Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

9/11 Conspirators to Plead Guilty

By Andy Worthington, AlterNet. Posted December 8, 2008.


Are Khalid Sheikh Mohamed and his co-defendants focusing on their pursuit of martyrdom?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Happened to That Prosperity Tax-Cutters Promised Us?
Sam Pizzigati

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
10 Tips for a Sustainable Thanksgiving
Sarah Newman

Health and Wellness:
Is the House's Health Bill Really Worse than Nothing?
Joshua Holland

Immigration:
Hate Group, FAIR, Is Looking for "Ethnically Ambiguous" Actors to Amplify Its Racism
Adam Luna

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
Just When You Thought It Was Safe: 3 Potential Obstacles to Health-Care Reform
Adele M. Stan

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Obama Quietly Backs Renewing Patriot Act Surveillance Provisions
Willam Fisher

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Obama Will Announce 34,000-Troop Escalation in Afghanistan 'Within Days'

More stories by Andy Worthington

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In a genuinely surprising announcement from Guantánamo, the five men accused of plotting and facilitating the 9/11 attacks -- Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who stated in his tribunal at Guantánamo last March that he was "responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z," Ramzi bin al-Shibh, Mustafa al-Hawsawi, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Walid bin Attash -- have declared at today's pre-trial hearing that they "request an immediate hearing session to announce our confessions."

The hearing, which is supposed to last all week, has already attracted significant media attention, partly because relatives of some of the victims of the 9/11 attacks are in attendance, and partly because it was seen as the Bush administration's last attempt to justify its much-criticized "War on Terror" detention policies. In the run-up to the Presidential election, the Military Commissions had dropped off the media's radar, and almost no one turned up at Guantánamo in the last week of October when Ali Hamza al-Bahlul, an alleged al-Qaeda propagandist, received a life sentence after a disturbing one-sided show trial in which he refused to mount a defense.

This week's hearings were widely expected to involve further attempts to resolve some long-standing complaints regarding bin al-Shibh, whose lawyers maintain that he is mentally unfit to stand trial, and al-Hawsawi, whose lawyers contend that he has been bullied by his co-accused. It was also expected that, as in the arraignment in June, and a previous round of pre-trial hearings in September, Mohammed would take the opportunity to dominate the proceedings and to make sly references to his torture at the hands of U.S. forces.

What no one foresaw, however, was that Mohammed would use the global media spotlight to return to another theme that he mentioned during the arraignment six months ago: his desire to be martyred. And yet this, it seems, is exactly what has happened. The trial's new judge, Col. Stephen Henley, read from a document that was filed by all five defendants on November 4, the day of the Presidential election, following a number of previously undisclosed meetings between the men.

"We all five have reached an agreement to request from the commission an immediate hearing session in order to announce our confessions … with our earnest desire in this regard without being under any kind of pressure, threat, intimidations or promise from any party," their statement said.

As Mohammed lived up to expectations, slipping in a reference to torture when, after telling Henley, "I do not trust you," he added that he didn't trust an "agreement between Bush and the CIA who tortured me," Ali Abdul Aziz Ali also spoke out, assuring Henley that all five had reached their decisions willingly. "All of these decisions were undertaken by us without any pressure or influence by Khalid Sheikh," he said. "What was said or will be said by Khalid Sheikh will be repeated by us, also."

Quite what this means is not yet clear. As the Guardian explained, "The letter implies they want to plead guilty but does not make clear whether they will admit to any specific charges," although it does establish that they "wish to drop all previous defense motions." Bloomberg added that "Henley asked military prosecutors to submit legal briefs on whether the commission can 'accept a plea of guilty to a capital offense,'" and doubts also remain about the status of bin al-Shibh and al-Hawsawi, who are still represented by military attorneys.

As we await further clarification, I can only wonder if Mohammed and his co-defendants have indeed chosen to focus unerringly on their pursuit of martyrdom, and have decided that their best hope for advancing al-Qaeda's cause lies in trying to secure a conviction in the tainted Military Commissions of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney before Barack Obama can dismantle them.

This interpretation would seem to be borne out by an additional comment attributed to Mohammed by AFP: "We don't want to waste time." And as with every previous occasion when Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has had the eyes of the world's media upon him, I can only wonder who's really running the show.

 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: 9/11, war on terror, khalid sheikh mohammed, military commissions, guantánamo, ramzi bin al-shibh, mustafa al-hawsawi, ali abdul aziz ali, walid bin attash

Andy Worthington is a writer and historian, and author of The Guantánamo Files.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Some of the most outrageous lies about 9/11
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Dec 8, 2008 4:37 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is hard to pick a place to start in terms of talking about the most outrageous lies that the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission have presented to the people in this country as a reason to attack Afghanistan and Iraq and to launch a "fake war on terror".

The reason I say this is that I have been reading articles and watching videos about the lies and deceptions surrounding 9/11 for the past three years. If anything, there are so many obvious unanswered questions about 9/11. However, not only has no one answered any of these questions but in fact no one in the mainstream media nor anyone in the United States Congress except for Representative Kucinich and Cynthia McKinney have even asked these questions.

Some of these questions are:

1. How is it that at the crash site of Flight 93, NBC and Fox News on September 11, 2001 reported on the scene with video coverage that there was no sign of a jetliner, engines, bodies or luggage? You can go to my website which is www.911insidejob.net and watch this video report which is on my home page. It has never been shown again on the mainstream media.

2. How is it that three steel framed buildings on September 11, 2001 fell in freefall time on their footprint? If you watch the two Towers collapse, it is obvious that they are being blown up. No steel framed building prior to this date or after this date has ever collapsed due to fire. Many steel framed buildings have experienced burning infernos for many hours and never collapsed. WTC 7, a 50 story steel framed building, had two small fires in it with no noticeable structural damage when it collapsed on his footprint in freefall time at about 5:40 p.m. on September 11. You can watch this building collapse on the homepage my website.

Go to http://www.countercurrents.org/lopisi080208.htm for rest of article

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Erroneous Photo
Posted by: IntlDad on Dec 8, 2008 4:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there a reason Alternet posted this article with the photo of Sadam Husain? Do you folks see some sort of connection between him and 9/11?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Erroneous Photo Posted by: MHolt
I thought they mean Bush & Cheney were going to confess!
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Dec 9, 2008 12:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many people rightly suspect that Cheney allowed 9/11 to proceed on purpose!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the last act before the final curtain in the bogus 9/11 narrative
Posted by: realtruther on Dec 9, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By now most people realize that the official 9/11 narrative is only a convenient series of lies and obfuscations. Whoever this KSM is, he is clearly being offered deal to confess to something he didn't do (unless he was somehow connected with the planned explosive demolition of the twin towers and WTC building 7). Having a public trial in a real court would expose the case for his responsibility for 9/11 for the charade it is, so he and his alleged co-conspirators must make a show of "confessing" before the new administrations shuts down Guantanamo and the "justice" by military commission system.

For years I and many others including Ivy league professors (see Richard Falk), former CIA officials (see Bill Christison and Ray McGovern), foreign statesmen (see Michael Meacher, Giulietto Chiesa, and Yukihisa Fujita), not to mention hundreds of architecture and engineering professionals and scientists (see ae911truth.org), and diligent researchers like Professor David Griffin (see his latest book The New Pearl Harbor Revisited) have been pointing out the falsity of the established 9/11 narrative only to have our views distorted if addressed at all by people who simply refuse to acknowledge that there is any problem.

To those who agree with Chomsky's view that this is all irrelevant, I would caution that not establishing the falsity of the 9/11 narrative invites more such frauds, as the recent tragedy in Mumbai seems to be. Immediately one could recognize the same old pattern we have seen time and again since 9/11. Before the dust settles there are claims of responsibility by groups no one has ever heard of, followed by claims from "unnamed sources" in government or professional "terror experts" giving their opinion on who may be responsible, and of course reports of the "evidence" the attackers left behind (Koran and flight manual in the trunk of a rental car indeed!) designed to convince the gullible that every claim they see a talking head on TV make is the gospel truth.

By the time the public has been given this treatment any discussion of the facts that includes skepticism of the now-established narrative (not proven, mind you, just established in people's imagination) is derided as revisionism, conspiracy theory, or plain old terrorist-loving or America-hating or enemy-coddling. Thus are otherwise sane societies strong-armed into destructive actions which establish facts on the ground that make the truth irrelevant (no WMD in Iraq? oh, well, can't pull out now anyway!)

Those who genuinely seek peace and understanding have an obligation to demand the truth and settle for nothing less.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More Truthiness Madness Posted by: EncinoM
Andy Worthington needs investigated FACTS to report.
Posted by: Meremark on Dec 9, 2008 2:04 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Khalid Sheikh Mohhamed is credibly reported to be deceased. And Bush's Gitmo gulag has NEVER shown a photo of whoever Bush's torturers are holding there by that name.

(Relatedly, 6 of the 19 fabled hijackers are credibly reported to be alive, and still in their homes they never left. With photos.)

And here is Mike Ruppert's best comprehension of this.

A 9-11 CONFESSION WHOOPEE! -- NOW ABOUT THAT BRIDGE IN BROOKLYN

RUBICON readers are going to love this! OMIGOD. Khalid Sheikh Mohhamed wants to confess to 9-11... How convenient, just weeks before Bush/Cheney leave office. Maybe he'll get a pardon!
Wait a minute!... in Rubicon we published very credible stories from several reputable news agencies that KSM had been killed way back five years ago. Wait a minute!... KSM has never ONCE been seen in public since his reported capture.

If we get his "confession" I can almost guarantee that we will never see him in person. If we do, there are enough of us with pictures of the real KSM to tell a switcheroo. You, see, we caught them switching his photographs too. He ain't the chubby guy whose pic is out there. (I must give credit to Michel Chossudovsky for his absolutely brilliant work after 9-11.)

George W. Bush and Richard Cheney you are stupid, lying criminals and this is an insult beyond belief to all of us. It may be too late to get justice for 9-11 with collapse underway (that's what I said in 2004). But damnit there are those of us who will remember what [Cheney's Bushies] have done and what an idiotic and transparent move this is.


---
Ruppert is author of CROSSING THE RUBICON: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil, for which CheBushney gestapo goons smashed his computers and darkened the beacon of illuminating information. WHY? Why attack someone if they are harmlessly babbling nonsense?

Anyhow, the incomprehensible perversions of Cheney/Bushies might be entirely understood by Worthington -- and everyone, reading Crossing the Rubicon. But hurry, the gestapo goonsquad is moving to seize or purchase and destroy ALL copies.

It seems Cheney/Bushies are also in a hurry to murder everybody at Gitmo gulag ... before Obama can order the Press gets access to the torture cells and the public gets an accounting of Cheney/Bushies war crimes and those who did it 'just following (illegal) orders.'

---
And yeah, Alternet, why DID you attach a Saddam photo to a Nine-Eleven Op story? Such ignorance is propaganda sickness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another thing
Posted by: l_m_n on Dec 10, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone else find it odd that all this supposedly great intelligence is coming out of Gitmo right as there is a big push for Obama to close it in January?

Is this some sort of December surprise?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Suddenly after many many long years - jest like majic full confessions
Posted by: Pop on Dec 10, 2008 4:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After over 7 years of torture and being subjected to God knows what kind of mind altering efforts, is it any supprise that the obvious patsies are finally ready to confess to everything they have been programed to confess. Brain washing is nothing new. Whom ever these people are, they had nothing at all to do with 9-11. I suggest each person having anything at all to do with them over the past several years while them were imprisoned be given a lie detector test - more appropriately, give the test to both Bush and Cheney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How did they bring down building #7?
Posted by: archives@uwyo.edu on Dec 10, 2008 6:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How did they bring down building #7? How did they coordinate things with the "dancing Israelis"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sorry but you live in a dream world
Posted by: harinama on Dec 12, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
building 7 WAS NEVER IN ANY DANGER OF FALLING, AND WAS PULLED ON PURPOSE TO DESTROY INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE.

Your assertions are completely without ANY substantiation. If all evidence points to conspiracy, well then it's probably a conspiracy. Hell they have the owner RECORDED as saying "lets pull it".

get your f-ing head out of your as_s and open your eyes. America had its own Reichstad to start the war on terror (not unlike nazi germany), only so that we'd have a reason to continue pouring TRILLIONS into the military industrial complex.

a little reading is a good thing. You should try it sometime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement