Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Obama Takes Charge -- Will He Bail Out America?

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted November 29, 2008.


While we deliberate major economic transformation, there are good ideas waiting on the shelf right now the new president can green light.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Joshua Holland

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Barack Obama has said that there can only be one president at a time. By all appearances, in the midst of an almost unprecedented economic meltdown, it is he.

Obama gave three press conferences this week, aimed at reassuring a jittery nation -- and world -- that he was preparing to tackle the recession head-on. Even as Bush’s Treasury Department announced an array of new interventions to prop up the moribund economy, Bush himself has been out of sight and out of mind. On Tuesday, while Obama was calling for a massive spending program to boost slacking demand for everything from houses to cars to consumer gadgets, Bush was in Kentucky, “thanking” troops returning from his wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Bush hasn’t held a full presser since August. 

Obama hinted that he would adopt an approach that progressives have been urging Washington to take since the economy went into free-fall: spending as much as $800 billion to revive the "nuts and bolts" economy. It’s a marked difference from the Bush administration’s (almost) singular focus -- which, in fairness, appears to be changing -- on recapitalizing large, teetering financial institutions.

The task the new president will face is daunting. New economic data released this week show an increasing risk of a “deflationary spiral” in which layoffs that follow the massive pile of national wealth that has evaporated in the financial crisis and bursting housing bubble -- and the fear of being hurt by the economic mess among those whose jobs are secure -- cause people to rein in spending, which causes the supply of just about everything to outstrip demand, which leads to lower prices, which hurts firms' profits, which leads to even more layoffs and even greater economic insecurity.

The four-week average of new unemployment claims hit its highest mark since the deep recession of 1983; consumer spending, which accounts for two-thirds of the American economy, dropped by a full percentage point last month -- the third consecutive monthly decline -- and prices fell by more than a half-point in October. A key index of business spending dropped 4 percent in October; over the past three months, firms’ capital spending has plummeted by a rate of 33 percent per year, a figure that one prominent economist characterized as “terrifying.”

Obama Sending Right Signals

During the presidential campaign, Obama called for a $175 billion injection of cash into the economy with new infrastructure spending, help for cash-strapped state and local governments whose tax revenues have been decimated by the collapse of real estate values and a $1,000 tax credit for working families. Now, Obama and his surrogates are hinting that they might spend as much as five times that amount. On Tuesday, the president-elect called for "a two-year nationwide effort to jump-start job creation in America and lay the foundation for a strong and growing economy." He promised to "put people back to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, modernizing schools that are failing our children, and building wind farms and solar panels." He added, "These aren't just steps to pull ourselves out of this immediate crisis; these are long-term investments in our economic future that have been ignored for far too long." Congressional Democrats, many of whom have been calling for such a package for some time, say that it’ll create up to 2.5 million jobs over the next two years.

In crisis, there is opportunity, and Obama appears to be seizing it. He has a clear mandate -- having won not only an Electoral College landslide, but 53 percent of the popular vote -- and he can, at least to some degree, use it and the financial mess to overcome the kind of ideological battles he’ll face from congressional Republicans, who have so far balked at the idea of spending on infrastructure and public works. The Washington Post reported this week that while Obama’s stimulus plan is “cast as a response to a rapidly worsening crisis, [it] could enable Obama to shift massive sums to domestic priorities that Democrats say have long been neglected, such as health care and education. It also could provide seed money to reshape major U.S. industries, hastening the production of wind and solar energy and fuel-efficient cars, for example.” Obama said the plan would be "a down payment on the type of reform my administration will bring to Washington."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, boehner, stimulus, housing crisis, financial crisis

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obama Needs a Game Changer to Stop the Slide
Posted by: mmckinl on Nov 29, 2008 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He can do this with "Medicare for All" a k a single-payer. Medicare for All would help re-capitalize business (especially manufacturing), school districts, state and local government, individual payers and the under and uninsured. The states/businesses would use any excess of savings for unemployment and pension funds. Overall, this could save hundreds of thousands if not millions of jobs, while putting money quickly and directly into the system in the most efficient, fairest way: taking care of people's medical bills.

By going to Medicare for All you bring in much more corporate support albeit many more enemies than just increasing money for state medicare. We saw that the Medicare Drug Benefit was implemented quickly and efficiently. The model could be used for Medicare for All.

This could indeed be Obama's legacy, a legacy that would immediately put him among the great presidents. And let's face it, to get the public truly inspired and out of their doldrums will take something, not just big, but a game changer, something enormous that shows them they have a stake in the government, that addresses their fears, that addresses their future well being no matter what their circumstance may be: Paid Healthcare!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

“It’s worked before.”
Posted by: Richard House on Nov 29, 2008 12:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has, but times are different. We’ve come from the mountaintop of the American century when Clinton was ruling to the valley of death where now only the rich can survive thanks to the Bushites, yet like Holland says, the devil is in the details. The plan sounds good on paper and I wish Obama and all of us a lot of luck but what I don’t understand is why Obama is placing so many people in top positions; wall street hustlers, former Federal Reserve chairman (the Fed should be nationalized or abolished), etc., people who belong to the same one-party political club, who probably have the same mindset they had decades ago that got America into trouble in the first place. The bail-out of the banks and the auto industry in a collapsing economy doesn’t sound right to people who can’t get work or afford health care – they are forced to believe that bailing out the big guys are somehow going to help them in the long term. This is nonsense. The banks are keeping the money and raising their interest rates, money is tighter than ever. There will be no universal health care, the kind you find in Europe, social security payments will be cut and taxes on it raised, the list is endless. All indications point that with Obama in power the business of governing a people will remain essentially the same, there will be changes but more like rearranging the furniture in your prison cell and painting the walls another color.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Robbing the People to Pay Paul
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Nov 29, 2008 1:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know that whatever happens the bankers are going to come out of it smelling like a rose.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LOL The Liberal Candidate elect turns out to be conservative
Posted by: IPF on Nov 29, 2008 3:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, now he's got the 911 on all, so he's got the full picture.

All of a sudden no tax increases, no gun bans, no end to the war, and he's even saying the top priority is killing Osama Bin Laden.

Oh well...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A simple Solution
Posted by: grosspointblank1986 on Nov 29, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See Fairtax.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Simple, obvious and absolutely wrong Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Thanks for the links. Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Thanks for the links. Posted by: yellow
» RE: Thanks for the links. Posted by: Longdream
» Shopping Spree Socialism Posted by: pdxjoe
The top secret briefing
Posted by: Gregory Kruse on Nov 29, 2008 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagine the change in Harry Truman's mind when he was told about the A-bomb. It has been my underlying fear from way back that the explanation for the Bush policies was rooted in actual scary threats we weren't being told about and not in greed, ignorance, and cronyism. Sometimes, "we can't do anything about it anyway, it's God's will", is a rational response to events if they are terrible enough. At the very least we will have a president and some leaders who are not lazy and who don't claim to be sitting next to God. We should be grateful for that, and if the worst is about to happen, we can take some comfort in the belief that the old Civil War is finally over. Not in John Boehner's mind though, that would take an A-bomb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The top secret briefing Posted by: americansheep
Obama for FASCIST CORP AMERIKA (INC)
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Nov 29, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, but this piece is fairly typical of the so-called "progressive" left MSM. Another column that plods on in near complete denial about the fresh stooge occupant at the White House in thrall to Organized Corporate Crime.

Of course, there is no way Obama will bite the corporate monopoly fist that fed him into pretend "power" at DC where nothing is as it seems.

Another poster mentioned the fact Obama is putting up ex-CIA asset and phony villain Bin Laden (the Emmanuel Goldstein role of Orwell's 1984). This playact in the aftermath of 9/11 coverup and its bogus 9/11 "war on terror" is as telling as Obama's cave-in to Fascist oligarchs that rig the economy thru players such as Paulson, Bernanke and Obama's own "advisors" Rubin, Summers, George Soros, etc.

By the way, seems no one told Obama that Bin Laden has been dead for years. Not exactly a secret when Benhazir Bhutto announced it the the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnychOXj9Tg

Again, Obama has been busted at his own corner by people of color with conscience as well as intelligence:

"It is absurd to claim that a progressive "movement" with a potential for profound social change can coalesce behind a candidate who repeatedly and reflexively aligns with the worst corporate malefactors on the planet, the very same individuals who brought about the current catastrophe."
Glen Ford (executive editor Black Agenda Report for the journal of African American political thought and action. October 15, 2008)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RESTRUCTURE THE ECONOMY
Posted by: drricklippin on Nov 29, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a physician who lacks training in economics but I found below comment on another AlterNet Post and it made sense to me.

"We don’t need stimulus per se. We need a major economic restructuring. Between the Health Care Sector, The financial sector and the Security (military and agency) sector we are wasting well over 20% of our economy on nonproductive, even counter productive endeavors. The waste : finance 25% of GDP should be 15%; health care 17% should be 9%; Security 8%, should be 4%. We need to realize that there is no future in consumption for consumptions sake"

GO FOR IT MR. NEW PRESIDENT! NO TIME TO BE TIMID!

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In our hands
Posted by: robchapman on Nov 29, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
major projects to retool America’s industrial base and radically transform our energy economy would take a significant amount of time to get off the ground. They require planning, consensus-building among stakeholders, drawn-out legislative debates, environmental-impact studies, public input from local communities

This author hits it right on the head.

Planning, consensus building, local support, political debate and assurance that projects are environmentally sound are the political parameters of this crisis.

If we cannot cohere and formulate an effective policy to meet our current challenge what is the point of democracy?

It is time to stop bickering and seize the moment.

Building an equitable, environmentally sustainable, high performing economy is the mission of our generation.

If we can, we can save the planet and provide posterity the first economic system built on the principles of justice and sustainability.

That would be legacy worth building.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: In our hands Posted by: weathered
"Meltdown" means "the iron is hot"?
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 29, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again, Holland gives us a reasoned evaluation of the impossibilities of anything good coming out of Washington. The campaign rhetoric is history.

The progressive balance in Congress has been increased--but not by much. Anyone who expected a transformation of American politics will have to settle for step-by-step attempts.

What we have going for us is that even a small positive change will loom large compared to what we have had. Even just holding steady for a while (and it won't be easy) is a good sign.

We are ready for the tasting that's the proof of the pudding. Here's hoping Obama's team knows how to cook.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to earn your keep...
Posted by: Knowmad on Nov 29, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd just like to point out that the ratio of those here who complain about, well, seemingly everything, to those who offer critique but also try to include substantive ideas and suggestions (whiners vs winners) is getting very out of whack, again.

Why not an honour system 'rule' that griping is fine, as long as the griper 'pays' by making an attempt to suggest what might be done to address their complaints - just as I've just done in this post. You depressed, jaded, pessimistic, lazy or 'prone to indulge in schadenfreude' Americans simply have to start standing up for something beyond "Wrong!"

And by the way, don't you think you might try to cut the new guy a little slack? He's not even in office, yet all some of you do is whine and wail and complain and berate and mumble obscenities. Of course, question everything, but if you can't go beyond that and contribute (and admit it, everyone can suggest something) then at least get out of the way. Your gaping potholes of negativity only make the journey more difficult.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Perfect example... Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Perfect example... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Perfect example... Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Perfect example... Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Perfect example... Posted by: Longdream
As long as Congress and the Courts are the same, NOT A CHANCE !
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 29, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So why do we rely only on the president but not take on Congress and the Courts?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A bail out that would benifit everyone
Posted by: beyondgreen on Nov 29, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not enough credit is being given to the high gas prices this past year and it's serious damage on our economy..A record number of homes and jobs have been lost as a direct result. And, while we are doing the happy dance around the lower prices at the pumps OPEC is announcing cuts to manipulate the prices upward again.We can't take another year like this past. There is a wonderful new book out about the energy crisis and what it would take for America to become energy independent.This book is profoundly informative and our country needs to become more informed and move forward with becoming energy independent. Green technology would not only provide clean cheap energy it would create millions of badly needed new jobs. The Book is called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence NOW. www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com I highly recommend this book if you are distressed about our economy, would like to see new jobs created and see our country become energy independent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Call me in Ten Years when this stuff "might" work Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
Decades of Dreams
Posted by: writerman on Nov 29, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's a profound mistake, though it's tempting, to give Bush the entire blame for the dire situation the United States finds itself in.

Bush hasn't exactly made things better, and these stupid wars cost a fortune, but the rot goes back decades, probably back to Nixon; and successive presidents from both the twin parties have ignored the growing, structural problems at the heart of the American economy.

Most of these leader's haven't told Americans the truth and have treated them more or less like children. Americans have been systematically turned into 'cattle-like' consumers, and have seen their heritage as citizens in a democracy undermined.

About the only president who dared, or was foolish enough, to address the people as adults, was Jimmy Carter; and he suffered both ridicule and defeat for his efforts.

Those who followed have sold Americans a dreamworld and not reality, and now, after decades of dreams it's all finally falling apart.

So any 'solution' is going to be a long and painful process. One can't reverse thirty years of bad policies like turning a yacht, it's more akin to steering a great beast of a supertanker which is unfortunately heading for the rocks. It'll be touch and go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Decades of Dreams Posted by: weathered
Will Obama's Administration be able to meet the challenge?
Posted by: foius on Nov 29, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has been a great deal of media and internet commentary on the options that the Obama Administration will have in attempting to keep the economy from sliding into a free-fall recession. So far, it is the Bush Administration that is spending most of the political, monetary, and bi-partisan capital in trying to halt this downward deflationary spiral. Unfortunately, the measures that are being implemented by Bush 43 fall short of actually stabilizing the financial, real-estate, and manufacturing industries. For $7 Trillion Dollars you would expect for some type of employment program, debt forgiveness/relief for homeowners/consumers, and subsidized health-care proposals which would eliminate a significant expenditure by both corporate and individual interests. However, with so much emphasis being placed upon the financial services/investment industry, an overall approach which includes a full-employment agenda is unlikely at this point. It seems as though any attempt to give relief to the American worker/consumer is met by staunch republican political resistance. Their recalcitrance on this issue will prove to be the "last straw" with the American electorate, and we will see a very different Congress (minus a few more republican seats in the House and the Senate) a couple of years down the road. But what about now? Does America have the werewithal to lift our ailing economy out of this recessionary/deflationary spiral? Not without a clear, consise, pro-active economic program which stresses the development of real equity for the American workers, stable employment, universal health-care, and a 21st Century infrastructure which will be both environmentally and technologically sustainable. Can Obama's Adminstration do all these things? We will find out...very soon!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama got in because......
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 29, 2008 1:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the BushCo adminstration fucked everything and everybody up!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THE LIES & LUV OF FDR Posted by: reelman
The coupe' is conplete.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Nov 30, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The events of 9/11 started the coupe' and the election of Mr. Obama (best corporate candidate) gives complete control to the ruling elite.

We now live as powerless subjects to the new world order.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I truly hope top Dems & Repugs are not on the same team!
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Nov 30, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I often get the feeling that many top Democrats are on the same team as many top Republicans. I hope I'm wrong.

Moreover, can we really attribute our severe dire straights to mere boo-boos, bad judgment, mistakes, incompetence, laziness, etc.??? I don't think so!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whilst America Did Some Absolutely Appalling Things When I Was Less Than One Year Old
Posted by: opmoc on Nov 30, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like letting off Massive Nuclear Bombs Over The Pacific Ocean - which is almost certainly responsible for the ENORMOUS increase of Cancer in the Human Population...

What America has done since the Start of The New Millennium is Completely Unforgiveable.

And So The World Just Hopes That Obama is Going to Turn The Tide of Humanity towards us all achieving a nice peaceful sustainable existence.

And Obama Recruits a Load of Extreme FASCIST Right Wing Psychopaths To Advise Him and Guide The Human Race Forward.

Where's Guy Fawkes?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wealth, or Credit; winner take all or IRV?
Posted by: Daniel35 on Nov 30, 2008 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe our biggest financial error has been mistaking credit for wealth. That becomes apparent when we hear about how much wealth has "evaporated".

Obama is right that there can be only one US president at a time, but maybe he's closer than most to being world president, or at least guru. He's not President yet, but hopefully many in the business world will recognize that they shouldn't take any lame duck actions too seriously, because there will be big changes in January.

This brings to mind that we'd do a lot better with "Instant Runoff Voting" or other ranked voting system. We could stay closer to the top of the bell curve of national opinion, rather than creating two lobes of opinion and putting a lot of energy into reversing the previous president's actions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well Lets Have a Bit Of TRUTH. AMERICA IS THE MOST RACIST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET
Posted by: opmoc on Nov 30, 2008 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans actually think it is O.K.

To just count the AMERICANS who were slightly disturbed or injured as a Result Of The LATEST CIA Bomb Going Off

No Americans Couldn't Give a FUCK about Iraqi Kids Having Their Arms and Legs Blown Off

They Just Take The Limbless Child To An AMERICAN Hospital

And Exhibit The Iraqi Child As If IT is a TEDDY BEAR

And The WONDERFUL AMERICAN STATE OF THE ART hospital has saved it

I Could NOW POST SOME IMAGES

OF HOW AMERICA AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE COMPLETELY DESECRATED HUMAN BEIMGS ON THIS PLANET

But I do not want to make you SICK

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AMERICANS HAVE DONE IT - Don't Blame The Jews Ot The British Or ANYONE ELSE
Posted by: opmoc on Nov 30, 2008 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AMERICANS have created all these WEAPONS Of PLANET DESTRUCTION

Sure America Can Destroy EVERY SINGLE FORM OF LIFE IN EVERY OBSCURE ISLAND ON THIS PLANET

And Americans Think

The Ultimate State of The Art

Is

AMERICAN IDOL

Can We Just Disable All Your Nuclear Weapons And Put You In a State of Quarantine and EXPORT YOU To The Next Passing Planet

BEHAVE

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Spread The Wealth
Posted by: MEL810 on Nov 30, 2008 6:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tend to agree. The industry keeps pushing mostly low MPG gas guzzlers, when Europe & Japan and other countries have working on autos with good gas mileage, decent public transit,etc..
Our auto industry is intricately tied in with the fuel industry and was created and grew substantially, initially, out of the red scare and white flight of the 50's and early 60's.
Higher MPG foreign compact cars came out and sold well in the late 70's & 80's, but come the 90's the industry pushed the gas-guzzling, expensive, road-hogging SUV and trucks as the next best thing to the American consumer sheeple' ignoring the greenhouse gas and OPEC problems. That's why the Big 3 are getting their butts whipped and deservedly so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prepare for the destruction of the dollar and hyperinflation.
Posted by: Constitutionalist on Nov 30, 2008 8:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's where we are heading with all this money printing. Oops, I mean "fiscal stimulus".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» POST ON NIXON BASH AND BHO Posted by: reelman
LIBERALISM IS NEVER THE ANSWER
Posted by: reelman on Dec 5, 2008 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LET’S JOIN THE “NAME GAME”

Since its fashionable that if you oppose any homosexual policy…you are a bigot…
and if you oppose any Obama policy…you are a racist…
can we call those that oppose any conservative policy socialists (or secular socialists)?

I vote “yes”!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement