Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Fixing Health Care Could Be Obama's Path to Greatness

By Dean Baker, Huffington Post. Posted November 6, 2008.


Extending health care insurance can be an effective stimulus that will provide an immediate boost to the economy.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Dean Baker

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

President Obama won an enormous victory this week, one that will change the country. But this is just the beginning as he said in his victory speech.

President Obama has the opportunity to establish himself as one of the truly great presidents in his first days in office. He can take advantage of the current economic crisis to announce plans to jump start national health care insurance. Extending health care insurance can be an effective stimulus that will provide an immediate boost to the economy.

More importantly, it will provide the same access to health care that people in other wealthy countries have long taken for granted. For this accomplishment, President Obama will rank alongside Presidents Roosevelt and Lincoln as one of the nation's truly great presidents.

The backdrop is straightforward. Economists from across the political spectrum are now calling for a large stimulus package to limit the economy's decline and the rise in unemployment. The consensus is in the range of 2.0-2.5 percent of GDP, or $300 billion to $400 billion a year.

This level of agreement among economists is encouraging, but the reality is that it is difficult to effectively spend $300 billion to $400 billion a year on short notice. There are some no-brainers that belong in any stimulus package: aid to state and local governments, extended unemployment benefits, and extra money for food stamps and home heating oil assistance. This is money that will be quickly spent, boosting the economy, while helping those hit hardest by the downturn.

A stimulus should also include increases in infrastructure spending, which will come about by moving plans forward for projects already on the books. There should also be a substantial green component, involving retrofitting homes, businesses and other buildings, which will reduce our energy use.

However, after we get through this list, the sum total for the stimulus package is probably still in the neighborhood of $150 billion a year, at best half of the targeted sum. This is the gap that will be filled by extending health care coverage.

As a basic outline, the government can give a substantial tax credit (e.g. $3,000) to employers who cover workers for the first time in 2009 and 2010. It can also offer a tax credit covering most, or all, of any additional payments by employers who increase their coverage.

This means that an employer who picked up the workers' share of insurance payments, or got a better plan, would have much of the cost reimbursed by the tax credit. Credits can also be given to individuals who are either self-employed, unemployed, or not otherwise covered through their employer.

If 20 million workers get coverage through this tax credit, that would cost $60 billion. If another 60 million get an average of $1,000 in additional health care benefits, this would cost another $60 billion. If we also throw in funding to reduce the health care burden for Medicare beneficiaries, for example by $1,000 each, this will cost roughly $40 billion. The total cost would be $160 billion a year, a reasonable target for the stimulus package.

At the same time that this health stimulus is enacted, we should open up the Medicare system, allowing all employers and individuals the option to buy into a Medicare-type plan. This is important, because a well-working public sector plan will be important to controlling costs over the long-term.

After 2010, the tax credits would be cut back, with the goal being a system of subsidies that pay the full cost for low-income people, but phase out at higher income levels. It will also be important to use the Medicare-type plan and other tools to squeeze waste out of the system, since controlling health care costs is essential to sustaining a healthy economy over the long-term.

Extending health care coverage in this way is effectively eating dessert before dinner, but this is exactly what we want to do to counter the recession. It is important that we spend money now to boost the economy. We will be getting double-value if this stimulus can be spent usefully toward meeting a longstanding goal, like providing national health care insurance, rather than just buying things at the mall.

Fixing the health care system so that costs are effectively contained will be a long and difficult political battle. Powerful interest groups, like the insurance and pharmaceutical industries will use all their power to obstruct this effort. The health care system's waste is their profit.

However, we should be reassured by the fact that every other country has managed to more effectively contain their costs. Average per person health care costs in other wealthy countries are less than half as high as in the United States, and they all enjoy better health care outcomes.

Over the long-run the task of containing health care costs is clearly doable. The question for President Obama now is whether he is prepared to take the big leap toward being a truly great president. This opportunity may not come again.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, health care

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Maggie Mahar
Posted by: maggiemahar on Nov 6, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In his victory speech, Obama did not mention healthcare. Why not?

Because he and his sdvisers understand that pouring billions into healthcare will not stimulate the economy.

There are things that we can do to pave the way for health care reform--structural changes that we can make, redistributing dollars, but as both Obama and his advisers understand, we should not be pouring money into a broken healthcare system.

Notice that, even before the economic meltdown, Obama said he would reform healthcare by the end of his first term--in four years. He understands that this is a huge endeavor, which will take more than one piece of legislation.

We elected him because he is a calm,, deliberate person. Let him do his job. Healcare reform is too important to view it as
a chance to "score" politically, or "make history."

We do need to stimulate he economy; most of all we need to create jobs.

True healthcare reform means losing jobs. Granted, we do need more primary care physicians and nurses but med students are no longer going into primary care, and nurses are retiring faster than they are entering the profession. Working conditions for nurses are terrible. Until we reform our hospitals, they will not take these jobs.

Meanwhile we need to close some hospitals providing subpar (and dangerous) care while eliminating redundant facilities. This means fewer jobs. (WE shouldn't rush into this, but eventually this is the direction we need to go in.)

We also need to open more community health care facilities, but net/net health care reform means a loss of jobs.

As Congressional Budget Direct Peter Orszag pointed out just a few weeks ago, rising health care spending is the greatest threat to the economy: health care inflation is, Orszag said, the major driver behind our fiscal crisis.

He warned that if we do not contain healht care spending, foreign investors (who now hold 55% of our treasuries) will stop buying them. (Purchases have already slowed.)

Morever, as Orszag and virtually the entire cognoscenti of the medical profession agree, we are not getting value for the health care dollars we spend today. About 1/3 are spent on ineffective, unnecessary, over-priced
procedures and products. This over-spending is hazardous to our heatlh (Ever unncessary treatment exposes the patient to risk without benefit.)

To stimulate the economy we need to spend on things that will add to the wealth of the nation--the things Obama mentioned in his victory speech: bridges, schools, alternative energy.

I've written about what is driving health care inflation and what Orszag and leading experts in the medical professoin have to say on www.healthbeatblog.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Simplest Solution -->
Posted by: Last Chance on Nov 6, 2008 12:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Extend Medicare to all citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dean Baker's Path to Mediocrity ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Nov 8, 2008 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Baker's answers to our healthcare crisis are tepid and timid. He invokes the healthcare all the other industrialized nations enjoy then proposes a potpourri of piecemeal palliatives that don't come anywhere near.

What we need is Medicare for All. Anything less and Obama's Presidency will be remembered as an abject failure of healthcare policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MarchHare
Posted by: MarchHare on Nov 10, 2008 5:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want the same health insurance coverage enjoyed by our public servants--the president, members of Congress and the Supreme Court, and other government employees. They work for us--the public. We pay their salaries. And their health insurance premiums. As their employers, I believe we should enjoy the same benefits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what can you do for your country?
Posted by: the director on Nov 15, 2008 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What can Barak Obama do for us? Fix us all by changing health care?

What are we willing to do for the nation? Isn’t that the more critical question?

Paula Poundstone aired an audio essay to President Elect Barak Obama last week on
NPR. She referenced the call to arms of the citizens of the US made by FDR when we
last faced the challenge of a failing economy and the impending wars abroad.
We the citizens of the US rose to the occasion.
In 1960 John Kennedy asked not what the nation can do for you but what are you willing to do for the nation.
We have this leadership equation all as backwards, we elected a leader to lead those who are willing to put country ahead of our own selfish desires.

Health care is such one of those issues.
Are we willing to demand sustainable organically grown food so that our health will improve? We are what we eat and those chemically grown foods or those processed to the detriment of nutrition must be replaced by REAL food.
Or are you complacent to eat processed foods while you sit on your back side and inject insulin so your body can process these complex sugars.

The easy part is something that Pres. Elect Obama and the congress can do in a heartbeat.
Repeal the 1954 Farm Subsides Rider to the Farm Subsidies Act of 1946; which pays farmers for not growing certain cash crops in favor of what the nation needs for food.
Tobacco is an excellent example, never a food but a cash crop none the less.
Corn was never an excellent food is now grown to make ethanol, not a good choice if the whole energy picture is considered, but the farmers have made some money by depriving us of food in favor of fuels.

Pay farmers even large industrialized farmer to grow organically without the chemicals
Mandated by this 1954 law. The greatest unknown bail out in the history of the our nation was that provided to the petrochemical industry and the prime motivator for our current “crop” of advertised drugs. 20 years after this law was imposed we saw gasoline at $4.00 per gallon. Our cars were playing second fiddle to the more costly chemical fertilizers.

What can we do for our country? Let your representatives know that you want the direction of the Farm Subsidies Act to reflect our desire for the organically grown food with all of the minerals necessary to improve our health. We will agree to stop eating Ding Dongs and all of the other food products which do not allow our cells to regenerate in a healthy manner. We are what we eat, what we feed our food determines what minerals our bodies get from these foods. Linus Pauling often said if we look very carefully we will find the cause of our modern diseases in the mineral deficiencies of our food supply. We believe that sulfur tops the bill of deficiencies thanks to the use of these
chemical fertilizers.

Praise to the funny lady on the radio. If we can not laugh at our errors we will continue to suffer the consequences of those errors.

Paula Poundstone for Sec of the Interior.

Second suggestion, rent “V” the movie and realize the change comes from within the electorate not from those elected. The only thing to fear is fear itself.

Patrick McGean
Director
Live Blood and Cellular Matrix Study
Body Human Project
organicsulfur@sisna.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement