrev
» RE: Do for Self Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: Do for Self Posted by: yale
» RE: Do for Self Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
I Laugh At the Gasps of Everyday Republicans
Posted by: bryangalt on Dec 11, 2008 3:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a staunchly progressive individual that believes in the ideals of our constitution. I also happen to live in the most conservative section of California, the are in the Central Valley where people believe Bush was a godsend, gays are demons sent to torment and anyone not a Christian already has a reservation in Hell.

This week, ironically, these same narrow, underdeveloped individuals are flooding their Republican Representatives with complaints about the bailouts and how the Bush administration has handled them so poorly. Wow.

You would think that people who have such clarity of their convictions would have been a lot harder to make into bitches. Yep, Bush and his billionaire pals are laughing all the way to the bank, with their money too. And suddenly they think something has gone awry.

WELCOME TO THE PARTY BITCHES! It was a long and expensive trip into the light for you wasn't it. It is was is classicaly referred to as an oxymoron that poor folk would call themselves Republicans, that they would vote for Republican representatives who quite literally couldn't give a shit about them or their well being and yet they thought they were part of the same social club.

Who's laughing now? Well, I am. Aren't you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why is Bush so dumb? Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
Democrats own socialism
Posted by: 2thepoint on Dec 11, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets not forget Barney Franks famous speech after he thought that HE hammered out the first bailout and the republicans did nothing but try to block it!..

Let it be shown that it was Barney Franks and Nancy Pelosi that pushed for the bailout while most republicans were against it in it's current form. What Bush wanted the democrats gave him.. True republican's were against it.

The first round of the bail out was a disaster and now everyone is running from it?.. Sorry Barney, it's following you and Nancy!

now, add universal health care to this and tell me who owns socialism in this country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As long as we the LOSER electorate keep picking between D and R,
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 11, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
things will just get WORSE !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reversed Socialism
Posted by: DHFabian on Dec 11, 2008 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny, isn't it? At any hint of an idea that would benefit the people, the political right-wing issues dire warnings about the "socialist scheme of wealth redistribution" -- yet "wealth redistribution" is precisely what the right-wing has promoted, and the government has been doing, for the past 30 years. The catch is that the wealth redistribution has been from the bottom up, pushing the average American deeper into poverty while wildly increasing the wealth of those in the top 5%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most of Those Republicans ...
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Dec 11, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... Lost There re-election bids!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Socialism for all
Posted by: bolivar on Dec 11, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Mr. Scheer. Perhaps we have reached the point when we hold on our right hand the rope to hung ourselves and on the left a rock to throw at our glass house. There is no socialism when corporations own the government, it is fascism. Our State has not socialized big business and corporations, corporations have corporatized government. The plunder and the rape will continue unless 'we the people' demand the guillotine for the greedy. Enough is enough. Change will not come because is the moral thing to do, it will be attained when we demand and fight for socialism for all. If we do not demand justice, we'll continue accepting past criminals us our present heroes and be content when our capital's airport is named after him or a demand for his face on Mount Rushmore is made. Is our choice. wake up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Socialism for all Posted by: using
It's nether socialism or communism
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Dec 11, 2008 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plain and simple it is welfare for the rich! This is welfare that we the people are paying for! The fact that now those "Conservative Christian Republicans" are a bit bitchy NOW, this is exactly what we all get when people don't think! When all of you "ideology driven non-thinking Christians" stop buying the bs culture dividing crap! When all of you "ideology driven non-thinking Christians" stop believing that these criminals give a d-mn about them or their "interests"! That these criminals are voting for legislation in their interests, or really trying to help them! Hopefully their eyes have been opened to the truth!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is so Dumb
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Dec 11, 2008 12:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But Nancy and Smelly Reid with the rest of the Democrats in Congress were willing to give President Bush everything he wanted.
For most whom like to forget: the Democrats Control Congress!
I know most of you will just become Obama's bag men because the Republicans you rail against, lost there re-election bits. Whom are you going to blame in 2010, 2012... Bush?
That will get old, FAST.
You Libs better start having solutions that work fast and dont be to quick to fly the "mission accomplish" banner instead of bashing over the head the half of America that does not agree with you.
Results and Accounablity!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush is so Dumb Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Bush is so Dumb Posted by: 2thepoint
Who Pushed the Bailout of the Financial Industry and Who is Pushing the Bailout of Detroit? DEMS
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Dec 11, 2008 3:01 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans have been fighting against this corporate socialism. Things are not as clear as the author would like us to believe by his title.

I think the author is biased against Republicans and cannot see that his own 'team' is just as responsible for corporate welfare and in the case of the recent welfare, that Democrats are even more responsible for it.

It's the monkeysphere, Dunbar's number, and this author is just another mindless oblivious monkey.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Socialism........
Posted by: gellero1 on Dec 11, 2008 5:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Used to be defined as Fascism. The Democrats are deep into it.....deep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tired Argument
Posted by: VicJuans on Dec 11, 2008 6:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this old news to call uber-Capitalism Socialism? After all it is just the worst side of capitalism exposed.

Good points made here: http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/printer_28631.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hold On Just A Minute
Posted by: tommytime on Dec 11, 2008 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is someone trying to re-write history here?

Wasn't it the house republicans that tried to stop the banker's bailout? They voted it down the first time.
Didn't Barak Obama speak out in favor of the bailout? I think I remember that pretty clearly.
Isn't it the Democrats who are trying to push through the bailout for the auto makers? Isn't Nancy Pelosi a Democrat? Or did she pull a 'Lieberman' while I wasn't looking??
Isn't it the G.O.P. that is trying to stop the auto bailout?

The Republicans have been a blight on this country for the last eight years... but they are generally against the bailouts. Bush excluded of course. But he is not really a republican is he? He's more of a globalist neo-conservative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Darkness cometh
Posted by: talkville on Dec 13, 2008 2:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If one adds to the word "Social" the appendage "ism", a vast range of meanings immediately spring to the mind. After all, if I go to a party I am engaged in 'socialism'. That is, associating with others in order to have a good time.

What good to continue to muddy waters already thick with sediment??

As long as there's a "rest of us" we are in Class relations. When one Class co-opts a political terminology of the other class (theft) no change or easing of Class relations is implied. This co-optation has a long and interesting history, along with a history of "left-right" alignments (or 'democrat'-'republican', or 'liberal'-'progressive', etc.)

As long as there's a 'rest of us' there is a Class Struggle, there are Class contradictions, and there are Class relations of domination.

In any case, regardless of the specific Term of Art used, if there's a "rest of us" it is this Class that is the dominated, beat up, mutilated and otherwise expendable in so many ways that must clarify the language and, and, and, ORGANIZE in order to MEET that other Class with EQUAL power in that DIALOGUE that will one day OVERCOME these CLASS contradictions.

One thing's for sure: if there's a "rest of us", there is no justice, there is no freedom, there is no dignity; there is only the Animal and not the Man (or Woman).

There's the Socialism that Marx spoke of; there's the Socialism that Hitler spoke of; there's the Socialism that Stalin spoke of; there's the Socialism that the Bourgeoisie speaks of. There are many "Socialisms". Why continue to muddy the Big Muddy? What "the rest of us" need desperately is Clarity, Demystification. Not only Class Consciousness but the awareness of Class Consciousness.

P.S. A curious factoid in the form of a Question: Why, in England, does it seem like there are NO republicans (or Republicans)? But there ARE Liberals and Conservatives, no? Citizens of this USA might do well to ponder such things these days, especially in the political and economic realms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MY TRASH MAN IS RUNNING! Posted by: reelman