-
Less Cost More Safety: a New Spin on Juvenile Justice
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Studies have shown that most of what Americans think about youth and crime is wrong. More and more Americans are convinced that their own lives and property are in danger at the hands of menacing youth. But Juvenile delinquency hasn't reached the proportions people think it has. In fact, some studies have shown that youth crime has taken a decidedly downward turn.
In the face of adult's fears of youth, many politicians have adopted a "zero tolerance" approach that is successful in rallying voters during election time. Still, most have done little to actually patch up the holes in the nations Juvenile Justice institutions. Heavy-handed responses to crime, such as those that build new prisons and send juveniles to adult courts, have failed at curbing existing youth crime. Measures that serve to prevent delinquency at its core -- those that emphasize educating and respecting youth -- are often described as lenient and ineffective, but it has long been believed that they are in fact more effective. Until now, however, there hasn't been enough evidence to support this belief.
|
In this follow up to Less Hype, More Help: Reducing Juvenile Crime (What Works and What Doesn't), Richard A. Mendel of the American Youth Policy Forum uses a flurry of numbers to show the potential for productive change in the juvenile justice system. Mendel is critical of recent reforms in this system, which he feels have ignored successful, and more cost-effective means of stopping juvenile delinquency by addressing its true origins.
| ||
One alternative program described in the study was in the state Missouri. The Missouri Division of Youth Services (DYS) functioned on a budget of about $94 per 10-17 year old in implementing its alternative approach to youth rehabilitation. The eight states surrounding Missouri allot approximately $140 per young person for measures that rely heavily on incarceration. Unlike Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Tennessee, only 180 Missouri youths are placed in heavily locked facilities. The other seventy five percent are assigned to non-residential and community programs, group homes, and residential facilities deemed "less secure." Community based programs such as the Star program in Gladstone, Missouri allow youth to continue their high school educations without interruption.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email








