Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Bush Playing Chicken With Detroit in Last-Gasp Effort to Demoralize the Dems

By David Sirota, AlterNet. Posted November 14, 2008.


Bush has his thumb on the Democratic Party's most divisive issue.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: 73 U.S. Kids Sentenced to Life Without Parole at 14 or Younger, and All Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by David Sirota

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It wouldn't be the George W. Bush we all know if our shamed president didn't spend his remaining White House days in a final fit of polarization.

That's what Bush's moves this week are clearly about: dividing -- not uniting. The New York Times reported that during his first meeting with Barack Obama, the outgoing president suggested he might support Democrats' economic stimulus package and aid to struggling automakers if party leaders "drop their opposition to a free-trade agreement with Colombia." While Bush later denied an overt quid pro quo, one was obviously implied.

Strange behavior? Yes and no.

Bush is the Texas Hold 'Em addict who raised on the largest tax cuts in contemporary history, re-raised on two wars and went all-in with an attempt to privatize Social Security. So yes, from a brinkmanship standpoint, it seems bizarre that in exchange for a massive legislative effort to right the entire economy, the cowboy president may insist on a tiny trade deal that -- at best -- promises a boost of "less than seven-hundredths of one percent to U.S. gross domestic product," according to the Brookings Institution.

But, then, Bush is the protege of Karl Rove and the son of George H. W. Bush. So no, his Colombia demand isn't weird at all -- nor is it as small a wager as it appears.

Bush understands what happened in 1993 when his father left an almost-finished North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in the lap of Bill Clinton's incoming administration. He knows that business interests subsequently pressured Clinton into joining with Republicans to pass the pact over his own party's opposition. His Rove-trained mind gets what The Nation's John Nichols reported: that the payout came with a 1994 election whose NAFTA taint delivered "a dramatic drop in turnout among members of union households," decreased "Democratic support in traditional areas of strength" -- and thus birthed the Republican Congress.

Bush wants to replicate this Three Card Monte -- and the Colombia trade pact is his ace in the hole.

The deal would reward a right-wing Colombian regime under investigation for links to paramilitary gangs, drug cartels and anti-union brutality. Like NAFTA, it includes few labor protections, meaning it will enrich Bush's corporate donors by forcing Americans into a wage-cutting competition with low-paid foreign workers. And, most important to Bush's legacy, the pact could bust Democrats before they ever have a chance to unify.

NAFTA proved that trade is the most divisive issue inside the Democratic Party. On one side is the party's Wall Street wing that supports free trade. On the other side is its progressive wing that wants our trade policies reformed. Lately, the latter has increased its clout. As globalization became a major campaign theme in the last two elections, the watchdog group Public Citizen reports that free trade critics replaced free trade proponents in 69 House and Senate races. These new populists, along with Democrats' more senior progressive incumbents, comprise a powerful new voting bloc promising to reject deals like the Colombia agreement and protect labor and human rights.

Therefore, if Bush successfully uses the economic emergency to hustle a faction of Wall Street Democrats into supporting the deal, he will have potentially engineered a 1994 redux: Democratic infighting, a demoralized progressive base, and these newly elected fair-trade Democrats humiliated -- and thus electorally endangered -- by their own party standard-bearers.

Certainly, with the president betting the economy on the Colombia deal, this is a difficult, high-stakes situation for Obama. But amid all the conflicting opinions he's hearing, he has the sound advice of country music's great political sage Kenny Rogers, who counsels that gambling greatness means knowing "when to walk away."

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, trade, nafta

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bush folded ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Nov 14, 2008 12:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today he says he never made the offer, so there will be no quid pro quo.

Obama called his bluff when he publicized the offer. Who ya gonna believe, Bush or Barack ? Any state producing producing cars or parts for the big three will now be Democratic for the next 20 years.

Now if Bush vetoes any help for Detroit it is all in his lap and just another chapter in the encyclopedia of Bush Failure now numbering in the tens of volumes and those states producing for the big three will be Democratic for 40 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dems are totally lost Posted by: IPF
Free Trade....
Posted by: CatDad on Nov 14, 2008 2:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue of free trade with Columbia and how Obama responds will be a real litmus test. If he uses has goodwill/honeymoon period to let this legislation pass...it will be a confirmation of my worst fear....that Obama is going to be a Tom Bradley like figure. If he rejects it...maybe we did get change we can believe in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What does Columbia export? Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: What does Columbia export? Posted by: somegirl
Lose lips!
Posted by: 2thepoint on Nov 14, 2008 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a bit shocking that Obama leaked a private discussion with Bush to the media. Very low class on Obama's part!

Aside from that, the auto industry has been in a tailspin for some time now. Union contracts combined with poor product decisions have taen their toll.

The Columbia trade agreement and saving the auto industry have nothing to do with each other and shouldn't be bartered.

The auto manufactures and the unions need to take their greed on the chin and and pay up! When an industry doesn't have the foresight to develop products that will meet market demands and unions cannot not see the impact of their demands on manufactures, they both need to pay the price! Unfortunately workers get caught in the middle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: adp3d
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: Spot
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: IPF
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: blue3zero
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Lose lips weren't Obama's Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Lose lips weren't Obama's Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Lose lips weren't Obama's Posted by: mejsmith
» RE: Lose lips weren't Obama's Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: violawall
» Where'd you "Lose lips!", 2thepoint? Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: Ethical1
» RE: Lose lips! Posted by: 2thepoint
Let Big Oil bail out the auto industry; not us.
Posted by: sasquuatch55 on Nov 14, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What people fail to understand.....
Posted by: Diecash1 on Nov 14, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that if the auto industry goes down, there will need to be a much more expensive aid package to the midwest. It will also take an estimated 3 million jobs with it....something our faltering national economy can not afford.

There have been a number of excellent discussions on the matter such as NPR's On Point:

Auto Industry Bailout

The auto industry is the largest purchaser of steel, plastic, electronics, etc and as such, it's failure would negatively impact virtually every industry and most everyone. Before you cast our manufacturing base into the abyss you might want to consider that the job you save may be your own!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Others will fill the void Posted by: suprmark
» Your logic..... Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: Your logic..... Posted by: AlienSlave
» More propaganda Posted by: IPF
» RE: More propaganda Posted by: AlienSlave
Michigander on the Fence
Posted by: Purple Girl on Nov 14, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Big 3 have been screwing US for Decades.
They have been the Dealers for the Oil industry and their Foreign Bosses since the last Oil extortion in the '70's.
Only once the japanese started kicking their ass in sales did the Big 3 blink an eye to build Shit versions of their 'fuel efficient 'car lines- what about 2 model yrs? then right back to gas guzzlers called SUV's which they CONNED Ameircans into buying ( one thing the big 3 knows is how to elicit Egoism from consumers). In fact they intentionally went after woman, first the updated Station wagon called the Minivan, but that was far to 'common' so they kicked it up a notch with size, Heigth and DVD players so they could drive their kids two blocks to soccor practice, and look better and Richer than those Moms in Mini Vans....Yes ladies your arrogance aided this economic heist! How to sell anything...play to womens Vanity-but that's a Doctoral dissertation in and of itself.
Notice the Dramaitc drop in fuel prices right now...Started just before the election. Ya think that was a fluke? Same Game different Decade.Now before this great drop in pricing it was stated conservation would have little real effect on pricing. Yet this is exactly why they are now claiming the price has Dropped. Bullshit. No doubt the downward spiral of our economy has reduced the need for Fuel Because NO ONE IS WORKING Because of Co's cut backs....But when the price drops to 1/2 price rigging becomes the obvious reason.
Personally having had 2 grandfathers work for the Big 3 before Unionization, building those corps from the ground Up..I have come to hate them for their Betrayal to those who made them Interantional Corps. I'd like to do to them what they did to MI... Leave them like spent dead whores on Woodward & 8. Unfortunately this would have a adverse effect on my friends and family who not only work in the auto industry but rely on it for their own business.
So what I would rather see is an immediate influx of money to Auto Corps who moved in as the Big 3 bugged Out. give Tax breaks and working capitol to Toyota, Honda, Saab to take over these factories and let the Big 3 go Fuck themselves. MI has the factories, the Workers (with lean hungry looks) and the Educational resources to start moving immediately Under the Guidance of Corps & CEO's who have invested in the American Worker instead of Screwing the American worker. I am sick of these 3 claiming to be the 'American Auto industry ' when they have done everything to bring America to her Knees- AGAIN!!!
In fact many past & present Big 3 top brass should be Prosecuted for Extortion, Embezzlement and TREASON! Thye have been pushing US down into third world Labor standards for Decades!Why should Americans be expected to lower their standards instead of the Corps raising the bar for the third world Workers. We are not in competition with the other Workers We are in a WAR with th eMultinational Corps who want US all to be indentured Slaves.
If the Ameircan worker and the Unions are willing to make concessions, do it for the auto Corps who have INVESTED in US, Not those who have Betrayed US!Just because they still have their World HQ's here and Fly Our Flag Does Not mean they have ANY allegience to US, or our citizens. these SOB's have been dancing and spitting on My ancestors graves for 30 decades!- Frankly I'd like to see some of thes TRAITORS Feet dangling from a very High Tree!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Michigander on the Fence Posted by: 2thepoint
A bail out is a bail out is a bail out....
Posted by: Tim Chadron on Nov 14, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enough already!! And to think it's the dems who want this. It's interesting that this very website has as their lead article, the words of Naomi Klein that talk about the bail outs as being "trillion dollar crime scene", with the question of why the dems aren't doing anything about it. Then in the next breath, here we are talking about the possible necessity of a bailout of the auto industry. Gads!

So, the auto makers want money. Here's my deal. First, all CEO and upper management assets frozen and vastly confiscated to help pay for said bailout. Oh, and did I mention that they will virtually all be fired? Cafe standards to be upped way above anything that has been discussed in recent years. In other words, you will start producing fuel efficient vehicles that puts us as equal to or better than any other auto manufacturers world wide. How are we going to do that? It's easy. Stop the wars. Put a moratorium on ALL weapons sales and development, and use those incredible engineers who have been working so long and hard developing sophisticated weaponry to develop green energy sources and more efficient means of moving an auto down the road. Oh, and did I mention that every penny that is given you will have to be paid back in full? Or that there will be caps on CEO salaries with no bonuses whatsoever until those loans are paid?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Does Bush Want Free Trade with Colombia?
Posted by: Carol Burns on Nov 14, 2008 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because he and Daddy have been exploiting the "War on Drugs" for years.

fromthewilderness.com/free/ciadrugs/bush-cheney-drugs.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Dana L. Stern
Posted by: Dana L. Stern on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly for the American People President Bush has done everything he could to destroy this democracy. After 1/20/09 everyone connected to him and those that supported criminal activities can be prosecuted. We just have to wait til 1/20/09 the end of an error! No one will escape justice, statutes of limitations will not apply. Even cases decided can be reopened. Rumors inWashington D.C. abound about those waiting to make a deal for lighter sentences with the new administration after 1/20/09. Better to go to Club Fed than Leavenworth!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mr. Dana L. Stern Posted by: Pop
We need the industrial infrastructure, but...
Posted by: truthteller on Nov 14, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...We desperately need to get away from what Jim Kunstler calls the "culture of 'Happy Motoring'". Clearly, we need to re-tool our heavy manufacturing for mass-transit, and away from private automobiles.

A couple of years ago, GM sold off it's locomotive division to a Canadian based partnership. From the 1930's to the 1980's GM had built the best diesel-electric locomotives in the World and had 80% of the U. S. market, but went into a downward spiral of ever worsening design and quality control problems after that that made minor rival GE into the dominant locomotive builder today. The problems they had with their Electro-Motive Division mirrored the problems with the rest of the company. First they quit building complete locomotives in the U. S. at LaGrange, IL, then they dumped the entire division, now based in London, ON.

I'm sure most Americans are not aware of this, but there is not one single successful company based in the U. S. that builds new rail-passenger, or rail-transit vehicles. The best you get here is final assembly of foreign built vehicles. GE is the ONLY U. S. manufacturer of totally new, self-designed and built diesel-electric locomotives from scratch. Brookville Locomotive (formerly just a maker of small, industrial railroad "critters") just got into the manufacture of a limited number of mainline locomotives from supplier provided components, and MPI in Idaho makes remanufactured locomotives from used/wrecked locomotives and new parts. No U. S. manufacturer builds totally electric locomotives or trains.

The U. S. auto industry was able to gear up in the early 1940's to build military vehicles and planes for WWII. If we are to come to their aid this time, we need to get them to build what this country really needs for people to get around - mass transit and passenger rail vehicles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THANK YOU ! Posted by: maxpayne
"cowboy president"
Posted by: REDgodowar on Nov 14, 2008 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush, a cowboy: he is not.

He successfully has invoked that image, and fooled most to believe that he is.

Cowboys value honor, courage, your "word" is your promise and contract, giving up all to help others in need, resourcefulness and endurance in dire circumstances, friendliness to all (not just an elite group), etc.

Bush personifies not one of these qualities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "cowboy president" Posted by: Malamute
Factory RATS
Posted by: AlienSlave on Nov 14, 2008 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I’ve spent a lifetime having family and friends telling me to purchase their factory built cars, refrigerators, and appliances. The reason being it will help everyone. The sad ass truth is it only helped them not me. I get too see them gloat as they wave their 1500.00 to 2000.00 weekly paychecks in my face. They are very eager to have me purchase their products but they don’t want to spend a dime on hiring me to work on their house, or the small business lawn care company they want to sell trucks to, to mow their lawn. Now that they have come to the end of the road trying to push off cheap built junk at a high price that only they can afford. The cry goes out dump in more cash so we can keep up our living the high life. The rest of us have long since learned to live below our means. As a matter of necessity and are doing quite well as a matter fact. Your life style is over and you have no one to blame but your own greed. Not me, not some distant Asian country, not some pathetic politician. Welcome to reality. You will get a bit of cash from the Federal Treasury but when that is gone what will you do. Your whole culture is self destructing before your eyes. God it feels so good to see you finally squirming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Whining and petty jealousy.... Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: Factory RATS Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Factory RATS Posted by: AlienSlave
» How sweet it is Posted by: MplsVala
» RE: How sweet it is Posted by: AlienSlave
» LOLZ Posted by: IPF
Is being "worst in history" a form of achievement?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 14, 2008 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Bush's demented game of chicken (and pique of defiance) doesn't work out and the second-largest automaker in the world fails, he will have engineered a redux of something far beyond his daddy's swan song as president: a complete, "Great Depression II"-style collapse of the America's – and maybe the world's – economy.

Now, there's a legacy he can believe in!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are dreaming...... Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: You are dreaming...... Posted by: AlienSlave
» What kind of medication...... Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: What kind of medication...... Posted by: AlienSlave
And why is Obama planning on giving Big Auto another taxpayer funded bailout all the while leaving
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 14, 2008 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the public transportation infrastructure to further languish as if 28 years weren't enough? For GOD's sake, let the system C-O-L-L-A-P-S-E !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush
Posted by: Archie1954 on Nov 14, 2008 11:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like his father he plays with people's lives. His father let the Iranian American diplomatic captives remain in jeopardy for longer than they had to be in order to make Reagan look good on his election and Bush plays with all the workers in the automobile industry to win a paltry victory for a egregious South American government. Neither of them had any empathy or compassion for humanity. They really are the scum of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"the free market"...............
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 14, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So how is it that all of these "free marketers" want WELFARE? How is it that Detroit, which by the way has received many millions over the last 15 years to re-tool their equipment is now on bended knees? As they were re-tooling for larger and larger cars because they didn't want to (and many Americans didn't) think about making smaller cars, as they fought tooth and nail to keep from having to add more miles to each gallon - NOW, NOW they need to be bailed out!!!!!

The nerve, even as Ford does make hybrids for Latin American markets! Even as they are laying off workers, workers that could have been retrained with those earlier $$$$ that they received! Earlier as they were paying their lobbiests to fight against higher fuel standards! Okay, let's give them money - but there definitely need to be major strings attached! And while we're at it - let's just give every American citizen making under $200,000.00, $1 million dollars, just to make it even!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Auto industry not issue. 'Corporate finacial Empire'
Posted by: amacd on Nov 14, 2008 6:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the Democratic Party’s traditional claim of concern for the ‘working class’ and industrial workers makes the appearance of trying to help auto workers a required political gesture, there will be great pain whether the corrupt and incompetent CEOs of the auto industry get ‘bailout’ money or not --- they certainly won't use it to help workers, any more than Wall Street did to help their clerical workers.

Any real progress must start with the investment industry which is the rotten core that determines and drives the abuses of all industrial sectors and all abuses of the ‘working class’.

As Nobel laurite in economics, Paul Krugman, has repeatedly noted in the NYTimes, “powerful stimulus needs to be progressive” --- which means it has to be 'externality positive' AND sustained, by individual as well as public investments.

Al Gore wrote a great op-ed here Sunday about the 'good news' synergies between new energy technologies, jobs, our environment, economic recovery, etc. But he didn't address the 'best news' which an economist like Krugman understands; that accepted government control over tax policy can change the whole balance of investing in our economy from one focused on negative externality scams to one of positive externality progress.

Yes, our US government already has the proper power and role of taxing investment in the production of things that hurt the economy, and giving tax breaks to things that help our economy, to provide true cost signals (which include externality costs) to industry --- so that the market functions FOR society, and not against it.

Four of the biggest industries in our democratic country are clearly producing things that hurt, rather than help, all of us: the financial industry – which produces ‘debt bombs’, the war industry --- which produces real bombs, the energy industry --- which produces globe-killing pollution, and the auto industry --- which produces energy consuming junk.

By simply starting with the first of these broken and destructive enabling industries, finance, we the people --- through our government, can use tax policy to channel trillions of our dollars into sustainable and honest investments for 21st century technologies and jobs, and away from dishonest, unsustainable and anti-investment schemes that produce nothing except pain for us and looted profits for the super-wealthy.

The starting point for this rebuilding of a healthy, progressive, honest, sustainable, and democratic investment industry is already in place – in the form of the new Socially Responsible Investment industry (SRI). We only need to expand on its success, assure (through government regulation and standards) that it honestly invests in positive (and not negative) externality industries, expand its scope and promote its image as the Socially Responsible and Honest Investment industry (SRHI), and give tax breaks to all Americans who invest in it for a better 21st century future, while applying extra tax costs to any laggards who want to continue to make money the ‘old fashioned way’, in the ‘fixed casino’ of ruthless investors of the old 19th century Wall Street of unbridled greed and destructive industries.

The snake of 'corporatist Empire' can best be killed by first cutting off its head --- the greedy, out-dated, and ANTI-social investment industry.

Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Partisan bantor
Posted by: upatriot on Nov 15, 2008 7:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be as easy to criticize Bush if he were the one suggesting a huge corporate welfare boondoggle for the Automotive industry. But really, what can we expect from Bush? For once he's towing his party's line.

How can folks who consider themselves progressive support any form of corporate welfare. There has to be a better way to help American workers.

Visit my blog, UrbanPatriot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement