Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Bikes Point the Way to a Sustainable Future

By Chris Carlsson, AKPress. Posted December 18, 2008.


Bicycling subcultures signal a sensibility that stands against oil wars, environmental devastation, urban decay and monocultural sprawl.
nowtopiafront

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Chris Carlsson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: The following is an excerpt from "Nowtopia: How Pirate Programmers, Outlaw Bicyclists, and Vacant-Lot Gardeners Are Inventing the Future Today!" by Chris Carlsson, published by AK Press, 2008.

[In] this bike subculture there's no person who is the best, who is winning, or getting the most money. It's a pretty equal community in that everyone can excel, but not have to be the top dog -- Robin Havens

A funny thing happened during the last decade of the 20th century. Paralleling events that transpired a century earlier, a social movement emerged based on the bicycle. This "movement" is far from a unified force, and unlike the late 19th century bicyclists, this generation does not have to rally around the demand for "good roads." Instead, "chopper" bike clubs, nonprofit do-it-yourself repair shops, monthly Critical Mass rides, organized recreational and quasi-political rides and events, and an explosion of small zines covering every imaginable angle of bicycling and its surrounding culture, have proliferated in most metropolitan areas. Month-long "Bikesummer" festivals have occurred in cities around North America since 1999, galvanizing bicyclists across the spectrum into action and cooperation.  

This curious, multifaceted phenomenon constitutes an important arena of autonomous politics. The bicycle has become a cultural signifier that begins to unite people across economic and racial strata. It signals a sensibility that stands against oil wars and the environmental devastation wrought by the oil and chemical industries, the urban decay imposed by cars and highways, the endless monocultural sprawl spreading outward across exurban zones. This new bicycling subculture stands for localism, a more human pace, more face-to-face interaction, hands- on technological self-sufficiency, reuse and recycling, and a healthy urban environment that is friendly to self-propulsion, pleasant smells and sights, and human conviviality.  

Bicycling is for many of its adherents both a symbolic and practical rejection of one of the most onerous relationships capitalist society imposes: car ownership. But it's much more than just an alternative mode of transit. A tall, rugged blonde man in his mid-thirties, Megulon-5, an inspirational character in Portland, Oregon's C.H.U.N.K. 666 group, declares, "We are preparing for a post-apocalyptic future with different laws of physics." It sounds off-kilter at first, but there is a rising tide of local activists in most communities who accept the Peak Oil arguments. Many are already organizing themselves directly and indirectly towards a post-petroleum way of life. It may not alter physics exactly, but it certainly implies a radical change in our relationship to energy resources and ecology.  

The explosion of zany and whimsical, practical and political self-expression via bicycling comprises a deeply rooted oppositional impulse that challenges core values of our society. The bicycle has become a device that connotes self-emancipation, as well as artistic and cultural experimentation. The playfulness and hands-on tinkering in the subculture is spawning new communities that can be framed as emerging sites of working class re-composition.  

The "outlaw" bicycling subculture has no hierarchy flowing from wage differentials and ownership, because most of the culture takes place outside of monetary exchange or the logic of business. Instead, these bike hackers are all about doing, tinkering with the discarded detritus of urban life, inventing new forms of play, celebration, and artistic expression. Theirs is a culture that is re-produced in action, not affirmed in acts of passive consumption. Not just an isolated geek culture, it exists in real spaces and brings people together across age, class, race, and gender boundaries.  

I call it an "outlaw" bike subculture because it goes against that kind of good behavior norm that a lot of mainstream bicycle advocates promote. The outlaw subculture is not particularly concerned with wearing helmets (or even safety in general), having the latest gear, following traffic rules set up for cars, or seeking approval from mainstream society. A 2003 issue of Christian Science Monitor described a "mutant bike" culture. Critical Mass rides have been important arenas for staking out these counter-norms in the bike scene. Crucially, this counter-sensibility has attracted legions of youth, and is eroding the nerdy image that has helped reinforce bicycling's reputation as unhip (recently emphasized in the film 40 Year Old Virgin, for example).  


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: capitalism, environment, oil, bicycling

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
villager
Posted by: villager1 on Dec 18, 2008 1:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny how when something makes such incredibly good sense, such as cycling and self sustaining gardening, nobody cares to comment! We are actually too stupid to survive! We do not actually deserve to survive - we have no idea what life is actually all about! Cars, computers, tv's and cellphones and lots of money are all that really matter to us! Time to stop and smell the roses - what exactly is going to occur to enlighten us is anybody's guess, but I have a feeling that this civilization like all those before is doomed to extinction and we will be forced to change our ways! There will not be a choice for us - no debate or discussion needed! - change or perish!

A little like pretending that death only happens to other people and not to us! Some actually believe that too!

In light of the matters that interest the vast majority of humans (who consider themselves civilized), this topic is of no interest whatsoever.

I wonder how civilized we really are?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very cool
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Dec 18, 2008 3:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad there are folks out there bringing the bicycle back down to earth.

At the same time, I'm not so sure about the "outlaw" part as it pertains to the rules of the road. I don't like idiots and maniacs in cars who don't follow the rules. Why would I like those qualities in a cyclist?

I'll admit that some members of the "vehicular cycling" crowd can be a bit fanatical. But I appreciate their general approach of fighting for cyclists' right to the road, while asking cyclists to behave more responsibly for safety and sanity's sake.

I don't really want to get in the face of either the gung-ho yuppie cyclists or the car people, or speak in terms of us and them; I'll save that for politics. All I want is to be able to get from point A to point B (or nowhere in particular) safely, at my own pace, and without any hassles. Whatever it takes, I'm glad folks are out there doing their thing and bringing more diversity to the bicycle world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WHAT!? Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Sorry to hear abou your injuries Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» Organ donors Posted by: BlueTigress
A fascinating insight into one aspect of American culture
Posted by: akai ringo on Dec 18, 2008 3:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never having been to the U.S., I ask your indulgence for any ignorance that I inadvertently display. Judging from this article alone, the role that the bicycle plays in the U.S. is clearly very different from its role in Japan, where I live.

Here, although cycling clubs etc. do, I believe, exist, they are not much in evidence, and the bicycle, increasingly in recent years, accompanying the growth in the elderly population, battery-assisted, is much more closely integrated into everyday life. Many supermarkets, particularly in crowded urban areas, do not even have car parks, and even in the case of those that do, the number of people doing their shopping by bicycle far exceeds the number using a car. Mothers with babies, with the baby sitting comfortably in its basket on the front of the cycle, are an everyday sight. Cycle riders here could certainly do with a dose of American-style traffic discipline; sometimes they ride on the sidewarlk, sometimes on the road, on the right and on the left, but in general, using a bicyle makes ecological common sense and may also be one contributory reason why you only rarely see a Japanese of any age who can be called obese.

Of course, your city planning system needs to be geared to the use of the bicycle. Because most people commute into work in large cities by public transport, every suburban station is surrounded by cycle parks, and unauthorized cycle parking is being clamped down on quite heavily. But as the no-oil era approaches, a cycke-based, instead of a car-based, way of life is perhaps something Americans might begin to contemplate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How very, very sane! Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: How very, very sane! Posted by: akai ringo
Not Exactly
Posted by: Yankeeinexile on Dec 18, 2008 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"And few people eschew that path and refuse to drive; for many, in spite of the financial burden, getting a car is an urgent priority of growing up, of establishing maturity."

Actually, if you don't live in a close urban community where public transportation or walking get you to job/grocery/Dr., a car is a necessity. Of course you have to have a job and earn money to get the car, but you have to have the car to get to the job to get the money to get the car..... A horrible Catch-22 many poor find themselves in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pair by the word?
Posted by: underledge on Dec 18, 2008 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading this article is painful. There is too much garbage stuffed into its rambling sentences of 30 or more words. Whatever the author is trying to convey should easily have been contained in one page.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So--what about us in rural areas?
Posted by: zooeyhall on Dec 18, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in rural Nebraska, the nearest town is 400 people with virtually no retail stores. The nearest retail center is 30 miles away, and also the nearest source of decent employment.

Sorry, but the won'drous advice of "riding bikes" just ain't gonna be practical out here for people like me, and the millions of others who live in rural areas. Would love to see you try and ride your bike down I80 here in Nebraska (bikes are forbidden on the interstate, btw).

Like so many other articles of this type, I find a disturbing ignorance on the part of the authors about middle America. They DO realize that the big land area between San Francisco and New York City IS occupied by people? Don't they? Or looking down from their 707 when flying over, do they imagine it occupied by Indians yet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» zooey- point well taken Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» Farmers are an exception Posted by: tommy_slothrop
and in cities with huge hills??
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Dec 18, 2008 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and in cities with huge hills bikes are tougher.
i live just outside of san francisco and the hills are HUGE from the coast, up and over, to the bay. there are not bike with power assist strong enough to get a person up a 1.5 mile hill with a 20% grade.
when that happens, biking will be accessible to most californians

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Builds character Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: and in cities with huge hills?? Posted by: Outsidetheboxlookingin
I am making a strange connection with a very old story
Posted by: Beck on Dec 18, 2008 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone remember the part of the Exodus story where God makes the Hebrews wander the wilderness until the slave generation dies out, because a generation raised in bondage can't begin life in freedom? I think I finally understand that and see parallels. Somehow many of us seem very enslaved, to the point where alternatives to our unsustainable lifestyles are instantly rejected. These articles are followed by so much dismissive negativity, it gets hard to see how we move forward. Every article can't possibly apply to every person in every city, town, village, or farm, yet the article will be completely rejected and criticized if it (of course) doesn't live up to impossible standards.

Something has gone wrong. Maybe there's a kind of psychic enslavement that truly has snared some people and it just can't be avoided, and you aren't the "tribe" that's going to move us forward to a different way of life. But some of us feel very able to get free of what we can plainly see holding us back. There's enough frustration built into the system without solutions needing to be perfect before they can even be presented, needing to apply to everyone even if they're working for a sizable group already.

I don't see this as impossible, this move to a better way of life, and many writers and commenters don't either. If those of you who find every solution irritating and exclusive are right, we're doomed anyway. But maybe let the rest of us keep trying, and stop worrying if what I'm doing in my flat, crowded, polluted, extremely-bike-UNfriendly city doesn't apply to you. It's gaining steam here. If it can be growing here of all places, there is hope. Maybe sit back, relax, and then take a deep breath and yell, "YAY! People in Detroit are beginning to bike more, alot more! A bad way of life is changing! Good for you, former Motor City."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I remember when sidewalks were being created here in VA Beach for bicylists and yet
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 18, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
immediately, the rightwing loonies in the local media and newspapers complain about sidewalks and bicycle paths being a waste of taxpayer money even at a time when traffic congestion along with major accidents and explosions on the roads become more commonplace. Until America gets rid of its societal intolerance for bikers, things will only get worse before they get better. Further more, even in cases where the distance between home and work can be greater than 10 miles, when so much money is wasted on idiotic HOV lanes which do NOTHING to reduce global warming but simply shift the traffic onto the streets and increase traffic congestion on the highway, one of the best solutions I ever heard of is to building a biker's infrastructure with TUNNELLING which can especially address the issues of bad weather. It costs far more to maintain roads where cars drive than it does to maintain bike driven roads. Think about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tunneling Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Tunneling Posted by: maxpayne
Imagine. Show up to work sweat-soaked
Posted by: harpy on Dec 18, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because you rode a bike in the summer heat for miles. Get real. This can only work where there are relatively short distances to go to get to work or to shop. My nearest grocery store is about 5 miles away. That's 5 miles of hills, twisting curves, and maniac car drivers. Or better yet, put a handicapped or aged person on a bicycle to fend against those cars whizzing by.
It sounds great, but unless you live in an area where everything is close by, with bike lanes, and relatively small amount of steep grades, this just won't work for most of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sweat Posted by: kepstein7777
Biking in winter isn't transit, it's an adventure sport.
Posted by: doubter on Dec 18, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's wrong with mass transit? Before the car, there were streetcars and electric commuter railroads all over North America. Much safer, especially for seniors. Riding a bike in winter when there are cars on the road is a good way to get killed. I am from Ontario, and was rear-ended by some twit who didn't know cars slide on ice. If I had been on a bike it would have been game over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Obvious Why People Bash The Solutions...
Posted by: Uriahz on Dec 18, 2008 1:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fear and denial.

The fact is that due to the cultural and economic changes we are now undergoing, the era of cheap and easy commuting is coming to an end. People all over the country have seen their property values plummet. Well I've got news for you: those of you who don't live in biking distance (5 miles or so) of shopping and job opportunities will not see your property values recover. Cities that are bicycle unfriendly will be hit so much harder in the next five years than those places that are working to integrate and localize their infrastructure. I'll tell you right now: if you live in some far-flung exurban development, you are getting fucked in the near future, and hard. If all your neighborhood has is a couple gas stations, you will be getting fucked.

Just because gas is cheap right now doesn't mean it will be six months from now. It is artificially low right now because the foreign countries and corporations that set oil prices had raised their prices so much so fast that it caused an economic slowdown that threatened the worldwide demand for oil, and so they have cut back the price to keep the world economy from collapsing, and to discourage spending on sustainable energy. Yes, the price of oil is THAT important to the economy, as evidenced in the 70s during the oil embargo and the 80s-90s when cheap oil spurned massive development, the rise of exurbs and unbearably bad traffic all throughout the country. It's not okay. It's unsustainable and it's going to bankrupt a whole lot of folks in the next decade.

And incidentally, if it DOESN'T bankrupt a whole lot of folks in the next decade, we are truly and rightly fucked when the perils of climate change come knocking on our door. The fact is that the bike movement, in concert with the local organic food movement and the renewable energy movement and the global peace movement and the economic justice movement, which you might as well throw together under the rubric of a widespread and largely disorganized change movement that is ultimately identified by a real cultural shift among people all over the world, that shift we are seeing is the ONLY hope for the continued existence of civilization, with all its pacifying and health-promoting benefits. If we don't change our ways now, we go back to living to 45 years old if we're lucky, we go back to widespread global starvation, and endless wars with our neighbors and perceived enemies at home. We go back to the dark ages, and that's if we don't kill ourselves off entirely in the next century.

But there is an alternative, and those who pursue it will have a vastly more rewarding life. A life that is actually easier, that is less affected by the vagaries of economies and oil prices, that is more connected with our community, that is sustainable and stable and just and inclusive and free. It is possible, and the will to survive alone will make it happen, because the alternative is unacceptable. Change your ways. Cut your losses, and join the movement. Do your part, and together we can ensure that we and our children have a future worth looking forward to, one that doesn't have to mean the death of billions of people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Convergence
Posted by: Urgelt on Dec 18, 2008 1:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with bikes is, of course, there is no trunk.

Cars really do serve a useful purpose, after all. There's no ready alternative for the simple chore of hauling groceries and shopping. Most of us aren't growing our own food or making our own stuff, and that means we need transportation.

Bikes are great for recreation, or maybe for short commutes if you don't have to haul a lot of cargo along. Or stop for groceries on the way home from work. So bikes will always be a niche, not very important for most of us most of the time.

Right?

Actually, there are two trends in bicycle design that might turn that conclusion on its head. One is the cargo utility bicycle. These come in many shapes and sizes, but a noteworthy one is embodied in the World Bike program (Google it for more info). The Yuba Mundo (Google that, too) is a model available in America which conforms to the World Bike mandate. It can haul up to 400+ lbs of cargo, yet looks and rides pretty much like bikes are expected to look and ride. Slightly scaled down from the Yuba Mundo is Surly's Big Dummy frame, designed to haul around 200+ lbs of cargo and still ride like the bikes we're all familiar with.

The other trend in bikes that is worth noting is electrification. The sad truth is that most of us (me included) aren't in the kind of physical shape that would make hauling a lot of cargo on a bike, especially in hilly terrain, very practical. Electrifying a bike can compensate for that little problem.

An electric-propulsion cargo utility bike can travel at a good clip, handle hills with ease, haul considerable cargo, and let you decide how hard to pedal.

There aren't, as yet, any ready-for-sale electric-propulsion cargo utility bikes available on the market in the US. But all the components exist. It's possible to build your own, or have a savvy bike shop do it for you.

I've commissioned a bike shop in North Carolina to build an electrified Big Dummy. It should be finished in January. It will be capable of putting out over 90+ ft-lbs of torque at low speed, so I don't expect hills to be a problem. It's got oversized panniers and a trailer hitch, and I've already acquired a Cycletote trailer to use with it. The bike will be capable of hauling as many groceries as you could possibly want to buy at one time. I wouldn't try to haul a sofa with it, but I think I could probably manage a big chair.

To encourage societal change, you don't have to ride your bike in the nude, or skip wearing a helmet, or obstruct traffic with hordes of obnoxious riders. You just have to think outside the box... and set an example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hauling and Sweating Posted by: ccarlsson
» RE: Hauling and Sweating Posted by: Beck
» RE: Convergence Posted by: Outsidetheboxlookingin
Bike cuffs
Posted by: rs_sternberg on Dec 18, 2008 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my neck of the woods, support for biking culture is shown by wearing bike cuffs: leaving the right cuff of your pants rolled up, all day long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bike cuffs Posted by: Beck
In a cast for 3 months after falling off bike after a bike trip home for work in...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 18, 2008 2:57 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the dark. Hit a potole, minus one wrist, + 1 toyota echo.

Bikes are not without personal cost, no matter the "greater gud" religious folks ascribe to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have not read comments from people in the suburbs
Posted by: PaulC on Dec 18, 2008 3:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A very large number of people live in the suburbs. Distances for these people are not as short as in the city but are still doable with proper planning.

So, instead of making many impulsive short trips we might want to plan a "shopping run" that involves a circuitous path hitting maybe four or more stores in one trip, getting some nice exercise at the same time.

The problem we face is there are no bike paths or lanes and most roads are simply not safe to ride a bike on.

This is apparently not understood by the author when he states that:

"this generation does not have to rally around the demand for "good roads."

The truth is that probably 50 percent of the US population lives in or near the suburbs and lacks decent, safe roads to ride on.

This is no accident. It was carefully planned that way over the past 60 years by the auto industry that had a lock on the Dept. of Transportation (recall the recently ousted John Dingell). It has been almost impossible to get money allocated for anything that could possibly compete with automobiles, especially bike lanes or paths.

In fact, the macho "good-ol-boys-clubs" that run most municipalities throughout the country display open contempt for suggestions that they spend money to accommodate bicycles. There is a visceral dislike of people who are not "of the body", generally being a conservative Republican mindset closely aligned with the Chamber of Commerce.

Taking that one step further, that is why we have sprawl in the first place - the unholy marriage between developers and municipal officers.

That is why it is absolutely necessary for the federal government to lead the way with personal leadership from the President on lifestyle changes such as this, combined with federal dollars to increase its appeal to municipal leaders. Governors can play a huge role here as well.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You raise a good point but Posted by: limburger
When has Amtrak not struggled to survive?! LOL!
Posted by: PaulC on Dec 19, 2008 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is pathetic, especially when you think about how different things could have been since we were really building from the ground up and could have done amazing things.

Instead we disavowed all planning and let chaos and greed define our development. Just total ignorance - and that is what we have, an inefficient sprawling mess built around decaying urban cores that spread further outward each year like some sort of bacteria culture in a petri dish.

Surely to someone viewing all of this from afar it must appear as a virus spreading over the earth, with the earth taking on a fever, man choking on his waste until he destroys himself.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two Americas
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 19, 2008 7:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a few communities that are Bicycle friendly- most are not. Many are unfriendly to the point of being dangerous or even deadly to cyclists. Unfortunately where I live and work happens to be one of those places and circumstances aren't likely to allow me to pick up and move to some Bike utopia.

While Obama is floating dump trucks of money on public works to put people back to work, we need to get pedestrian friendly and cyclist friendly projects in our community. The time to get the plans together is right now if not a long time ago.

The clock is running.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two Americas Posted by: Beck
What about cold climates?
Posted by: BlueTigress on Dec 19, 2008 9:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We got 8 inches of snow today with more on the way. Do they make snow tires for bicycles?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about cold climates? Posted by: limburger
» The ultimate freedom Posted by: limburger
Bikes are important but sniping among cyclists does not help
Posted by: Geeber on Dec 26, 2008 5:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Carlsson only has part of the story correct. He is right to point out the vibrant emerging bicycle counterculture, which does provide an alternative narrative to the car culture. What is not helpful is stoking the coals of disagreements among disparate parts of the cycling population. This debilitates the possibility of consolidating cycling as a political force by looking for common ground among the reformists and radicals. In the end, they need each other. If political consolidation can't be brought about, we will continue to labor in the car culture, and face the oncoming changes without much of a coherent plan that is accessible to the mainstream. Radicalism is fine as a counterpoint, but it also needs to offer a program that can be scaled up. We have enough polarization, punditry and fragmentation in this country, and it is debilitating to bringing real change. Go dig up the numbers from the transport researchers; more bikes on the road means safer roads for bicyclists. Reformists and radicals both have something to contribute to that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement