comments_image -

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: Through Thick and Thin

Soup and sauce making is a true skill, there's no question, and with either, the foundation of flavor lies in its stock or broth.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Soup and sauce making is a true skill, there's no question, and with either, the foundation of flavor lies in its stock or broth. In the case of thick soups, and most definitely sauces, an important factor to consider is its thickener. When liquid takes on a certain viscosity it coats and stays on the palate longer, thus adding texture and offering the diner added ability to ascertain its natural flavors.

There are, of course, many ways to thicken a stock. It can simply be reduced to syrup through evaporation, which is done by simmering and skimming until a desired consistency is achieved. Other options include the use of an added thickener -- such as cornstarch, flour, potatoes, rice, butter -- and the lesser used and more obsolete method of thickening by adding tempered eggs, just to name a few.

Of those mentioned, the most common thickener is flour, but unlike its counterpart, cornstarch, it should never be merely dissolved and added to a broth -- boiling or not -- at least not with hopes of a promising outcome. Thicken it, yes, raw flour will most definitely thicken liquid, but the flavor and consistency of the soup, sauce, or whatever will be extremely compromised. Most likely the result of adding raw flour will be lumpy and pasty, not only in physical appearance but also in flavor. Cooked flour, on the other hand, is rendered free of these undesirable traits.

So how, you may wonder, do professionals create such satiny smooth and lump-free soups and sauces? The key is roux (pronounced "roo"), or equal parts fat and flour cooked until varying degrees of doneness.

Oh sure, there will be some young culinary Turks who will disagree with this, and conclude that roux is passé. The time honored tradition of using roux has been banished by many, just as it was banished in the late fifties and early sixties when a group of talented young French chefs rocked the unsinkable boat of Cuisine Classique and began serving flourless reduction sauces in what became known as Cuisine Nouvelle. Unfortunately, as brilliant as the chefs were, Nouvelle Cuisine ultimately became somewhat of a parody of their original intentions, just as "tall food" has in more recent years.

I first encountered the anti-roux movement while applying for a sous chef position in New Orleans during the mid-eighties. The chef, nice as he was, was interrogating me with a barrage of questions. Why did I choose cooking as a profession? What is my favorite style of cooking? How do you make this, or that? But it was the gleam in his eye that gave it away when he tucked in his chin and almost whispered -- almost demanded -- in his Franco-Germanic accent, "And you do not thicken demi-glace with roux, no?"

I lied, or at least stretched the truth a little, and said simply, "But of course not chef -- triple reduction and monter au beurre (mounted with butter)." I was hired on the spot, but as fate would have it, I never did end up working at his restaurant.

I met with another chef who openly proclaimed his disdain for roux, and this was close to home and more recently. A few years ago I found myself working as chef at a local restaurant and a new partner was brought into the business -- the new partner happened to be a chef (talk about knowing when your days are numbered). He was also something of a "celebrity chef," so I was told.

Anyhow, this particular chef was pretty vocal about his disrespect for roux. In fact, when he saw me making the substance in question to thicken a demi-glace for a banquet that was scheduled the following evening, his only remark, with his nose in the air, was "I haven't made roux in so long I probably wouldn't know how," in a tone that insinuated that roux-making was the act of a non-human, or at least a cook that was not on the "cutting edge." This statement, I knew, was nonsense, because despite his arrogance he was a good cook. This same cook was also quoted in a local newspaper describing his version of flourless turkey gravy -- highly concentrated turkey stock emulsified with extra-virgin olive oil. However flavorful and trendy it may be, an olive oil and stock emulsification is not gravy.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]