comments_imageCOMMENTS: 11

Let's Start This New Era of Hope by Preventing Genocide in the Congo

Eastern Congo is about to spin out of control and tumble into full-scale war. Let that be the place where this new era of hope starts.
November 3, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
I spent the last month in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), much of my time in Goma. There, I was privileged to be part of the first public testimonies where women survivors of rape and sexual torture came forward in front hundreds to bravely break the silence on the terrible atrocities done to their bodies and souls during the twelve-year conflict that has embroiled the DRC. The conflict, a virtual proxy war fought between the Congolese government, former Hutu Genocidaires from Rwanda, and ethnic Tutsis is the largest the world has seen since WWII. I heard stories that ranged from young women being raped by fifty men in one day to women being forced to eat dead babies. These women represented hundreds of thousands of survivors of similar crimes. These public testimonies, and other surrounding activities, are part of a fragile but burgeoning grassroots peace movement in the DRC--a movement that exists to stop the violence and restore individual and national autonomy.

The weeks I spent in Goma reflected the insane duality that is the Congo. I met activists, doctors, nurses, NGO workers, leaders, filled with determination and hope, working non-stop, to save lives, heal trauma and provide the most basic resources. At the same time, despair lingered around the borders as rebel leader Laurent Nkunda's troops pillaged, killed, and raped, 16 kilometers away.

Now that I have returned to the US, and there is full scale war with Nkunda's troops threatening to take Goma, I receive emails and calls by the minute from people on the ground who have been rendered speechless and thrown into despair. Where is the world? they ask me. Why is no one coming to defend us? I wonder: What stops the world from intervening on behalf of the people of the Congo?

12 years later, 5.4 million are dead, over 300,000 raped. What about this conflict doesn't move the world to action? Is it that the Congolese people no longer exist in our imagination, since they were decimated by the colonialism and brutality of King Leopold of Belgium? Is it that the vast resources of the Congo--coltan for our cell phones, for example--are all that the West is paying attention to? Is it simply racism--that unless white people are involved in the conflict the world does not intervene? Or, is it because so much of this war is being waged on the bodies, genitals and reproductive organs of women and that the world still does not give a damn about women?

Right now, in America, we are living in the center of a potential paradigm shift. A definite, burgeoning movement. A time of Hope. With the upcoming elections, we could redefine America's standing in the world by enacting foreign policy that is based on the universal understanding that we are all interconnected. That the rape of an eight-year-old-girl in Congo is akin to the rape of an eight-year-old girl in Chicago or Phoenix. We use the words and slogans "Never again" and "Not on our watch", but right now thousands are being displaced, raped, murdered in Eastern DRC.

"The Responsibility to Protect" requires that we, as the international community, particularly America, intervene where governments cannot protect their own people, demand that more UN peacekeeping troops are deployed and seriously focused on the mission of protection. Where the world sees to it that leaders are brought to the negotiating table to find solutions to the conflict so that the people of Congo are no longer pawns in this economic and ethnic battle. Where the world delivers plentiful resources to Congolese women and girls, who have survived the unthinkable.

The Congo is the heart of Africa and Africa is the heart of the world. Right now Eastern Congo is about to spin out of control and tumble into full-scale war. Let the DRC be the place where the paradigm actually shifts. Where we usher in a time of Hope. We have to do more than we have ever done before. The time to act is now.
Eve Ensler is the award-winning author of The Vagina Monologues, and the founder and artistic director of V-Day, a global movement to end violence against women and girls (http://www.vday.org).
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: genocide, congo


Comments are closed-

RE: Is Eve Ensler willing to be the change she wishes to see in the world?
Posted by: Erin on Nov 3, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In case you hadn't noticed, your racism and mysoginism is showing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What is the "Developing World" developing into?
Posted by: strahlungsamt on Nov 3, 2008 1:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back when I was a young lad, growing up in Ireland in the 70s, every year at the start of Lent, we got a little cardboard money box. On the front was a picture of a starving African boy. Every week of Lent, we would put our pocket money in to buy food for starving Africans.

Now, almost 40 years later, Irish Aid has grown to corporate status and copied the "Save The Children" commercials from the US (minus Sally Struthers). They have a big corporate office in Dublin where a multimedia display in the window runs 24/7 showing their progress in African villages. And that's not counting the clipboard-nazis who chase me in the street looking for donations.

Meanwhile, Africa has sunk deeper and deeper into poverty. I ask the question WHY? Why hasn't all the effort and money we put in over the years paid off? Here's my $0.02:

Let's go back in time 200-300 years. As the colonialists sailed around the World, discovering new continents and new peoples, the first things they did were: kill off the local wildlife and bring Christianity to the poor wretches. As always, never leave good enough alone. The savages must be civilized if they are ever to see Jesus Christ and go to Heaven and they must reap the benefits of British (or French or Spanish) life. Then, of course, they would be a good source of slaves, servants, wood, metals and be someone to sell European products to.

Africa had it's share of empires and civilizations (not just Egypt) which have been wiped from the school history books. Instead we got the fables of the great missionaries and how they built schools and taught them about Jesus.

What nobody wants to face is the fact that Africans are not like us. They have their own social systems which seem barbaric to our sensibilities but which sustained them for thousands of years. Westerners always broke down these systems while helping them exploit their environment (deforestation is the major cause of war in Darfur) and selling them weapons so they can better fight each other.

Sometimes the good things the West does have consequences too. We help stop infant mortality but preach the evils of birth control. This in a society where a woman is expected to pump out at least 8 children. Then we don't treat a population explosion, and the resulting environmental damage, as a problem. Yet when boatloads of starving Africans land on a Spanish resort, we have a problem.

What we really need is a "Back to the Bush" campaign. Sorry I can't think of a better term but we need to get real about other countries. We need to stop trying to make them like us and face the fact that they have always had a different way of doing things which we might not necessarily like.

Why do we use the term "Developing World" all the time? What are they "Developing" into? Is this term not racist? Haven't we learned already that Globalization is not the answer to the World's problems?

And why are we surprised when the countries where we "Bridged the Digital Divide" send out the most 419 emails?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We are involved
Posted by: daw13 on Nov 3, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
whether we like it or not. The terrible state of affairs in the Congo, and elsewhere in Africa and Asia, is the direct result of U.S. decades long manipulation of colonial governments to ensure their loyalty to US goals. Which have nothing to do with the welfare of their people. In general, U.S. stragegies include doing all possible to create so much instability that nationalism in service of a country's citizens cannot materialize.

We are far more responsible for Congo horrors than even those decrying it like to acknowledge. An exception is the Black Agenda Report. Check out their archives on this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We are involved Posted by: chomsky

Comments are closed-

New Era of Hope?
Posted by: cariboo on Nov 3, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's start a new era of hope by preventing genocide? I think we've pretty much missed the boat. As the author says, after 12 years, "5.4 million are dead, over 300,000 raped." The truth is that the west really doesn't give a shit as long as it can plunder the nation's rich mineral resources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We do not need to spend 10 billion dollars a month
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Nov 3, 2008 2:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the lives of our young soldiers on a unwinnable war. We can not win a civil war. It can't be done. We could be feeding our own hungry and educating our own youth. There are alot of things we can use that money and manpower for more benifical to the USA right here in the USA. Border protection is a great example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Blah blah blah... BAD Article
Posted by: chomsky on Nov 4, 2008 5:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Or, is it because so much of this war is being waged on the bodies, genitals and reproductive organs of women and that the world still does not give a damn about women?"

You are dead right on this. It is because ONLY women are being killed.

When was the last time you heard for the protection of men? Iraq has a man shortage heard about that? Yet all we hear about is women and children, and I have no complaint about that it just when an idiotic comment like the one quoted above is written it tends to irk me.

I am sure most of the dead are men. As far as I know some of the armies involved consist conscripts of children who are broken down by either being forced to rape/kill their own siblings and if they fail they get shot or stabbed. Either way your humanity dies.

FYI: I am a man. I care about men and women, who doesn’t hate himself because of his gender, and I also love accurate facts and history so I am incompatible with the feminist movement.

The Conflict
What about the history of the mainly FOREIGN WESTERN money involved in the conflict. What about the neighbours, or you want no history with just lots of gun power.

Did you know the UN only goes into action if it coincides with American foreign policy?

DRC might not be rich in OIL but try Colton, Diamonds and other precious commodities. If I was a betting man I would say the wars are proxy wars, mainly for Western Interest. Of course this is not just DRC it much bigger, it covers huge swathes of rich Africa with poor Africans caught in the middle.

Either way, CIA is most likely neck deep in this. Last thing they want is a functioning country that can set a fair price on their precious minerals & metals. If they ever get their stuff together it means we won’t get free mobiles or worse no more cheap laptops.

Keep the Arms out of Africa. Keep the fat corporations out. And try to explain the full history of the conflict and not just try to sell it on emotion. Bush did that, look at Afghanistan and Iraq. Look how free they have become. Taliban is once again popular and most Iraqis look onto former CIA Saddam fondly.

Below is a link to a site that hasn’t been updated in a long time but still has better than the good intentioned article above.

http://allthingspass.com

No To UN forces in Africa.
No to US Forces in Africa with their DU shells.
No to foreign powers in Africa.
No to Arming of Africa
No to USAID with neo-imperialistic obligations
No to proxy wars (Difficult one to stop)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

RE: Is Eve Ensler willing to be the change she wishes to see in the world?
Posted by: Erin on Nov 3, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In case you hadn't noticed, your racism and mysoginism is showing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What is the "Developing World" developing into?
Posted by: strahlungsamt on Nov 3, 2008 1:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back when I was a young lad, growing up in Ireland in the 70s, every year at the start of Lent, we got a little cardboard money box. On the front was a picture of a starving African boy. Every week of Lent, we would put our pocket money in to buy food for starving Africans.

Now, almost 40 years later, Irish Aid has grown to corporate status and copied the "Save The Children" commercials from the US (minus Sally Struthers). They have a big corporate office in Dublin where a multimedia display in the window runs 24/7 showing their progress in African villages. And that's not counting the clipboard-nazis who chase me in the street looking for donations.

Meanwhile, Africa has sunk deeper and deeper into poverty. I ask the question WHY? Why hasn't all the effort and money we put in over the years paid off? Here's my $0.02:

Let's go back in time 200-300 years. As the colonialists sailed around the World, discovering new continents and new peoples, the first things they did were: kill off the local wildlife and bring Christianity to the poor wretches. As always, never leave good enough alone. The savages must be civilized if they are ever to see Jesus Christ and go to Heaven and they must reap the benefits of British (or French or Spanish) life. Then, of course, they would be a good source of slaves, servants, wood, metals and be someone to sell European products to.

Africa had it's share of empires and civilizations (not just Egypt) which have been wiped from the school history books. Instead we got the fables of the great missionaries and how they built schools and taught them about Jesus.

What nobody wants to face is the fact that Africans are not like us. They have their own social systems which seem barbaric to our sensibilities but which sustained them for thousands of years. Westerners always broke down these systems while helping them exploit their environment (deforestation is the major cause of war in Darfur) and selling them weapons so they can better fight each other.

Sometimes the good things the West does have consequences too. We help stop infant mortality but preach the evils of birth control. This in a society where a woman is expected to pump out at least 8 children. Then we don't treat a population explosion, and the resulting environmental damage, as a problem. Yet when boatloads of starving Africans land on a Spanish resort, we have a problem.

What we really need is a "Back to the Bush" campaign. Sorry I can't think of a better term but we need to get real about other countries. We need to stop trying to make them like us and face the fact that they have always had a different way of doing things which we might not necessarily like.

Why do we use the term "Developing World" all the time? What are they "Developing" into? Is this term not racist? Haven't we learned already that Globalization is not the answer to the World's problems?

And why are we surprised when the countries where we "Bridged the Digital Divide" send out the most 419 emails?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We are involved
Posted by: daw13 on Nov 3, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
whether we like it or not. The terrible state of affairs in the Congo, and elsewhere in Africa and Asia, is the direct result of U.S. decades long manipulation of colonial governments to ensure their loyalty to US goals. Which have nothing to do with the welfare of their people. In general, U.S. stragegies include doing all possible to create so much instability that nationalism in service of a country's citizens cannot materialize.

We are far more responsible for Congo horrors than even those decrying it like to acknowledge. An exception is the Black Agenda Report. Check out their archives on this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We are involved Posted by: chomsky

Comments are closed-

New Era of Hope?
Posted by: cariboo on Nov 3, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's start a new era of hope by preventing genocide? I think we've pretty much missed the boat. As the author says, after 12 years, "5.4 million are dead, over 300,000 raped." The truth is that the west really doesn't give a shit as long as it can plunder the nation's rich mineral resources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We do not need to spend 10 billion dollars a month
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Nov 3, 2008 2:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the lives of our young soldiers on a unwinnable war. We can not win a civil war. It can't be done. We could be feeding our own hungry and educating our own youth. There are alot of things we can use that money and manpower for more benifical to the USA right here in the USA. Border protection is a great example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Blah blah blah... BAD Article
Posted by: chomsky on Nov 4, 2008 5:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Or, is it because so much of this war is being waged on the bodies, genitals and reproductive organs of women and that the world still does not give a damn about women?"

You are dead right on this. It is because ONLY women are being killed.

When was the last time you heard for the protection of men? Iraq has a man shortage heard about that? Yet all we hear about is women and children, and I have no complaint about that it just when an idiotic comment like the one quoted above is written it tends to irk me.

I am sure most of the dead are men. As far as I know some of the armies involved consist conscripts of children who are broken down by either being forced to rape/kill their own siblings and if they fail they get shot or stabbed. Either way your humanity dies.

FYI: I am a man. I care about men and women, who doesn’t hate himself because of his gender, and I also love accurate facts and history so I am incompatible with the feminist movement.

The Conflict
What about the history of the mainly FOREIGN WESTERN money involved in the conflict. What about the neighbours, or you want no history with just lots of gun power.

Did you know the UN only goes into action if it coincides with American foreign policy?

DRC might not be rich in OIL but try Colton, Diamonds and other precious commodities. If I was a betting man I would say the wars are proxy wars, mainly for Western Interest. Of course this is not just DRC it much bigger, it covers huge swathes of rich Africa with poor Africans caught in the middle.

Either way, CIA is most likely neck deep in this. Last thing they want is a functioning country that can set a fair price on their precious minerals & metals. If they ever get their stuff together it means we won’t get free mobiles or worse no more cheap laptops.

Keep the Arms out of Africa. Keep the fat corporations out. And try to explain the full history of the conflict and not just try to sell it on emotion. Bush did that, look at Afghanistan and Iraq. Look how free they have become. Taliban is once again popular and most Iraqis look onto former CIA Saddam fondly.

Below is a link to a site that hasn’t been updated in a long time but still has better than the good intentioned article above.

http://allthingspass.com

No To UN forces in Africa.
No to US Forces in Africa with their DU shells.
No to foreign powers in Africa.
No to Arming of Africa
No to USAID with neo-imperialistic obligations
No to proxy wars (Difficult one to stop)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS