Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Desperate Right's Five Biggest Flops of the 2008 Election

By Brad Reed, AlterNet. Posted November 8, 2008.


How Sarah Palin, Joe the Plumber and other stupid stunts did not win the election for McCain.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Brad Reed

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

After every election cycle, our national press corps likes to point out the so-called game-changing moments during the campaign that supposedly shifted momentum decisively toward one candidate. Classic examples include Gerald Ford freeing Poland, Ronald Reagan telling Jimmy Carter that he went again, Michael Dukakis appearing in a tank, Bush I looking at his watch, Al Gore sighing and John Kerry windsurfing. At their heart, these moments are superficial explanations for very complex processes and phenomena, which is the biggest reason why the media love to discuss them. After all, it beats talking about policy.

Over the past two decades, the Right has excelled at manipulating the media's love of shallow, scripted storylines to transform our national discourse into one long psychodrama in which Democratic candidates inevitably make some tragic gaffe that shows voters how truly out of touch they are with the Real Americans living in the heartland. These moments are usually dramatized by illustrations of blaring sirens on the Drudge Report accompanied by bold, red-lettered headlines that say things like, "SHOCK VIDEO: Kerry orders Swiss cheese on his cheesesteak." Our press corps then dutifully reports on how Kerry's disdain for traditional Cheez Wiz shows why Democrats are having trouble connecting with blue-collar voters who suspect that Democrats are all secretly Jesus-hating communists.

This election, however, none of the GOP's scripted game-changing moments were able to derail the Obama campaign. Indeed, it could be argued that many of the non-game-changers (See: Palin, Sarah) actually worked in Obama's favor. Here, then, are the five most uneventful events that did not decisively help McCain win the election:

Non-Game Changer #5: A crazed Obama supporter did not carve a backward "B" into a McCain staffer's face.

At first, the Ashley Todd saga seemed like the perfect way to shift the election momentum back to McCain. Here, after all, was a young white woman who had been robbed and assaulted by a crazed black Obama supporter who went so far as to mutilate her face when he learned she was working for McCain. Matt Drudge blared Todd's "shock" story at the top of his home page and showed a picture of the poor young conservative with a black eye and a backward "B" carved into her face. Some of the dimmer right-wing bloggers such as Red State's Erick Erickson jumped all over the story and proclaimed that the media were to blame for Todd's alleged assault because they had "cooked up tales about Republican verbal violence" at McCain rallies. Obama also took his share of the blame because he had urged his supporters to get in opponents' faces and aggressively defend their positions and beliefs.

Todd's story, of course, was such obvious bullshit that even Michelle Malkin expressed skepticism about it. While this didn't stop the McCain campaign from actively pushing it to the media, it did ensure that the non-story had a nonexistent shelf life.

Non-Game Changer #4: Obama's non-friendship with Bill Ayers did not leave him vulnerable to charges of supporting terrorism.

In the 1970s, Bill Ayers was a member of the Weather Underground, a fringe lefty outfit that become notorious for unsuccessfully using terrorism to achieve its political ends. By the 1990s, Ayers had become a professor at the University of Chicago and a powerful player in the Chicago political scene. Obama first met Ayers back when then-Illinois State Sen. Alice Palmer invited him to a gathering at Ayers' house. In the years that followed, Obama and Ayers would sporadically serve together on nonprofit charity and education products and ... that's pretty much it.

But while Obama's relationship with Ayers was not exactly what you'd call "close," it was used by the Right as a potential game changer. Sarah Palin made the most high-profile statement about Obama and Ayers by accusing the senator of "palling around with terrorists." Traveling even further into Cloud Cuckoo Land was the National Review's Andy McCarthy, who actually pondered whether Ayers had secretly ghostwritten Obama's first book. And of course, the gold medal for lunacy on this front went to blogger Tom Maguire, who speculated that Obama's connection to Ayers and his interest in ending apartheid in South Africa made it conceivable that Obama could have been involved in an anti-apartheid bombing in 1981.

Non-Game Changer #3: McCain does not suspend his campaign to not help with the Wall Street bailout.

In a campaign filled with goofy stunts, McCain's announcement that he was "suspending" his campaign in order to help craft a Wall Street bailout bill was perhaps the goofiest. After Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson told Congress that they needed $700 billion to buy up the toxic mortgage-backed securities that were threatening to deep-six the economy, McCain dramatically announced that he was temporarily halting his presidential campaign to deal with the crisis. The idea behind the stunt was to show that McCain was a mavericky bipartisan consensus builder who would bring both parties together to pass mavericky bipartisan legislation that would save the asses of extremely rich people.

Fortunately for us, it didn't quite work out that way. McCain should have known that the move would be a bust when pollster Dick Morris, who often serves as America's bellwether for wrongness, called it "the most brilliant move since Sarah Palin" and said that McCain would "save the country" and become known as "the credentialed expert for handling the economy." This could well have happened, of course, if the congressional Democrats had been stupid enough to let themselves be used as McCain's grand campaign props, which they weren't. When McCain swooped into Washington to supposedly save the day, the Democrats smartly told him to take a hike.

"Before McCain came in, we thought we were working," Congressman Barney Frank said at the time. "McCain comes in, it gets screwed up, now McCain leaves."

Heckuva job.

Non-Game Changer #2: Joe the Plumber does not convince America that Barack Obama is a communist.

During a campaign event in Ohio, a local unlicensed plumber named Joe Wurzelbacher told Barack Obama that he was planning on buying his own plumbing business that would have a net income of $250,000, which would be enough to raise his taxes under Obama's tax plan. When Obama said that his tax plan was designed to "spread the wealth around," the McCain campaign accused Obama of outright socialism and used Joe as the symbol of how blue-collar workers in this country would be harmed if Obama raised taxes on the wealthy. In reality, Obama's plan would only raise taxes on Joe the Plumber's theoretical small business between $0 and $900, but that didn't stop McCain from referencing Joe's untragic non-plight more than 26 billion times during the third presidential debate.

Afterward, McCain even went so far as to claim that Joe the Plumber was the "winner" of the debate and that Joe was "the man" for exposing Barack Obama's sinister plot to bankrupt America's large class of billionaire plumbers. But in an economy where gains in recent years have gone primarily to the wealthy, the idea of "spreading the wealth around" didn't seem quite so horrible to a majority of voters. And besides, it's pretty hard to feel too sorry for Joe the Plumber when he's pondering whether or not to quit his job as a plumber to become a country music star.

Non-Game Changer #1: Sarah Palin does not get Hillary Clinton supporters to defect to the McCain campaign.

In the aftermath of the Democratic primary feud between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, some in the McCain campaign were eager to "ratfuck" Obama's presidential bid by persuading Democratic women to shift their allegiances to John McCain. The crown jewel in this strategy was the selection of Sarah Palin, a little-known half-term governor from Alaska, as McCain's vice presidential running mate. While the surprise selection of Palin did generate some much-needed media hype for McCain's flagging presidential bid, it also practically begged the media to heavily scrutinize a politician of whom practically no one had ever heard.

Palin's problems began when she stopped reading from a script and started talking with reporters. Palin had trouble answering hard-hitting questions such as what newspapers and magazines she read ("All of them!") and whether she could name a Supreme Court case that she had ever disagreed with. Even more worrisome was her claim that living in close proximity to Russia gave her invaluable foreign policy experience because "as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there." And who could forget Palin's assertion that the government's $700 billion Wall Street bailout plan would "help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up the economy." Also, the bailout was proof that "we've got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing" and that "reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americas."

After the election, many former McCain staffers rushed to tell the media that Palin was even more disastrously ignorant in real life than she was on the campaign trail. FOX News' Carl Cameron, of all people, got the scoop that Palin did not know that Africa was a continent and that she didn't know which countries were involved in the North American Free Trade Agreement (Hint: They're the three biggest countries in North America).

If the McCain campaign really thought that Palin could win over former female Clinton supporters, then they must think that female voters are some of the stupidest people on the planet. Memo to the GOP: Millions of people flocked to Clinton in the primaries because of her intellect and her wonky passion for bread-and-butter economic issues such as universal health care. She cannot be easily replaced by a woman whose chief accomplishment so far in life has been eating a moose.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: right-wingers, obama, election08, mccain, stupidity

Brad Reed is a writer living in Boston. His work has previously appeared in the American Prospect Online, and he blogs frequently at Sadly, No!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Fascists Should Confine Themselves To Consuming Large Undulates
Posted by: ranchero42 on Nov 8, 2008 1:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When they start eating each other it's always embarrassing public spectacle. Or is embarrassment yet another emotion they cannot feel?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Laundry Lists
Posted by: peakoiler on Nov 8, 2008 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems like everyday on Alternet there are 2-3 "articles" that are simply lists - five things here, ten things there. It adds up to crappy and boring journalism. The scary thing is that there are probably a great number of Alternet's readers who think its cool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» missed the point Posted by: Auk
» RE: Laundry Lists Posted by: harryf200
» Just wait til New Years Posted by: chaoslegs
Stop hatin' on the "right".
Posted by: -matti on Nov 8, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Start getting ready to do something to make that CHANGE happen!

One way that I've found?

november5.org

Check it out.

Become an Active American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I don't understand... Posted by: -matti
» RE: Calm down, matti Posted by: Longdream
» RE: You're no Salesman? Posted by: Longdream
» So this is a joke, right? Posted by: -matti
» LOL! Of course it's a joke! Posted by: harryf200
Mean-spirited with no vision
Posted by: taxidriver on Nov 8, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of these add up to the biggest problem of the McCain campaign: It was mean-spirited and it had no vision other than "country first." McCain sought to divide Americans at precisely the time when we need to come together to address major problems. And a majority of Americans decided they preferred Obama's sense of unity and optimism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mean-spirited with no vision Posted by: helenwheels
Nice
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Nov 8, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL, It is what it is. Bottom line is, the Obama elected the Bush Regime is "out the door"! Is it January yet? Sooner the better. Good Riddance Dictator Bush!

Jess
Is your ISP spying on you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BANKING ON HEAVEN . COM
Posted by: X-POLYGAMIST WIFE on Nov 8, 2008 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now there's HOPE for 10,000 FLDS polygamists in Colorado City, Arizona who John McCain ignored for 26 years. HALLELUJAH.

Thank you America for electing Barack Obama!

http://www.bankingonheaven.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Game Changer WAS
Posted by: robchapman on Nov 8, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain's utter spinelessness in pandering to the whacky right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You didn't headline the stupidest part
Posted by: cellis56 on Nov 8, 2008 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain's insistence that Obama would "spread the wealth around"--as if this would be the worst possible thing that could happen--at a time when American savers are seeing their retirement accounts shrivel away, their jobs dry up and disappear, and their SUVs parked in the garage for lack of gas money--simply shows how completely out of touch the rich are with the average American.

It shows too that the campaign, like George Bush's, tried to capitalize on fear and loathing. Joe the Plumber linking Obama to Sammy Davis Junior. Sarah Palin tying Obama to Al Qaeda. Fox News shaking the word "liberal" in its teeth, like a dog trying to kill a chicken.

The funniest thing about the US of the last 100 years is our hubris (These colors don't run!) viewed in the context of our quaking in our boots and shivering under our bedclothes at the slightest boogeyman--the Reds are coming! Al Qaeda's coming! and in between The Liberals are coming! When are we going to actually demonstrate some of the courage we brag about???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a pretty lame list.
Posted by: Longdream on Nov 8, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If these were supposed to be the game-changers, McCainCo had NO idea what game it was playing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's a pretty lame list. Posted by: westomoon
» RE: It's a pretty lame list. Posted by: Longdream
Correction
Posted by: Evelyn on Nov 8, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see how to contact the author, so I will post this minor detail here. Bill Ayers is not a professor at the University of Chicago (Michelle worked there and so did Barack.) Ayers is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The two schools are often confused, as they are both on the South Side in Chicago, but they are quite different.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Correction Posted by: fkuechmann
McCain deserved to lose -----
Posted by: symcokid on Nov 8, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and didn't have a prayer especially after stating that we should be in Iraq for a hundred years besides voting with Bush 90% of the time. At least that eight year reign is over with and it is clear to see that Obama is taking the 'Bull by the horn' already and I believe we have more to look forward to than we have had in a long time, Thank God.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McCain deserved to lose ----- Posted by: helenwheels
Was the elction won or was it lost?
Posted by: harryf200 on Nov 8, 2008 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well ... I suppose it might be construed that McCain/Palin lost the election rather than Obama won it. And I dare say McCain might have given Obama more of a contest if he handn't saddled himself with accident-prone and sometimes witless Palin. (It almost seems he wanted to lose! Indeed, since George W didn't vote, it's easy to conclude even he didn't want McCain/Palin to win but just couldn't bring himself to vote for Obama!)

However, my impression from across The Pond is that such a conclusion would not be fair to Obama. He came across as a good, strong candidate in his own right, and not the best of the worst.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The people of the United States won this election
Posted by: grindermonkey on Nov 8, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And does the word "undulate" have any meaning as a noun?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Maybe a typo Posted by: rkewen
WEll there you go
Posted by: Zimbly on Nov 8, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There you go, its nice to see the "Repugnicans" strategy debunked and clarified into concise talking points.

They were all attacks on Obama's character and trying to manipulate the public perception.

It didn't work....why? It worked in every other election since Reagan.

1) Obama had the "duck power"...by Obama letting these things just roll off of him and not giving them much energy, by his reaction, the public was capable of making up their own minds.

2)Unlike previously and unlike what the Repugnicans think, Americans are really hurting and really suffering as a collective, Obama understood this, his speeches spoke to that strata of society , there was a real connection, Obama's strategy was to "connect" and it worked.
3) Lasty people have grown tired of the Rupert Muderdock style of TV, FOX will in the end fade into non- existence because it will gradually become more and more irrelevant to societies real needs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Different perspective on the top 5
Posted by: channing on Nov 8, 2008 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 5 biggest non-winners for the RNC:

#1 Palin:

Alaskan approval ratings for Palin have taken a nose-dive to a still-strong 68%, down from some 90%+/- prior to her campaigning. I am completely convinced that her popularity was fueled by a sense in Alaska that "nobody cares what we do up here" and they just as well should "have fun with our politics as be too serious" about who sits in office, and "might as well have someone to look at". Once on stage with real thinkers, real-world politics, and real government servants, she shriveled and blew away like a dried flower, and it will be clearer to a larger and larger swath of Alaskans that they should not play with world fire. She also exposed the horrific reality-deficit and reckless-endangerment presented by the fanatical religious-right, and galvanized moderates into action against it. My bets are that she NOW will be taken seriously and that she loses her very next race to a serious government servant, (that is, if Alaska can get Diebold out of running their misunder-the-table elections).

#2 Socialism, Joe the Plumber and Tax-Relief for the Super Rich:

These all depended on the Socialists Are Coming- The Communists Are Coming mass-market scare-theme. Now that it's been 25 years of Trickle-Down theory seen and felt in practice in the real-world, almost no Americans have been unscathed and/or personally unfamiliar with someone making out like insatiable pirates with unequal/unearned massive gains while normal working Americans stagnated and declined. It's a GOOD thing the RNC championed this theme because this election was able to get people thinking about this macro-economic issue, seriously. Like every addicted criminal, unrestrained capitalism overreached and got caught just in time for the election.

#3 Ayers-Terrorism:

Their second Mass Fear approach used Ayers as a point-man to validate their domestic terrorism "We Must Spend Hundreds Of Billion Of Dollars A Year Against the Unibomber" Bull Shit. First is that their point-man is a respectable Professor at a respectable and highly rated university. Second is that he was part of a '60's movement that had to take to the streets to Stop the War. And claims that a civilian bomber was trying to kill thousands of innocent Americans rings hollow. Fact is, the Military Industrial Complex, symbolized by the Pentagon, has been War-Mongering since WWII and providing endless plunders for its stake-holders. Americans are finally awakening to President Eisenhower's 1961 Warning that the MIC is the single greatest threat to American Liberty and Constitutional government. Ayers was on the right side and did his time.

#4 No-Show Campaign Suspension:

McCain was already a self-confessed non-economist, his flagrant posturing to draw attention to his false-seriousness in meddling with real budget-crunchers was akin to him stabbing himself in the back, especially when Obama was already campaigning seriously about practical solutions and not pretending to be the center of the fix. The contrast confirmed McCain was a Desperado willing to try anything however unreasonable.

#5. Backwards "B" Symbolized a Backwards Campaign:

If there was one symbol of just how desperate and backwards the entire McCain campaign was, it was having a mentally-frail supporter self-inflict a wound on her face to claim victimhood and stir racial-fear. This not only was really, really stupid, but it made the entire fear-mongering class lose credibility. The false racism, terrorism, criminality they tried to associate with the Obama camp and Acorn was ripped to shreds about a day after they capitalized on it, proving McCain and the RNC behind him would deliberately use fear without a prerequisite checking of facts... Game Over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, the fluff is what matters... CNN, ABC, CBS, FOX, NPR, MSNBC all agree.
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Nov 8, 2008 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The media fluff that was served up before the election must now be reviewed after the election - 'cause fluff is what matters. McCain used the wrong fluff, so he lost. Is that really true?

Only if the public is composed of idiots who believe whatever they see on the TV... I don't think that's the case for the majority of the public, though.

Here are the issues the Republicans screwed up on, in no particular order - and most of the public would agree:

* the economic collapse

* the attack on environmental standards

* the failure to develop clean energy

* national security failures at home and abroad

* massive government corruption (contracts & leases)

That's why the public booted Republicans in a landslide, across the board. Now, the public is waiting to see what steps the Democrats will take to deal with the mess. If the Democrats don't deliver, the public will quickly lose the current celebratory mood and turn into an angry raging beast - it can happen overnight.

P.S. Call your Congressmember and tell them to support Waxman's bid to get Dingell booted out of the Energy Committee chairmanship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The REAL #1 reason mcbarf lost?
Posted by: willymack on Nov 8, 2008 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are simply not enough stupid, ignorant clods in the US to elect a crazy old fuddy-duddy paired with a NITWIT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The REAL #1 reason mcbarf lost? Posted by: BigElectricCat
Avid reader
Posted by: frank69 on Nov 8, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What newspapers and magazines do I read?
All of them.
What is Africa?
A country.
What countries comprise NAFTA?
Obama is a friend of terrorists!
What is the Bush Doctrine?
I read the King James bible.
Hu's in China.
What?
Second base.
Who?
China.

Had enough?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Avid reader Posted by: Longdream
Bill Maher said it best
Posted by: bannelee on Nov 8, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last night Bill Maher said it best. He said (not an exact quote)that now that Obama's in,no more investigations on trumped up charges,like with Bill Clinton.Until he subverts the Constitution,starts an illegal war,wiretaps,outs a CIA agent,etc,etc,they have NO credibility to investigate anyone!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bill Maher said it best Posted by: weenie
The highest emotion.
Posted by: Sinibaldi on Nov 8, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a winding
road you can
find the light
of a barrier, and
always, when
you try to
forget her, a
lovely emotion
discovers in sips
a delicate candle.

Francesco Sinibaldi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHEN IT ALL COMES TOGETHER
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 8, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a pathetic campaign. That Republcan smirk makes me crazy. It was shocking to see the hatred aroused by Palin. McCain never said a word about 'us'. Just insulted and degraded Obama. He deserved to lose. He offered us absolutely nothing. We've had 8 years of nothing. Someone put it very well. "This was not an election it was a revolution". A peaceful one at that. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrytom Re. spread the blame
Posted by: terryton on Nov 8, 2008 3:44 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please in all this responsibility assessment do not forget that somewhere around 50 million morons voted for the McCain Palin ticket. These are our fellow citizens. What kind of selfish personal issues or bigotry could cause so many to put America in such peril especially after 8 years of Bush? So many live in self imposed ignorance and denial that I often have little respect for my fellows. I am relieved beyond belief that the election was not stolen. I was pleasantly wrong, as I was sure it would be so. We have Obama and his wonderful followers for what must be the best run campaign and get out the vote effort in our history. Thank you Lord.
Terrytom

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Terrytom Re. spread the blame Posted by: LostInAmerica
Did anyone notice that Obama has won 1 of the electoral votes in NE and now the rightwing GOP
Posted by: jwverez on Nov 9, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in NE are preparing to abolish the idea of splitting the EVs and force NE back to winner take all? My state of TX could sure as hell use the electoral vote splitting for a change and so too could all 50 states. Better yet, abolish the Electoral College and actually pay attention to people's concerns. Never mind. It's just a "dream" !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's not outFOX 'em
Posted by: misscerris on Nov 9, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to preface this comment by saying that I am a regular reader & supporter or Alternet & it's mission. However, at times, I think that articles like this border on malicious and unproductive. For the past 8 years, we've watched right wing pundits & corporate controlled media create a division of this country based on negative stereotyping & "nanananaboo boo boo" playground point-and-laugh politics. What we need now is a shift in attitudes. We cannot persuade others to have revolutions of hearts & minds by being seemingly negative. Instead of pointing and taking pleasure in the failure of the Republican's dismal 2008 campaign, it is much more important that we focus on the future of this country. There is an incredible amount of work to be done, & we have got to find a way to overcome partisan wedge-issue bickering to work together in a time where our democracy is being threatened to it's foundation by our own division & partisanship. Let's not follow the hate-spewing example set by Fox news, but instead be a beacon for progressive & productive change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong university
Posted by: fkuechmann on Nov 9, 2008 8:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
>Ayers had become a professor at the University of Chicago

Uh, I think Ayers professes at the University of Illinois at Chicago

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One could argue those were all successes
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Nov 9, 2008 11:42 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The gallup poll at the end of June had the race at 47/42 in Obama's favor, which is essentially the same margin he ended up winning by, given the limited accuracy of polls.

On the other hand, the total meltdown in the financial markets following the conventions was a severe undertow on the incumbent party, and thus McCain, so I'd argue all five things on the list actually helped him hold steady while trying to swim upstream against a daily flood of bad stock market news -- not to mention the hundreds of millions of dollars Obama had dumped on him from wealthy donors with which to flood the airwaves the final two months, all the positive Big Media coverage one could ever hope for, combined with all the negative coverage of Palin, etc.

Obviously the cumulative effect was insufficient, but in one sense it was a miracle just to hold steady. This wasn't a 62/38 landslide like it would have been if McCain and his campaign were totally horrible.

So you can fool yourself that the things on that list were big negatives, cause, of course they didn't work any magic on you. But then nothing McCain could have said would have changed your mind since you were always going to vote for Obama. Duh. So I don't think you're looking at this objectively.

The biggest mistake the McCain campaign made was in not creating a narrative that the 35% freefall in the markets was caused by widespread fear of what an Obama presidency would mean to business, employment and consumer spending, and the economy generally, which is a plausible scenario.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ayers the Terrorist?
Posted by: Polenium on Nov 14, 2008 11:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ayers broke media silence today on Democracy Now! He would take issue with your glib description of his activites as terrorism.
No one was hurt. No one died. They were targeted acts of symbolic civil disobedience.
The object was to stop the carnage in Viet Nam.
The issue was much more urgent then than now. The slow bleed of the US's Middle
Eastern Wars is much easier to ignore than more than 50 thousand American deaths and millions of Viet Namese slaughtered (11000 a month). American kids were drafted right out of high school and had no choice but to fight or flee.
In context it could even be called a measured response.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AYERS IS A HOMOPHOBIC SCUM BAG
Posted by: ds1st on Nov 24, 2008 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ayers by all accounts is a HOMOPHOBIC scum bag. Socialist and communistic societies do not belive is Gay rights.

AYERS is not a threat to the United States though. Just an old man weenie blithering brainless blather on outdated socialist ideals. Cuba does not have MTV, North Korea does not have healthcare. Socialism and communism is dead or dying. AYERS and friends can’t see the Forrest from the trees.

Ayers is a would be communist, but not willing to live the lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement