Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Soil Not Oil: Why We Need to Kick Petroleum Out of Our Farms

By Vandana Shiva, South End Press. Posted December 3, 2008.


Biodiverse farms offer us more food, better food, higher incomes for farmers and a defense from climate disasters.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Vandana Shiva

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following is an excerpt from Soil Not Oil: Environmental Justice in an Age of Climate Crisis by Vandana Shiva (South End Press, 2008).

The industrialized, globalized food system is based on oil. It is under threat because of the inevitability of "peak oil." It is also under threat because it is more vulnerable than traditional agriculture to climate change, to which it has contributed. Industrial agriculture is based on monocultures. Monocultures are highly vulnerable to changes in climate, and to diseases and pests.

In 1970 and 1971, America's vast corn belt was attacked by a mysterious disease, later identified as ''race T" of the fungus Helminthosporium maydis, causing the southern corn leaf blight, as the epidemic was called. It left ravaged cornfields with withered plants, broken stalks, and malformed or completely rotten cobs. The strength and speed of the blight was a result of the uniformity of the hybrid corn, most of which had been derived from a single Texas male sterile line. The genetic makeup of the new hybrid corn, which was responsible for its rapid and large-scale breeding by seed companies, was also responsible for its vulnerability to disease. At least 80 percent of the hybrid corn in America in 1970 contained the Texas male sterile cytoplasm. As a University of Iowa pathologist wrote, "Such an extensive, homogenous acreage is like a tinder-dry prairie waiting for a spark to ignite it."

Industrial agriculture is dependent on chemical fertilizers. Chemically fertilized soils are low in organic matter. Organic matter helps conserve the soil and soil moisture, providing insurance against drought. Soils lacking organic matter are more vulnerable to drought and to climate change. Industrial agriculture is also more dependent on intensive irrigation. Since climate change is leading to the melting of glaciers that feed rivers, and in many regions of the world to the decline in precipitation and increased intensity of drought, the vulnerability of industrial agriculture will only increase. Finally, since the globalized food system is based on long-distance supply chains, it is vulnerable to breakdown in the context of extreme events of flooding, cyclones, and hurricanes. While aggravating climate change, fossil fuel-dependent industrialized, globalized agriculture is least able to adapt to the change.

We need an alternative. Biodiverse, organic farms and localized food systems offer us security in times of climate insecurity, while producing more food, producing better food, and creating more livelihoods. The industrialized, globalized food system is based on oil; biodiverse, organic, and local food systems are based on living soil. The industrialized system is based on creating waste and pollution; a living agriculture is based on no waste. The industrialized system is based on monocultures; sustainable systems are based on diversity.

Living Soil

Every step in building a living agriculture sustained by a living soil is a step toward both mitigating and adapting to climate change. Over the past 20 years, I have built Navdanya, India's biodiversity and organic-farming movement. We are increasingly realizing there is a convergence between the objectives of conserving biodiversity, reducing climate-change impact, and alleviating poverty.

Biodiverse, local, organic systems reduce water use and risks of crop failure due to climate change. Increasing the biodiversity of farming systems can reduce vulnerability to drought. Millet, which is far more nutritious than rice and wheat, uses only 200 to 300 millimeters of water, compared with the 2,500 millimeters needed for Green Revolution rice farming. India could grow four times the amount food it does now if it were to cultivate millet more widely. However, global trade is pushing agriculture toward GM monocultures of corn, soy, canola, and cotton, worsening the climate crisis.

Biodiversity offers resilience to recover from climate disasters. After the Orissa supercyclone of 1998, and the tsunami of 2004, Navdanya distributed seeds of saline-resistant rice varieties as "Seeds of Hope" to rejuvenate agriculture in lands that were salinated as a result of flooding from the sea. We are now creating seed banks of drought-resistant, flood-resistant, and saline-resistant seed varieties to respond to such extreme climate events. Climate chaos creates uncertainty. Diversity offers a cushion against both climate extremes and climate uncertainty. We need to move from the myopic obsession with monocultures and centralization to diversity and decentralization.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: oil, agriculture, farming, vandana shiva, soil, soil not oil, organic farming

Activist and physicist Vandana Shiva is founder and director of the Research Foundation for Science,

Technology, and Natural Resource Policy in New Delhi. She is author of more than three hundred papers in leading journals and numerous books.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Illuminati Forcing Soy on Factory Farms to Destroy Family, Soft Kill
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Dec 3, 2008 3:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I so much agree with this author on the absolute necessity for organic, decentralized farming. He is right about growing millet also -- millet is not only easy to grow, needs little water and will grow most anywhere, but it is super nutritious, rich in the cancer killing vitamin B17 (laetrile).

God-forsaken soy, a plant good only to be plowed under to fix nitrogen, was never meant to be eaten by man nor beast.

Likewise for Montsanto's GM corn, of which nearly 100 percent of factory farm corn is of that type.

Both soy and GM corn are being used as a sinister and deliberate means of mass eugenics "soft-kill" of world populations.

The article vaguely points the finger of blame to "global market forces" as the reason why corn and soy are produced and sold en masse, fails to note that these "forces" are calculated, deliberate decisions, financed and orchestrated by the criminal international financiers who plot and plan almost everything that goes on around the planet. Nothing is by accident and all is done with a final and completely sinister goal in mind.

These people are bona fide Luciferians and eugenicists, the international Banksters, with the Rothschilds and Rockefellers at their head, (Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan working as their frontmen here in the U.S.). These evil men have arranged (through their puppet politicians guided by the Banksters' lobbyists) to see that soy and GM corn are grown and subsidized on large factory farms, incentivized by huge loans and subsidies in the millions of dollars per factory farm.

The resultant flooding the world food supply with soy products has made men sterile and effeminate and given women breast cancer, because soy is full of phytoestrogens. Babies are fed soymilk formula; boys grow up with undescended testicals and girls go to puberty at the age of 8 or even younger.

The soy is turned into vegetable oil from which is made all kinds of salad dressings, mayonaise and unstable and deadly cooking oil used in deep fryers and is directly responsible for thickening arteries, for making people insulin resistant, diabetic and obese.

The corn that is grown is genetically modified corn and is killing the bees, also making people and animals very sick. It also ensures the globalists will have control of the food, that people will not be able to save seed for next year's crops. This fits nicely into the eugenicist criminals' plans for death and control of the world's serfs. When the famine hits America, and it will soon, people will quickly abandon whatever small sentimental attachment they once had for the Constitution and happily embrace total tyranny.

The Banksters, aka Luciferian Illuminati international crime syndicate, are crazy like a fox. They know exactly what they are doing.

They are USING soy, factory farms, GM corn to sicken and kill and dumb down millions of people, to destroy families and society, to cause mass social and sexual confusion.

Why would they do such a thing, you ask? Because they are EUGENICISTS and RACIST Zionists working to control the world and kill most of the people. They aim to cull as much as 6 billion of the world's population down to 500 million (Google Georgia Guidestones, aka America's Stonehenge), to create a hellish New World Order, where the remaining population will live in total tyranny and mind control as described in Huxley's Brave New World and Orwell's 1984.

The horror is that Obama is one of them.

Watch Alex Jones' film Endgame online to see what is really on the minds of the eugenicists, the global elite orchestrating world events. Check out the Weston A. Price Foundation website online and read up about soy and what it does to people, to babies who are fed this stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Arrrrrrrrg. Posted by: Bbear41
» Illuminati, Zionists and Luciferians Posted by: kellysgarden
» You said that Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» Big dick pills Posted by: Bliss Doubt
Here's another stronger take on fossil fuels and factory farming.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 3, 2008 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ron Paul really had this one kicking when he said that people who really want to curb global warming should bring back grass-fed meat and diary rather than lecturing people into being vegetarian alone. Still, I find it pretty cool to be a vegetarian just like Dennis Kucinich. A combo of those two ideas would be nice for a change. Heck, raise these animals on the pasture and feed them both grass and hemp. And while at it, make lentils more available for us non-meat eaters. At times, my wife wonders whether all these decades of poisoning the public with fossil fuel junk has lead to men and even some women losing their scalp so fast. With the oil prices being manipulated so often and the markets being rigged to keep us hooked to oil along with banning or at least over-regulating alternative ideas, kicking petroleum out is proving to be a long shot. I am sorry but most Americans are still too corn-fed to face reality. And I'm still surprised my wife and I pulled out !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Did you say HEMP Max? Posted by: garry minor
» RE: Did you say HEMP Max? Posted by: kellysgarden
We
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Dec 3, 2008 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Need more farmers. we need more farmers.... This is the system we get when people flee the family farm. It is not possible right now to get to a decentralized farm system without the people who are willing to risk a lot to raise food. Until we have more than 2% of the food supply(and that is a very generous statistic)coming from local farmers.. all the handwringing over weather it is local and organic is just hot air. Consider also the fact that the average age of a farmer in the states is 55. ANyone who wants to farm get your ass out there and do it..Look into incubation farms. Do it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Incubation farms? Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» RE: Incubation farms? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Incubation farms? Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» Sweet, prolific nature! Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Sweet, prolific nature! Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» RE: Sweet, prolific nature! Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Incubation farms? Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Incubation farms? Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: Incubation farms? Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» RE: Incubation farms? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Growing under black walnut tree Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» Squirrels love it at my house Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» I agree I agree Posted by: zipoka
» RE: I agree I agree Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» RE: I agree I agree Posted by: MyLeftFoot
Government Subsidies are Killing the Small Farmer, depleting rural economy and population
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Dec 3, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Illuminati does not want people living in the country. They want people herded into cities where they can be more manageable, stick them up in high rises, give them grain rations and "healthy jogging paths."

Subsidies are tied to amount of sales. The USDA right now is working with Congress to declare any farm less than 40 acres to be a hobby farm, not eligible for nothing.

Meantime, the factory farms are incentivized to keep buying up more land and equipment so they can get more subsidies. Imagine having a bottom line on your income tax of $200,000 and being able to rake in $350,000 in subsidies.

Here's from Citizens against Government Waste:

"The drive to get bigger leads to more farm consolidation. While productivity growth contributes to farm consolidations, farm subsidies, which distribute benefits in proportion to production or sales, play a very important role. As the Chicago Council on Global Affairs noted in its report, “Modernizing America’s Food and Farm Policy: Vision for a New Direction,” “Larger farm operations have often invested money received from government program payments in the purchase of even more farmland as well as newer,larger, higher-tech machinery with which to cultivate the larger acreage.”7

In those parts of the country that are most dependent on farm subsidies, farm consolidation is moving the fastest. Because farm program benefits are distributed in proportion to the amount of sales, it makes it easier for larger farmers to acquire their smaller neighbors.
Farm consolidation leads to fewer jobs in all agriculture-related businesses in rural areas, including hardware stores, implement and equipment dealers, and banks.

Farm consolidation also impacts other businesses such as grocery stores, and even affects a community’s ability to support schools, hospitals, and churches. The net result is that subsidies for growing certain commodities accelerates the consolidation of farms and contributes to the loss of jobs and population in rural areas.

In fact, according to a March 2005 study by the Center for the Study of Rural America at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, “farm payments are not providing a strong boost to the rural economy in those counties that most depend on them. Job gains are weak and population growth is actually negative in most of the counties where farm payments are the biggest share of income.”8

The study looked at employment growth from 1992 through 2002 in the top 25 percent of U.S. counties dependent on farm payments. Of the 783 counties where farm payments have the biggest impact on the rural economy, 483 had job gains below the 19 percent national average over 10 years, 167 had job losses and only 133 had above average growth in employment. The study concluded that “job growth is decidedly weak in the counties most dependent on farm payments.”9
The study also discovered that “farm payments have an even weaker impact on population growth,” with 461 counties (59 percent) losing population. While 234 counties had modest growth, only 88 had population gains exceeding the 10 percent national average over 10 years.
Finally, the study concluded that “farm payments are not yielding robust economic and population gains in the counties where they should have the greatest impact. If anything, the payments appear to be linked with subpar economic and population growth.”10

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» to salt Posted by: kellysgarden
» To Kellysgarden Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» RE: No we did not. Posted by: TheLimit
The Illuminati Wants Control of the Food through Famine and Ownership of Seeds
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Dec 3, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The government has now got the farmers growing corn to be turned into ethanol -- ridiculous when the country is floating away in oil. But this will help to divert the food and start the famine they want.

The ceremonial government has deliberately worked in conjunction with the Illuminati Secret Government to implode the economy, suck out all the money, destroy the economy. This will lead to grocery stores closing. They need credit to run just like every other business.

Only the small farmers growing food locally will save people, and Obama has plans to tax these small farmers off the planet, tax they for every chicken and cow and goat they own for emitting methane gas, for adding to the so-called carbon footprint, causing global warming (when the climate is now in a global cooling cycle and the whole global warming thing is a huge lie to help put the last nail in the coffin of the last bit of freedom left in rural America, to end property rights, and put everybody in the bread lines, ready to kiss the feet of the government "saviors" and sign on to the NWO, turn their neighbors in, and worship the antichrist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Huh? Where is the proof? Posted by: henderson
I believe in peak oil, global warming, and organic food
Posted by: nahikurain@mac.com on Dec 3, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am currently pulling together my own organic farm and I have worked at least part time as an organic farmer the last ten years. I love living soil! I love organic fertilizer! I love real food! I love knowing that I can be part of the solution. I use Seeds of Change. I practice permaculture as much as I understand it, and Natural farming techniques (seed balls) in some areas.
I feel very happy growing my own food and working from home and I encourage everyone to grow a garden, and keep worms, grow soil, conserve water, love your self and love your life!!
I am Posting at whitehouse.org for tax breaks for small farmers and no subsidies for petro-based agriculture- if someone still wants to do it, at least I'm not paying for it, right?
I love America and well, I hope America will love me too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting topic
Posted by: WhatNow? on Dec 3, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here are a few links related to the topic that some may find interesting.

This one is related to choices Obomber may make regarding appointments dealing with agriculture. These appointment could be as gloomy as any.

Obama's Team Includes Dangerous Biotech "Yes Men"

I found this book fascinating. It deals with plants native to the western hemisphere. One part particularly interesting is related to terrace farming the Incans did. They had some of the most diverse crops due to the numerous microclimates available at different elevations in the Andes. It's also very sad in it's description of what destruction the Spanish wrought on their agriculture.

Chilis to Chocolate

And last, here is a link to something that some may find very useful. It's a very simple idea I wish I had thought.

5 x 5 Home Greenhouse for under $25

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks for the great links Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» RE: Interesting topic Posted by: swooshy
Agri-business.....
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Dec 3, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll admit it, I'm a foodie, there I've said it and I'm proud of it. I lived overseas and that was really when I realized exactly how much we as Americans have lost the "taste" of our food. Agri-business has replaced the family farmer! And yet the subsidies continue! As this nation confronts the fact that we can no longer live on oil, maybe the family farmer will come back. Maybe we can get rid of those genetically modified seeds!

Maybe you won't be able to have grapes in January, but isn't your health is more important! We are what we eat, so the saying goes, so is it any wonder why obesity is on the increase, cancer rates are skyrocketing, high blood pressure and diabetes are rising daily - people consider the foods that you consume! These supposedly wonderful GM seeds haven't been tested for the long haul, we are the test rats, and the experiments are failing! As a nation we need to wake up and see that fact! We need to demand fresher, more organic food. For the farmer is it more labor intensive, yes initially, but in the long run it will be better for us all!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are singing my tune Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
You can do something about it
Posted by: swooshy on Dec 3, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of sitting around worrying VOTE WITH YOUR FORK. Growing whatever you can, patronizing farmers markets, encourage local growers and community gardens. This will have an effect. Also VOTE out of office local politicians taking payoffs from greedy developers who want to put up crappy buildings on what should be preserved as LOCAL FARMLAND near cities... Read Michael Pollan (on Bill Moyers last week)Avoid processed crap like the plague. Educate your children on proper nutrition and yes, turn off the damn tv if that's where they are getting brainwashed to want junk food. If you do go to a supermarket shop the outer perimeter for your foods.
Everyone needs to know that their food is intimately tied to health, energy policy, climate, etc and take a more critical look at what is on their plate. Start researching the companies of the brands you use. READ LABELS. DROP brands if the company engages in unsafe or dishonest practices. Put your money where your mouth is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You can do something about it Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
This is right on target
Posted by: crazy carlos on Dec 3, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is probably one of the most important posts ever made on Alternet. I have done many things in my life from high tech to truck farming several acres.

If you follow the bouncing ball backwards you can see the short term money grubbing of our brand of Capitalism and where it leads to. If the short term thinkers get hold of the production of food we will definitely, over a couple of generations, reduce world populaion. The hooker is, you cannot turn around the soils destroyed in a couple of generations--nature does not give a shit about what the elite want. This article and astute comments should be run once every two weeks so people begin to grasp the signifance of what the author has pointed out. Carlos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Without inorganic methods of farming, millions/billions would likely starve
Posted by: Physiocrat on Dec 3, 2008 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm all about organic agriculture, but if you face the facts you realize that the Earth is vastly overpopulated because the nearly 7 billion people on this planet could not be fed if we didn't use inorganic fertilizers because the yields produced by organic agriculture aren't nearly as large.

It's a terrible situation we've gotten ourselves in, becoming so dependent on all of these agrichemicals...however, it seems that the only choice now is to either use all of these agrichemicals or else millions/billions would starve or become malnourished.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah, CHEMTRAILS. My favorite. (NOT!!!) Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» Religion is a SCAM. Posted by: AsteroidMiner
Millet won't grow if there is NO rain.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 3, 2008 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following is an article by Mark Lynas based on his book Six Degrees: Our
Future on a Hotter Planet. It was published in the Guardian on 23 April 2007. The
original version is available here
.

1ºC: Nebraska isn’t at the top of most tourists’ to-do lists. However, this dreary
expanse of impossibly flat plains sits in the middle of one of the most productive
agricultural systems on Earth. Beef and corn dominate the economy, and the Sand
Hills region – where low, grassy hillocks rise up from the flatlands – has some of
the best cattle ranching in the whole US. But scratch beneath the grass and you
will find, as the name suggests, not soil but sand. These innocuous-looking hills
were once desert, part of an immense system of sand dunes that spread across the
Great Plains from Texas in the south to the Canadian prairies in the north. Six
thousand years ago, when temperatures were about 1C warmer than today in the
US, these deserts may have looked much as the Sahara does today. As global
warming bites, the western US could once again be plagued by perennial drought –
devastating agriculture and driving out human inhabitants on a scale far larger than
the 1930s “Dustbowl” exodus.

1ºC is 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Since the year 1750, we have already caused 1.3
degrees Fahrenheit of global warming. You didn't notice it because you are not
300 years old. The rate of global warming continues to speed up. It won't take
much longer. Only another half a degree Fahrenheit and Americans stop eating.
American civilization collapses and 99.99% of all Americans and Europeans die.
Cannibalism happens.
Read: "Collapse" by Jared Diamond and "The Long Summer" by Brian Fagan.
Something like 2 dozen civilizations have already disappeared because of climate
changes smaller than the one we have already caused. Starvation was the cause of
death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ""You Friggin Idiot"" Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» Also a one-dimensional android Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement